About us Login Get email updates
Press/Bloggers
Print

Mainstreaming the Fringe

June 18, 2009 4:29 pm ET

Comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, June 18, 2009

CONTACT
Jessica Levin
(202) 772-8162
jlevin@mediamatters.org

Media Matters hosted discussion on the consequences of providing a national platform to violent, anti-government rhetoric

Washington, D.C. -- Today, Media Matters for America held a panel discussion on the growing culture of extremist, anti-government, and violent rhetoric in conservative media. Media Matters Senior Fellow Eric Boehlert, who has written extensively on the subject, hosted leaders from the Southern Poverty Law Center, America's Voice, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the National Council of La Raza, and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights to examine how the mainstreaming of extremism impacts our security, politics, and culture.

"The conservative media are giving a national platform to what was previously relegated to the right-wing fringe," said Boehlert. "Mainstreaming this rhetoric sends the message that violent behavior is acceptable, if not welcome. We all need to learn from the recent tragedies in Kansas and Washington, D.C., that this type of hate has no place on the airwaves."

Watch highlights from the panel:

BACKGROUND

Report: Emerging culture of paranoia

http://mediamatters.org/research/200904130024

Summary: Conservative media have directed their violent, doomsday, and anti-intellectual rhetoric at progressives in power, and specifically at President Obama, whom fake populists in conservative media depict as a threat to their audience's very way of life.

Boehlert: O'Reilly and Fox News will have more right-wing vigilantism to explain

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200906090004

Excerpt: If Fox News is going to continue to traffic in hateful rhetoric, then folks at Fox News, as well as their apologists in the GOP Noise Machine, are going to have to come up with better talking points to spin away the atmosphere of vigilantism fomented by that rhetoric. They need a better line of defense because the one they trotted out in the wake of the right-wing assassination of abortion provider Dr. George Tiller was wholly unconvincing.

Boehlert: Fox News' militia media: mainstreaming the fringe

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200904160001

Excerpt: Imagine if Fox News had been on the air back on February 28, 1993, just months into the new Democratic president's first term, when agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives attempted to serve warrants on David Koresh's Branch Davidian compound. Agents arrived because federal authorities got a tip that Koresh and his followers were stockpiling weapons.

Boehlert: Glenn Beck and the rise of Fox News' militia media

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200904070009

Excerpt: After a night of drinking followed by an early morning argument with his mother, with whom he shared an apartment, 22-year-old Richard Poplawski put on a bulletproof vest, grabbed his guns, including an AK-47 rifle, and waited for the police to respond to the domestic disturbance call his mother had placed. When two officers arrived at the front door, Poplawski shot them both in the head, then killed another officer who had tried to rescue his colleagues.

###

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by netsez00565 (June 18, 2009 5:46 pm ET)
      1 3
      $hocking: ABC Employees' Donations Went to Obama by a 33-to-1 Ratio, and Not a Single Journalist Gave to Palin/McCain

      The tally: 130 to Obama, 4 to Palin/McCain.

      None of the four McCain contributors, which includes Elizabeth Hasselbeck, are from journalists at ABC. Meanwhile, approximately 130 ABC employees gave money to Obama. That's close to a 33 - 1 ratio. Yet, ABC officially announced that they and they alone would manage what questions were asked of Obama about his program, including from the audience.

      It strikes me as simply unwise to entrust such a significant portion of the debate around a policy that will impact American lives, potentially forever, to just one organization with such an imbalance in their political views.

      http://www.cprights.org/2009/06/interesting-to-notean-analysis-of.php
      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (June 18, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
        3 1
        Maybe they're just making up for that pathetic reichwing hit piece "the path to 9-11". Personally, I don't think a network that shills 24/7 for republicans and had exclusive access to Bush doesn't have a leg to stand on whining when someone else gets the same kind of break.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by OnceYouGoBarack (June 18, 2009 7:57 pm ET)
        2 1
        The personal beliefs of the individuals doesn't constitute bias. I'm sure everyone in news has personal opinions, but not everyone lets this color their coverage. It's called journalist ethics.

        You can't show bias so you rely on these dubious "stats" instead. Meanwhile, we have example after example of blatant con propaganda being spit out of Fox News on a daily basis.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pags2 (June 18, 2009 8:07 pm ET)
        2 1
        by netsez00565

        "It strikes me as simply unwise to entrust such a significant portion of the debate around a policy that will impact American lives, potentially forever, to just one organization with such an imbalance in their political views."

        You can't have an intelligent debate with the nutjobs and crazies. If the debate is one sided then you can't fault the Dems for what the Republicans are doing to themselves. There does not appear to be any Republican that can stop the crazy talk, unite the party and bring back moderates while delivering a cogent message.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by twseattle (June 19, 2009 3:43 am ET)
           
        Seems to me a news organization with that many people that smart is by far the best choice to present an issue this important.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (June 19, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
        1  
        "It strikes me as simply unwise to entrust such a significant portion of the debate around a policy that will impact American lives, potentially forever, to just one organization with such an imbalance in their political views."

        Right.... and I suppose you felt the same way about Fox-Noise being truly and clearly on one side of the debates on each issue?

        I would ask you to find at least three examples of ANY of Fox during the entire Bush regimes 8 years where they went in the opposite direction?

        Hint: You will very likely not find any examples... as I doubt any exist!
        Report Abuse

Appearances

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace