About us Login Get email updates
Press/Bloggers
Print

Media Matters calls on networks to address McCaughey's health care falsehoods

June 26, 2009 3:21 pm ET

Comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Friday, June 26, 2009

CONTACT

Jessica Levin (202) 772-8162

jlevin@mediamatters.org

Washington, D.C. -- Today, Media Matters for America President Eric Burns issued an open letter to cable news networks regarding the decisions by some of those networks to give former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey a platform to spread misinformation about health care reform -- misinformation that cable news personalities have, in some cases, previously debunked. Indeed, CNN and Fox News have both hosted McCaughey and have allowed her to spread falsehoods even after employees of those networks debunked claims she made earlier this year.

Burns writes, in part:

"As the debate over health care reform proceeds, it is crucial that discussions and reports on the subject are accurate and fair. If the networks insist on hosting Ms. McCaughey to discuss health care, they have an obligation to their viewers to challenge and debunk her falsehoods."

The letter reads:

Nancy Lane
Senior Vice President of Editorial, CNN
1 CNN Center
Atlanta, GA 30303

Patti Domm
Executive Editor, CNBC
900 Sylvan Avenue
Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Neil Cavuto
Senior Vice President, Business News/Managing Editor,
FOX Business Network
1211 Sixth Avenue
New York, NY 10036

Michael Clemente
Senior Vice President, News
FOX News Channel
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036

Shannon High-Bassalik
Vice President and Managing Editor, MSNBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112

June 26, 2009

Dear cable news executives:

I am writing to express my concern that some television networks have given former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey a platform to spread misinformation about health care reform -- misinformation that cable news personalities have, in some cases, previously debunked.

In a February 9 Bloomberg "commentary," Ms. McCaughey claimed that a new National Coordinator of Health Information Technology "will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and 'guide' your doctor's decisions." This claim was subsequently repeated by Megyn Kelly and Bill Hemmer of Fox News, Stephen Moore of The Wall Street Journal, and radio host Rush Limbaugh.

During Ms. McCaughey's February 10 appearance on CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, Lou Dobbs allowed Ms. McCaughey to repeat her false claim that provisions in the economic recovery act would allow the government to dictate to doctors treatments they could provide.

CNN's senior medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen debunked the falsehood during the February 11 edition of CNN Newsroom, reporting on a conversation she had with McCaughey. Cohen said: "I had a PDF of the bill up on my computer. I said, 'Show me where in the bill it says that this bill is going to have the government telling your doctor what to do.' And she [McCaughey] directed me to language -- it didn't actually say that." Cohen later added, "Now when we asked the folks who wrote this bill, 'Hey, is this bill going to allow the government to tell doctors what to do?' they used words like, 'preposterous' and 'completely and wildly untrue.' "

Similarly, MSNBC's David Shuster debunked the myth on the February 11 edition of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, noting that the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology "will not be empowered to monitor doctors or require them to do anything."

In addition, on the February 11 edition of Special Report with Bret Baier, Fox News contributor Mort Kondracke said of the stimulus package's health IT provisions: "I talked to Newt Gingrich's favorite expert on health care IT, David Merritt, and he says that there's nothing in this bill that is not bipartisan, that hasn't been worked out by the Bush administration except that there's a lot of money to help doctors buy technology equipment. ... So the idea that there's a conspiracy here is just far-fetched."

Since then, however, CNN, Fox Business Network, Fox News, and CNBC have all hosted Ms. McCaughey and have allowed her to spread further misinformation.

During a March 27 appearance on Fox News' Hannity, Sean Hannity allowed Ms. McCaughey to falsely assert that the stimulus' health IT provision would "deliver protocols that will tell your doctor to limit care to what the government's advisers deem cost-effective."

CNN's American Morning hosted Ms. McCaughey on June 24, with John Roberts introducing her as a "long-time expert in public health." Mr. Roberts failed to note her previous falsehood on CNN. He then allowed Ms. McCaughey to assert without challenge that the Affordable Health Choices Act "[b]asically ... pushes everyone into an HMO-style plan" and that most Americans will have to "go through what they call a 'medical home,' which is this decade's term for an HMO gatekeeper." Similarly, on the June 16 edition of CNBC's The Kudlow Report, Larry Kudlow hosted Ms. McCaughey and failed to challenge her assertions that the Affordable Health Choices Act "pushes Americans into low-budget plans" and that the bill "restricts the choice that other Americans have. If you have your plan and you like it, you may not be able to keep it unless it's an HMO-style plan."

In fact, the proposed bill does not require people to give up their health insurance nor does it "push" people into "an HMO-style plan."

Also, on the May 11 edition of Fox Business Network's Cavuto, Ms. McCaughey falsely asserted that White House health care policy adviser Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel had said that "if you want to save money in health care, we're going to have to push doctors to eliminate the Hippocratic Oath." In fact, Dr. Emanuel wrote that the culture of health care "overuse" has led physicians to interpret the Hippocratic Oath "as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of cost or effect on others."

As the debate over health care reform proceeds, it is crucial that discussions and reports on the subject are accurate and fair. If the networks insist on hosting Ms. McCaughey to discuss health care, they have an obligation to their viewers to challenge and debunk her falsehoods.

I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Eric Burns

Eric Burns

President, Media Matters For America

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Ena Wason (June 26, 2009 4:44 pm ET)
      7 1
      Like being lied to? No? Then always check the advertisements in any media, either print or broadcast, if you want to know who is buying the hidden messages being delivered to you, the reader and viewer. Thousands of mergers and acquisitions have taken place in the past decade, so sometimes it's hard to tell how many other companies any advertiser owns. But, go ahead and do it anyway. Just count the Drug and Insurance Company ads on Fox and CNN, for example. Visit the countries that have universal health care, as I have done. Talk to the PEOPLE there. From 1987 to 1995, I was denied health insurance FOR ANY KIND OF INJURY OR DISEASE by 4 companies (including Blue Cross Blue Shield) because I was diagnosed with degenerative bone disease. Ask if anyone has ever been denied health care of any kind because of a "pre-existing condition", or how long they have had to wait for treatment, how they select their own doctors, or if anyone they know has had to file bankruptcy because of medical expenses. Go Online and read about research being done in universal health care nations for Parkinson's, systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), or for diseases effecting women(their bodies are not the same as men's). Then read about research in the U.S.A. It will make you weep!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fawltylogic (June 26, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
      5 1
      I'm sure Neil Cavuto is working tirelessly on issuing corrections as we speak.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seroquel (June 26, 2009 7:24 pm ET)
      5 1
      I am so glad someone is looking out for the rest of us. Good job MMFA!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mustardman (June 26, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
      3  
      Now Michael, jihad on MediaMatters, Savage knows who you are. Could a teabag protest in front of your office be far behind?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by latanza (June 27, 2009 9:45 am ET)
      4 1
      Job well done Eric. I am thinking that you are on to something! This is a revolution for media and you guys at MMA can pat yourselves on the back for addressing a long time standing issue. Straight Up and down. You are on to a real social issue, firts pioneered and addressed by your organization and you can give your blogging some more credit for vision and interest.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by roundhouse (June 27, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
      4 1
      Frank Luntz must be so proud of McCaughey. She is following his government takeover talking points to a tee. She puts forth some ignorant slippery slope fallacy about government control of your health and conveniently ignores the fact that insurance companies tell your doctors what they can and cannot treat today.

      Screw these stupid conservatives and their stuck in reverse attitudes. They suck at life. They have no concept of what it means to be a responsible citizen and care about anyone but themselves.

      Meanwhile, the Republicans can not offer an alternative plan to contrast and compare with Obama's plan. They have nothing because they're pathetically lacking ideas. All they have is more of the same tax cut speak that so weakened our common societal safety net that our long term security as a healthy, vibrant nation is now in jeopardy.

      Just get out of the way you ridiculous lying Republican corporate lackeys.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by roundhouse (June 28, 2009 3:11 am ET)
        3  
        Aaaaahhhh, a thumbs down. Poor Roundhouse is devastated :(


        Typical Republican punk can't talk about it, he chooses to bottle his emotions and let them fester until he rationalizes killing liberals in the street because AnnieHannityLimbaugBoortzO'Reilly told him Libs are are bad m'kay.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (June 27, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
      5 1
      Want to bet that there will be NO response or allowance for anyone to correct her lies?

      And people think the MSM is in the tank for Obama yet allow non stop lies about his policies all day long.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MikeW67 (June 27, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
      2  
      It's morally wrong to leave 100 million Americans un or underinsured, 1 illness away from financial ruin. And it's wrong to burden small business with the outrageous insurance costs also -- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth
      Report Abuse
    • Author by amandaterkel (June 27, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
      1  
      ha!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NHPackerfan26765 (June 27, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
      2  
      One fact I see NO ONE except Paul Krugman using in these discussions -- opponents of universal health care issue issue dire warnings about the government coming between "you and your doctor." I guess that is a dire prospect, because it *might* prove to be a more cost-effective system than the way private insurers already come between patients and their physicians. The administrative costs of private carriers are far higher than those of Medicare, or other systems where the point is to pay bills and prevent fraud -- not deny claims and effectively prevent patient care.
      I have excellent health care benefits, but I still feel vulnerable because I am basically at the mercy of my employer, who provides it. It is an HMO that (like others in the Northeast) act more like a PPO, in the way it has networks of physicians, but no separate clinics or freestanding hospitals. I have access to the best medical centers in Boston (and have used them). The "hassle" that i put up with for this? I have to have a primary care provider, and obtain a referral if I want to see a specialist. Not the biggest health care hurdle in the world, I can assure you.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (June 28, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
      3  
      Ms. McCaughey is not following the truth. She's following the money. She pushes the talking points, then collects the cash.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Butwanna (June 28, 2009 3:34 pm ET)
      2  
      This may sound off topic but it is related. The language put forth that "big government is going to take over our freedoms and rights to good healthcare are bull pucky", they are designed to make the American People forget that "The Government" in America is "The People". So the argument should be obviously ridiculous. Why would we NOT want "The Goverment of the People, by the People" to manage the cost of the commons such as heathcare or any other social common. American people need to remember the "Government" is not some outside agency, the Government is "us" in the form of those we hire to do that job. And part of that Job has always been to "fight the "greed of private interest" through proper regulation of those things that are common to the general welfare of this United States and idealogically all peoples everywhere. Private greed and "Preditory Capitalistic Ideals" are fine for any object that is not required for people to survive, so when private interests try to get their greedy hands on the commons they should be stopped by our government who represent the people over private interests. (If the government doesn't aspire to do this they they are supposed to be fired per our constitution, through elections "not run by private interests". Stopping ALL the hypocritcal "private" interests on all sides of the political spectrum from spewing their orwellian lies and creating class warfare is what the American Ideal and Government aspires to overcome. Those who talk about integrity and sacrifice at the same time defending private interests over the general welfare of all peoples, have no integrity, have never sacrificed anything for anyones benefit but their own, and speak of protecting "the homeland" like the followers of Hitler spoke of protect "the fatherland", they are like those fools who followed Hitler. They are uneducated schoolyard bullies or bully want-to-be's who are either intellectually uninformed and/or emotionally unbalanced. They are afraid and are "projecting" like the bully personality protects himself by accusing his victum of the very lies and chicanery that he is up to. In this case including accusing true American Ideals of being Socialist or Communist Ideals. It is a shame that the Media and the people in general have let the bullies win. That so much of the time their voices are heard louder than those voices of true democratic ideals of integrity, fairness, service and sacrifice. What our soldiers think they fight and die for are not what they seem and their sacrifice appears to be in vain.
      Report Abuse

Appearances

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace