About us Login Get email updates
Press/Bloggers
Print

Murdoch Agrees With Beck: Obama Is a Racist

November 10, 2009 1:25 pm ET

Comments

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

CONTACT

Jess Levin (202) 772-8162

jlevin@mediamatters.org

Washington, DC - Today, Media Matters for America denounced Rupert Murdoch, chairman of News Corp., the parent company of Fox News, who recently declared that Glenn Beck was "right" when he called President Obama a "racist" with a "deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture."

Media Matters released a video of Murdoch's statements: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLe-x6bA8G4

"Rupert Murdoch's comment proves that Glenn Beck speaks for the highest level of Fox's leadership," said Eric Burns, President of Media Matters. "If Murdoch wants any hope of redeeming what little credibility his network has left, he should apologize immediately."

BACKGROUND

Murdoch's comments are simply the latest example of Fox News' emergence as a partisan political organization waging a campaign to destroy President Obama and the progressive agenda. 

As Media Matters has noted, Fox News president Roger Ailes spent the better part of his career working as a Republican media consultant, during which time he became known for appealing to racial fears and biases for political gain. Under Ailes' leadership Fox News routinely employs these same tactics in its ongoing campaign to destroy the Obama administration and the progressive agenda. Examples include:

  • Hannity just can't "get over" his Rev. Wright obsession. Sean Hannity -- who claimed he "broke the story" about Obama's controversial former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, during the 2008 campaign -- mentioned Wright on at least 45 different episodes of his Fox News show between Obama's inauguration and July 31.
  • O'Reilly tease: "[S]hould white Americans be concerned about Judge Sotomayor?" Bill O'Reilly stated, "Next on the rundown: Should white Americans be concerned about Judge Sotomayor? Later, far-left Hispanic group says if you oppose the judge, you could be racist" [The O'Reilly Factor, 7/13/09].
  • Rev. Peterson: Obama was elected "mostly by black racists and white guilty people." On Hannity, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson said, "I think we all agree that Barack Obama was elected by, mostly by black racists and white guilty people" [Hannity, 2/3/09].

Previously, Fox News' senior vice president of programming Bill Shine unconvincingly attempted to distance the 24/7 political operation from Beck's comments by claiming that they "represented his own views, not those of the Fox News Channel," adding that "as with all commentators in the cable news arena, he is given the freedom to express his opinions."

###

Media Matters for America is a progressive research and information center dedicated to monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the media. For more information, visit www.mediamatters.org.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by News Corpse (November 10, 2009 2:59 pm ET)
      2 2
      Would Murdoch actually redeem any credibility if he apologized?

      I don't think there's much to be redeemed. Therefore, I'm betting he won't bother to apologize. His reputation is already shot. He will forever be tied to Glenn Beck and the rest of his Freak Show, despite his attempts to distance himself from them.

      [http://www.crasscommerce.com/images/art/political/127-FreakShow.jpg]
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SHSZack10 (November 11, 2009 9:45 am ET)
          1
        "Rupert Murdoch's comment proves that Glenn Beck speaks for the highest level of Fox's leadership," said Eric Burns, President of Media Matters. "If Murdoch wants any hope of redeeming what little credibility his network has left, he should apologize immediately."


        They prove no such thing. Murdoch's comment proves that Glenn Beck and him agree on this issue. And his reputation is not already shot, because if it were, he wouldn't be the head of a major news company. Accusing Beck, Hannity, and O'Reily of being part of a freak show is slanderous and entirely inaccurate. It just simply isn't true. If you don't like them because they disagree with you and have opposing viewpoint, explain that. Don't photoshop them into an outrageous picture that is slightly funny, but very degrading.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Don Quixote (November 10, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
      3 2
      Of course the puppet master agrees with the puppets he makes and whose strings he pulls. You're just stating the obvious.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Bad News (November 10, 2009 5:10 pm ET)
         
      News Corp. "A Racist Enterprise"
      The Proof is in Rupert Murdock, a Racist no longer in Disquise.
      It's no longer Fox News but News Corp itself that must be Stoped.
      Mr. Murdoch made a verbal goof, he spoke from his heart & may have inadvertantly provided the needle for their Racist Balloon to finally be Popped.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Samurai Cowboy (November 10, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
      2 4
      Rupert Murdoch will not apologize because he does not have to. I have always believed that Fox News Channel is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican National Committee and that Rupert Murdoch is nothing more than a figurehead owner. After all. Why was Roger Ailes seen going to the RNC Headquarters everyday that Bush was in office? Not to have coffee and a danish.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (November 10, 2009 6:06 pm ET)
      2 1
      Well we all know the prez is a racist and Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson is just an informed guest. SMDH. Can we stop pretending Fox is a news channel yet?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (November 10, 2009 6:33 pm ET)
      1  
      Murdoch is about a dollar.He knows he has milked the hate thing just about all he could.This is to ease trying to get into the growth market.What you will soon see is more minority faces on fox.This is also a lame attempt to remake the republican party,which consist of nothing but republican party media.Murdoch will in coming days attempt to paint the republican party(republican party media) as the party of love.I do not know who runs the republican(conservative) outfit.But this I know about studying them for the past 30 years.Every move they make bears a striking resemblance to Ron Hubbard books,page for page.I have been waiting for them to vary from a page,They have not??Is this more than a coincidence??
      Report Abuse
    • Author by pilotx (November 10, 2009 7:26 pm ET)
        1
      Your text to link here...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by j.geikie8143 (November 11, 2009 1:03 am ET)
         
      Responsible members of the media best avoid bias against Mr Murdock. He is not Satan, just as President Obama is not Allah, so there is no need to be afraid of him, or his opinions. A person of genuine liberal persuasion displays tolerance towards the attitudes of others.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by west0605 (November 11, 2009 7:39 am ET)
      3  
      Omg! The first race-bait by the right. Oh glory days for the Dems who wait for every word out of the celebrity's mouth, hoping it will be in support but God forbid it shouldnt be. Is it possible the right has stopped trying to fight race-baiting for the sake of its popularity, and decided to use it for its political advantage. GOD FORBID! The right is not allowed to take a page from the left's playbook....In all honesty I'm embarrased for the right, but were they Dems all is fair game
      Report Abuse
    • Author by SpacePedestrian (November 11, 2009 10:57 am ET)
         
      Interesting how much attention the left gives to Fox and the like. Clearly, they find it threatening. Funny thing is, Fox is but one network in a sea of leftist political operations fronting as mainstream media outlets.

      Furthermore, the race thing is extremely ironic to me because the left use it to their advantage all the time. The pitch to minorities of all variety is "oh, you poor victims of Republican racism...vote for us and we'll help you - you're powerless without us." That view is inherently racist, but panders to people's emotions and feelings of altruism. The conservative point of view says anyone of any color has the ability to achieve if only we get out of their way and allow them to be personally responsible.

      Obama is quite possibly a racist. He tolerates whites who are convenient to him politically, but seems to have genuine disdain. After all, he wanted reparations. He has stated that the constitution basically keeps blacks down.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Byte Man (November 11, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
      1  
      The first move of any racist is to accuse someone else of racism, so that they themselves are not the focus of the racism debate, even though they are clearly the source of the tension.

      News Corp. "Where all our opinions come with a Cape and a Hood!"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtdavis11200 (November 11, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
      1  
      The media does not cover this story. Why?

      Is Murdoch running the American agenda?

      Obama has been attacked by this man and his network for two years and the American people who elected him have been silent.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Nobodyputsbabyinacorner (November 11, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
         
      Are these not racist statements?

      "It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks' greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere…That's the world! On which hope sits!"

      "The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity, but that she is a typical white person. If she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know - there's a reaction in her that's been bred into our experiences that don't go away and sometimes come out in the wrong way and that's just the nature of race in our society. We have to break through it. What makes me optimistic is you see each generation feeling less like that. And that's pretty powerful stuff"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by k1dork (November 11, 2009 5:37 pm ET)
      3 1
      The fair and balanced Huffington Post kept deleting my comment, so I will post it here, and hopefully it will stay up.

      Obama attended a church for 20 years that preaches things like "God d@*n America," "the government made AIDS to kill black people," "whites should give their wealth to black people," and honored Farrakhan, a man who REGULARLY calls white people "devils."

      I'm not saying that Obama IS a racist against white people, BUT, is it really inconceivable to think that a person who attended a church that spouts such rhetoric MIGHT have a problem with the status quo that IS white America?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by k1dork (November 11, 2009 6:47 pm ET)
        1  
        I have some questions.

        Does any white person agree that they are devils? Do any white people think that the American government created AIDS to specifically kill black people? Do any white people think that they should give their money to black people?

        Sorry, but such are the sentiments of fringe militants in the black community, who really have animosity for the white culture. Sorry, but Obama attended such a militant church.

        I don't think it helps race relations in our country to sweep such things under the rug and simply label Beck a "racist" simply because this is a tough and sensitive issue.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Prin T (November 11, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
         
      In my experience as a nurse and voter over 50 years, I can fully understand the racism displayed by many blacks. I might react the same way if I were singled out and mistreated by law enforcement, etc. If you look at photos and the change of first names used by Obama, that alone gives an appearance of a person confused about his heritiage. Compare Obama to Tiget Woods and you see the contrast. I will personally read Obama's books to find the places quoted to show his racism because I know things can be taken our to context and be distorted. Calling me or anyone on their predjuices is not always a bad thing. Leave out the name calling and there is truth is what is being said about the progressives.
      Report Abuse

Appearances

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace