NRO's Judicial Attack Dog Calls Elena Kagan A Prostitute

The t*rd meant every word. I have been following the rw opposition to a candidate that has not been named for quite some time on the Right Wing Watch web site. The shallowness of the attacks on a yet unnamed nominee to the SCOTUS cannot be missed by any sane person. What is even more shameful is that groups like Focus on the Family and other "christian" organizations have stooped so low as to embarrass themselves by openly displaying their stupidity and un-Christian values. The key question here is, how do you know you don't like someone if you don't know who it is, and you have spent little/no time studying his/her opinions on important issues?

Many on the right remind me of my niece whose father (my brother) asked me to bake him an old fashion bread pudding. I asked her if she would eat any of it. She said no, turned up her nose and said she didn't like it. I asked whether she'd ever had bread pudding, and she said no. I then asked her how would she know she didn't like a certain type of food if she'd never had it. She just smiled and looked at me. My niece is younger than those on the right, but their reaction to the unnamed SC nominee is the same.

Unsupported bias, ginned up controversy, acting without thinking, using their supporters as cash cows, opposition based not on merit but on prejudice, immaturity, all can be clearly seen in these attempts to discredit an unnamed SC nominee, only because President Obama is entrusted by the Constitution to make the choice. It's funny how the party that screams loudest about following the Constitution only wants it followed when it is in power. They fail to see that the Constitution grants them no power to select a SC justice. They can rant and rave and run their mouths as much as they want while making complete fools of themselves but the Founding Fathers established the guidelines in the Constitution, and they are powerless to do anything about it.

We know what you are, Mr. Whelan. We're just looking for the nearest place to flush you.

No putting the Genie back in the bottle Mr. Whalen. If you didn't mean to imply Kagan was a whore, than what did you mean?

"Ed Whalen is a pedophile, imbezzler, adulterer, kleptomaniac, and a traitor."

Now, when someone calls me out on the previous statement, I will simply tell them that they have misunderstood my meaning and taken the sentence out of context. Limbaugh uses this tactic constantly.

Mr. Whelan is too intelligent (if, in my view, mostly wrongheaded) not to understand the implications of a choice phrase! The fourth woman to serve on the Supreme Court - ever and he doesn't see how such a turn of phrase might be ill advised? Normally, I am not particularly in the "politically correct" camp of my party but I do believe in calling out folks who aren't willing to stand by what they meant - both directly and by innuendo.

Either his use of the quote was based on ignorance of its meaning, or he was deliberately trying to insult Ms. Kagan in a completely vile way. In either case he has proven himself unqualified to be anyone's "judge." He really should lock himself inside his glass house and put away his rocks.