Burns: "Beck's insistence that today's rally was non-political ignores the facts"
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Saturday, August 28, 2010 |
CONTACT Jess Levin (202) 772-8162 |
Washington, DC -- Today, Media Matters for America President Eric Burns released the following statement on Glenn Beck's Restoring Honor rally:
I greatly admire the Special Operations Warrior Foundation and applaud Glenn Beck's decision to commend those who dedicate their lives to defending our great nation. But Beck's insistence that today's rally was non-political ignores the facts.
The fact is, today's rally was political even if it wasn't overtly partisan. Sarah Palin launched into a not-so-thinly veiled attack on President Obama and last night's event at the Kennedy Center emphasized issues held dear by the Christian right. It was hosted by a political talk show host, featured speeches by conservative politicians, and was promoted and staffed by political groups of all stripes. If the rally truly wasn't political, the NRA, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, and Tea Party Patriots wouldn't have anything to do with it.
For more on Media Matters coverage on the rally, please see:










Actually I think you're alluding to the comeback by Lloyd Bentsen to Dan Quayle during the vp debates: "Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you are no Jack Kennedy."
Although your reference was off, your meaning was right on.
Not a political event? How many Democrats attended? Give me a percentage.
Check out this link
http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/35344/
Is it hypocrisy, lunacy, forgetfullness, stupidity or what?
So not only do we have Sarah Palin trying to co-opt the image of MLK, just days after exhorting Dr. Laura to RELOAD! for using the N-word. Not only do we have a homophobic preacher like Hagee trying to steal the spirit of an event organized by the proud and openly gay man (Bayard Rustin.) Not only do we have the same crowd that ran Shirley Sherrod through the ringer for bogus sound-bytes contrived by Andrew Breitbart (when she was, in fact, talking about coming out of her own racism).
We have Beck trying to appropriate for himself, the words and promise of a man he described as a socialist (the worst thing a person can be in his world.) He's trying to steal the legacy of someone who he described as not being the person we celebrate.
hmmmm....
The mendacious audacity, let alone the whole-hearted embrace of cognitive dissonance, overwhelms itself.
He seems appalled that an activist who went to jail fighting an unjust establishment should ever be called a radical. And from that he goes to assuming that this means King was a socialist, or at least asserting that Bond had said so (as if Dr Kings economic perspectives were really that obscure.)
And through it all, his attitude is childish, condescending, embittered, paranoid and hardly reverend at all to Dr Kings real work and message. All his pretenses to co-opting King for his own bs rally today are belied by his own behavior.