Right-Wing Noise Machine Repeats Misguided Attack On Obama Admin. Over Sex Ed.
You might remember Penny Starr as the CNSNews.com reporter who tried to manufacture outrage  over a gay-themed art exhibition at the Smithsonian last year. Now, she's upset  by something she found on the Internet:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is offering advice to parents and teens about sex education, including assurances that teens may "experiment" with homosexuality as part of "exploring their own sexuality," and that masturbation should be of concern only "if a child seems preoccupied with it to the exclusion of other activities."
The information, located on a "Questions and Answers About Sex" link on the "Quick Guide to Healthy Living " portion of the HHS Web site, also describes children and infants as "sexual beings."
Under the question "When Do Kids Start Becoming Curious About Sex?" the answer notes that infants have curiosity about their bodies.
"Children are human beings and therefore sexual beings," the Q&A Web page says. "It's hard for parents to acknowledge this, just as it's hard for kids to think of their parents as sexually active. But even infants have curiosity about their own bodies, which is healthy and normal."
This sort of thing, of course, is catnip for the right-wing media, which have used Starr's article as a way to attack the Obama administration. The headline at Fox Nation  blamed "Obama's HHS" for publishing this information; a LifeNews headline stated  that "Obama Admin Pushes Sex on Kids." Even the version of Starr's article posted at NewsBusters  -- like CNS, a division of the conservative Media Research Center -- carried the headline "Obama's HHS: 'Children Are Sexual Beings.'" The Blaze  and Weasel Zippers  are among the other right-wing websites that picked up on the story.
Starr suggests this purportedly offensive information originated from HHS; later, she writes that the "HHS Web site reassures teens and parents that having homosexual tendencies as a young person is 'common' as teens 'sort through their emerging sexual feelings.' " In fact, both pages  are located  on a website called KidsHealth, which is operated  by the Nemours Center for Children's Health Media. The center is part of a foundation that is  "dedicated to improving the health and spirit of children" and operates several children's health facilities.
Further, the KidsHealth "Questions and Answers About Sex" article contains a note that it was reviewed  by a pediatric endocrinologist, as well as two licensed social workers, and the sexual orientation page states that it was reviewed  by a child psychologist who holds a doctorate. At no point does Starr cite any children's health professional to rebut or contradict the statements being made.
On top of the professional review of those frank but accurate statements, the KidsHealth website features a long list of "educational partners " endorsing its "award-winning, doctor-review, family-friendly content." On that list are dozens of children's hospitals across the country, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and private health insurance companies.
In lieu of an actual expert, Starr brings in Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council to take potshots. Not only is Sprigg not a licensed children's health professional (he's an ordained Baptist minister ), but he is employed by an organization listed as a hate group  by the Southern Poverty Law Center for its rampant anti-gay rhetoric.
Starr paraphrases Sprigg as saying that "some of the information has no place on a federal government Web site." So, in the end, this all seems to boil down to a demand that information about sexual health not be discussed by public health officials.
That's just doesn't make sense.