"Socialized
medicine" smear is false
Progressive
reform is not socialized medicine. The Urban
Institute wrote in an April 2008 analysis that "socialized medicine involves government
financing and direct provision of health care services," and explained that recent
progressive health care reform proposals do not "fit this
description." The analysis also noted, "Similar rhetoric was used to defeat national health
care reform proposals in the 1990s and, with less success, to argue against the
creation of Medicare in the 1960s."
Obama
has not proposed socialized medicine, single
payer,
or nationalized health care. As
PolitiFact.com noted in a March 5 post, "Obama's plan leaves in place the
private health care system, but seeks to expand it to the uninsured," and "the
plan is very different from some European-style health systems where the
government owns health clinics and employs doctors." And during a March 26 online town hall, Obama explicitly
rejected the notion of implementing a health
care system "the way European
countries do or Canada does," explaining that what
"we should do is to build on the [employer-based] system that we
have."
Congressional
Budget Office: More enrollees in employer-provided insurance under House, Senate
legislation than under current law.
In both its July 26
analysis of the House
tri-committee draft bill and its July 2 preliminary score of the Senate health
committee bill, CBO found that more people would be enrolled in employer-based
insurance under the bills than under current law in every year CBO examined
following the legislation's implementation.
Conservative media
predictably cry "socialized medicine" about 2009
reform
Conservatives
cite Reagan's anti-"socialized medicine" recording to fearmonger about health
reform.
On August 14, the
Drudge Report, Rush Limbaugh, and O'Reilly Factor guest host
Laura Ingraham featured a recording of Ronald Reagan speaking in
1961 against "socialized medicine" for the American Medical Association's "Operation Coffeecup" campaign.
Neither Drudge,
nor Limbaugh, nor
Ingraham, however, noted that Reagan was speaking out against
a legislative
precursor to Medicare, which has
become very popular since it was enacted 44 years ago, or that Reagan's dire
predictions of curtailments of freedom were never
realized.
Conservative
media
figures repeatedly invoke socialism in stating
their opposition
to health reform. Numerous conservative media figures have
revived the "socialized medicine" smear or raised the specter of
socialism in their discussions
of Democratic health care reform proposals. Examples include:
- In a May 8 Wall Street
Journal op-ed headlined, "Republicans and ObamaCare," editorial
board member Kimberley A. Strassel
trotted out the falsehood that Obama is on a "drive to socialize health care."
[The Wall Street Journal, 5/8/09]
- During the July 18 edition of Fox
News' Bulls & Bears, host
Brenda Buttner asked if health care proposals take us "one step closer to United
Socialist States of America." [Bulls & Bears, 7/18/09]
- During the July 21 edition of Glenn
Beck's Fox News program, Beck claimed that health care reform is "good old
socialism ... raping the pocketbooks of the rich to give to the poor." [Glenn Beck, 7/21/09]
- The July 23
edition of Sean Hannity's Fox News show -- billed as a "Universal Nightmare"
special edition -- relied on distortions and falsehoods to raise the specter
of "socialized medicine." [Hannity, 7/23/09]
- During the August 17 edition of
his
Fox News program,
Bill
O'Reilly claimed that the public
option debate is really "about socialism," for which he claimed
Howard Dean and Paul Krugman are
"poster boys." [The O'Reilly
Factor, 8/17/09]
Numerous
media figures baselessly
link Obama's reform efforts to Canadian, British health
care
systems.
Despite Obama's
explicit rejection on March
26 of implementing
health care
systems like those of
Canada or the United Kingdom, media
figures have continued to link Democratic reform efforts to such
systems. Examples
include:
- During the March 26 edition of his
Fox News program, Hannity claimed that Obama "wants to lay down $634 billion for
nationalized health care. Well, we've had nationalized health care in
Great Britain, and we've had
it in France, and we've had
it -- single-payer in Canada." Interviewing European
Parliament member Daniel Hannan, Hannity later asserted, "So your advice to
America is stay away from
nationalized health care." [Hannity, 3/26/09]
- During the April 24 edition of
Fox News'
Special
Report with Bret
Baier, White House correspondent Wendell
Goler cropped
a comment by Obama and took it out
of context -- effectively reversing the statement's meaning -- to falsely
suggest that Obama supports creating a health care system "like the European
countries." Goler claimed that Obama "doesn't want to do it halfway" on health
care and then aired a clip from the March 26 online town hall event of Obama
saying, "If you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health care system
like the European countries?" Following the clip, Goler reported: "His critics
worry universal health care would mean government-run health care."
In fact, Obama was
paraphrasing the question he had just been asked before explaining why he
opposed such a system. [Special Report, 4/24/09]
- On the April 27 edition of
Special
Report, chief political correspondent Carl Cameron
falsely suggested that Obama has proposed a nationalized health care system
similar to those of the United
Kingdom and Canada
when he asserted: "The
battle is already one of this year's most polarizing and partisan. Conservatives
for Patients' Rights launched a new ad with British and Canadian doctors warning
Americans about the perils of nationalized health care." [Special Report, 4/27/09]
- In an April 30
Wall Street Journal
column, Fox News contributor Karl
Rove took Obama's March
26 quote out of context and reversed it's meaning, writing
that, in 2008, the Obama campaign
"ran ads attacking 'government-run health care' as 'extreme.' Now Mr. Obama is
asking, as he did at a townhall meeting last month, 'Why not do a universal
health care system like the European countries?' " [Wall Street Journal, 4/30/09]
- On the June 29 edition of
Special
Report, host Bret Baier falsely suggested that Obama has
cited Canada's medical system as a
"possible model" for his health care reform plan. [Special Report, 6/29/09]
- A July 18 Associated Press article by Charles Babington
uncritically repeated the baseless charge that "Obama would push"
the
United
States "into a
Canada-like [health care] system." [AP, 7/18/09]
Opponents have used
"socialized medicine" smear for 75 years
Smear
dates back to 1930s. A Media Matters analysis
found that dating as far back as the 1930s -- with
respect to at least 16 different reform initiatives -- conservatives have
attempted to smear those proposals by calling them "socialized medicine" or a
step toward that inevitable result.
These reform efforts include President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's
consideration of government health insurance when crafting the
1935 Social Security bill; President Lyndon Johnson's 1965 amendment to the
Social Security Act establishing Medicare; President Bill Clinton and first lady
Hillary Clinton's health-care initiative in 1993 and 1994; the creation of the
State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 1997, as well as its 2007
reauthorization and 2009 expansion; Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's
health-care proposals during the 2008 presidential campaign; health information
technology provisions included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; and
health-care provisions included in President Obama's fiscal year 2010 budget blueprint.
Roosevelt's
consideration of government health insurance when crafting the 1935 Social
Security bill
- A January 3,
1935, New York Times
article (purchase required), "Doctors in Debate on Social
Medicine," reported that during a "discussion on the socialization of medicine,"
the editor of The
Journal of the American Medical Association, Dr. Morris
Fishbein, "attacked the general proposal of socialization" and "ridicul[ed] the
Roosevelt administration's attempts to evolve a plan of socialized medicine."
Fishbein also reportedly said that the "American Medical Association [AMA] was
strongly opposed to any scheme for group practice and to health insurance ...
because they are un-American."
- The New York
Times reported in a February 16, 1935, article
(purchase required), "Doctors Meet on 'Peril' in Security Plans; Illness
Insurance Moves Stir Profession," that the AMA called a "special meeting" of its
house of delegates due to "what some medical men have pronounced the most
critical situation in the history of American medicine, brought about by
President Roosevelt's social security program, and particularly by proposals of
his advisers for compulsory insurance against the costs of sickness." The
Times
reported that the AMA asserted that "sickness-insurance
plans ... are a step toward socialized medicine."
Truman's
health-care reform proposal (the
Wagner-Murray-Dingell bill)
- The Harry S. Truman Library website states that "Truman's health
proposals finally came to Congress in the form of a Social Security expansion
bill, co-sponsored in Congress by Democratic senators Robert Wagner (N.Y.) and
James Murray (Mont.), along with Representative John Dingell
(D.-Mich). For this reason, the bill was known popularly as the W-M-D bill. The
American Medical Association (AMA) launched a spirited attack against the bill,
capitalizing on fears of Communism in the public mind. The AMA characterized the
bill as 'socalized [sic] medicine', and in a forerunner to the rhetoric of the
McCarthy era, called Truman White House staffers 'followers of the Moscow party line.' "
- In
The Social Transformation of American
Medicine, discussing Truman's health-care proposal in
Senate hearings, Paul Starr writes: "Senator Murray, the committee chairman,
asked that the health bill not be described as socialistic or communistic.
Interrupting, Senator Robert Taft of Ohio, the senior Republican, declared, 'I
considered it socialism. It is to my mind the most socialistic measure this
Congress has ever had before it.' Taft suggested that compulsory health
insurance, like the full employment act, came right out of the Soviet
constitution." [Page 283]
- Starr
further writes: "In May 1947 Senator Homer Ferguson accused the [Truman]
administration of illicitly spending millions 'in behalf of a nationwide program
of socialized medicine.' A House subcommittee investigating government
propaganda for health insurance concluded that 'known Communists and fellow
travelers within Federal agencies are at work diligently with Federal funds in
furtherance of the Moscow party line.' " [Page 284]
- Starr also
writes that after Truman won re-election in 1948, "the AMA thought armageddon
had come. It assessed each of its members an additional $25 just to resist
health insurance and hired [public relations firm] Whitaker and Baxter to mount
a public relations campaign that cost $1.5 million in 1949, at that time the
most expensive lobbying effort in American history. ... 'Would socialized
medicine lead to socialization of other phases of American life?' asked one
pamphlet, and it answered, 'Lenin thought so. He declared: "Socialized medicine
is the keystone to the arch of the Socialist state." ' (The Library of Congress
could not locate this quotation in Lenin's writings.) So successful was the
campaign in linking health insurance with socialism that even people who
supported Truman's plan identified it as 'socialized medicine,' despite the
administration's insistence it was not." [Page 284-285]
- An April 14,
1950, Washington Post
article (purchase required), "Dewey Views Truman Plans As
Dangerous," reported that New York Gov. Thomas E. Dewey, a two-time Republican
presidential nominee, said that the Truman administration's "compulsory health
insurance plan" was " 'socialized medicine.' "
Kennedy's health-care reform proposal (the Anderson-King
bill)
- In a
February 12, 1961, article (purchase required), "Fight Looms Over Medical Plan,"
about President John F. Kennedy's call for Congress "to set up a system of
health insurance for the aged tied to Social Security," The New York
Times reported, "One of the principal opposition
arguments is that a Governmental system of health insurance opens the way for a
form of socialized medicine."
- A May 13,
1962, New
York Times article (purchase required), "Fight Over New Aged Plan Grows
Hotter," reported that in opposing the Anderson-King bill, the AMA "had been
fighting back with cries of 'socialized medicine.' " The report also stated:
"Stepping up its own campaign, the A.M.A. has issued a twelve-page booklet
entitled 'The Case Against Socialized Medicine.' "
Johnson's 1965 amendment to the
Social Security Act establishing Medicare
- In a January
17, 1966 article (purchase required), "Insurers Ask What's Next in
Medicare," The New York
Times reported: "This discontent in the wake of the
enactment of the Federal medicare program is not over the loss of at least part
of the health-insurance business involving people over the age of 64. Rather,
the insurance sellers are distressed at the thought that medicare has brought
the nation a giant step closer to socialized medicine."
- Reagan
delivered an October 27, 1964, speech, "A Time for Choosing," supporting
Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater against Johnson, the
incumbent. In the speech, Reagan said, "Will you resist the temptation to get a
government handout for your community? Realize that the doctor's fight against
socialized medicine is your fight. We can't socialize the doctors without
socializing the patients. Recognize that government invasion of public power is
eventually an assault upon your own business." (The Greatest Speeches of Ronald Reagan;
Page 3)
- An August
17, 1992, analysis in the St. Petersburg Times by Ellen
Debenport, "Bush resists action, distrusts change," noted that George H.W. Bush
"opposed Medicare in 1964 as 'socialized medicine.' "
- In a July
11, 1965, article on the passage of Medicare, "Now Medicare" (purchase
required), The New York
Times reported that "Medicare bills have been bouncing
around Capitol Hill for years, but have run into strong opposition. The American
Medical Association has lobbied against a Federal medical program on the ground
it would be a step toward socialized medicine."
Clinton's 1992
campaign health-care proposal
- In a
September 28, 1992, editorial (retrieved from the Nexis database), The Orange County Register
wrote that then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton's
health-care proposal "resembles long-standing plans by congressional Democrats
to impose a version of socialized medicine in America."
- An August 5,
1992, New York Times
article, "THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Issues -- Health Care; G.O.P.
Tries to Seize a Democratic Issue," reported that President George H.W. Bush
"tried to paint as socialistic" Clinton's health-care proposals. The
Times
continued: "Accusing Mr. Clinton of advocating socialized
medicine -- although he does not -- Kevin Moley, Deputy Secretary of Health and
Human Services, called elements of the Clinton plan 'oxymoronic, with the accent
on the 'moronic.' "
- In an August
6, 1992, article, "Health care: Plenty of politics but few answers" (from
Nexis), USA
Today reported that "Bush maintains that Clinton is pushing
socialized medicine." The article continued: "Clinton ... has a plan that isn't really, as
critics charge, 'back door' national health insurance."
- In an
October 18, 1992, article, "THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: ISSUES -- Health Care; Bush and
Clinton Aren't Saying It, But Health-Care Taxes Are Likely," The New York Times
reported that "Mr. Clinton has modified his proposal to
deflect Republican charges that he favors socialized medicine" and that
"Republicans pummeled him as an advocate of ... socialized medicine."
The Clintons' 1993 health-care
initiative
- On the
December 16, 1993, edition (from Nexis) of Limbaugh's television show,
Rush Limbaugh, which ran from
1992-1996, Limbaugh stated, "I don't have time to beat around the bush. The
health-care plan as proposed by Mrs. Clinton is socialism. There's no soft way
to peddle it. There is not other way to describe it."
- On the
December 27, 1993, edition (from Nexis) of Rush Limbaugh, Limbaugh said
of President Clinton's health-care plan, "People have to oppose this
philosophically." He added, "You can't let the agenda be set by the
administration because socialized medicine is not the solution."
- On the April
4, 1994, edition (from Nexis) of Rush Limbaugh, Limbaugh said
of Clinton's plan, "this health-care plan is all about the destruction of the
creation of wealth in America and the socialization of this country, and it
won't work -- never has anywhere else -- and we're going to go to the mat here
to see to it that they don't succeed."
- In a
September 29, 1993, Washington Post column,
"Socialized Medicine In America" (from Nexis), Robert J. Samuelson asserted, "We
have arrived at socialized medicine in America. I do not report this as
either a good or bad event but simply as something that has happened with hardly
anyone realizing it. This is the first result -- and probably the most important
-- of the national health care debate launched last week by President Clinton.
Our politics and economy will never again be the same."
- An October
21, 2000, New York
Times article, "For Mrs. Clinton, Health Plan Left Lessons and
Questions," reported: "When Mrs. Clinton visited Congress in February 1993, Newt
Gingrich, the Georgia Republican who was then minority whip, articulated the
concerns that swamped the president's plan 19 months later. Mr. Gingrich said
then that Mrs. Clinton's proposal looked like 'washed-over old-time bureaucratic
liberalism, or centralized bureaucratic socialism.' "
- In a
November 27, 1992, article (purchase required), "House Democrats Dust Off
Long-Stymied Agendas," the Los Angeles Times reported
that "[Rep. Carlos J.] Moorhead [(R-CA)] said he
opposes Clinton's health care reform proposal as
'socialized medicine.' "
- A January
23, 1994, Washington
Times article, "Dole calls for revival of Bentsen's
health care plan" (from Nexis), reported that "former Housing Secretary Jack
Kemp, in a well-received closing address to the RNC [Republican National
Committee] yesterday, called Mr. Clinton's" health-care plan a " 'socialized
medicine' proposal."
- In a
February 20, 1994, article, "Old Republican Fissures Feel Strain as Health Care
Debate Grows" (from Nexis), The Washington Post reported
that Sen. Phil Gramm (R-TX) said of Clinton's health-care plan: "If we can't
offer a viable alternative to socialized medicine, then we don't have any excuse
for existence."
- In an
October 20, 1994, article, "THE 1994 CAMPAIGN: PENNSYLVANIA SENATOR Struggle for
the Senate; In Pennsylvania, Round 2 on Healt [sic]," The New York
Times reported that then-Rep. Rick Santorum (R)
"describes President Clinton's health proposal as 'socialized medicine' that the
country repudiated."
Creation of SCHIP in
1997
- In a
February 18, 1997, column for The Star-Ledger of Newark, New
Jersey, "GOP mustn't swallow bad medicine" (from Nexis), Tony Snow wrote that Republicans "must decide soon where they
stand on the issue of socialized medicine," explaining that "President Clinton
threw down the gauntlet in his State of the Union address, when he proposed
guaranteeing health insurance for at least half of the 10 million American
children who have none."
- In a July
23, 1997, column, "NEA Convention Delegates Gather to Gloat," Eagle
Forum founder Phyllis Schlafly wrote that the National Education Association
(NEA) was "confident that Congress will pass the Kennedy-Hatch KidCare bill, a
first step toward the single-payer socialized medicine system that the NEA has
endorsed for years."
- An August
26, 1997, Atlanta
Journal-Constitution article, "THE TOBACCO BATTLE:
Conservative man in middle" (from Nexis), noted that Sens. Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
and Orrin Hatch (R-UT) "sponsored an increase in the cigarette tax by 43 cents a
pack to fund health insurance for about 5 million poor children." The article
quoted Bradley Keena, "spokesman for the archconservative activist group the
Free Congress Foundation," saying of Kennedy: "He wants socialized medicine, and
he's working with Hatch on a first step. This is not the old Hatch."
Gore's 2000 campaign health-care
plan
- Appearing on
the August 28, 2000, edition of CNN's Crossfire, then-Rep. J.D.
Hayworth (R-AZ) said: "And if you like socialized medicine, you will love this
government bureaucracy under [then-Vice President and Democratic presidential
nominee] Al Gore that will actually cost seniors who get $500 a year in
prescription drugs right now -- it will end up costing seniors more money and
take away control from those seniors."
- On the
September 25, 2000, edition (from Nexis) of Fox News' Hannity &
Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity said: "And the other issue
is Gore, $4.6 trillion -- the single largest expansion of government in American
history, from universal preschool, now, to prescriptions to health care -- it is
Socialism 101."
- Right-wing
pundit Ann Coulter attacked Gore on the October 3, 2000, edition (from Nexis) of
CNBC's Rivera
Live, saying: "Yeah, but the point is what Gore says,
'No, we can't have an across-the-board tax cut, but we can have an attract --
across-the-board socialist health care plan.' "
2001 Patients Bill of
Rights
- Rep. Ron
Paul (R-TX) wrote in an August 1, 2001, Health Care News article, "Bill of Rights ... or Federal Takeover of
Medicine?": "Without question, the true goal of some in Congress is to create a
system of socialized medicine. It's politically expedient to slap a 'patients'
rights' label on legislation that simply leads us closer to a complete
government takeover of medicine."
- In an August
2, 2001, speech on the House floor, Paul urged his colleagues to
"reject the phony Patients' Bill of Rights. ... We don't have to continue down
the path of socialized medical care, especially in America
where free markets have provided so much for so many."
Kerry's 2004 campaign health-care
plan
- On the
September 9, 2004, edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country, host Joe
Scarborough claimed that Sen. John Kerry (MA), the Democratic presidential
nominee at the time, "wants to socialize medicine," adding: "John Kerry ain't no
bargain. You add up all that he wants to do, with socializing medicine -- he's
talking about universal health care, with adding 40,000 new troops. It's a lot
bigger deficits" (from Nexis).
- On September
15, 2004, then-Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) released a statement attacking the "Kerry-Edwards health care plan,"
saying: "While they have been touting their move toward socialized medicine,
Kerry and [then-Sen. John] Edwards [(D-NC), Kerry's running mate] have opposed
serious reforms and improvements to the health care system throughout their
careers."
MD's 2005 proposal requiring
Wal-Mart to pay increased health benefits
- As
Media
Matters noted,
Limbaugh stated on the May 20, 2005, edition of The Rush Limbaugh Show that proposed legislation in Maryland, which would have required
Wal-Mart to choose between increasing health benefits for employees or paying
more into the state's Medicaid program, is "a vestige of fascism." Limbaugh
added, "[T]hey're legislating socialism at the Maryland legislature."
2007 SCHIP
reauthorization
- During the
October 16, 2007, broadcast of his radio show, discussing the debate over the
reauthorization of SCHIP, Limbaugh stated that the media "have done everything
they can to push this whole notion of socialized medicine, to rip the president
as being heartless and cold and cruel to children. And yet -- see, this is why
you gotta celebrate the new media, folks, and people like me."
- During a
speech given for WPHT-AM Philadelphia on October 11, 2007, Limbaugh said of
SCHIP, "It's an expansion. And it's a stealth mechanism to put the tentacles of
socialized medicine even deeper into society."
- During the
August 3, 2007, broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show,
Limbaugh stated that "the SCHIP program ... is a stealth maneuver by the
Democrats to take us further down the road to nationalized, socialized medicine,
which will be an abject failure." He added, "It will not be free. You may not be
paying for it yourself, but you'll also suffer in the kind of coverage that you
get and treatment that you get."
- An April 1,
2007, New York
Times article, "Expanded Health Program for Children Causes Clash,"
reported: " 'The Children's Health Insurance Program has given Democrats a
wide-open door for socialized medicine,' [Rep. Jack] Kingston [R-GA] said in an
interview. But he added, 'The door was left open by Republicans, who were in the
majority when we passed the original legislation in 1997.' "
- An August 2,
2007, New York
Times article, "House Passes Children's Health Plan 225-204,"
reported that "Representative Pete Sessions, Republican of Texas, said the bill
embodied the Democrats' 'vision for the future: socialized medicine and
Washington-run health care.' "
- A September
26, 2007, Washington
Post article, "House Passes Children's
Health Bill; Despite Strong Republican Support, Threatened Veto Will Probably
Stand," reported that "Republicans attacked the bill on multiple fronts, saying
it would move the nation toward 'socialized medicine.' "
- A September
28, 2007, New York
Times article, "Senate Passes Children's Health Plan," noted that
"Republican opponents of
the bill, like Senators Judd Gregg of New
Hampshire and John Cornyn of Texas, said it would be a big step toward
socialized medicine."
- An October
3, 2007, Associated Press article, "Bush vetoes child health insurance plan," reported
that "Bush argued that the congressional plan would be a move toward socialized
medicine by expanding the program to higher-income families."
2008 campaign health-care proposals
by Obama and Clinton
- On the
January 25, 2008, edition of his morning radio update, Limbaugh cited a study
showing that, in Limbaugh's words, "women will not get tested [for breast
cancer] if they have to pay for it. He added, "Every liberal on the campaign
trail has a plan to deliver free, socialized medicine, but no country on earth,
folks, can possibly pay for every test for everybody without going bankrupt."
- Discussing a
Rocky Mountain
News editorial about a single-payer plan under
consideration in Colorado, Limbaugh stated on his radio show of
September 17, 2007 -- the day then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton
announced her health-care proposal -- "I'm getting to the bottom line, is that
you have the single payer proponents. Tying this to Mrs. Clinton, she's a single
payer advocate. The government's going to be the single payer. It's going to be
socialized medicine, national health care."
- A September
16, 2007, ABCNews.com article quoted
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney attacking Clinton's
then-unannounced health-care policy at a campaign event in Iowa, saying: "The
last thing we need is Hillarycare," and, "The last thing we need is socialized
medicine."
- On the
December 19, 2007, edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf
Blitzer interviewed Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani and said,
"Quick couple of questions, and you can give me your honest answers, as you
always do." Blitzer then asked Giuliani: "Has Hillary Clinton been a good
senator for New
York state?" After stating, "Not from my point of view,"
Giuliani falsely claimed that Clinton "want[s] to move toward mandated
government medicine, socialized medicine."
- In a
September 24, 2007, USA
Today article, reporter Fredreka Schouten quoted Romney's charge that Clinton's health-care proposal is
"a 'socialized medical plan.' "
- On September
18, 2007, USA
Today's Richard Wolf reported: "Republicans criticized Clinton's plan as
heavy-handed. Rudy Giuliani's campaign called it the 'Clinton-Moore plan' after
filmmaker Michael Moore, whose film Sicko lambastes the U.S.
health care system and lauds government-run programs in other countries. Mitt
Romney called it 'a European-style socialized medicine plan.' "
- During the
August 23, 2008, edition of
Fox News' Cavuto on
Business, guest Jonathan Hoenig, a regular panelist on Fox News' Cashin' In and managing member of
Capitalistpig Asset Management LLC, falsely asserted that Obama and then-running
mate Joe Biden "have made it very clear that they support socialized health
care."
- In an
October 6, 2008, National Review Online column headlined "Take This and Run: Ten things the McCain
campaign needs to do to win," Lisa Schiffren described
Obama's health-care proposal as "state health care," writing: "Ask why Barack
Obama wants to make us all wards of the state, with state health care. Is this a
good moment to embrace 20th Century Socialism Lite, even if we are facing a year
or two of belt tightening? Shouldn't the future be freer, with less state
interference in our lives?"
- A
May 3, 2008, New York
Times article, "Parsing McCain on the Democrats' Health Plans,"
noted that Sen. John McCain, then running for president, has repeatedly
"inaccurately described the Democrats' health-care proposals, using language
that evokes the specter of socialized medicine."
2009 SCHIP
expansion
- A February 4
New
York Times article, "Obama Signs Children's Health Insurance Bill,"
reported that "Representative Steve King, Republican of Iowa, denounced the bill
as 'a foundation stone for socialized medicine.' "
- A January 30
Washington Times
article, "Children's health bill clears Senate," reported that
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) said, "Democrats are making it clear that they intend to
use our economic crisis to rush through their longtime liberal goals without
public scrutiny or debate. ... This will increase burdens on taxpayers and take
a significant step toward socialized medicine."
Health information technology
provisions in 2009 economic recovery package
- On the
February 10 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, co-host
Megyn Kelly, speaking to Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), cited Betsy
McCaughey's Bloomberg commentary in claiming that the health information technology
language in Obama's economic recovery package "sounds dangerously like
socialized medicine."
- Radio host
Martha Zoller, appearing on the February 15 edition of CNN Newsroom, claimed that
her "biggest concern about socialized health care is a lot of those things are
in the stimulus bill. There are a whole bunch of things in the stimulus bill
relating to health care and it is about telling, especially older folks, that
it's not going to be cost-effective to continue to treat them and Democrats have
been scaring older folks for 15 years about Republicans taking away what they
have."
- In a
February 25 American
Spectator column, "Repeal Health Care Fascism," Peter Ferrara, who
served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, wrote that the
stimulus bill funds "a bureaucratic structure for the government to begin
rationing the health care of the American people." Ferrara counseled
"Republicans and conservatives" to "sponsor a new bill of their own proposing to
repeal the health care rationing provisions of the supposed stimulus bill. They
can then lead a national, populist, grassroots movement to force Congress to
pass the bill, and President Obama to sign it, educating the public along way
about the intractable problems of socialized medicine."
Obama's 2010 budget
blueprint
- During the
February 27 edition of his morning radio update, Limbaugh mentioned the carbon
cap-and-trade and tax provisions included in Obama's budget outline and stated,
"The Obama budget also funds the relentless drive toward socialized medicine.
And all that is just the beginning."
- In a
February 26 statement "[r]eacting to President Obama's budget blueprint,"
Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-PA) "vow[ed] to fight against socialized medicine,"
stating further: "On healthcare, I agree with the President that we need to get
costs under control. I look forward to working with him by utilizing my 28 years
of experience working with over 10,000 patients dealing with life altering
conditions to accomplish that feat. I can also say without hesitation, that the
quality of healthcare in this county is second to none -- and sacrificing
quality to achieve these necessary reforms is not acceptable. A single payer,
government run healthcare system is the worst possible way to achieve this
goal."
- Rep. John
Fleming (R-LA) released a statement on February 26 claiming that Obama's budget "will
move us even further down the path to universal health care. We are treading
dangerously close to bureaucratic intervention in the exam room and I will not
support any measure that leads to socialized medicine."
- In a
February 26 statement, Rep. Paul Broun (R-GA) said of Obama's budget: "One
such troubling provision is a tax increase to pay for the $635 billion included
in the budget for health care 'reserve funds.' Health care reform is desperately
needed in America, but I'm concerned that $635 billion will be a down payment on
socialized medicine, causing the impersonal rationing of health care and
destroying the doctor-patient relationship."
&mdash M.W.
Copyright © 2012 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.