September 11, 2009 8:20 pm ET
As part of Fox News' witch hunt against Obama administration "czars," Fox News asserted that "czars are not subjected to congressional oversight." In fact, many of the Obama administration officials the network has labeled "czars" have been confirmed by the Senate or were appointed to positions created through legislation passed by Congress; additionally, a number of the officials had counterparts in the Bush administration.
Fox graphics list 30 czars. Fox & Friends displayed pictures of 30 Obama administration officials under the title "President Obama's Czars." From Fox & Friends:





Fox & Friends graphic, hosts asserts czars are not subject to oversight. Moments after airing the "President Obama's Czars" graphics, Fox News aired a graphic stating that "Czars are not subjected to congressional oversight." Additionally, during the segment, co-host Gretchen Carlson said of the "czars": "[T]hey don't answer to Congress because, [co-host] Brian [Kilmeade], they don't have to be confirmed." Kilmeade replied, "Yup."
From the September 11 edition of Fox & Friends:

Eight "czars" were actually confirmed by the Senate. The Senate's list of confirmed civilian "Executive Nominations" includes the following administration officials listed by Fox as "Obama's czars":
Two other Fox "czars" are appointed to positions specifically created by statute:
Fox & Friends forwards claim that there were only "a couple of czars" during the Bush administration. During the segment, Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-NC) asserted that there were only "a couple of czars in previous administrations." Carlson agreed, replying "Right. And a lot of people are wondering, is this just friends of Obama who need work and, you know, pay back a favor. Or do they actually have the kind of power that a Cabinet secretary would have -- who, by the way, has to be confirmed."
Six of the "czars" confirmed by the Senate filled positions that existed during the Bush administration. According to the Library of Congress' Thomas database, Kerlikowske, Blair, Sunstein, Holdren, Carter, and Chopra all filled positions that were previously held by Bush administration appointees; Blair's position was created by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) of 2004. Additionally, Kundra's position was created in 2002.
In at least six other cases, Bush administration officials held similar or identical positions to those of the officials listed by Fox:
Fox has led charge against Obama administration officials they have called "czars." As Media Matters for America has documented, Fox News personalities have been leading the charge against Sunstein, Van Jones, Holdren, and other Obama administration officials and nominees they have described as "czars" -- often by unearthing and criticizing statements the officials had made in the past rather than critiquing their job performance or credentials for those positions -- with Sean Hannity, for example, declaring that "my job starting tomorrow night is to get rid of every other ['czar']."
From the September 11 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:
CARLSON: Welcome back. All right, you're looking at the screen, and you're hearing the music. President Obama has appointed more than 30 czars who have a major influence on public policies. And even though these advisers are not Cabinet positions, they don't answer to Congress because, Brian, they don't have to be confirmed.
KILMEADE: Yup. Joining us right now, a guest who wants to change all that, from North Carolina, Congressman Patrick McHenry. Congressman, why now? Why, when we put up with czars through other administrations, do you think a line in the sand has to be drawn now?
McHENRY: Well, I think it should have been drawn in the sand a long time ago. The Constitution is clear, Brian, that the advice and consent of the Senate is required for high-ranking administration officials. And either these czars are high-ranking administration officials making policy, which is counter to the Constitution, or they're simply figureheads collecting a salary.
It's apparent that they -- they seem to be making some big decisions, whether it's the health care czar, the green jobs czar who resigned over the weekend, or the international climate change czar, Carol Browner, who's trying to coordinate policy with the Department of Energy and the EPA. So it seems to me that it raises questions, no matter the administration. And I think what's apparent is that the Obama administration has done what previous administrations have done, but they've done it in a much wider way.
CARLSON: Yeah, right.
McHENRY: Look, the government spends money, and they're spending a lot more money. The government's been involved in health care, but they want government to take over health care. They've had a couple of czars in previous administrations; now they have dozens and dozens of czars in the first eight months.
CARLSON: Right. And a lot of people are wondering, is this just friends of Obama who need work and, you know, pay back a favor. Or do they actually have the kind of power that a Cabinet secretary would have -- who, by the way, has to be confirmed. Here's my question for you, Congressman. I have really been sitting back and waiting for Republicans to stand up and speak out about this. You seem to be the first person to bring it to national attention that you actually have a problem with it.
&mdash J.K.F., D.C.P., & A.H.S.
Copyright © 2012 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.