Media Matters for America

Rogue Fact: Palin suggests "no other candidate" subjected to scrutiny "about their hair, makeup, or clothes"

November 14, 2009 7:30 pm ET

Sarah Palin writes in her memoir that after it was reported that the Republican National Committee spent $150,000 "to clothe and accessorize" Palin and her family, "many wondered at the same time why no other candidates or their spouses were being asked a thing about their hair, makeup, or clothes." However, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama were repeatedly subjected to critiques and questions about "their hair, makeup, or clothes" during the 2008 campaign.

Palin: "[M]any wondered at the same time why no other candidates or their spouses were being asked a thing about their hair, makeup, or clothes"

From Pages 314 - 315 of Going Rogue: An American Life:

The first wardrobe story hit on October 22: "RNC Shells Out $150K for Palin Fashion." The [Politico] headline was highly misleading, as was the article itself, which said that according to campaign financial disclosures, the McCain campaign had spent $150,000 "to clothe and accessorize vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin and her family."

[...]

I didn't care so much about the petty potshots because I knew they weren't true, and people who knew me laughed out loud when they read the "diva" accusations. But my family was made to look like a herd of hillbillies who had come to the big city and started living high on the hog, and that hurt me for them. My family is frugal. We clip coupons. We shop at Costco. We buy diapers in bulk and generic peanut butter. We don't have full-time nannies or housekeepers or drivers. So the portrayal of my family as wasting other people's money on clothes was a false one. And many wondered at the same time why no other candidates or their spouses were being asked a thing about their hair, makeup, or clothes.

Politico article Palin cited contradicts her "no other candidate" claim

Politico: "The business of primping and dressing on the campaign trail has become fraught with political risk in recent years." The same Politico article Palin referenced noted that questions have been raised about other candidates' "primping and dressing," and Politico reported that it reviewed "similar records" for Obama but found "no similar spending." From the article:

The business of primping and dressing on the campaign trail has become fraught with political risk in recent years as voters increasingly see an elite Washington out of touch with their values and lifestyles.

In 2000, Democrat Al Gore took heat for changing his clothing hues. And in 2006, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) was ribbed for two hair styling sessions that cost about $3,000.

Then, there was Democrat John Edwards' $400 hair cuts in 2007 and Republican McCain's $520 black leather Ferragamo shoes this year.

A review of similar records for the campaign of Democrat Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee turned up no similar spending.

But all the spending by other candidates pales in comparison to the GOP outlay for the Alaska governor whose expensive, designer outfits have been the topic of fashion pages and magazines. [Politico, 10/21/08]

Edwards, Obama, Clinton and Biden were subjected to frequent scrutiny "about their hair, makeup, or clothes"

Edwards' haircuts. During the Democratic primary, the media devoted significant attention to John Edwards' "expensive" haircuts. For instance:

Obama. During the campaign, Obama was the subject of critiques and attacks about his clothing:

Clinton. Then-Sen. Hillary Clinton was the frequent target of critiques about her clothing:

Biden. Biden's hair was frequently a topic among journalists. For instance:

&mdash E.H.H.

Copyright © 2012 Media Matters for America. All rights reserved.