About us Login Get email updates
Special Reports
Print

REPORT: "Fair and balanced" Fox News aggressively promotes "tea party" protests

April 08, 2009 3:58 pm ET

SUMMARY: Despite its repeated insistence that its coverage is "fair and balanced" and its invitation to viewers to "say 'no' to biased media," Fox News has frequently aired segments encouraging viewers to get involved with "tea party" protests across the country, which the channel has described as primarily a response to President Obama's fiscal policies. Media Matters has compiled an analysis of Fox News' promotion of these events.

Comments

Despite its repeated insistence that its coverage is "fair and balanced" and its invitation to viewers to "say 'no' to biased media," in recent weeks, Fox News has frequently aired segments encouraging viewers to get involved with "tea party" protests across the country, which the channel has often described as primarily a response to President Obama's fiscal policies. Specifically, Fox News has in dozens of instances provided attendance and organizing information for future protests, such as protest dates, locations and website URLs. Fox News websites have also posted information and publicity material for protests. Fox News hosts have repeatedly encouraged viewers to join them at several April 15 protests that they are attending and covering; during the April 6 edition of Glenn Beck, on-screen text characterized these events as "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties." Tea-party organizers have used the planned attendance of the Fox News hosts to promote their protests. Fox News has also aired numerous interviews with protest organizers. Moreover, Fox News contributors are listed as "Tea Party Sponsor[s]" on TaxDayTeaParty.com. Media Matters for America has compiled the following analysis of Fox News' promotion of the tea-party protests. (Most transcripts are taken from the Nexis database.)

Protests responding to administration policies

While tea-party organizers have stated that the protests are nonpartisan, Fox News and organizers have also characterized the protests primarily as a response to the administration's fiscal policies.

TaxDayTeaParty.com -- which describes itself as the "Online HQ for the April 15th Nationwide Tax Day Tea Party Rallies" -- states: "The Tea Party protests, in their current form, began in early 2009 when Rick Santelli, the On Air Editor for CNBC, set out on a rant to expose the bankrupt liberal agenda of the White House Administration and Congress. Specifically, the flawed 'Stimulus Bill' and pork filled budget."

Fox News personalities have repeatedly characterized the protests primarily as a response to the Obama administration's fiscal policies. For instance:

  • On the February 27 edition of On the Record, host Greta Van Susteren said: " 'Tea party' protests are erupting across the country. Angry taxpayers, or at least some of them, are taking to the streets in the spirit of the Boston Tea Party. People are protesting President Obama's massive $787 billion stimulus bill, his $3.55 trillion budget and a federal government that has been ballooning by the day since the president took office."
  • On the March 16 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, host Bill O'Reilly said that "big government spending protests are taking place all over the country. The latest in Cincinnati where about 5,000 folks showed up, showed their displeasure with the Obama's administration money strategy. These gatherings are being dubbed tea parties."
  • On the March 25 edition of Special Report, host Bret Baier said that the tea parties are "protests of wasteful government spending in general and of President Obama's stimulus package and his budget in particular."
  • During the April 6 edition of America's Newsroom, FoxNews.com contributor Andrea Tantaros said of the protests: "People are fighting against Barack Obama's radical shift to turn us into Europe." Fox News also aired on-screen text stating that the "Tea Parties Are Anti-Stimulus Demonstrations."

Fox Screenshot 1

Additionally, Peter Roff, a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty who is listed as a "contributor" to FoxNews.com's Fox Forum, wrote in an April 3 blog post on the Fox Forum: "In the case of the current crisis the blame appears to have been assigned almost totally to Obama, at least by the thousands of U.S. taxpayers attending near-spontaneous 'tea parties' in protest of the Democrats agenda of more taxes, increased spending, higher deficits and a surge of borrowing to pay for it all."

From Roff's Fox Forum post:

In the case of the current crisis the blame appears to have been assigned almost totally to Obama, at least by the thousands of U.S. taxpayers attending near-spontaneous "tea parties" in protest of the Democrats agenda of more taxes, increased spending, higher deficits and a surge of borrowing to pay for it all. These mass protests, which have been occurring in different spots almost weekly -- 2,000 people in St. Louis, 3,000 people in Cincinnati, 6,000 people in Orlando -- promise to culminate on Tax Day, April 15, with at least 300 protests at sites large and small according to the "official" Tax Day Tea Party Web site.

As was the case with the Obama campaign, the new "Tea Party Movement" is bringing people out to engage in politics, many for the first time in their lives. And, again, as was the case with the Obama presidential campaign, these activists are making liberal use of new media technologies like Twitter and Facebook to find supporters and allies, to meet each other and to establish a sense of community, a community of people who are being economically oppressed by the new burdens being placed on them by the Democrats who now are in complete control in Washington,. D.C.

Roff's Institute for Liberty is listed as a "Tea Party Sponsor" on TaxDayTeaParty.com; Roff has also authored a "How to Brew a Tea Party" kit to "show you step-by-step what you can do to make your hometown Tea Party a success, including slogans you can use and model press releases for you to send."

"FNC Tax Day Tea Parties"

While discussing the April 15 protests on his April 6 program, Glenn Beck suggested that viewers could "[c]elebrate with Fox News" by either attending a protest or watching it on Fox News. Beck stated that in addition to himself, hosts Neil Cavuto, Greta Van Susteren, and Sean Hannity would be "live" at different protests. While Beck spoke, on-screen text labeled those protests as "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties."

Fox Screenshot 2

TaxDayTeaParty.com lists Fox News contributors Michelle Malkin and Tammy Bruce as "Tea Party Sponsors." The sponsors section also lists American Solutions for Winning the Future, whose general chairman is Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich. Gingrich filmed a video "invitation" to attend the April 15 protests. According to TaxDayTeaParty.com, "Gingrich will be a featured speaker" at the April 15 protest in New York City.

Tea-party organizers have used the planned attendance of the Fox News hosts to promote their protests. For instance, the Sacramento Tea Party website uses Cavuto's image at the top of its home page:

Cavuto's homepage image

On its Facebook page, the Sacramento Tea Party states: "We've just received notice that FoxNews will be broadcasting the 'Your World with Neil Cavuto' show live from the Sacramento Tea Party. Now we really have a chance to let the whole nation hear our voices in Sacramento. Bring your friends, family and everyone you know!"

The website AtlantaTeaParty.net states of Sean Hannity's appearance at its Atlanta protest:

Moments ago, Sean Hannity, of Hannity on Fox News, announced that he is going to broadcast LIVE from the ATLANTA TEA PARTY!!!! Fox will also have news crews in other cities around the country at their Tea Parties. This is huge and exciting news for the Atlanta event and also for the Tea Party movement in general.

We are honored to have Hannity covering our Atlanta Tea Party!

San Antonio Express-News media columnist Jeanne Jakle wrote in an April 2 blog post that "Eric Adam, the media correspondent for the San Antonio Tea Party, said he's expecting thousands to attend the event now that Beck and his national forum are involved." From the post:

Eric Adam, the media correspondent for the San Antonio Tea Party, said he's expecting thousands to attend the event now that Beck and his national forum are involved.

"We're tired of the government spending all our money," Adam said of the tea party's message. "We're not anti-Obama, we're not anti-Republican or anti-Democrat, we're anti-arrogance. We don't approve of the fact that the government thinks we're stupid."

He said it will be a family-friendly event with water, comfort, security and, he emphasized, "no violence." Adam said all logistics haven't been worked out, but "we're aiming for the actual tea party to start at 6 p.m."

Promoting and reporting on the protests

The tea-party protests have been promoted or covered on numerous Fox News shows, including Fox & Friends, America's Newsroom, Your World, Glenn Beck, Special Report, The O'Reilly Factor, Hannity, and On the Record. The following represents a show-by-show cataloging of Fox News' protest coverage.

America's Newsroom

On April 7, co-host Bill Hemmer interviewed Felicia Cravens, the organizer of the Houston tea party. While Cravens spoke, Fox News displayed the following on-screen information about the protest:

Fox Screenshot 3

Fox Screenshot 4

Fox Screenshot 5

During the segment, both Fox News and Cravens said that the event was nonpartisan. While Hemmer spoke, Fox News aired protest footage referencing Obama:

Fox Screenshot 6

Fox Screenshot 7

At the conclusion of the interview, Hemmer directed viewers to go to America's Newsroom's website for more information about the protests. On-screen text displayed the following information:

Fox Screenshot 8

America's Newsroom's website currently displays a link to "Upcoming 'Tea Party' protests." The website also hosts a list of protests, and states that "protests over big government spending and bailouts are popping up all over the country."

On April 6, Hemmer discussed the tea parties' political impact with Tantaros and Fox News contributor Bob Beckel. During the segment, Tantaros said of the protests: "People are fighting against Barack Obama's radical shift to turn us into Europe." Fox News also aired footage referencing Obama, and on-screen text stated that "Tea Parties Are Anti-Stimulus Demonstrations":

Fox Screenshot 9

Fox Screenshot 10

Fox Screenshot 11

After the discussion, Hemmer directed viewers to visit the program's website for more information:

If you want to know more about the tea-party movement, if there is one happening near you, head to our website FoxNews.com/americasnewsroom. We have an entire section devoted to the growing tea-party movement. That's our America's Newsroom website online. All the information you need to know. Check it out right now.

While Hemmer spoke, the following graphic appeared on-screen:

Fox Screenshot 12

On March 24, Hemmer noted protests in Florida and Ohio and directed viewers to the program's website to learn more about the protests. From the program:

HEMMER: It's called the tea party. And check out the scene in Orlando, Florida. More than 4,000 turned out over the weekend protesting government spending and a big thumbs-down to the policies currently in Washington. Radio host Bud Hedinger hosted that event. Protesters, well, they waved flags and signs and with slogans like "Repeal the Pork" and "Our Bacon is Cooked." I say, our bacon is cooked.

They're popping up literally all across the country now. They had about 5,000 in Cincinnati last weekend. If you go to our website, you will find a growing list of these events, hundreds of photos, and a new tea-party anthem that you will hear from the man who wrote it and recorded it next hour. And there's a list of the nationwide Tax Day tea-party events coming up on the 15th of April, which will be a huge deal for those organizations. So check it out online right now.

While Hemmer spoke, on-screen text directed viewers to a Fox News website listing protests:

Fox Screenshot 13

Later during the program, Hemmer interviewed Lloyd Marcus, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of Color, who wrote a song for the protests. Marcus said that he previously "was on a 40-city 'Stop Obama' tour" and later said of the Orlando, Florida, protest: "[P]eople were not negative about Obama the man, they were negative about his policies, what this man is trying to do -- have all this government overreach. That's what people were really concerned about."

After Marcus' interview concluded, co-host Megyn Kelly said: "Great guest."

Marcus' song -- which is posted on FoxNews.com -- appears to be primarily about Obama:

Mr. President!
Your stimulus is sure to bust.
It's just a socialistic scheme,
The only thing it will do
Is kill the American Dream.

You wanna take from achievers
Somehow you think that's fair.
And redistribute to those folks
Who won't get out of their easy chair.

We're havin' a tea party across this land.
If you love this country,
Come on and join our band.
We're standin' up for freedom and liberty,
'Cause patriots have shown us freedom ain't free.

So when they call you a racist cause you disagree,
It's just another of their dirty tricks to silence you and me.

The song later added: "We gotta vote out these clowns who don't love the USA."

During the interview, on-screen text directed viewers to protest websites:

Fox Screenshot 14

Fox Screenshot 15

On March 23, Hemmer directed people to a list of tea party events on FoxNews.com and promised to "add to [the list] when we get more information from the New American Tea Party." While Hemmer spoke, the following on-screen text appeared:

Fox Screenshot 16

Hannity

Hannity has frequently promoted the April 15 protests by providing on-air information about the protests and encouraging viewers to "join us." Hannity has also encouraged viewers to "send us your 'Tax Day Tea Party' videos," which he said may be posted online or on-air. In promoting the protests, Hannity has directed viewers to visit his websites for more information. Hannity.com features the following graphic:

Hannity website graphic

The graphic links to a message board discussion that states: "This thread is for the sole purpose of getting the word out about organized tea party events around the country. If you know of a planned event, please post the information here."

In a blog post on Hannity's FoxNews.com site, producers for Hannity wrote, "Get your Tea Party Tees at CAFE PRESS and wear them on April 15!" and included a link to the site. A web producer also posted "some helpful links" to AtlantaTeaParty.net and TaxDayTeaParty.com.

The following are examples of Hannity promoting or discussing the protests on Hannity:

  • On April 7, Hannity said: "And don't forget, you can log on to our website to get all the details one week from tomorrow, our special, 'Tax Day Tea Party' show. You can attend. It's live. It's in Atlanta. Joe the Plumber and John Rich and Newt Gingrich and Mike Huckabee and [radio host] Neal Boortz and [radio hosts] Rick and Bubba. It's all coming up April 15th. Tax Day, or we call it Tim Geithner Day." Hannity later said: "And of course, April 15, our big show coming out of Atlanta. It's tax day, our 'Tax Day Tea Party' show. Don't forget, we're going to have Joe the Plumber. We're going to have John Rich performing, Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Neal Boortz, [Fox News correspondent] Ainsley Earhardt, Rick and Bubba. April 15, in Atlanta, the gold dome, the capital. You can come, and it's free."
  • On April 6, Hannity said: "And log on to our Web site, by the way, and get all the details about our special 'Tax Day Tea Party' show that's going to be live in Atlanta and you can come on April 15th. Hope you'll join us." Later, Hannity said: "On April 15, it's our two-party tax day show. And I'll be hosting from Atlanta, Georgia, where one of the dozens of tea protests will be going on that evening. And you can send us your 'Tax Day Tea Party' videos, by the way. Film it, save it to your video -- the computer. Download it to us. And for more information, go to my Web site, Hannity.com, or FOXnews.com/Hannity."
  • On April 3, Hannity said: "And also log on to our Web site to get all the details about our special 'Tax Day Tea Party.' We're going to be live in Atlanta, April 15th. [Former Arkansas] Governor [and Fox News host Mike] Huckabee [R], by the way, will be on that show." Hannity also said during the program: "And then it's April 15, it's our tea party tax day show. And I'll be hosting the show from Atlanta, where one of dozens of tea party protests are going to be going on that evening. So we hope you'll join us."
  • On April 2, Hannity said: "And don't forget to log on to our website to get all the details about our special 'Tax Day Tea Party' show. That's live in Atlanta. It's on April 15th. John Rich will be there and many more, details coming up." Hannity later said: "On April 15, we we'll be broadcasting from a tea party in Atlanta. I will be there in Atlanta, where one of the dozens of tea parties around the country will be going on. And we hope you'll be watching."
  • During the April 1 edition of his show, Hannity said:

And tonight in "Your America" Americans are not happy with the skyrocketing tax rates. Now just yesterday, 500 people stormed the Iowa House as Democrats there unveiled a plan to raise taxes and the country's widespread unhappiness also explains why tea parties are being held across the country.

By the way, on that note, don't forget, on tax day, April 15th, Tim Geithner Day, this show will air from the "Tax Day Tea Party" in Atlanta, Georgia, and we'll also be checking in with other tea parties all across the country.

Hannity further stated on April 1:

And then on April 15, it will be our tea party show. It's tax day, or as we refer to it here on this program, Tim Geithner Day. And I'll be hosting the show from Atlanta, where one of the dozens of tea party protests are going to be going on that evening. And we also want you to send us your tax day party video messages. And we may play some of them during the show and post them on the "Great American Blog." All you have to do is film your own video, save it to computer, and you can easily upload it on our Web site by clicking on the "send us your video" link.

  • On March 31, Hannity said: "By the way, we're putting together that special 'Tax Day Tea Party' show on April 15th. I will be hosting the show from Atlanta, where one of the dozens of tea party protests will be going on that evening and we'll give you the details on how you can join us." Hannity later said: "And on April 15, we're going to be at the tea party in Atlanta, Georgia. We'll be hosting the show from there, where one of dozens of tea parties and protests are going on around the country that evening. You don't want to miss it."
  • On March 30, Hannity said: "I think Americans tonight should be frightened, and that's why we're going to have a special tea party in Atlanta on April 15th. We're going to give you more details later here. Spending trillions of dollars." He later said:

And by the way, don't forget. We are putting together a very special "Tax Day Tea Party." It's all happening on April 15th. I will be hosting this show from Atlanta where one of the dozens of the tea party protests will be going on that evening.

Now we also want to -- if you want to send us your "Tax Day Tea Party" video to air during the show, we're going to tell you how. Make sure you check out the "Great American Blog" at FOXNews.com/Hannity. We have those details and you can join us, April 15th. By the way, we're calling it "Tim Geithner Day."

Hannity later added:

Now, before we go, we want to give you another reminder about our very special Tax Day show. It's all happening on Tim Geithner Day, April 15. I'm going to be hosting the show from Atlanta, Georgia, my old stomping grounds, where one of the dozens of tea party protests will going on around the country.

Now, we also want you to send us Tax Day Party video messages. And we're going to be playing them during the show and also post them on the "Great American Blog." So you can be a TV star also.

  • On March 27, Hannity said: "On April 15 which of course is tax day, I'll be hosting this show from Atlanta, Georgia, where one of the dozens of tea party protests will be going on. That evening we'll also have coverage from other protests around the country and we're going to be given more details about how you can participate in the days to come. So stay tuned. Check out our website." Hannity later said:

And before you go, just another reminder about our tax day show. April 15. I will be hosting from Atlanta, Georgia, where one of the dozens of tea party protests are going to be taking place that evening. We'll have more details, how you can participate if you're in Atlanta. Stay tuned. Also, listen to News Talk 750 WSB and we'll have the details there.

  • On March 23, Hannity said to radio talk-show host Mark Levin:

HANNITY: You -- we now see popping up all over the country these tea parties and people angry. They've lost a lot of their money, and there's bailout mania fatigue here. You have a call to action here, and that is that it's going to be conservatives who lacked the confidence and persistence to deal with statism, but you also have a call to action towards the end of the book when you lay out your manifesto.

LEVIN: Right.

HANNITY: And the call to action is conservatives have got to be shrewder, smarter. They've got to be engaged, they tend to, you know, live and let live as you say. So if people want to counter Barack Obama's European socialism, they must what?

  • On March 12, Fox News host and former Rep. John Kasich (R-OH) said: "You know, you save, you live within your budget and you have -- the government has no right to punish you for doing it, and that's getting people worked up. That's why there are tea parties all over this country that are coming from the grass roots up, not driven by Sean, Rush, or anybody else. It's just happening."

Glenn Beck

Beck has frequently promoted "Tea Party" protests and hosted organizers of at least four tea party events. While discussing the protests, Beck has said that he hoped the parties wouldn't become "just Republican rallies or anti-Obama rallies" and that "[t]his isn't about parties or politics or the president."

On April 7, Beck said:

Also, we're getting ready for next week's Tax Day tea parties across the party. People that come together to let the politicians know, "OK. enough spending." We're taking the show on the road next Wednesday. We will be live from the Alamo in San Antonio, Texas. This isn't about parties or politics or the president; just standing together for principles.

Celebrate Tax Day probably for the first time in your life and say enough is enough. We start with Your World with Neil Cavuto. He will be in Sacramento, California, 4 p.m. to 1 p.m. Pacific. We're going to be then live from the Alamo.

Can I say who is coming? Ted Nugent called me today and said, "Hey, can play the "The Star Spangled Banner? Can I come?" So I'm going to talk of the Tea Party. But he'll also join us for a few minutes on the TV show.

Then also Hannity will be in Atlanta from 9 p.m. That is going to be one incredible tea party if you are anywhere in the Atlanta area. And Greta wraps things up, Washington D.C. 10 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Pacific. Don't miss it.

While Beck spoke, the following graphics appeared on-screen:

Fox Screenshot 17

Fox Screenshot 18

During the April 6 edition of his show, Beck said:

This year, Americans across the country are holding tea parties to let politicians know that we've had enough. Celebrate with Fox News. This is what we're doing next Wednesday. Fox News with -- Your World with Neil Cavuto is going to be live in Sacramento, California, at 4 p.m. That's 1 p.m. Eastern -- 4 p.m. Eastern, 1 p.m. Pacific.

Our show is going to be at the Alamo at our regular time. Then Hannity will be in Atlanta, Georgia, at 9 p.m. Eastern, 6 p.m. Pacific. And then Greta is live in Washington, D.C., 10 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Pacific time.

If you can't make the one in San Antonio, please go to the one with Neil or with Sean in Atlanta. That's supposed to be great. Greta is in Washington, D.C. Just get out and let your face be seen and connect with other people.

We want to be with you and your tea party. If you have a tea party anywhere that -- we're not covering one of those, email me at glennbeck@foxnews.com. We may cover your tea party live on April 15.

During the April 2 edition of his show, Beck said: "Tax Day, two weeks away. All right. More Americans are fed up with the nonsense in Washington both left and right. They are holding tea parties on April 15th. In this show, I can now announce that we're going to have our program live from the only place in America where I think it really, really makes sense - the Alamo. Plant your flag, America. It's in San Antonio, Texas. We will see you there on Tax Day!"

On April 1, Beck hosted Bill Hennessy, the organizer of the St. Louis protest, which Beck said "is expecting up to 5,000 people now." During the segment, Hennessy claimed: "We're not affiliated with any party. We're Americans' fiscal conservatives. ... [Y]ou know, we probably lean toward one party more than the other. But no, I'm not associated with either of the parties really."

On March 31, Beck hosted Richard Behney, who Beck said was the "organizer in Indianapolis of the tea party there, which is expecting more than 8,000 people on April 15." Beck later stated in the interview that he "fear[ed] that these tea parties, if they become just Republican rallies or anti-Obama rallies, they have completely missed the point. Because the Republicans sold America out just as much as the Democrats have." Beck asked Behney why he got involved with the protests and Behney replied:

BEHNEY: Hey, for me, personally, it had to be during the Joe the Plumber debacle. That hit home. I mean, I'm small-business owner. I'm living his dream. I started a small plumbing company with nothing, from nothing. And to work -- I mean, literally working my butt off. I literally have no butt here. To provide better for my family and for my employees' families. And to hear that a segment of our society and our politicians want to come in and take everything away and spread it around, that's when I said, "Enough."

On March 30, Beck hosted Felicia Cravens, the organizer of the Houston tea party. During the segment, Cravens stated she was a Republican but said, "Republicans are just as guilty." From the segment:

BECK: OK. Why are you doing it? Wait a minute. You just joined into the Republican Party? So do you believe -

CRAVENS: A couple of years ago.

BECK: OK. Do you believe the Republican Party is not part of this problem?

CRAVENS: Oh, au contraire. No way. I have worked locally to try to get the Republican Party to really pay attention to the messages that the spending bills are out of control. Republicans are just as guilty. We've done both ends of the spectrum finding people who are guilty.

BECK: OK. Felicia, this is what - you know, I'm looking for a rally that I'm going to attend. And I'm looking for the rallies that - because, to me, if they become about partisan politics, they're a waste of time.

On March 27, Beck said: "On April 15, Tax Day, there are going to be tea parties all across the country and this program wants to be part of it. Check out this invitation from Texas. Watch this." Beck then played a video invitation for a tea party in Texas.

On March 24, Beck said: "I have been telling you for weeks that you've got to stand up. And a lot of people around the country are doing these tea party things. But please, make them about principles, not about the parties. Make them about the principles." Beck then hosted Lisa Feroli and Shelly Ferguson, who organized a tea party in Orlando, Florida.

On March 23, Beck said: "Here is video from Saturday's tea party held in Orlando, Florida. It was -- I saw one report when I was down in Florida, there -- oh, there were hundreds of people there. There were like 5,000 people there and this is not the only tea party this weekend."

On March 20, Beck said:

BECK: I don't know if you missed the program yesterday, but if you supported Ron Paul for president last year, or a third-party candidate, law enforcement is now maybe on the lookout for you.

A new government study was just conducted to help authorities identify domestic terrorists. It warns that militia members most commonly associate with third-party political groups. Oh, so you're cool if you vote for the Republicans or the Democrats.

But if you're concerned about the government, you're considered dangerous now in America. More than 160,000 Americans have already signed up to be part of our 9/12 Project, "912project.com," since we launched it a week ago -- 163,000 people have signed up. Who are these people? They're people just like you that are just concerned about our government and they're concerned about our country.

You know, are they militia members? Yes. Yes, sure they are, along with all the other people that are now on the tea parties nationwide. There is one here in Orlando, Florida. Tomorrow is supposed to be huge.

On March 18, Beck said: "Barack Obama is on Jay Leno tomorrow. That's the first time a president has ever done that. He knows they've got to get massively populist here, because things are starting to shake apart. I mean, I don't know if you saw the Drudge Report today, but there's all kind of story there on the Democrats are starting to back away from him. People are starting to get angry. These tea parties are starting to really take off. I mean, and I think what these guys are doing in Washington is whipping up mob rule."

On March 16, Beck said: "[T]here are a lot of people in Cincinnati this weekend. There were about 5,000 people that had a tea party and many of them were holding signs that said, 'we surround them, we're not alone.' That is the mantra."

Your World with Neil Cavuto

On April 7, Cavuto began his show by claiming: "Only eight days before a nationwide tea party, some over-caffeinated crashers aiming to lay waste to it. Reports of very well organized infiltrators trying to mix in and rain on this [tea party] parade. Well talk about taxing. But talk about prepared." Cavuto then hosted protest organizers John O'Hara and Mark Meckler. During the segment, Meckler said: "We invite everybody to come to our events. We don't care if they are from ACORN, The Huffington Post, or the Daily Kos."

Meckler later said of Fox News:

MECKLER: Thanks to your coverage, Neil, you're doing such an incredible job and all the Fox there and folks, what you guys are doing, the people understand what these movements are about. The people who are involved understand that they're not racist, they're not fringe, they're not even partisan. I mean, these events we've got people across the board -- Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, liberals, libertarians. You name it, everyone's coming out to these events. So the people who are going to be there actually know what's going on. We count on organizations like Fox to tell the truth about what's going on. We know you guys are fair and balanced. And so we know the real word is going to get out there. We're not worried about these folks polluting the events.

At the end of the segment, Cavuto said of Fox News' coverage of the protests:

CAVUTO: We'll continue covering this because, guys, here at Fox our view is very simple on this stuff, we don't pick and choose what events we cover. If this has a magnitude and a populous support that this does, just as a Million Man March, or a march on Washington, this is big. And on April 15, it will be very big. And in Sacramento it will be so big that we figure we should be there to monitor it. To watch it. And to see thousands of people converge on the statehouse, demanding accountability, not only from the statehouse but from the federal government. We are going to be watching it very closely.

On April 6, Cavuto said: "By the way, this tea party movement that's going against largesse, it is growing. And folks are fed up with out-of-control spending. To that end, we are going to be broadcasting live from one of the biggest of these rallies on April 15, Tax Day. We are at California's state capitol in Sacramento. This is the epicenter of this tax revolt beast, if you will." While Cavuto spoke, the following graphic appeared on-screen:

Fox Screenshot 19

On March 31, Cavuto hosted Rep. Gresham Barrett (R-SC) to discuss the TEA Act. According to a March 31 Barrett press release, the legislation "was inspired by the more than two hundred modern day Tea Party protests being held around the country." During the interview, Barrett referenced the tea parties:

BARRETT: I mean, you have seen what has happened across the country. In Greenville, South Carolina, a couple of weeks ago, 2,000 people were a part of a tea party; in Cincinnati, Ohio, 4,000 people.

I mean, we are telling people to send tea bags into the federal government, to their legislators, and say, look, this is serious. We have had enough -- thus, the name tea party, because I will tell you, when you have got the American people behind you, that is a pretty strong friend.

CAVUTO: Congressman, thank you very much. We will watch it very closely.

Special Report with Bret Baier

On March 25, Baier reported on the tea parties by stating that they're "grassroots protests of wasteful government spending in general and of President Obama's stimulus package and his budget." Baier noted the URL of TaxDayTeaParty.com and stated that the protests have been "largely ignored by the mainstream media." From the program:

BAIER: We've also reported before about the grassroots protests of wasteful government spending in general and of President Obama's stimulus package and his budget in particular that are really sweeping the nation.

Here's the latest. Modern day tea parties continue to draw crowds around the country. In Orlando, Florida, this weekend, 4,000 showed up with signs ranging from "Don't tax me, bro" to "TEA," as in "taxed enough already."

There were also tea parties this weekend at Raleigh, North Carolina, Lexington, Kentucky, Ridgefield, Connecticut, and Salomon's Island, Maryland.

One group, taxdayteaparty.com is helping to organize events and says more than 250 locations in all 50 states and will hold rallies on April 15.

The events so far have been largely ignored by the mainstream media prompting the "Investor's Business Daily" Editorial Board to write "The real reason the major media aren't interested in these protests is that they don't agree with them."

On March 16, Baier noted a protest in Cincinnati and said it was "a grassroots protest of wasteful government spending in general, and President Obama's stimulus package and budget in particular." From the program:

BAIER: Police in Cincinnati say at least 4,000 people showed up Sunday for a grassroots protest of wasteful government spending in general, and President Obama's stimulus package and budget in particular. It was one of many tea party protests around the country inspired by the Revolutionary War era Boston tea party protesting British taxation.

Protestors had signs reading "Give us liberty, not death," and "Where's my bailout?" One report states there were 150 tea parties scheduled across the nation in the upcoming months.

Events so far have been largely ignored by the mainstream media, but several blogs are tracking them. The conservative "News Busters" writes on the coverage so far, quote, "Compare that to these networks practically fell all over themselves to report war protests after the public's opinion changed concerning Iraq in late 2003."

During Special Report, Baier did not note Fox News' own role in promoting the tea parties.

The O'Reilly Factor

On March 24, while discussing Obama's news conference that night, Fox News contributor Karl Rove said:

ROVE: But what really matters is the average American -- assuming there were average Americans watching this tonight and who stuck through the thing -- when they saw [CBS News chief White House correspondent] Chip Reid ask a tough question about, "You say you don't want to pass on problems to the future. Well, what about your huge deficits in your budget?" And they hear Barack Obama's nonresponse response, they're going to draw conclusions.

There is a reason why anger is growing in this country. There is a reason why people are holding spontaneous tea parties. There is a reason why we hear all around -- I suspect you hear the same thing I do in your travels. People are getting very concerned and anxious and in some instances angry about the future of the country.

On March 16, O'Reilly said: " 'Check' one, big government spending protests are taking place all over the country. The latest in Cincinnati where about 5,000 folks showed up, showed their displeasure with the Obama's administration money strategy. These gatherings are being dubbed tea parties. We expect to see a lot more of them."

On the Record with Greta Van Susteren

On April 1, Van Susteren hosted Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich, who predicted the protests would have "much bigger numbers than [the protests] in London":

VAN SUSTEREN: What do you make of the demonstrations, the protests in London? And there have been other protests about various economies around the world - France, Germany. What about the protests today?

GINGRICH: I got a note from a friend of mine in Orlando who pointed out there were more people at a taxpayer tea party in Orlando a week ago than they are in London. They just didn't get any coverage out of the media.

There were more people recently in Cincinnati at a taxpayer tea party than there have been demonstrating in London.

But the London demonstrators are breaking windows, they're being violent, and, you know, the media is always happy to cover the anarchic and violent left.

But the peaceful taxpayers of this country are actually turning out for these tea parties, and I predict on April 15 will turn out even more, in much bigger numbers than they are in London.

Later in the program, Van Susteren asked Gingrich, "[T]hese tea parties that are coming up, what exactly are they, and what do you expect the impact to be?" Gingrich replied:

Well, I think if you go to places like taxdayteaparty.com, or you go to Americansolutions.com, you'll see that all across the country there are people who are actively angry about taxes, about borrowing and spending, about the size of government.

And this kind of sprang up almost unexpectedly over the last two months in a spontaneous effort around the country. I think there were 15,000, for example, in Orange County the other night at one of these tea parties.

I think what you'll see on April 15, which is tax day, is lots of people in many places -- I'm going to be, for example, in New York City at the city hall, where I think we're going to have several thousand people there.

And essentially what I think they're going to be saying is that they don't want to see this budget passed. They don't want to see their taxes go up. They don't want to see huge borrowing. And they don't want to see the inevitable inflation and high interest rates that that's going to lead to.

So I think you're beginning to see the mobilization of citizens who want to take their own government back, and who don't believe that a big government, big bureaucracy, high-tax solution will work for America.

I think it's going to be a nationwide movement. I think there will be a lot of people involved in tax day tea parties all over the country.

On March 27, Gingrich said that every member of Congress should "have the courage to go to a tea party in your state or your district and listen to your citizens":

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, the tea parties that they're having around the nation -- April 15, a number of states are going to have tea parties -- that just sort of a passing fancy, or is that a grass-roots movement?

GINGRICH: No, I think the tax day tea party movement, which is actually Americansolutions.com, is helping with a great deal. Over 300 cities have people signed up already. And I think these tea parties -- remember, the House and the Senate will pass the first round of a really bad budget next week. They will then go home for two weeks. These tea parties come right in the middle of that congressional recess.

And my challenge is, to every member of the House and Senate, have the courage to go to a tea party in your state or your district and listen to your citizens. My prediction is there'll be over 300,000 Americans at the tea parties, and I think it's the beginning of a huge movement of fundamental reform not just for Washington but for places like Albany, New York, Sacramento, California, Trenton, New Jersey, all the places where the lobbyists, the politicians and the bureaucrats have been running over their citizens.

On March 23, Van Susteren discussed a protest in Orlando and noted that protestors held signs that read, "Repeal the pork or our bacon is cooked" and, "Obama lied, liberty died." From the program:

VAN SUSTEREN: Some people are steaming. Another grass-roots conservative tea party has sprung up. Eight days ago in Cincinnati, this time, Orlando.

Over the weekend more than 4,000 people gathered in a park in Orlando to show their outrage at the federal government. Protesters held signs that read "Repeal the pork or our bacon is cooked," and "Obama lied, liberty died."

Several speakers addressed the crowd about gun rights, freedom of speech, and, of course, the economy.

Incidentally, a statewide tea party is planned for April 15 in West Virginia.

On March 5, Gingrich said: "I think the American people are sick and tired of the Appropriations Committee members of both parties in ripping off the rest of us, sticking stuff in there that is indefensible, ramming it through with no time to read it, and arrogantly walking over every taxpayer in this country. And I think any politician who thinks these issues are small is going to be surprised with the taxpayer tea parties on April 15th and the solution parties we're doing, American solutions, and the number of people around this country who are fed up with being taken for granted and being told, 'Pay your taxes and shut up. I will decide where the pork grows.' "

On February 27, Van Susteren said: "But first, protests across the United States. 'Tea party' protests are erupting across the country. Angry taxpayers, or at least some of them, are taking to the streets in the spirit of the Boston Tea Party. People are protesting President Obama's massive $787 billion stimulus bill, his $3.55 trillion budget and a federal government that has been ballooning by the day since the president took office." Van Susteren then played video from the protests and discussed them with Wall Street Journal senior economics writer Stephen Moore.

Fox & Friends

On March 25, Fox & Friends interviewed Lisa Feroli and Shelly Ferguson, two organizers of the Orlando protest. At the conclusion of the interview, co-host Gretchen Carlson stated: "[H]ats off to both of you for getting involved and for speaking what your mind is and what you think. We'll follow your programs down there, and if you have another protest, we'll be there."

The Fox Nation

Additionally, Fox News' new website, The Fox Nation, has posted numerous links discussing and promoting the protests. One link, headlined, "Find a Tea Party!" links to results from Google Maps of "2009 Tea Parties." Another link, headlined, "Video: The Trillion Dollar Tea Party Video!" is an embedded YouTube video on Fox Nation's website from the Tampa Bay Area Tea Party explaining why you should "join your local tea party." The five-minute video makes frequent references to Obama's fiscal policies and includes a clip of Obama during a presidential primary debate.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by shoes89 (April 08, 2009 4:04 pm ET)
         

      Uhhhh ...

      Where is the "conservative misinformation"?

      The real bias here is that the rest of the media has largely ignored the tea parties.

      Yet a few years ago any and every little anti-war protest (even those in other parts of the world, Europe etc.) was always met with glowing media coverage across the spectrum. Cindy Sheehan, anyone?

      FNC is actually saying "no" by actually covering these tea parties when much of the rest of the media outright refuses to do so.

      %

      Report Abuse
      • Author by shoes89 (April 08, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
           

        Oops. Last line should read, "FNC is actually saying 'no' to biased media by actually covering these tea parties when much of the rest of the media outright refuses to do so!"

        Report Abuse
        • Author by kromecom48 (April 08, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
             

          Shoes you ask? Where is the "conservative misinformation"? The misniformation is in Fixed News' claim of being "fair and balanced." Also, there's a big differernce in reporting on these protests and actually promoting them.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by sobetonwork2469 (April 08, 2009 7:00 pm ET)
               

            <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

            Promoting by saying you’re going to have reporters cover the event, and showing the location of the events? Seems like Fox is providing information, I think the media does that from time to time.  

            Report Abuse
          • Author by teihs3416 (April 09, 2009 12:28 pm ET)
               

            I don't care what Fox News promotes so long as they are reporting the whole story so I can make an intelligent, well-informed accessment of our world.  Besides, don't for a nanosecond thing that CNN, MSNBC and the like haven't "promoted" their liberal agenda by simply not providing full coverage.  That's an old Communist tactic from the Cold War days, remember? 

            Report Abuse
          • Author by nycgal (April 10, 2009 5:15 pm ET)
            1  

            I have a friend who was previously a right leaning republican.  I saw her last week and she has completely tipped off the deep end. Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, Coulter - during our discussion she of course brings up the 'fact' that Fox is fair and balanced.  To which I replied - the news is not supposed to be fair and and balanced its supposed to be factual - your supposed to report on the 'news' of the day not your opinion of the news of the day.  Reluctantly she agreed.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by libertyordeath20007896 (April 11, 2009 12:13 pm ET)
               

            What is worse, to "over report something" or not report is at all!! This is America.!!! It's our Country not the Suits in Washingtons!!You just sound like you hate Fox News.!!! If it wasn't for them I would have felt alone, listening to the others!!!Demonizing Americans for speaking out!!Sounds like Censorship to me!!

            Report Abuse
        • Author by National_Insecurity (April 09, 2009 12:35 am ET)
             

          The "misinformation" is that these are not grassroots, they're astroturf!

          These are literally sponsored events. 

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
           

        Shoes, I hate to say it but you have a point. 

        The only difference is I don't remember CNN or FOX or MSNBC sending out its leading show hosts to cover the events.

        Maybe I am wrong?


        Regardless , Americans have a right to protest either Wars or Taxes.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (April 08, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
             

          You both make me laugh! Fox is there to "cover" the events, eh?

          This is completely phony. There are organized by celebrity news & political leaders which they are touting as "grassroots".

          The only reason Fox News, Gingrich, Keys & AM hate radio hosts are advertising themselves is so that Beck & Malkin won't be embarrassed by small turnouts like the dozen that showed up in Lancaster, PA.

          Fox News is MAKING the news, not covering it.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
            1  

            That is what FOX is claming!  They are covering the events. I never saw CNN or MSNBC cover the anti War crowd by promoting the event . Can you send a link and see if that makes you laugh? When did CNN or MSNBC run an ad that Anderson Cooper will be at a Anti War Rally on Such and such a date.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 08, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
                 

              FOX IS DOING MORE THAN COVERING THE TEA PARTIES, FOX IS PROMOTING THEM. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THE TEA PARTIES SUPPORTERS IDEAS FO GETTING OUT OF THIS MESS  THAT THEIR REPUBLICAN HEROS HAVE GOTTEN US INTO.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:06 pm ET)
                   

                Hurricane of course they are.

                That is my entire freaken point.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
                     

                  Shoes, I hate to say it but you have a point.

                  Of course that was your entire point, Caseysprings.  Of course it was.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:23 pm ET)
                       

                    Governor, I asked shoes a question. Did you forget to bold that one also?

                    The only difference is I don't remember CNN or FOX or MSNBC sending out its leading show hosts to cover the events.

                    Maybe I am wrong?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Tbone Slickens (April 09, 2009 6:45 am ET)
                         

                      Be careful casey...you stepped off the reservation for a sentance. 

                      Them's hanging offenses!

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 7:55 am ET)
                         

                      That's true.  Point taken.  Out of genuine curiosity, what valid point is it that you agreed w/ Shoes on?

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Caseysprings (April 09, 2009 9:00 am ET)
                           

                        Shoes had a valid point when he stated this

                        Yet a few years ago any and every little anti-war protest (even those in other parts of the world, Europe etc.) was always met with glowing media coverage across the spectrum. Cindy Sheehan, anyone?

                        Then I felt this

                        The only difference is I don't remember CNN or FOX or MSNBC sending out its leading show hosts to cover the events.

                        Maybe I am wrong?

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 9:04 am ET)
                             

                          Fox News is not covering the events, they are promoting them.  That's the difference.

                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Caseysprings (April 09, 2009 9:13 am ET)
                               

                            Of course they are promoting it Governor.

                            But you wont get FOX News to claim that or it supporters.

                            I don't understand why you insist on parsing every word I write.

                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 9:28 am ET)
                                 

                              Fox News is breaking the core tenant of reporting the news.  Pointing out the difference between covering news and promoting a political protest is not word parsing.  I see absolutely no comparison between media's past coverage of actual protests and Fox News' promotion of a future protest.  That's really my only point.

                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Caseysprings (April 09, 2009 9:36 am ET)
                                   

                                And my point is FOX is doing something that I have never seen CNN , MSNBC or FOX do in the past. That is promote or cover a protest.

                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 9:54 am ET)
                                     

                                  Fine, but they can't cover news that has not happened.

                                  Report Abuse
                                • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 10:00 am ET)
                                     

                                  And they've all covered protests in the past, so I don't get what you mean by that.  Promote and cover are two completely different things.

                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by Caseysprings (April 09, 2009 10:31 am ET)
                                       

                                    Governor

                                    FOX will never claim they are promoting the event , they will claim they are covering the event.

                                    We all agree they are promoting the event. But when you talk to someone who is in agreement with FOX and use the word cover, and compare it to other networks covering protests it doesnt add up. My point is CNN Never had Anderson Cooper or Larry King "cover" a War Protest by promoting it all week on the air.

                                    Report Abuse
                                • Author by Willyg (April 09, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
                                     

                                  You have never seen CNN, MSNBC or FOX cover a protest? What do you think the people in Britin were doing, replacing the banks windows with "green" approved glass?

                                  Report Abuse
                              • Author by libertyordeath20007896 (April 11, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
                                   

                                And what does MSNBC and CNN do? Yeah they are right on the LEFT so far, they offend!! So Tell me what to do? Get the news from where . MSNBC that makes fun of the tea parties and CNN or maybe someone that encourages how i feel about the stupid spending going on. Get off the bias. Get on the real issue---Spending out of Control. When you spend more and have no money-do you get out of debt???NO

                                Report Abuse
              • Author by Willyg (April 09, 2009 8:18 pm ET)
                   

                It's simple. We are going to vote out all the rotten apples that exist, which ever party they are part of.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 10, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
                     

                  WILLY,Vote out all the ROTTEN apples and no one will be left.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 10:02 am ET)
               

            So I am guessing MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NBC and ABC news will not even talk about these events on their news cast.  You can have thousands show up for a Tea Party and does not make the main stream media.  Those same Networks will cover a Anti War Protest where only a few show up, or will cover left wing protesters marching in front of AIG Building or a AIG persons home.  So Tell me all you left wingers where is the balance in those networks?  Thank GOD for Fox news.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by JLyons (April 09, 2009 10:38 am ET)
                 

              Hi Mark

              Did MSNBC, CNN , CBS, NBC and ABC run promo ads for the AIG protests?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 10:51 am ET)
                   

                No, but I have seen them talk about protest for Anti-War Demostrations that were to happen during the Bush years, so what is the difference? 

                Report Abuse
                • Author by JLyons (April 09, 2009 11:01 am ET)
                     

                  The difference is the "promotion".

                  If CBS News was promoting Dan Rather to appear at the Anti War Rally on June 15 in LA and Bob Schieffer was going to be at the Anti War Rally on June 15 in Philadelphia you would be correct.

                  FOX is promoting the event because they are anti Obama. They hate the President want him to fail and are catering to the right wing gun carrying nuts.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:48 am ET)
                       

                    JLyons, can you show one story that Fox News has done that says "They Hate the President"?  Last time I checked these are Tea Parties, not Anit Obama Parties.  I agree that the changes he has made in the Tax Policy, or this Stimulus Package, or the Mortgage Plan should be protested.  This is what makes this country Great, the freedom to Protest.  I am sure the guy from MSNBC that gets tingles up his leg, the same one that says his job is to make sure Obama succeeds, will not bet there.  FINE by me. 

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ru$$ian1 (April 09, 2009 12:29 pm ET)
                       

                    just because your "reporters" prefer to sit behind a desk and have super tight close of shots of their fat faces and never leave the studio....well, that's their choice. our network gets involved. it doesn't just sit there waiting for tingles up its leg.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by RABBITLUVR (April 09, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
                         

                      Your 'network' only needs to 'get involved' as far as REPORTING the stories and not PROMOTING them. Now what part of that are you failing to understand?

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by JLyons (April 09, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
                         

                      "Our Network"

                      That is telling.

                      Report Abuse
              • Author by roundhouse (April 09, 2009 11:01 am ET)
                   

                On related point. Why don't these teabaggers protest the AIG bonuses? Oh, that's right, the tb's are fighting to to protect lower taxes for those same executives.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:52 am ET)
                     

                  I am looking for the news to show the ACRON protest for the Freddie and Frannie Bonus packages, oh wait ACRON and the main stream media is ok with those bonuses since those are heavy Democrats board member companies.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by roundhouse (April 09, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
                       

                    LOL! Careful there. You might come up lame. You're liable to hurt yourself stretching so hard for a comeback like that. 

                    Report Abuse
            • Author by Ru$$ian1 (April 09, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
                 

              excellent point. those other protests are done by paid protesters. fox ain't payin anyone. i bet it won't show up in msm unless it's huuuuge, which i believe it will be.

              just like the last protest i saw here in harrisburg pa. anti card check protest, paid union people bused in to shot down the speakers tlaking about how the unions will not allow a free unfettered choice on your part. they prooved the point quite well. and loudly. that was covered. last tea party wasn't.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by Ru$$ian1 (April 09, 2009 12:20 pm ET)
               

            ya ever been lancaster??? it's tiny. these cities are not lancaster. there will be turn out. how many times have we been shown war protests and as said above it's like 5 people standing around in the middle of the day? this is huge. it's gonna be huge. and i believe beck when he says it's not partisan. the others, i can't speak about but i know this is deeper and bigger than right and left. the ones "on our side" didn't stand up to it. this bs attitude of "we won, shut up" has got to stop.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 3:50 pm ET)
                 

               this bs attitude of "we won, shut up" has got to stop. - some dumb Ru$$ian1

              Evidently you don't remember when the Right did this to the Left after GWB was elected.  What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

              We won.  Get over it.  Sit down and STFU.  Your party had the chance to run the country, and they screwed it up - royally.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by Willyg (April 09, 2009 8:14 pm ET)
               

            Celebrity news & political leaders. Oh really, I live in Utah where there are none of these and we are having GRASSROOTS protests in every county, put together by "We the People". I doupt if Fox News even knows where Utah is.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
             

          Please point out to me one instance of anyone saying that Americans don't have the right to protest, or one instance of someone trying to prevent the exercise of that right.

          There's a huge difference between covering an event and promoting it. FoxNews is promoting the event.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
               

            Ellie717

            No one is saying it . Why would you think I was accusing anyone of saying it? Oh thats right your playing games again. Get a life lady.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 08, 2009 9:37 pm ET)
                 

              CASEY, I hate to tell you this but LULU is right on with her post. It is YOU that needs to pull your head out of the sand.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:05 pm ET)
                   

                Hurricane can you tell me why she is right? Did I ever imply that there was an instance of anyone saying Americans don't have the right to protest?

                Didn't we have enough of this in the Bush years .

                I remember in 2003 when I was protesting the war in Iraq , I was called Freak , and nut and had things thrown at me.

                I think you and Ellie need to pull your heads out of the sand and stop playing word games.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 10:24 pm ET)
                     

                  You said "Regardless , Americans have a right to protest either Wars or Taxes."

                  No one said they didn't. By saying what you said, you sure do imply that this right needed to be defended from something!

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:31 pm ET)
                       

                    Exactly that right needs to be defended from the right wing nuts that went after me in 2003 when I was protesting the Iraq war. Of course you just want to play word games and define people.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:33 pm ET)
                         

                      Ellie if they want to defend the rights of these Tea Party nuts, then they should have defended my rights to protest the war in 2003.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
                         

                      Sheer lunacy.

                      Here you say "No one is saying it (that don't have the right to protest, or one instance of someone trying to prevent the exercise of that right.)."

                      Then here you say "the right needs to be defended."

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 3:52 pm ET)
                           

                        It's simple feigned victimhood.

                        There's no attack on the right to protest, so Casey needs to manufacture one, then play the victim because he was a victim in the past.

                        His whole argument is a strawman.

                        Report Abuse
                • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 09, 2009 5:25 pm ET)
                     

                  CASEY,If you were protesting  the IRAQ war in 2003 then I take my hat off to you. I was against the war from the very begining and argued with people about it( including members of my own family) but I never took the time to go protest it.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by vfeinstein6659 (April 08, 2009 8:41 pm ET)
               

            "There's a huge difference between covering an event and promoting it. FoxNews is promoting the event."

            Hammer, meet nail.  Kudos

            Report Abuse
      • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
           

        shoes, you make a valid point, but we all why know why mmfa had no issue with the war protests, yet want the tax protests shhh'd.  well, actually two reasons - a Republican was in office for the war protests and a Democrat is now in office, it's far too disrespectful to protest Democrats, they do the lord's work.  and the other reason is how can anyone in their right mind protest taxes, to a liberal it makes no sense to protest something held in such high esteem.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mk3872 (April 08, 2009 4:21 pm ET)
             

          Tax protest, JamesB? That's what this is?

          So they are PROTESTING the tax CUT they received in the stim bill?

          Oh, wait, don't tell me ... they are protesting the tax rate hike to 39% on the marginal income of those making over $250k, right? Because all .5% of those at these "parties" are making that much, is that it?

          Gimme a break. ABC, CBS, MSNBC, NBC never promoted or hosted anti-Bush rallies, my friend.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
               

            face it, if Fox was promoting war protests this website and you liberals would have no problem with it at all.  But to question, much less protest, any tax of any kind under a Democrat is blasphemy. That is the real issue here, it's taxes and Democrats.  they are inextricably linked, so when you promote protesting one, you promote protesting the other, and that is what irritates mmfa, and many here.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
                 

              Legitmate media never promotes a protest.  Period.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 4:51 pm ET)
                 

              I've noticed a common theme throughout most of your posts lately, jamesB.  That theme really is a very poorly veiled attempt to call liberals partisans and to protect the right-wing ('cause no, they can't be partisan, can they?).

              When you do that, YOU YOURSELF become the partisan, you freakin' hypocrite!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 4:55 pm ET)
                   

                name one rightwinger that I "protect"?

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (April 08, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
                     

                  The 2 percent of small business owners who have income above $250,000 are all going to go to the tea parties.

                  The other 98 percent of small business owners who will be receiving a TAX CUT are going to pelt them with water balloons.  It's gonna be a wet one boys!!

                  Report Abuse
                • Author by captfoster2 (April 08, 2009 5:23 pm ET)
                     

                  jamesB,

                  I think what commonsenseliberal is trying to say is that you go out of your way to defend and protect rightwing ideology... not specifically a given rightwinger!

                  I'd like to ask this of you though... were you so up in arms against the Bush/Cheney regime as they were dismantling our Constitution? or allowing torture in our names? or illegally and needlessly invading a country that did nothing to harm us on 9/11?

                  I can offer proof that shows that I was very critical of Clinton in his days... and even Obama today... even MMfA itself! Can you say the same about those that advocated that which I listed?

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:26 pm ET)
                       

                    i don't protect any politician period.  I have my principles and beliefs and I stick to those, I don't see that as partisan in a political sense. Stubborn and pigheaded?, maybe, but I don't look for a D or an R at the end of someone's name before I pass judgement.  That is partisan.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by princeofwheels (April 08, 2009 5:36 pm ET)
                         

                      jamesb, you are Hannity aren't you? If not, how can you be such a liar? "I don't look for a D or an R at the end of someone's name before I pass judgement?" Nor do you read the articles or the threads. You crap is getting old...it is still humorous but get some new material.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
                           

                        just because you cannot fathom not checking for their party affiliation before deciding on whether they are your hero or not, doesn't mean I do.  sorry to disappoint.

                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
                             

                          It's evident to all here that you're the one who cannot fathom, well, anything.

                          Nice strawman too.  Nobody claimed that they were or were not checking party affiliation, oh, except for you...which leads me to your next fallacy: PROJECTION.

                          You really don't see that when you proclaim what you think should be some sort of startling revelation against liberals is really nothing more than your projection of what you despise of conservatives, but you don't have it in you to admit it.  You must enjoy the lies, the lies you tell yourself and the lies Fox News spit at you.

                          Report Abuse
                  • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:40 pm ET)
                       

                    Of course you could see that, captfoster, because you use your brain.

                    Report Abuse
                • Author by mk3872 (April 08, 2009 10:17 pm ET)
                     

                  Charles Krauthammer

                  Report Abuse
            • Author by captfoster2 (April 08, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
                 

              "face it, if Fox was promoting war protests this website and you liberals would have no problem with it at all.  "

              Actually... I would have a problem with this... I would be demanding that all of the FoxNoise cartoons that work there all be forced to pee in a cup... I would like to know what drug it might take to get them to see reality......

              And then pass it along to people like you!

              I noticed in the thread from yesterday jamesB that you and a few of your little buddies were doing your able best to defend Glen Beck and Fox from being somewhat responsible for that lunatic in PA that shot those cops by nearly wording verbatim what Beck had lied about on his show to his friends prior to what he had done... let alone his suicide note that nearly said as much.

              Before you get all hysterical on me... I will grant that it was the gunman that had pulled the gun and shot those officers... but the question remains... would he have done so if Glen beck and others had not out right lied about some non existing law or any actual motivation of the Obama administration to go out of their way to try and take away peoples guns?

              From reports I have read... this guy was an avid follower of Fox and rightwing conspiracy sites... and was obviously a bit disturbed...

              And no... I'm not saying that Glen Beck should be held personally responsible... but his making claims that are outright lies no doubt influenced that man to do what he did! That can not be disputed!

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:20 pm ET)
                   

                "I noticed in the thread from yesterday jamesB that you and a few of your little buddies were doing your able best to defend Glen Beck and Fox"

                show me, liar.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by captfoster2 (April 08, 2009 5:33 pm ET)
                     

                  Ok... I went back to the thread in question and your name showed up, but not by any post from you... your name was mentioned by someone else... so in this one case... I was wrong to accuse you... and for that... I am sorry!

                  I will be more vigilent in my quest to find you in the wrong...and be more prudent before I post any future accusations.

                  It is true that some of those that think like you most assuredly were trying to defend Glen Beck and his rantings...

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                       

                    It's too bad that he couldn't say that 'you're mistaken', but had to jump directly to 'liar'.

                    Hhhhmmmm....I think that tells us a lot about jamesB.

                    Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:07 am ET)
               

            MK, could you please show me were the tax cut is happening?  Last I heard it Obama is going to have to push back the Middle Class Tax cut.  Yes, the main stream media did talk about upcoming Anti-War Protest during the Bush years even had the talking heads out in the middle interviewing.  If I remember correctly all the major networks were out watching Cindy Seehan, and showing each day how more and more where showing up, perfect example of promoting Cindy.

            http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2008/03/20/all-3-network-newscasts-recognize-anti-war-protests-war-anniversary

            http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4099029.ece

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 11:18 am ET)
                 

              A protest right down the road from the president's retreat is newsworthy.  How is that "promotion"?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:55 am ET)
                   

                When the main stream media sets up camp, (President not even there) to show her protesting, that is news?  Every day, day in day out, that was news - Really?   

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 12:27 pm ET)
                     

                  Like it or not, she became a symbol for the anti-Iraq movement.  If you want to argue that they overplayed the story, that's one thing.  Promotion is a much different matter.

                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Brabantio (April 08, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
             

          "it's far too disrespectful to protest Democrats, they do the lord's work."

          That has to be the mother of all strawmen.  Where do you come up with this stuff?

          "and the other reason is how can anyone in their right mind protest taxes, to a liberal it makes no sense to protest something held in such high esteem."

          You mean the concept of taxes?  Did Obama create the IRS?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 6:03 pm ET)
               

            "it's far too disrespectful to protest Democrats, they do the lord's work."

            James, the patron saint of bipartisanship, who never looks at the (D) or (R) of a politicians name, is making a sweeping judgement of an entire party (D)? That can't be true, he just told us he would never do something like that.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 6:10 pm ET)
                 

              i make judgements all the time, most Democrats love taxes and most posters here are liberal, far left Democrats who, along with mmfa, rush to defend them at any cost.  If you doubt that, read the posts.  And for any liberal on this website to complain about me making blanket assumptions or sweeping judgements is an absolute farce.  how many times is "cons" or other derisive names called to those who don't follow the liberal line.   ALL THE TIME. but that is met with applause and cheers.  just giving you a little of your own judgements, sorry if it stings.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 6:19 pm ET)
                   

                ahh, you don't bother me. I love it when you claim you are above the fray and then prove yourself again and again to be a hipocrite. It's like a 2nd serving of dessert after the meal.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:20 pm ET)
                   

                Excuse me, but which democrat in this article have I defended "at any cost"?

                Name one.  Just one.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by jjamele2880 (April 08, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
                     

                  Don't you just hate the gutless cowards who come here and claim to be "bipartisan" or "nonpartisan?"  What they are of course is totally lacking in conviction- they will spend all their time bashing Democrats, saying things like "almost all Democrats love taxes" then saying "hey I'm bipartisan."  I'm all for calling them on their BS.

                  If you are a Conservative Republican, SAY you are a Conservative Republican.  State your case and defend it if you can.  Don't give us this totally one-sided partisan crap and then say "Hey, I'm not a Republican or a Democrat."  Grow a pair already.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 6:47 pm ET)
                       

                    just to clarify your idiotic rantings, I never once said I am bipartisan.  I am not partisan or beholden when it comes to one particular party, I hold them both accountable for running this country and performing the duties of their office.  Do you want a slap against Republicans like I've done against liberal tax loving Democrats, would that satisfy you?  Ok, here goes. Republicans are spineless hypocrites when it comes to keeping government off our backs, they talk tax cuts but they want their morality in my bedroom and many keep me from my inherent right to marry my partner. They preach religion way too often and use it as a club against those who don't believe as they do.  They align themselves, spinelessly again, with the likes of Limbaugh, a raving idiot, because they have no balls to stand up to him, denounce him for fear of offending his listeners.  They make me ill.  Satisfied?

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
                         

                      That's very nice, but this item - and this entire organization - focuses on the media, so you might consider delving into that chestnut from time to time.  We get it that you hate paying taxes.

                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
                         

                      "just to clarify your idiotic rantings, I never once said I am bipartisan."

                      "i don't protect any politician period.  I have my principles and beliefs and I stick to those, I don't see that as partisan in a political sense. Stubborn and pigheaded?, maybe, but I don't look for a D or an R at the end of someone's name before I pass judgement.  That is partisan."

                      "just because you cannot fathom not checking for their party affiliation before deciding on whether they are your hero or not, doesn't mean I do.  sorry to disappoint."

                      Hanged by your own words...

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by princeofwheels (April 08, 2009 8:38 pm ET)
                           

                        Thanx Snoop, you beat me to it.

                        I will say it, jamesb is a fraud. By the way, who were has ever said they like to pay taxes??? I guess that makes us bipartisan the same as jimmy(B).

                        P.S. jimmy(b)...my only heroes were Rocky Colavito and Doug Moran.

                        Report Abuse
              • Author by pete592 (April 09, 2009 1:53 am ET)
                   

                "just giving you a little of your own judgements, sorry if it stings."

                How much more pathetic can a justification of one's own use of "blanket assumptions" and "sweeping judgments" possibly be than this?

                It's all just payback to you?  Are you really that predisposed by political vindictiveness?

                Report Abuse
        • Author by craig98607271 (April 08, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
             

          i like that last line james. yes, to libs there is no tax that can't be higher and conserves, there is no tax that can't be cut

          Report Abuse
          • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
               

            You both are guilty of gross overgeneralization and blanket statements that kill any credibility that either of you could have possibly ever had.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:24 pm ET)
                 

              losing credibility on a board filled with liberals is something I will have to learn to live with.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:34 pm ET)
                   

                That's good to know.

                Enjoy your future wallowing in irrelevance.

                Report Abuse
        • Author by jmh (April 08, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
             

          so, in what way is mmfa suppressing this story.

          Fine, report it, I would have not problem seeing reports on this story

          but I would _never_  trust the journalistic ethics of FOX.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:09 am ET)
               

            JMH, I am waiting for MMFA to promote the whole bowing thing, how the right wingers are getting it wrong, he did not bow, he was reaching down to shake the hand.  This is the report the WH is putting out today.  RIGHT, shaking the hand excuse. 

            Report Abuse
        • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (April 08, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
             

          shoes, you make a valid point, but we all why know why mmfa had no issue with the war protests, yet want the tax protests shhh'd.

          James, neither you nor Shoes "get the point" of the MMFA article.

          Fox CLAIMS to offer UNBIASED new reporting and they DON'T!

          MMFA's complaint has NOTHING to do with Republicans and taxes, and EVERYTHING to do with the LIE that Fox offers "fair/balanced/no bias reporting".

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:17 pm ET)
               

            baloney.  who on this planet with a lick of sense takes that stupid slogan of Fox's with any seriousness?  Nobody. this is all about taxes and their champions, Democrats.  You sully the good name of taxes, you sully a Democrat, it's not hard to figure where mmfa is going with this one.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (April 08, 2009 5:40 pm ET)
                 

              "who on this planet with a lick of sense takes that stupid slogan of Fox's with any seriousness?"

              Hardly anybody, precisely because of things like this.  It's just another example of how FOX is dishonest, it has nothing to do with any "inextricable" link between Democrats and taxes.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
                 

              Who? Based on their ratings, I'd say about 28% of the country.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (April 08, 2009 5:56 pm ET)
                 

              James, it's pretty obvious that Fox needs that "stupid slogan", which is WHY MMFA once again, pointed out what a total and complete lie the slogan is.

              READ THE HEADLINE! MEDIA MISINFORMATION!

              Now YOU may want to rant on about Democrats and taxes, but MMFA was correct in pointing out that NOTHING that's reported on FOX as news is either fair, balanced or unbiased.

              THAT was the point of the article.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jjamele2880 (April 08, 2009 6:02 pm ET)
                   

                Fox needs their stupid slogan because of they were honest about their intentions, their slogan would be "Dedicated to the Violent Overthrow of Democracy and It's Replacement by a Corporatist-Fascist Aristocratic State."

                And who would watch that?  Something less than 28%, I would hope.  But who knows.

                Report Abuse
        • Author by pete592 (April 08, 2009 7:32 pm ET)
             

          "but we all why know why mmfa had no issue with the war protests"

          Because the war was waged by a conservative, er rather, the guy that most conservatives voted for?  And because the war protests were not promoted by the media?

          "it's far too disrespectful to protest Democrats, they do the lord's work."

          Correction, it's far too irresponsible for a "fair and balanced" news source to promote a protest.

          "yet want the tax protests shhh'd"

          Ugh, more First Amendment whining.

          "how can anyone in their right mind protest taxes, to a liberal it makes no sense to protest something held in such high esteem."

          Yet you vilify others over their preconceived notions?  Unbelievable.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 08, 2009 4:18 pm ET)
           

        Define "little".  Some of these tea parties are forty or so people gathering.  I've been to bigger Bridge games than that.  Maybe that's part of why they're "largely" ignored.

        In any event, the key word here is "promote".  It goes beyond "covering" when they direct you to further information on how to find a tea party near you.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
             

          That is exactly also why the Nuts at the Westboro Church are largely ignored. They have hate rallies of about 20 people.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
               

            casey, the tax loving liberals here say it's much ado about nothing, they dismiss protesting taxes as a bridge game, typical condescending elitist garbage.  how dare anyone protest taxes, and anyone that dares do so, or has the gaul to direct you to further information on one near you are just bridge players who don't know the government can spend your money better than you can. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
                 

              I like the way you still don't understand the media's role in our society.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
                 

              I don't recall seeing anyone dismissing any protests, anti-tax or not.

              What is it with you and blanket statements which can be debunked with a simple sentence? 

              You don't find that your own statements aren't the least bit condescending?

              And if you think I love taxes because I'm a liberal, then you haven't the first damned clue as to what you're talking about.  I hate taxes, but I accept taxes as being necessary for a civilized country.  Just because I don't agree with your view of the tax code, doesn't make me the evil tax-and-spend liberal you'd like everyone to believe.

              And you don't even see that you're one of the biggest hypocrites that posts on this board.  Take your crap over to freeper or Fox for that matter.  They love partisans like you over there.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by Brabantio (April 08, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
                 

              I'm beginning to wonder if you're some sort of "Mad Libs" program which just fills in blanks with random phrases.  I didn't use "bridge players" as some sort of insult.

              What are the taxes being protested?  The ones being raised on the rich?  They have the right to do it, but it comes off as sort of silly when so many others are having genuine problems in this economy.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by roundhouse (April 08, 2009 9:07 pm ET)
                 

              You're ridiculous. These teabaggers are protesting what? A tax cut on 95% of the country.

              You entrenched partisan anti-tax conservatives are remarkable in your willingness to simply do the opposite of liberals, even if it means acting against the good of your fellow man. So concerned with defeating liberals, you have no concept of what you're fighting against.

              Pitiful. 

              Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 08, 2009 7:31 pm ET)
           

        The problem, Shoes is that Fox News Hosts are listed as "sponsors" of this protest.  The problem is that "While discussing the April 15 protests on his April 6 program, Glenn Beck suggested that viewers could "[c]elebrate with Fox News" by either attending a protest or watching it on Fox News."

        Show me similar coverage of any protest anywhere else where a "news" channel is inviting its viewers to protest with it.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (April 09, 2009 5:09 pm ET)
           

        SHOES, Every time the CONSERVATIVES open their mouths it's misinformation.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:09 am ET)
           

        Actually the anti-war protests were grossly downplayned. I attended at least one that was completely ignored by even our local media, let alone the national media. This move by Fox is going to push the United States into a civil war. This is very dangerous and must be stopped immediately. Millions of police, fire, health professionals educators and millions of sick and elderly are at risk if these "protests" cause a collapse of our tax system. This is very wrong.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by imsupermom (April 11, 2009 7:53 am ET)
           

        AMEN!!!!!!!! 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 4:17 pm ET)
         

      Legitmate media never promotes a protest.  Period.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 4:57 pm ET)
           

        IMHO, legitimate media doesn't promote anything.  They REPORT.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
             

          Sad thing is most of the msm promotes something. Either Tax Tea Parties, Special Reports in Primetime, upcoming interviews.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 08, 2009 7:32 pm ET)
               

            Special reports are one thing, inviting viewers to "celebrate" with Fox News at a politically-driven event is another.  "Sponsoring" such an event takes it too far.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 10:29 pm ET)
               

            Most of the MSM behaves nothing like FoxNews. They are in a class all by themselves.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 10:34 pm ET)
                 

              As long as FOX news is considered part of the msm they will continue to do these things.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (April 08, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
         

      I don't think Fox News needs to promote these events with their news models. We already know that Fox News hates Obama, Democrats and their policies.

      But, hey, if it gives them pleasure, then I guess it just only officially makes them the mouthpiece of the GOP an a completely non-credible source of news since they are now the news MAKER.

      Of course, it also deligitimizes these "events" as "grassroots" when they are organized by Newt Gingrich, Alan Keyes, Fox News, Glenn Beck and Michelle Malkin.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by craig98607271 (April 08, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
         

      i aggree with shoes. plus i am a blue dog so i'm not sure if some(or most) of this spending is such a good idea. no i'm not going to say we are under a tyrant or that crap. but be honest, this is a lot of money that may have to raise taxes to much higher levels than 39%, i hope not

      Report Abuse
      • Author by mk3872 (April 08, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
           

        So, if I get this straight, then ... the "tea party" protest are taken from the anti-tax Boston Tea Party that protested taxation without representation. And these tea parties are protesting the recent middle class tax cuts AND the 2011 tax INCREASE to 39% on those individuals making over $250k as it was in 1992 when we had high economic growth?

        Oh, AND, the protests are against the HOPE that we do not have to raise taxes higher later, right?

        Yup, makes PERFECT sense!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
             

          These dolts and their tea parties don't make any damned sense.  That's why it's all just a bunch of nonsense.  They're obviously too ignorant of American history - and to me, that's just part of their hypocrisy.  They love this country so much that they don't even understand her history.  Nice.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:05 pm ET)
               

            do you have the same disrespect for war protesters, are they dolts too?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by SaddamHussein (April 08, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
                 

              I guess the War Protesting was ok, because that was Anti Bush?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by JLyons (April 08, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
                   

                What is your point Saddam?

                Report Abuse
              • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 5:22 pm ET)
                   

                it's all politics, protesting things you like are done by dolts and bridge players.  protesting things you hate are done by brave warriors and concerned citizens.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Victor Colorado (April 08, 2009 5:34 pm ET)
                     

                  Wow, you really don't know WTIH.  Awesome.

                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:09 pm ET)
                       

                    He's just a troll, Victor.  He has nothing of substance to say, other than blaming liberals for this and protecting conservatives from that...

                    I'm not surprised that he didn't get the point of what I wrote.  But just to make sure he does:

                    If they're going to promote some sort of gathering and give it a name which harkens back to the history of this great nation - and events which are integral to the formation of our way of life, the very freakin' least they can do is get the historical concept correct.  The Boston Tea Party had nothing to do with a stimulus package and everything to do with taxation without representation.  So show me, jamesB, where these so-called Tea Parties have anything to do with taxation without representation.  It's simply not there.

                    And you folks have the gaul to call yourselves patriots - and you don't even understand the history of this country.  Wow...just...wow.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jamesB (April 08, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
                         

                      name calling is substantive?  nice try.  as for the rest of your post, if you knew your history you'd know that social engineering, taxing prosperity and income redistribution that you advocate would have gotten the Boston Tea partiers so incredibly angry your head would spin, so save your history lesson.  it's a paltry liberal rewrite.

                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:29 pm ET)
                           

                        I'll save my history lesson.  You're not worth half the wisdom I have in my little finger.

                        The Boston Tea Party had nothing at all to do with social engineering (strawman), taxing prosperity (strawman) and income redistribution (strawman). 

                        Pick up a freakin' book, wouldya?  Learn something.

                        There is no social engineering going on with a stimulus package.  There is no income redistribution and there is no taxing prosperity.  If you believe that a tax hike on the rich is taxing prosperity, then wouldn't you believe that taxes on ANYBODY would be taxing prosperity?  I mean, don't we all pay taxes?  If we have a job, we pay taxes, right?  Am I being taxed because I'm prosperous (I'm not in the above $250K range)?  That's mularkey and you know it.

                        You would think that someone like you would praise the tax CUT that you are about to receive.  But no, instead, you bitch because rich folks, 2% of the population, are going to have to fork over 4% more of their money.  Are you really that concerned about rich folks who really don't give a damn about you, rich folks who would rather that YOU carry the tax burden?  I cannot believe that you would cry for such people...

                        WAAAAAHHHHH!!!! Rich folks are going to be taxed 4% more.  WAAAAAHHHH!!!!

                        You are the perfect example of a person who would cheer for those who hate you and hate those who cheer for you.  You make no sense.

                        Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:45 pm ET)
                 

              Let's be clear, jamesB.  I'm not against them protesting.  Let them have their protest.  Let them call it whatever they want.

              However, let's also be clear that Fox News is promoting this - and they really shouldn't.  It might not be illegal, but it smells funny. 

              Also, I still find it funny that the people who claim the most to be patriots of this great nation don't even appreciate the history on which this nation was founded.  And you support them blindly.

              Report Abuse
          • Author by montchai.k5692 (April 09, 2009 6:18 pm ET)
               

            You are terrified aren't you.    You are obviously the ignorant one.   What this administration is trying to do is unprecedented.     The growth of government which surpasses the New Deal.    What history are you referring to?   Could you be more precise or do you just like to call people names?   You are wrong and you are refusing to even question your ideas?    Big Government is not the answer to any problem. 

            Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 11:51 am ET)
                 

              Actually, I'm not terrified.  I'm not involved in any of these rediculous protests.

              And how is it that I'm ignorant?  I understand our nation's history - and I don't need to try to rewrite history in order to push some rediculous ideology.

              Look in the mirror, Montchai.k5692.  Your projection says a lot.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:13 am ET)
           

        This country's most prosperous times were also those with highest taxation, more than 70% during much of the 20th century. If only the government would return those taxes with beneficial social programs such as national health, people would likely feel better about paying them.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by SDL (April 08, 2009 4:54 pm ET)
         

      Aren't these anti-tax nuts the same people who werre screaming that WE pay our TAX MONEY for vouchers so THEIR kids can attend PRIVATE/RELIGIOUS schools?

      I went to college with one of these clowns 25 years ago. He was a jerk then, he's de-evolved into a right wing looney since then. His blog is http://taxingme.blogspot.com Don't bother posting responses...he doesn't allow opposing viewpoints. His "sad tale of woe" is actually quite laughable.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Shadibadoo (April 08, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
         

      I'm amazed that yet again the conservatives can be upset with something so morally trivial, enough to climb down their SUVs and actually participate in something.  It may be important to them financially, but i'm willing to bet money 99% of them have never cared a whit for ANY violation of ANYONE's rights before.

      Secret prisons? Torture? Selective deportation? Poisonous chemicals in our water? Selling chemical weapons and poison gas to central asian countries so they can continue to gas to kurds?  Nothing, not even the dastardly wicked sexualization of the youth, has pushed them to protest at all, their entier lives.

      Only taxes can do that. And that's why the american revolution was an illegitimate war based on a few fat old men's greed.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sobetonwork2469 (April 08, 2009 5:01 pm ET)
         

      <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

      Most of the media has ignored the protests. Also the protests are not about Obama specifically; it’s about policies in some people’s opinions which are wasting taxpayer money.

      What wrong with the Media telling you about protests?

      What’s wrong with Fox covering the protests?

      Answer to the above Nothing!!

      The majority of the Media need stop attacking and labeling people who happen to disagree with President Obama, and his policies. The Honeymoon Needs To End!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (April 08, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
           

        What honeymoon? The RightWingRadioNuts and the Republicans in general started bashing Pres. Obama in November when the Republicans were still in charge and a bunch of money was spent then without tea parties. Cons and Repubs may have short memories but liberals think for themselves. They can remember things.

        Shove your Honeymoon garbage...By the way, I expect big crowds for the "Green Tea Parties" since none of the Republican elite..over $250,000 a year will be working.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by sobetonwork2469 (April 08, 2009 6:53 pm ET)
             

          <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

          Ahhh the republican conspiracy! Liberals are like sheep; you just follow the herd. Just deal with the fact that people have a right to protest, and the media have a right to report about it. Even it goes against the precious liberal doctrine.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 2:43 pm ET)
               

            Yeah, but the problem is reporting on the protests, as has been explained multiple times. It's the sponsorship and the promotion that's the issue.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:16 am ET)
               

            When the GOP almost tripled the number of earmarks in their last control of Congress, over the number of the last preceding Democratic Congress, there were few cries about taxation then. Why the hypocrisy?

            Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 10:35 pm ET)
           

        Did you not even read the headline? I know you didn't read the whole piece, but not even the headline?

        "What wrong with the Media telling you about protests?"

        "What’s wrong with Fox covering the protests?"

        It's the aggressive promotion of them. Did you notice how long it took you to scroll down to the bottom of the commentary from MMfA? They have a ton of examples of the aggressive promotion of the protests. That's the issue. Got it?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (April 08, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
         

      Come on, these "tea parties" are absolutely BS.  They are bought, paid for and promoted by Fox.  Why should they be covered by the rest of the media?

      Hannity's "Freedom Concerts" are more newsworthy than this pathetic attempt by a "News" channel to gin up widespread anger that simply doesn't exist.

      Fox is entitled to it's fun- it's NOT entitled to be taken seriously as a News Agency when it's spending it's time organizing protests, and that's exactly what they are doing here.  Fox should just change it's name to GOPTV and be done with it.  At least it would be honest.  Which is why they won't do it, I guess.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Caseysprings (April 08, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
           

        But FOX Is not legitimate.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by sobetonwork2469 (April 08, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
           

        <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

        wonder if MSNBC will change their name to MSDNC? LOL You have no proof Fox has paid for these protests. its purely paranoid speculation.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by JLyons (April 08, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
         

      This is disturbing. FOX News is creating a story and promoting its Right Wingers like Hannity and Beck. This is a clear abuse of the power they have.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Reality (April 08, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
         

      My tea bag is in the mail.  We do not want the Presidency to fail, many of us want his policies to fail for the zillionth time. 

      My local congresswoman asked us to participate.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 5:45 pm ET)
           

        I appreciate you buying a tea bag. Buying stock in Lipton the moment I heard about y'alls cockamamied plan turned out to be a great move!

        Report Abuse
      • Author by Übermensch (April 08, 2009 5:50 pm ET)
           

        "We do not want the Presidency to fail, many of us want his policies to fail"

        Thats such a bullcrap statement. thats like saying that we don't want Rush Limbaughs to fail, just his radio show.

        But the reason you listen to Rush's radio show is BECAUSE its his radio show, built upon HIS ideas.  So if you want hi radio show to fail...than by proxy you really want him to fail

        Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 10:37 pm ET)
             

          Exactly. It was Limbaugh's excuse. There's no subsstantive difference between wanting Obama to fail and wanting his policies to fail. Wanting Obama to fail IS wanting his policies to fail!

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (April 08, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
           

        Sorry, who are you tea bagging?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
             

          Wow...I spit coffee all over my keyboard.  Pay up, Old Benjamin...I need a new keyboard!  ;)

          That was freakin' hilarious.  Now, I hope s/he'll respond.  I'm also curious as to who Reality is teabagging...

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (April 08, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
               

            Typical LIB - you want someone else to pay for your mistake! =>

            Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:35 pm ET)
                 

              Way too funny for a Wednesday afternoon.  Save it for a Friday!  :)

              Report Abuse
      • Author by Übermensch (April 08, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
           

        I'm sure that Reality will get a nice Tea Bag

        Report Abuse
      • Author by friedbergboy1422 (April 08, 2009 7:35 pm ET)
           

        Now conservatives get to parse?  How will the Presidency succeed if his policies fail?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ellie1112 (April 08, 2009 5:32 pm ET)
         

      Wait a minute. Fox News is accused of "promoting" tea parties by covering the fact that the silent majority is tired of being silent?

      Where was your outrage when NBC and their cable stations promoted "Green Week"? Who is it exactly that owns NBC? Oh.........that's right. General Electric, who couldn't possibly benefit financially from sales of those ridiculous florurescent bulbs, now mandated within just a few years. Maybe you should "follow the money" when you write your articles.

      Fox is neither financing any of these gatherings, nor will it benefit financially. They have better ratings than MSNBC and CNN combined. How could this be? Not only that, but O'Reilly ON CABLE beats Letterman's numbers on network. Letterman's condescension was palpable when O'Reilly was on his program.

      The "Silent Majority" is tired of the media ignoring or omitting news pertinent to their lives. It's not just taxes, it's out of control spending, Congress ignoring the wishes of the majority of their constituents, and outrage over the radical few attempting to sell us all down the river.

      Thomas Jefferson was a proponent of small government. John Adams was a proponent of big government, more on the lines of Britain. The arguments here are nothing new.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 11:58 am ET)
           

        Well said

        Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
           

        (1) The 28% of the people who are against Obama's policies are not "the silent majority".  If you believe that 28% (out of 100%) is a majority, you need remedial math.

        (2) Promoting "Green Week" is a different animal than promoting these "Tea Parties" (a) "Green Week" was not a protest, but more of a program to get people to become more environmentally friendly; (b) these "Tea Parties" are an abomination to history.  The Boston Tea Party, upon which these faux tea parties are based, had nothing to do with protesting a stimulus package.

        (3) Fox will benefit financially from sponsoring these events.  Their moniker will be proudly displayed at the events, for all to see.  Along with that, the corporations who advertise on Fox will indeed continue to advertise on Fox during Fox's coverage of the tea parties.  People will watch the tea parties on television.  Fox gains.  The corporation gains.

        (3) Again with the silent majority.  This so-called silent majority is not what you think it is.  If it were, we wouldn't have Obama as president, now would we?  The silent majority in this country is dead.  And again, 28% of anything is NOT a majority.

        (4) How has Congress ignored the wishes of the majority of their constituents?  Because 28% of people don't agree with Obama's policies?  Where were you during the last administration when Congress - and the Presidency - did NOTHING AT ALL.  Where's your outrage that we spent hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq.  If anything, that is the wasteful spending.  Where's your outrage, Ellie?  Methinks your outrage is selective, with a hard tilt to the right.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:20 am ET)
           

        Jefferson advocated BIG government in education and that costs money. The only small government he advocated was the intrusive kind that spied on you and denied your basic equality. Unfortunately without redistributive policies, we cannot even approach equality.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jjamele2880 (April 08, 2009 5:58 pm ET)
         

      All that's left for Fox to do is to organize the burning of the Reichstag.  These guys really ARE Nazis- its not hyperbole anymore at all.

      Of course, when some nut blows up a federal building, shoots up a post office, derails an Amtrak train, etc. and is caught with autographed Sean Hannity pics in his pocket, it will be like the old Howard Jones song- "no one, no one, no one ever....is too blame."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brishon (April 08, 2009 6:07 pm ET)
         

      Why do right wingers have to constantly bring up Iraq war protests? Protesting a manufactured war is NOT the same as protesting something that doesn't even make sense.

      I remember Fox running a video of a woman saying "NO TAXATION WITH CRAPPY REPESENTATION" and I just had to wonder to myself "they don't enjoy seeing a tax cut for themselves, but are fine with tax cuts for the richest in the country....ok"

      This is just more phony outrage over a total non-issue, I wouldn't be suprised if everybody at these tea bag parties were hired by the RNC.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (April 08, 2009 6:16 pm ET)
         

      Considering that FOX considers NBC the most liberal of networks I think it's very fair and balanced of them to promote these tea parties inspired by that great populist Rick Santelli of CNBC.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
           

        I laugh every day about how these clowns think they are just like the patriots who threw tea into the harbor. A few facts might do them well:

        1. The tea party was preceeded by a massive corporate tax cut. King George cut taxes on tea in the belief that lower taxes meant lower prices and therefore the east india company would be able to sell more tea, thus keeping them from going bankrupt.
        2. Colonists rebelled because smaller business would be severely undercut and go out of business.
        3. Colonists boycotted the east india tea company.
        4. Eventually, they rebelled and boarded british ships to carry out the infamous boston tea party.

        So once again the morons of the right got it wrong and have once again distorted history to claim they are the true patriots when in reality they are advocating policies of King George. I guess we know who the torries are, don't we?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 08, 2009 6:38 pm ET)
             

          Exactly my point above, Snoopy.  Rightwingers claim to be patriots, but haven't the first clue as to what basic American history says...

          How can you be a patriot without understanding our nation's history?  I won't hold my breath waiting for a cogent response.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by loonz (April 08, 2009 6:49 pm ET)
             

          King George was also heavily invested in the East India Company.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Reality (April 09, 2009 7:07 pm ET)
             

          The catalyst of the Boston Tea Party was taxation without representation by the British government.  They raised taxation on the colonies just to show that they COULD. 

          So, you all are wrong...yet again.  Obama has raised taxes just because he can.  I'm not dressed up like an Indian, but the tea is flying.  Even though the numbers do not lie.  More revenue is created with a robust economy with less taxation percentages.  History is a weak subject for many of you that ATTEMPT to argue against the black and white, documented facts.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:22 am ET)
               

            This country's most prosperous years coincided with very high taxation.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by smarshall1432997 (April 08, 2009 6:43 pm ET)
         

      Wow, FoxNews really "Hate" Pres. Obama so much, that they are begging people to "rise up" against him so they could "broadcast" these "angry" people sending tea bags at FoxNews' Tea Party on April 15.  Umph, umph, umph FoxNews begging viewers to "rise up" against President Obama ....who would have thought a tv station would "proudly" do such a thing ....umph, umph, umph and FoxNews see nothing wrong with this is just ....umph, umph, umph.  I am just lost with words.  FoxNews definitely 'got game'. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (April 08, 2009 7:01 pm ET)
         

      I'd like to know where was all this "teabagging" when Dumbya signed that $700 billion Wall St. baliout . . . or when nearly $12 billion went POOF! in Iraq . . .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by yoikesohoythere1991 (April 08, 2009 8:50 pm ET)
           

        There was a Tea Party on December 16, 2007 (during the Bush administration), on the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, but this event was not "sponsored" by Fox News. The organizers were mostly supporters of Ron Paul's campaign to be the GOP presidential candidate. A google search of "tea party" and the above date will provide many links.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by anebriated199 (April 09, 2009 9:33 pm ET)
           

        Hey, I liked bush, but didn't agree with the bailout. However, he tried numerous times to regulate, but was blocked. The cost of freedom does not come cheap, go to any veterans hospital in your area and find out. And also, I like to back up what I say so there is a link below to verify it.

         http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/2008/09/democrats-blocked-bushs-fannie-mae-and.html

        Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (April 08, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
         

      Here's a real tea party idea. When you get your tax refund don't spend it.  Send it on to a rich person who will soon be suffering under the burden of Obama's tax increases.  That will have a twofold benefit:  First it will show Obama that he can't buy you off by cutting your taxes-the more he cuts the more you give to Paris, Nicloe, et al.  And second it will get badly needed cash into the hands of rich people who know much better how to stimulate the economy than mere mortals like yourselves.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (April 08, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
         

      I knew the national embarrassment that is Fox News was completely in support of the lame tea baggers but even I am surprised they’re now the official sponsors of this right-wing douchebaggery disguised as a grass roots movement. MMFA nails Fox again big time by simply quoting them and showing screengrabs from their “news” broadcasts. Unbiased? Fair & Balanced? Lord, just when you thought those phrases couldn’t be more laughable, Fox ups the ante and dials the hilarity up to ten.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by marco21 (April 08, 2009 8:05 pm ET)
           


        Oh, I almost forgot. The Fox defenders here “the liberal MSM covered the war protests,” “the MSM is trying to silence conservatives,” etc., please. Do you even believe what you’re saying? The wingnuts here don’t sound like it. Bluster and BS through and through.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Reality (April 08, 2009 8:13 pm ET)
         

      I'm happy to point that out for you all.

      First, move the teabag out of the way so that you can see the screen.  Notice how tough that is.  Many of us that make our own path in life and do not sit awaiting go-getters crumbs to fall to the floor have this phenomenon...a rather large teabag for YOUR face.

      A President can lead a country by upholding the Constitution and leading the government in its one and only true role in our lives as our forefathers intended, protecting us from foreign powers.  Alas, the title, Commander-in-Chief.

      At the same time, he could have some off the wall liberal idea that every American should have a $2000 check even if they had to crawl over our border fence illegally to do so.  I can want this idea to fail, but at the same time pray that he upholds the Constitution and keeps us safe.  Therefore, I can want all frivolous policies such as Obama's to fail.

      There you go.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (April 08, 2009 8:16 pm ET)
           

        Huh?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 8:20 pm ET)
           

        Whatever, torry. I don't drink tea. Go worship your "king" as you cry about losing the revolutionary war TWICE...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by vfeinstein6659 (April 08, 2009 8:44 pm ET)
           

        Stimulating the economy, and helping the Middle Class, which Bush failed to help for eight years, is frivolous?? 'splain, Lucy ...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ButteryPat (April 08, 2009 8:56 pm ET)
           

        I don't think I got all of this, it's very...strange. But I was able to glean this:

        1. You're concerned about teabags being in your face.

        2. The government's only role is protecting us from foreign powers (screw you post office and public education).

        3. GODDAMN MESSICANS!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Reality (April 08, 2009 9:36 pm ET)
             

          Nope, that is YO face!  hehe

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Reality (April 08, 2009 9:44 pm ET)
             

          That darned forefather of mine actually who IS in my family tree, Andrew Jackson, felt the government should educate us.  (THAT seems to be going well...NOT!)He was a PROUD slaveowner that fought hard to keep them and laid the groundwork for democrats everywhere. 

          What a guy to look up to!

          Nope, again I have several legal immigrants that are good friends.  They are right with me wanting others to get in line just as they did.  They speak our language and function in our society without having to say, "What you need homey?"

          Report Abuse
          • Author by snoopy (April 08, 2009 10:02 pm ET)
               

            We share an ancestor? God, that really sux. Another racist sounding relative.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Reality (April 09, 2009 9:23 am ET)
                 

              I live where he was born and raised too.  Isn't that funny?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
                   

                Somehow that makes you better? More patriotic?

                Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy - just like your screeds above.

                Report Abuse
                • Author by Reality (April 11, 2009 9:57 am ET)
                     

                  Yes, I am more patriotic than you, yes. I have stood in uniform very proudly many times at attention.  Something about being around a lot of patriotc folks makes you change.

                  When bullets fly out at you and your country, you see things at a different angle than before.  I look at many of these arguments that are against the very fabric of my country and they repulse me.  The emasculation of men in this country by the left is despicable.  Men should grab the bull by the horns and not accept having hungry mouths at their table. Not BLAME others for their own responsibilities.

                  Part of the reason that I am here is to try to see things through your prism.  I liken this to putting my wife's glasses on when I have perfect vision.  It hurts my eyes and head to try to see things through there.  I am not here to throw rocks and knock your intelligence, I'm not.  I apologize for throwing rocks ack at you too.  It's tough not to.

                  Report Abuse
          • Author by ButteryPat (April 09, 2009 8:04 pm ET)
               

            What the hell does that mean? Are you honestly saying that somebody who owned slaves must be wrong on absolutely every count? Hey, you might as well check the military off your list of worthwhile endeavors, because George Washington believed in the military and he owned slaves, smoked opium, and achieved prominence and favor in the British military by brutally murdering more innocent Indians than anybody else. What a guy to look up to!

            And look guy, you having "legal immigrant" friends isn't impressive. Especially when you then go on to stereotype "illegal" immigrants as all drug dealers. Nice job making it sound sufficiently "hispanically" too. Yeah, dude, you're really convincing me of your open-mindedness. Just think about this, guy. Without even thinking about it you just made an entire argument about immigration without once considering anybody coming from anywhere besides "over our border" (Mexico). You know what? I'm an illegal immigrant. However, I come from a white, English-speaking country. I've lived in this country for 17 years and I speak excellent English with a Western U.S. accent. The decision to leave my home country was not mine.

            Blowing your mind yet? That's why I get so frustrated by this idiotic immigration debate and I so easily see the racism in it. Because I think about myself, and everybody else I know who came to this country illegally for a variety of reasons, and I see Russians, Thais, Chinese, Koreans, Laotians, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Latinos, Ukranians, Nigerians, and so many more. I turn on the TV or talk to somebody like you and all I hear about is "border-hopping". I came here in a plane. Coach. Does that make me good or bad? Do I deserve to be pulled from the only home I know and returned to somewhere I have nothing but faint memories of or not?

            Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (April 08, 2009 10:44 pm ET)
           

        Wanting Obama to fail is wanting his policies to fail. Obama is his policies. We don't think anyone (well, almost anyone) wants him to drop dead from a heart attack tomorrow. We understand you don't want his body to fail. We understand that there's no one (well, almost no one) who wants him to become brain-dead tomorrow, and have a body that's sustained but a mind that's gone. You on the right want the things he stands for and the policies he will implement to satisfy his philosophy to fail. That's wanting Obama to fail. That's what he is. That's who he is. He is not a conglomeration of cells sustained by life. He is a person with a specific political bent, and it's his political aims that you want to fail.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Reality (April 09, 2009 9:22 am ET)
             

          I can can finish THIS.  >>>>>

          Wanting BUSH to fail is wanting his policies to fail. BUSH is his policies. Wrong!

          I knew there was a way to illustrate just how stupid that it sounds for anyone to disagree that a Presidents policies can fail and then to still have a successful Presidency!!!  If he governs from the center as he has claimed that is VERY possible.  His whacked out liberal ideas can fail, but then the more centrist ideas can be accomplished.  More will be happy from the centrist policies than only the liberal policies succeeding for the liberals. 

          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
               

            This is nonsense. If the President's policies fail, then the President fails.

            If his policies are corrupt or ludicrous, then the nation may succeed if he fails, if his policies fail, but the President is judged on his policies failing or succeeding.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Reality (April 11, 2009 10:02 am ET)
                 

              I understand that in YOUR mind this square peg does not fit in the round hole, no problem.  Either way no President goes unscathed.  Some good and some bad usually comes out of ALL presidencies. 

              If you cannot understand that the policies that cause irreversable damage/change to our country could be bad and other policies that make enough positive change to pull a Presedency out of the toilet then, fine.  If you choose not to understand that fact, then I cannot make you understand.

              THIS is what makes liberals SO dangerous.  Their inability to stand in the middle of a crowd and just get along with the rest of it.  They want the whole crowd to FEEL how they FEEL.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (April 09, 2009 1:03 am ET)
           

        "At the same time, he could have some off the wall liberal idea that every American should have a $2000 check even if they had to crawl over our border fence illegally to do so." - unReality

        Soooo - I take it that you're AGAINST the policy in the liberal enclave of Alaska . . . where EVERY Alaskan gets a $1600 rebate check from the state yearly from the oil pipeline surplus {whether they work in the oil industry, or not.}

        Thanks; good to know . . .


        Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (April 09, 2009 11:18 am ET)
           

        in its one and only true role in our lives as our forefathers intended, protecting us from foreign powers.

        Lordy you are dense.  Please pick up a civics book.  Open it.  Start reading.  Then get back to us.

        Psst - here's a hint - the president's ONLY responsibility is to uphold the constitution.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Reality (April 11, 2009 9:49 am ET)
             

          Nope, you are in fact dense.  He also has powers and responsibilities as Commander In Chief.  Look THOSE up too. 

          My biggest concern with Obama was our safety on HIS watch.  Being that our safety is his main job under the Constitituion.  His community organizing really set him up to be a strong Captain huh?

          And now BOWING very obviously so and having the White House lie and say he didn't too?  How weak and pathetic...

          Report Abuse
    • Author by vfeinstein6659 (April 08, 2009 8:45 pm ET)
         

      Gee, I hope it's warm out at these 'parties'.  Seeing as the only people who are going to see taxes raised, a whopping 3%, are the 'have-mores', I'd hate like hell to see the ladies have to take their furs out of storage ...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ButteryPat (April 08, 2009 8:51 pm ET)
         

      "The real bias here is that the rest of the media has largely ignored the tea parties.

      Yet a few years ago any and every little anti-war protest (even those in other parts of the world, Europe etc.) was always met with glowing media coverage across the spectrum. Cindy Sheehan, anyone?"

      Nah, this is all pretty objectionable. First of all, the media was just REPORTING on those events after they'd happened. They weren't telling you where to go and saying "now remember to go out to our anti-war protests where you can meet and greet Ted Koppel!" It was just stuff like "last night there was a big anti-war protest somewhere". What's funny is your attempt to turn that reporting into left-wing media bias when I distinctly remember the sad hilarity of watching countless news reports of big anti-war protests conflated with "pro-troops" events with like 20 people at them. Maybe they should be covering the tea parties, I don't know, I think if they come and go, and they're a big deal then it would be necessary. But I think right now if they covered them too much it would be like advertising for them.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (April 08, 2009 8:58 pm ET)
         

      In response to the Tea Party, I am organizing a food bank for those making over $250,000.00 a year. This is a special food bank. we only accept donations of $1000.00 or more. The acceptable food will be 12-16oz. Filet mignons, fresh 2lb. Maine lobsters and nice crab legs from the bay. Please, help me with this aid.

      Additionally, I am going to circulate a petition for all those attending the tea parties, GREEN I hope, to help those above $250G a year cover their bills. Those signing this petition will gladly donate 4% of their income to help the lower upclass survive this renewal tax.    jimmyB, shoes89, I am asking that you help me in the Great American cause because remember, these upper people give us jobs so giving back 4%, not in taxes, is needed. Will you help??? Please call Glum Beck and ask for his help or just send him 4% of your money. We can all be friends.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Übermensch (April 09, 2009 12:49 am ET)
           

        mmmmm...Filet mignons, fresh 2lb. Maine lobsters and nice crab legs from the bay

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (April 08, 2009 9:02 pm ET)
         
      By having their on-air talent attend all these Fox-promoted media events (or whatever you want to call them), it's pretty much a guarantee that no other media outlets will cover them. Why would ABC promote a Glenn Beckathon, a Hannity harangue, or Cavuto cavorting in California? Fox's complaint that these *cough* 'non-partisan protests' aren't covered by the media is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Fox owns these doodah rallies - no one else cares, in the same way no one else cares about Fox's blathering on about Obama at Notre Dame, and whatever its problem is this week with Acorn. This looks to me like a somewhat desperate attempt to prove to advertisers that the network is actually relevant, since it has lately positioned itself as champions of the very positions the majority of the country opposes.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by carlileb5935 (April 08, 2009 10:55 pm ET)
         

      The real bias here is that the rest of the media has largely ignored the tea parties.

      There's a reason for that. The original Boston Tea party was protesting taxation without representation, as illustrated by the extreme tax on tea.

      So just what is the analogy here?-- where's the comparison? i.e., it's idiotic.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by yoikesohoythere1991 (April 08, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
           

        Governments can raise money through taxation, borrowing, or by simply printing the money.

        Unbalanced budgets are taxation without representation because the money for these budgets is raised through borrowing or printing.

        Some of those who will repay the borrowed money have no vote today, so they have taxation without representation.

        Printing money without an increase in goods must ultimately result in inflation with each dollar buying less tomorrow than it does today; this is a tax on savings that will affect everyone with savings no matter how meager their incomes.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (April 08, 2009 11:27 pm ET)
         

      I especially like the photo and decision that Glen Beck is going to be live at the Alamo...

      Anyone that has even a vague amount of knowlegde would understand immediately just how patheticly stupid that choice of venue is!

      FYI----> Every one of the Americans there.....DIED!!

      It is a fitting tribute to Glen Beck and his vast amount of brains he has to work with!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by captfoster2 (April 08, 2009 11:29 pm ET)
           

        'pathetically'.... not 'patheticly'

        Although... I have said before in the past that spelling is not all that important in here...

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ButteryPat (April 09, 2009 12:53 am ET)
           

        Glenn Beck: Live at Waterloo!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by slick50x9598 (April 08, 2009 11:35 pm ET)
         

      Let's not say that Fox is bad because they are promoting an event.  MSNBC and CNN have been demoted to covering O.J., Octomom, Brittney Spears and some guy that died from being doped up because he was in Batman.

      President Obama wouldn't even have been the Democratic nominee had the press not promoted him.  The zaniest, least experienced candidate of them all won the presidency because of the press. 

      I think most of the complaining is due to the fact that not one person will watch anything but Fox news of April 15th.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by slick50x9598 (April 09, 2009 12:58 am ET)
         

      Hmm, is MediaMatters in the tank for Fox News's coverage of the Tea Parties?  This article promotes the Tea Parties and Fox News better than they can do themselves.  It's free advertisement.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 9:34 am ET)
           

        I'm sure the vast majority of readers here have great interest in attending a tea party.  Anyone here who has any interest in them surely learned about them from right-wing sites previously.

        And I guess the MRC promotes the people and organizations it criticizes as well, then.  Totally nuts.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Oenophile (April 09, 2009 7:46 am ET)
         

      I think the key portion of the article to think about is " . . . Peter Roff, a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty who is listed as a "contributor" to FoxNews.com's Fox Forum, wrote in an April 3 blog post on the Fox Forum: "In the case of the current crisis the blame appears to have been assigned almost totally to Obama, at least by the thousands of U.S. taxpayers attending near-spontaneous 'tea parties' in protest of the Democrats agenda of more taxes, increased spending, higher deficits and a surge of borrowing to pay for it all.""

      Near spontneous and pre-advertised and promoted by a "news" organization ostensibly covering it are not the same thing.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by yeadha3895 (April 09, 2009 8:44 am ET)
         

      Fox News is selective, and ideological in its coverage, and never misses events, and situations to promote its right wing ideology. Its sole reason for existence is to knock off, and disable any, and all left leaning ideas, and policies by using every tool it can find.  

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bayside1022 (April 09, 2009 8:48 am ET)
         

      It would appear that fox new and members will do anything to help Obama ,our choice,to fail. in essence, if obama fails we fail..They are like the klan stomping their feet at the middle class because we are coming back with a voice and they dont like it..Fox is getting the klan all in one spot and thats a good thing. Someone needs to sue them for inciting a riot..encouraging violence, and misinformation campaign for partisan purposes...If I were in charge of a company and any of my employees joined this group and word got out they worked for me, they would lose their jobs..Association works two ways

      Report Abuse
      • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 10:49 am ET)
           

        Bayside, so if Obama is able to succeed in moving this nation towards Socialism, you are ok with that idea?  What I see in your statements are racism, you use the words Klan as if the Klan and any anyone that disagrees with Obama as racist.  What it really shows is that you are the only racist here, because you do not see past a man skin color, you only see Obama as a Black Man, where I see him as a President that believes in Socialist Nation.   I am guessing when Bush was in office, it was ok to call him Hitler, or march against our soldiers, or say he was a dumb Texan. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (April 09, 2009 11:20 am ET)
             

           moving this nation towards Socialism

          How is Obama doing this?

          You probably have absolutely no idea what socialism means except what the talk radio liars have told you it means.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
               

            http://bridgetdgms.wordpress.com/2008/04/07/obama-supports-socialism-more-proof/

            1. Obama advocated the communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land, as part of a forced “development plan”, an important element of his attack on the government’s advocacy of private ownership, land titles, and property registration. (p. 29)

            2. Obama advocated the nationalization of “European” and “Asian” owned enterprises, including hotels, with the control of these operations handed over to the “indigenous” black population. (pp. 32 -33)

            3. Obama advocated dramatically increasing taxation on “the rich” even up to the 100% level, arguing that, “there is no limit to taxation if the benefits derived from public services by society measure up to the cost in taxation which they have to pay” (p. 30) and that, “Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.” (p. 31)

            4. Obama contrasts the ill-defined and weak-tea notion of “African Socialism” negatively with the well-defined ideology of “scientific socialism”, i.e. communism. Obama views “African Socialism” pioneers like Nkrumah, Nyerere, and Toure as having diverted only “a little” from the capitalist system. (p. 26)

            5. Obama advocates an “active” rather than a “passive” program to achieve a classless society through the removal of economic disparities between black Africans and Asian and Europeans. (p. 28) “While we welcome the idea of a prevention [of class problems], we should try to cure what has slipped in .. we .. need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now .. so long as we maintain free enterprise one cannot deny that some will accumulate more than others .. ” (pp. 29-30)

            6. Obama advocates price controls on hotels and the tourist industry, so that the middle class and not only the rich can afford to come to Kenya as tourists. (p. 33)

            7. Obama advocates government owned and operated “model farms” as a means of teaching modern farming techniques to farmers. (p. 33)

            8. Obama strongly supports the governments assertion of a “non-aligned” status in the contest between Western nations and communist nations aligned with the Soviet Union and China. (p. 26)

            Report Abuse
            • Author by fawltylogic (April 09, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
                 

              Wasn't that all about KENYAN policies, or am I misunderstanding something here?

              Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:11 pm ET)
             

          You're so good at projection, you don't even know it.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 2:54 pm ET)
               

            CL - find it funny you skip right over everything I spoke of and went right to insulting me.  NICE JOB.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 4:01 pm ET)
                 

              Why do you say that?  My point that you're guilty of projection is definitely an answer to your comment.

              And how is 'projection' an insult?

              If anything, my answer to your comment was a compliment...you're so good at something you don't even know it...

              sheesh...

              Report Abuse
      • Author by montchai.k5692 (April 09, 2009 11:49 am ET)
           

        Bayside,  You are so ill-informed.   I do not belong to a Klan and never will.  This is not about race, it is about the future of our country.  Ibelieve in the Freedom of Speech provided to us in our Bill or Rights.   I plan on using my freedom to assemble to meet with other people who are afraid of where this country is headed.   With the amount of debt we are accumulating, we will have a hard time succeeding.   I have never been so afraid for the future of our country and I have never been so involved as this.   I was simply living my life by the rules assuming that my rights as a citizen were safe and sound.    I have awaken to find out this is not true.

        Also, No company could ever fire a person for their political affiliation or the fact that we assemble to cry out against our government spending so much money so fast.    Please read your constitution.   Learn what our founding fathers wrote.    They wanted the government to play a Limited role.    This is not where we are today and this is why people across the country, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent are terrified by what they see today.   

        Please educate thyself!   Read the constitution! 

        God Bless America!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by fawltylogic (April 09, 2009 2:57 pm ET)
             

          I have never been so afraid for the future of our country and I have never been so involved as this.

          Were you asleep the past 8 or so years?

          And nobody is arguing that these protests shouldn't be allowed to take place, only that a news channel should not take part in organizing them.

          What exactly are you protesting by the way? I thought this was supposed to be about taxes, and I don't see anything unconstitutional being done by lowering taxes. Can you explain?

          Report Abuse
          • Author by anebriated199 (April 09, 2009 10:20 pm ET)
               

            Do you work for fox news? Are you a mind reader? How do you know they are organizing the event? Cause last I checked they were covering the event. Americansolutions.com is organizing people. And they are protesting higher taxes and want fiscal responsibility. PBO has spent and committed more money in 3 months than the previous 232 years combined. You truly beleive taxes have been cut or lowered? Oh that's right the middle class tax cut, wow, almost forgot. Did you know the top 1% pay 40% of the federal taxes? And the top 25% pay 86% of the federal taxes? The top 50% pay 96.7%. So when PBO says 95% will get tax cuts, he actually means tax credit or a check.

            So in other words, PBO is taking away the money from the job creators and giving it to people who have never created anything or paid taxes their entire life. Some in this country have lived off the government their entire life. Getting paid to have babies, getting government housing, foodstamps, etc...Liberals in my view would do far greater for this country if they didn't keep the poor down by giving them everything, how do you expect them to become motivated? If someone handed you a check every month, you didn;t have to work for it, wow this is easy. Well life was not intended to be easy, the people who work hard should have more, and I will be damned if any liberal will take away what I have worked for my whole life.

            Do you know what the longest war in american history is? The war on poverty, we have given 11,000,000,000,000 to fight it. Guess what its still here, why is that you say? Liberals always want to throw money to the poor, oh its the poor they make 12,000 a year. It is another example of how money being used in a negative way, but it always gets the poor to vote democrat doesn't it. look at the state by state and see the poor areas vote democrat, and affluent neighborhoods republicans, why is that? Gosh, I just figured it out, democrats depend on the poor to vote them into office cause they promised them the world on the campaign trail. End welfare and motivate people to get back to work PBO instead of sucking off the system like a little puppy.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by montchai.k5692 (April 09, 2009 9:01 am ET)
         

      Fox News is actually covering what the people are already doing.   I did not attend my first tea party because of Fox News.   Our local media covered it, but did a poor job overall.  It didn't make national news until later.   I am excited that Fox News covered the fact that 5000 people gathered to voice our disapporoval of this administration's spending and policy.   5000 people showed up with little to no press.   It was not in the papers or on TV, yet 5000 showed up.   Now we are finally getting press.  

      April 15th will be huge and thousands of people are attending hundreds of Tea Parties on the same day.  There will be no celebrities at ours.   Of the 350 -500 scheduled Tea Parties, Fox will be present at 4 or 5.    I am thrilled that our message will be getting out.   CNN and MSNBC will be caught flat footed for not covering us.   You have 2 news stations who present the news as they "see" it and we have one who chooses to notice that we exist.   

      These Tea Parties belong to the People.   They were independently formed and people who understand and agree with the message are attending.   This is not about Obama, it is about the massive amount of Debt that the current government, including Republicans, is piling on our shoulders.   It is about protecting our rights provided for us in our Constitution and it is about getting back to the type of government provided for us in the Constitution (Limited!).    We will not be going away anytime soon.   More and more people are waking up everyday to the fact that We the People have the power to change the course of history.   Watch this video: http://www.thefoxnati...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
           

        You lost the election.  Get over it.  Sit down and STFU.

        Your grandstanding here isn't anything new or inspiring, mostly bullhockey heard on right-wing radio stations.  You're not convincing anyone - and you've got the most skewed vision of the Constitution anyone could have.  You truly need to take your own advice and READ THE CONSTITUTION. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by montchai.k5692 (April 09, 2009 10:36 pm ET)
             

          Wow lack of sense liberal, I must have really struck a nerve with you.    Is that the most intelligent thing you can think of to say???   The constitution speaks of a LIMITED federal government.    This administration is planning on expanding the role of government beyond what is reasonable or intended.  

          "A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.  This is the sum of good government"  Thomas Jefferson

          Report Abuse
          • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 11:58 am ET)
               

            A quote from Thomas Jefferson isn't the same as a quote from the Constitution.  They are not one in the same.

            Nice try, though.

            Let me ask you this: where was your outrage when (1) Reagan spent us into oblivion (leaving future generations to foot the bill); and (2) when GWB expanded government to the largest it's ever been? 

            Your outrage must be selective.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by jim_mcelroy2553 (April 09, 2009 10:04 am ET)
         

      "Conservative misinformation"?  “Not Fair and Balanced”

      The mainstream media is really upset or is it scared) that some one other than the elite gets to decide not only what to cover but also how to cover it. Every day CBS, NBC, ABC and their cable news outlets as well as Newsday, the New York Times and many others not to mention the interestingly named "National Public Radio" (how public could it be if only one point of view is aired), the "News" is covered by, edited and reported by people that decide what is covered ("well that’s not news", and "The American People have a right to know") and what is covered. The last time I can remember that the journalistic integrity test of "just the facts" were used was in Dragnet, The TV show that’s how long it's been that the Media News organizations have been "Airing their Views" as news. I am a very big fan and have a tremendous respect for one of the giants and founding fathers of News Persons Walter Cronkite but the night he used the CBS Evening news to “inform” the Audience of his Opinion of the war in Vietnam was the last night that the news had any semblance of being impartial. I do not doubt the courage it took, the belief he had or the right he had to say it. He might have felt compelled to speak out because of conscience. None of that matters when anyone portrays themselves as being impartial. I have watched Fox news as well as ABC, NBC and CBS over the last year rather intently due to, the historic campaign, election and economic crisis and have seen a difference between Fox News Coverage proper and the rest of the shows that are aired on that channel. When covering the news most of the time it is far more “Fair and Balanced” than any of the other channels. In my opinion NO group of people could be unbiased all the time but when I have seen and most people agree (see all the polls that were taken during the campaign) that Fox News is more “Fair and Balanced” ,which means “shows both sides” not “Shows only one side” than any other news programming on at this time. Next time you want to throw stones remember the glass house you live in.

      Sincerely,

      Jim McElroy

      Report Abuse
    • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 10:41 am ET)
         

      Can you believe that a Fox Newscaster would say the following?  They are so one sided.  "Fox News' Neil Cavuto reports "over-caffeinated crashers" plan to show up at Tax Day tea parties. He said he has received reports of "very well-organized infiltrators trying to mix in and rain on this parade."  Wow, he talked about a group that plans to protest the Tea Parties.  

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 11:01 am ET)
           

        What do you imagine your point is?  "Over-caffeinated crashers" would suggest that they're not acting rationally.  Is that supposed to represent some sort of balance or something?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
             

          My goodness, he talked about people that will protest the protesters, they are FOX, they would never cover these things.  Covuto must be fired, he is moving to the left.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Victor Colorado (April 09, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
               

            Reporters don't report what the news will be.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 12:22 pm ET)
               

            You're arguing that criticizing opponents of the protest serves as a balance to promoting and supporting the same protests.

            Are you really that stupid, or is this just an act?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                 

              Sarcasm, ever heard of it? Lighten up Francis.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
                   

                So what is the sarcasm supposed to be based on?  There has to be some underlying point.

                Report Abuse
            • Author by markbfoot199 (April 09, 2009 2:58 pm ET)
                 

              Sarcasm, ever heard of it? Lighten up Francis.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
                   

                No, what you were trying to say was that FoxNews was giving coverage to multiple angles of this event, all because he denigrated potential protestors of this event.

                Report Abuse
      • Author by llph9993736 (April 09, 2009 11:40 am ET)
           

        Yes, and I imagine that the infiltraitors trying to rain on the parade are probably as fake as the paid protestors bussed to the fake AIG protests.  Why was there no outrage over the Fannie and Freddie bonuses?

        These rallies have nothing to do with party or Fox and everything to do with the rediculous spending of everyone in Washington without accountability, and returning to the roots of our Founding Fathers.  The accountability is coming.

        "The Utopian schemes of leveling [re-distribution of the wealth] and a community of goods , are as visionary and impractical as those which vest all property in the Crown [Federal Govt.]. [These ideas] are arbitrary, despotic, and in our government, unconstitutional"  Samuel Adams

        (William V. Wells, The Life and Public Services of Samuel Adams, 3 vols.[Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1865], 1:154.)

        "... we shall all consider ourselves unauthorized to to saddle posterity with our debts to the next generation, and morally bound to pay them ourselves; and consequently what may be deemed the period of a generation, or the life [expectancy] of the majority." (Bergh, Writings of Thomas Jefferson, 13:358)

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:19 pm ET)
             

          I'm just curious, were you screaming about "sadd[ling] posterity with our debts to the next generation..." when Reagan was in office?

          How about during the last administration, you know, where billions of dollars were wasted in Iraq on an illegal occupation that our children and grandchildren will pay for, a waste of money that Bush couldn't be honest with the country about (hiding the war funding from the general budget)?  Were you screaming about saddling our future generations with that debt?

          If not, you're just another right-wing hypocrite.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by njmiller316901 (April 09, 2009 11:26 am ET)
         

      Congratulations Media Matters. You have just spent an untold number of hours (and dollars) discovering what most of the rest of the country has known for a long time: Fox News is a conservative news channel. I suppose next you're going to try and tell us that MSNBC is a liberal news channel. Where DO you come up with this stuff?

      If I were you guys, I wouldn't get so worked up about the fact that FNC is conservative. I'd be more worried that people are actually watching the FNC... lots of people.

      For Tuesday April 7th (note that O'Reilly's 11p rerun has twice as many viewers as Matthews' prime time slot):

      Prime: FNC: 708 | CNN: 210 | MSNBC: 337 | HLN: 240

        5p: 6p: 7p: 8p: 9p: 10p: 11p: FNC Beck: Baier: Shep: O'Reilly: Hannity: Greta: O'Reilly:   602 413 405 765 801 558 519 CNN Blitzer: Blitzer: Dobbs: Brown: King: Cooper: Cooper:   204 209 220 150 249 232 156 MSNBC Matthews: EdShow: Matthews: Olbermann: Maddow: Olbermann: Maddow:   126 187 261 498 319 194 155 HLN Prime: Prime: VMitchell: Grace: Dobbs: Grace: Showbiz:   124 163 230 403 114 230

      166

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
           

        You must be new.

        Believe me, we all here know the worthlessness of the news from Fox.  We know it's got a conservative bias.  You're not telling anyone here anything new.  Sorry to rain on your parade.

        Also, remember this: Ratings DO NOT equal quality of programming. 

        Report Abuse
        • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 1:30 pm ET)
             

          They also don't equal election wins :)   :)   :)   :)   :)   :)   :)  

          Report Abuse
        • Author by njmiller316901 (April 09, 2009 4:16 pm ET)
             

          I am new. As should be evident by how poorly the ratings numbers cut and pasted in my original post. The gist: 11pm O'Reilly rerun = 519, prime time Matthews = 261. Can I post links on here? I'd be more than happy to post the link to the ratings.

          My parade is still quite sunny though. If you'll read my post again you'll see that my intentions were not to inform everybody what everybody already knows (FNC IS conservative). The point was to point out that MM just spent a lot of time (and maybe money) trying to prove the already proven. And from what I can tell, that's par for the course around here.

          So I know the fact that FNC is conservative is old news... But does MM know that?

          You're right, ratings don't necessarily equal quality programming, but they are a pretty good indicator. Especially when the lowest rated FNC program consistently beats the highest rated MSNBC program.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (April 09, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
           

        "If I were you guys, I wouldn't get so worked up about the fact that FNC is conservative. I'd be more worried that people are actually watching the FNC... lots of people." - njmiller316901

        I'm not worked up about it . . . why would I get worked up about a fake news network that's watched by 3% of the USA's population at any given time ?


        Report Abuse
        • Author by njmiller316901 (April 09, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
             

          Oh good then. You should have nothing to worry about.

          But wait a second... you're on a thread that is centered around a bunch of people being worked up over FNC's conservative bias.

          hmmmm

          Report Abuse
          • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 1:32 pm ET)
               

            The only people getting "worked up" about this issue are those of you on the right defending Fox.

            Liberals aren't worked up about it, just pointing out that the shameless promotion of a political event by a major news station stinks.

            Report Abuse
    • Author by teihs3416 (April 09, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
         

      ...you're kidding, right?  When Cindy Sheehan gathered twenty of her friends and stood in front of President Bush's Texas ranch, every media outlet in the US was there covering it like there was no greater news to report.  Night after night after night we saw Ms. Sheehan's protest.  However, the same outlets who followed Ms. Sheehan's every move have absolutely ignored or marginalized the Tea Parties that have been attended by thousands in each city they've been held in!  Why is that?  Why is it that Americans protesting irresponsible government are accused of being "militant"?  This unfair, biased slant by the liberal media is why they are being dumped by Americans who are wise enough to know we're not being told the whole story!  Thank God for Fox News!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by c21marybisig5844 (April 09, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
         

      this is idividuals, protesting as a result of the continuation of taxing eveything...taxes for middle class are suppose to be cut...but then they turn around and adding a tax on gas, adding a tax on electric, adding a tax on cigarettes..I don't smoke...but what we need is LESS GOVERNMENT so we will need less taxes.....unlike acorn is going to protest the same day...but they get paid through OUR TAXES that are going up ..America needs unity

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ru$$ian1 (April 09, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
         

      for being "liberal" minded people you sure don't like when one of your own seem to give an opposing opinion even a second glance. i actually thought i would come in here and learn a bit about how you guys really feel amongst yourselves. why you seem to be so oppposing to the other sides ideals and such. seems to me you have enough arguing with each other to keep you busy.

      i don't even get why y'all are so interested in every minute of fox. if ya hate it so much ya have about 20 other places to go. for those of us crazy gun totin right wingers, this is the only place we get our kind of balanced. compared to the heavily weighted left channels and programs, i'll take a little crazy to get to a more medium point. what shows on msnbc, cnn, abc, nbc, cbs, what shows could someone go watch that are not the same just opposite way? you have plenty of options. sorry for you, this psycho cookoo crazy gunwaving fox news makes sense to a whooooole lot of people.

      many people have but just one or two sticking points about one side or the other. not everything everyone says on every show is agreed upon by the majority of rights or lefts. but admit it, this is the only place for right leaning people.

      why do you even give a crap?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by c21marybisig5844 (April 09, 2009 12:47 pm ET)
         

      what is wrong with free speech....let people talk...we may not agree ...but that is the good part of our great country...if we all had the same views...we would be zombies...or worse yet...like people overseas who can't think on their own...can't have their own money...can't speak out against the government.....can't have their own religion or no religion....that is why people come to this country.....stop worrying what people say....be thankful we are in a country where we can talk

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (April 09, 2009 1:04 pm ET)
           

        Journalism has ethics and standards.  Any entity that purports to be a news organization should abide by them.

        It's really just that simple.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pamdixon495445 (April 09, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
         

      Bravo Media Matters, you are actually reporting the facts just as they have been shown to us by the commentators at FOX.  Commentators, opinions vs news.  Surely even you know the difference since you largely just give your opinion.  It's no wonder that FOX has more of an audience day after day then the others all put together.  In my little town, most of the participants are democrats.  My 81 year old mother, bless her soul, will be voicing her opinion for the first time.  Having lived through the great depression and knowing first hand how her family was affected, she has lots to offer.  It appears that some are confused about TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.  Well, my mom for one doesn't have $3,000 extra dollars a year laying around to pay for increased energy, gas, city, state, federal taxes.  Having worked until the age of 79, retiring 3 times, and saving most of what she earned, she is unfortunately going to be hit hard, but maybe you wouldn't understand that.  A furgal woman who has worked all of her life should not have to watch her savings decline nor should she have to worry about what she will be leaving her grandchildren (college tuition, which will now go to Obeyme).  Maybe if you expanded your view of what's going on you might see things differently.  Oh, and I'm not ranting, just saying.  Having worked for the government for 32 years as an analyst with a goal of downsizing the activities where I worked, it's funny to see that 160,000 jobs will be added back.  Maybe if you would have had my job you would understand how absolutely hysterical this is.  The jobs that my little team cut, a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme of things, resulted in approximately 2,000 jobs lost through attrition over a 5 year period.  Little did I know that the year I retired, they would be bringing back the very jobs where people just sat around with nothing to do.  Now that is funny.  And the contractors, OMG, even funnier.  If the public only knew.  Anyway, just so you know, there is absolutely nothing partisan about this effort.  I'm nobody from nowhere with no particular political fantasies, but I do understand what is going on because I don't depend on one person, one news source, or one party to tell me what's going on.  However, FOX comes closer to the truth then anyone else, not to mention they at least talk about ALL of the issues, not just those that have been hand-picked by someone with an agenda.  The beautiful thing about freedom of speech is that we have commentators like Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly (though I don't much like him), and Greta (a scientologist and as liberal as they come...........but maybe changing her views...........don't know) who are free to state how they feel.  Hopefully you actually watch them before you critize them.  I noticed that you don't have to listen to Rush, Media Matters will do it for you and tell you what he says.  LOL, now that's a good one.  I am so entertained by this.  Again, BRAVO Media Matters.  I suspect you will have a variety of visitors today since you have actually written something on the Tea Parties.  Maybe you'll send some people out to do some fair and balanced surveying.  You'll probably be  surpised to find a lot of democrats who are having buyers remorse standing along side a lot of republicans who have been screaming about this since the very first bailout.  The Bush/Obama b/s has got to stop before the country is taken so far down we cannot recover.  Personally, I feel the need to do something about it.  I'm glad that there are at least some in the media who feel the same way.

      If you didn't know that Katie Couric is getting an achievement award for her "interview" of Sarah Palin, well she is, maybe that will make you happy.  It always seems to cheer up the left when Gov Palin is being torn down.  Of course, it might be too much to ask for you to find the unedited version of the interview to see what really went on.  Naaaaa...................too much trouble.  But hey, the award thing should get you into a good mood. 

      Trust me, unless you want the government to get 60 cents of every dollar you earn, you'll thank me for this later.  That 95 percent tax cuts is not a fact you should hang your hat on.  Maybe you should do a little research on tax cut, tax increase, tax decrease.  They really all do mean something different.  LOL, 95 percent, ROTFLMAO

      Report Abuse
      • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 1:24 pm ET)
           

        WoW! b You really drank the Kool-Aid!  Maybe you should do a little research since every statistic you just mentioned is a complete lie that has been debunked time and time again.  But I guess it doesn't matter to you and your troll cronies.  Lying to the American people is just fine as long as your lies are louder than the truth.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Robin in Cody (April 09, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
             

          I never thought I would read anything of value here, but....

          You know the person who claims that statistics are 'false' but produces no references to support his claim is just blowing hot air.

          I was a small business employer for quite some time before becoming a sole proprietor (I couldn't afford employees anymore - thank you especially the ones who felt I 'owed' them a paycheck whether they worked or not) and I know that for every dollar we earn we pay close to 52% of it in taxes. I know this because I pay attention to the payroll taxes, my sales taxes, my federal utility taxes, my property taxes, the taxes on my car registration, on my cellphone bill, etc... I challenge each of you to just take one month and look closely at all the bills you pay and take note of the 'taxes' and look at your property tax bill, if you don't own property ask your landlord about them, YOU will be paying the tax increase in your rents. If you don't know just how much you pay in taxes --- find out, then you too will be looking for a TEA Party to attend. (Taxed Enough Already!!!!!!!)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
               

            If your total taxes make it difficult or impossible for you to have a reasonable standard of living, then you will be getting a tax break from Obama.

            If your total taxes still let you have a very reasonable lifestyle, then STFU.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
               

            The $3,000 figure is an outright lie that has been exposed on this website as well as last night on MSNBC.  When somebody presents a bunch a facts with no sources complains about somebody calling them out with no sources is filled with the proverbial hot air.  And thats just one statictic but keep reading this web site, the Republcian lie machine gets exposed here every day.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by ritapp_1776 (April 09, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
           

        pamdixon, you are my hero! 

        I find it hilarious that this site did not place a distinction on commentators versus news reporters.  And the people posting here don't seem to understand the difference either. 

        These tea parties are big news, and Fox is covering it.  I can't believe that so many feel that it is okay for the government to take, take, take, spend, spend, spend.  Both the Ds and the Rs!!!!!

        I wonder if mediamatters thought it was fair when BO went on his tour of Europe during the campaign and the 3 networks sent their top news anchors to cover it?  Yet not a one covered the opposing party candidate's trip.  Why?  Because they had already selected our next leader??  Or if they studied how for YEARS these same networks campaigned against GWB and during the campaign they were (and still are) cheerleaders for BO?  I am a certifiable independent, and I watch as much coverage of political news as I can stand, but the bias is sickening.  Now see how they whine.....

        WHY is this even a story?  I think some people are a little scared...  It seems people cannot think for themselves any more.  I wish they would hand me their money as freely as they are willing to hand it to the government....

        Report Abuse
        • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
             

          FoxNews isn't just reporting these events, they are promoting them. Why is that so difficult for many on the right to grasp?

          Report Abuse
      • Author by fawltylogic (April 09, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
           

        It appears that some are confused about TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION.  Well, my mom for one doesn't have $3,000 extra dollars a year laying around to pay for increased energy, gas, city, state, federal taxes.

        Does she have a couple of bucks extra per month? Over the next 10 years?

        http://mediamatters.org/items/200904060021

        MIT professor John Reilly, one of the authors of the study, has disputed the GOP's calculation, stating that his study "has been misrepresented" and that the Republicans' claim of an average household cost of $3,128 is "nearly 10 times the correct estimate" based on his study's cap-and-trade model

        He clears it up here:

        Doing this we find that the NPV cost per family of four starts at about $75 in 2015, rises to nearly $510 by 2025, and then falls to $205 by 2050. We can calculate the average annual NPV cost per family by summing over all years and dividing by the number of years, and this shows the average annual net present value cost to be about $340 -- only a part of which would be actual energy bill increases. This $340 includes the direct effects of higher energy prices, the cost of measures to reduce energy use such as adding insulation to homes, the higher price of goods that are produced using energy, and impacts on wages and returns on capital. The cost per household will vary from our hypothetical average family of four depending on the household's circumstances. Those households with large heating and cooling bills because of the climate in which they live or who drive more than average will face higher costs. Those with smaller homes who live in benign climates will have lower costs.

        So, stop worrying about your grandmother, she won't have to pay $3000 extra per year at all.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (April 09, 2009 3:19 pm ET)
           

        "It appears that some are confused about TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION." - pamdixon495445

        And it appears that you're one of them.  I'll assume your 81 year old mother lives in the US - if so, that means she is represented by two US Senators and one member of the House of Representatives . . . not to mention a state Governor, state legislature, mayor, local gov't, etc.


        Report Abuse
    • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
         

      Don't worry too much.  The truly hysterical part about all of this is that the market is on a steady rebound and has been for close to a month.  When the economy is functioning properly again a lot of people are going to eat a lot of crow.  But i guess they'll have a new lie, they always do.

      Right now Republicans=Keep watching Fox News=Keep lying to the American people=Keep losing elections.  :) :) ;) :)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by anebriated199 (April 09, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
         

      Fox news is way more fair and balanced than MSNBC, CBS, CNN, or any other news network. One must ask though why is ACORN saying they are going to infiltrate these parties, do they not realize that they are kept alive by the people in these tea parties? Or the stimulus plan that gives ACORN 5 billion of taxpayer money just so they can continue to work for democrats who always find a way to funnel money  to them. ACORN needs to sit at home if they cannot pay for their own way like the rest of us, but if they are there protesting taxpayers they should be called out by all the media, but they won't, at least not by the mainstream or MSNBC. Fox news, another reason you are number 1 news channel in america.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by LuvLuLu (April 09, 2009 3:22 pm ET)
           

        Go back to school, and read a few non-biased sources, and you'll learn that ACORN didn't and won't get any stimulus money. ACORN didn't say they will infiltrate the tea parties.

        FoxNews is a large cable provider because they pander to a group that likes to be spoon-fed the news they want to hear to fit their preconceived notions.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (April 09, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
           

        "Fox news is way more fair and balanced than MSNBC, CBS, CNN, or any other news network." - anebriated199 [what an apt name]

        Um, do you have any PROOF of this?


        "Fox news, another reason you are number 1 news channel in america."

        Sigh . . . why do wingnuts continue to believe ratings = content?  By that logic, SpongeBob SquarePants - whose viewers are consistently higher in number than the Fox Comedy Channel - must be the best new channel in America . . .


        Report Abuse
        • Author by anebriated199 (April 10, 2009 12:18 pm ET)
             

          Yeah comparing msnbc to a comedy channel I will agree, makes me laugh hysterically. Excuse me, wingnuts? nothing like putting a label on someone, does that help you make your point? If spongebob has more viewers their content must have something that brings viewers in, just like fox news has content that brings people in which in turn makes their ratings high.

          All I was saying is fox news is being proven by viewership, while the other networks are simply falling by the wayside with their one-sided reporting. And my name is in reference to Obama, he is punch drunk, so I am inebriated or anebriated, just like obama hopefully I will pass out for 4 years and wake up and have a real president.

          Report Abuse
      • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 3:47 pm ET)
           

        Another lie=more votes for Democrats.Keep it up!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (April 09, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
         

      <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} span.EmailStyle15 {mso-style-type:personal; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-ansi-font-size:11.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:windowtext; font-weight:normal; font-style:normal; text-decoration:none; text-underline:none; text-decoration:none; text-line-through:none;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

      Precisely.   Self-promotion is at the heart of the issue with Fox’s planned "coverage" of the protest parties.

      When a news organization becomes a participant in the news, it can no longer objectively report on that news.

      Fox isn’t sending crews to file reports as independent observers of an event.  It’s assigned a squadron of talk-show hosts to join a group of protestors. 

      Greta and Beck and Hannity and Cavuto aren’t news journalists, they’re conservative talking head entertainers who host opinion shows.  There’s nothing wrong with that, but don’t confuse it with news. The broadcasts from these protests will in no way be factual news reports - the whole point of them being there is to support and engage with the crowd.

      For the Fox News network to cover the protests as “news”, it cannot also be a participant without crossing the line between journalism and entertainment.

      The people that will lose out in this circus will be those who genuinely want to protest without the baggage of having the Fox news organization taint their message by branding them as members of the “Fox Nation” in an effort to boost ratings and advertiser revenue.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by PigFox (April 09, 2009 4:14 pm ET)
         

      Go FoxNews! I support you in the Tea Party protests! I believe in keeping as much of my money as i can and the government not using my tax dollars to fund abortion, public schools that don't work and universal health care. Universal health care is available NOW! My sister, who was broke five years ago, got treatment for diabetes blindness at LBJ Hospital in Houston five years ago and only paid what she could afford. ANYBODY in America RIGHT NOW can be treated if they have no money. And if you do have money and no health care insurance, sounds like you got your priorities out of whack.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by diogenie27611 (April 09, 2009 4:22 pm ET)
           

        I don't know about you but I'm getting a tax cut.  What's all the fuss about?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 09, 2009 4:42 pm ET)
             

          Half of these idiots don't care that they're getting a tax cut.  They just want to get together with other folks who want to bash Obama and make a party out of it.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by njmiller316901 (April 10, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
               

            It has to do with a lot more than just tax cuts/hikes for a lot of us attending the tea parties. The out of control spending is striking a nerve with a large sector of society. People understand that it is literally impossible for BO to increase spending the way he has AND balance the budget the way he plans to, without raising somebody's taxes. And we all know who that "somebody" is going to be, don't we? The "rich." Which of course is a FANTASTIC idea... let's take money from the few that employ the many. That shouldn't backfire at all, right? Especially since unemployment is so low right now.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by ButteryPat (April 09, 2009 8:13 pm ET)
           

        "My sister, who was broke five years ago, got treatment for diabetes blindness at LBJ Hospital in Houston five years ago and only paid what she could afford. ANYBODY in America RIGHT NOW can be treated if they have no money."

        Right, and who do you think picks up the tab when somebody who needs a really expensive operation can't afford it? Does it just magically get paid for? Does everybody just agree that they'll let it go because they realize how important it is? Nope. That'd be John and Jane Q. Public who pick up the tab. At massive, overinflated, "free market" prices. So yep. Great job calling attention to one of the worst aspects of our healthcare system today.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:35 am ET)
           

        Your claims are demonstrably false. If your sister received care without some transfer of funds, it was charitable care. That system was tried and failed a long time ago. The system we have now is why our healthcare system is ranked 37th worldwide just above communist and embargoed  Cuba. Government run health programs deliver some 95 cents on the dollar to healthcare while private insurance only delivers some 75 cents when the patient samples are controlled for conditions. (Public healthcare currently costs more because those systems get all the worst poor cases the private insurers won't cover!)Public schools worked for the better part of this country's most prosperous years. China has a booming economy and public schools. Don't be duped by corporate media propaganda about privatizing your public schools. Smaller class sizes (which cost more in tax revenues) solve almost ALL the current problems with our school human warehouses. School uniforms finish the job nicely.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by royalsan18367 (April 09, 2009 4:33 pm ET)
         

      It amazes me how testy liberals get when those they perceive as 'the right' start using the tools of the left to advance their message.

      It's totally ok with them that the majority of the media promote the causes of the left.  Hell, they're biased reporting just elected a president.  But, let one media outlet promote a cause of the right, and the catterwauling begins... with calls for reinstituting the 'fairness' doctrine.  What a bunch of whiny crybabies!!! 

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ButteryPat (April 09, 2009 7:11 pm ET)
           

        Of course, like a good Republican, you've confused the Fairness Doctrine with the Equal Time Rule.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by laissezfairesucks (April 10, 2009 6:39 am ET)
           

        Obama is not progressive and not socilaist. That is not my opinion, that is the official position of the Socialist PArty of America. That's ultimately why General Electric promoted Obama, along with AIPAC andother monied interests (his first two largest campaign donors were the 2nd richest hedge fund manager inthe U.S. and UBS Bank, which is now embroiled in a tax dodge haven scandal, ironically!) Obama was put in with biased coverage fraudulently identifying him as progressive simply because they could, and because he would make the monied interests much richer, which he has by continuing the Bush Bailout and realestate giveaway (for 7 cents on the dollar).

        Report Abuse
    • Author by pjcarter (April 09, 2009 5:02 pm ET)
         

      I just found out Ted Nugent will sing the national anthem in San Antonio.  I was born and raised in San Antonio.  I've also met Ted Nugent in person.  He's a racist jerk.  I'm ashamed. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by sobetonwork2469 (April 09, 2009 5:03 pm ET)
         

      <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

      Good For Fox News For Covering The Protests. Previous protests covered by Fox News Million Man March, Green Peace Protests, Iraq War Protests, etc. Can't get anymore fair and balanced then that.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Reality (April 09, 2009 7:06 pm ET)
         

      The catalyst of the Boston Tea Party was taxation without representation by the British government.  They raised taxation on the colonies just to show that they COULD. 

      So, you all are wrong...yet again.  Obama has raised taxes just because he can.  I'm not dressed up like an Indian, but the tea is flying.  Even though the numbers do not lie.  More revenue is created with a robust economy with less taxation percentages.  History is a weak subject for many of you that ATTEMPT to argue against the black and white, documented facts.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ButteryPat (April 09, 2009 7:32 pm ET)
           

        "The catalyst of the Boston Tea Party was taxation without representation by the British government.  They raised taxation on the colonies just to show that they COULD."

        Right. And they did so autonomously with no input from the colonies. Not to mention that the Tea tax in question was inflated, regressive, and had much more of a burden on the poor than on the rich. That's why the Tea tax was such a big deal. Because it was the poor majority getting screwed rather than the rich.  Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Paul Revere and Patrick Henry didn't really give a crap about the Tea tax. They could afford it. It was the majority of the population, who depended on tea to render their water drinkable, who were burdened and outraged. It was the point at which American Independence became something average people could support, rather than a bunch of rich socialites whining because King George f'ed up their land deals, which is what it was up until that point.

        So how does this apply to the rolling back of taxes to pre-Bush levels for the top 5%? Especially because your views ARE being represented in the Congress. I can find any Republican senator or rep. saying exactly the same things as you. It's disgraceful to attempt to argue that you are being put in the position of the Boston Revolutionaries. Nothing could be further from the spirit of the Boston Tea Party than a bunch of wealthy silver-spoon fed socialites complaining that they're being oppressed, and what we should really do is raise taxes on poor people. After all, if they want representation, they should just buy it like us good rich folk.

        Unless you're arguing that Obama's new tax policy is going to place an unreasonable burden on the poor, and are taking a new compassionate stance on our nation's low-income peoples, than the Boston Tea Party is not the most convenient of events for you to attempt to associate with. Pick up a book on the Revolution that doesn't say "ages 4 and up" on it if you'd like additional information on these subjects.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by yoikesohoythere1991 (April 09, 2009 9:08 pm ET)
             

          Governments can raise money through taxation (such as income tax), borrowing, or by simply printing the money.

          Unbalanced budgets (whether signed by Bush or Obama) are taxation without representation because the money for these budgets is raised through borrowing or printing.

          Some of those who will repay the borrowed money have no vote today, so they have taxation without representation.

          Printing money without an increase in goods must ultimately result in inflation with each dollar buying less tomorrow than it does today; this is a tax on savings that will affect everyone with savings no matter how meager their incomes.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by njmiller316901 (April 10, 2009 3:49 pm ET)
               

            "Some of those who will repay the borrowed money have no vote today, so they have taxation without representation."

            Excellent point! I've never looked at it that way. I wonder if there are any legal justifications to this. Now THAT would be an interesting case if it were ever brought before the courts.

            Unfortunately, "no taxation without representation" is little more than a 230+ year old battle cry. There is nothing in the constitution that says congress can't raise our taxes whenever they feel it necessary: a fact largely ignored on this board.

            So the only way my unborn children could win a suit against the gov't for the debt that Obama is passing along to them, is if the courts decided that "no taxation without representation" was found in the "penumbra" of the constitution; which, if you ask me, is a bunch of BS anyway. But hey, it worked for Roe.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by Curtis03 (April 09, 2009 11:08 pm ET)
             

          The Boston Tea Party is a symbol of protest.  We are protesting the ARRA of 2009.  We don't like it.  We are not going to "STFU" since we don't have to....yet.  Our government used to be of the people and for the people.  We are some of the people.

          Speaking of books, ever read Atlas Shrugged?  Look it up.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
               

            Just so you know, Atlas Shrugged was a fictional work, not reference material.

            You righties always forget that don't you?  What is it with right-wing folks and believing that fictional works are reference materials?  Do I need to make a list for you?

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Curtis03 (April 10, 2009 1:06 pm ET)
                 

              The Wreck of the Titan was a fictional work also, written 14 years before the sinking of the Titanic.  The point is there are similiarities to what is happening now and the story Atlas Shrugged. 

              I doubt explaining it to you further will make a difference.  I'm not a special ed teacher.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 8:26 pm ET)
                   

                I believe you when you say you're not a special education teacher.  In fact, I believe you're one of the special education students.

                The point I'm driving home is that no matter the similarities between what is happening now and Atlas Shrugged, it's not an indication of what will happen.  Ayn Rand was not a prophet, but a philosopher.

                Report Abuse
    • Author by FNC Liberal (April 10, 2009 1:48 am ET)
         

      Folks, there's a big difference between reporting on an event and participating in one. Fox News hosts are participating in these Tea Parties. Of course, Sean, Glenn, Greta and Neil will speak favorable of these Tea Parties.

      I oppose any news organization personally participating in a political event. It sends the wrong message to their viewers. How can you be fair in your reporting if you are participating in an event like this?

      If you want scandals, I strongly recommend Media Matters investigates the funding of these Tea Parties, especially the ones where Fox News is participating in.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Curtis03 (April 10, 2009 10:37 am ET)
           

        "How can you be fair in reporting"?  Wow, that is the pot calling the kettle black.  Anyone who views the other major news channels and calls that "fair" reporting, is either a blind hypocirte, ignorant, or hates America.

        I oppose your opinion.

        White House - "that wasn't a bow."

        Report Abuse
        • Author by libertyordeath20007896 (April 11, 2009 1:10 pm ET)
             

          What is fair. media matters bashes the tea parties , their fair. And they won't print post that oppose their position. Yeah that is fair!!

          Report Abuse
    • Author by ellie1112 (April 10, 2009 6:56 am ET)
         

      Being new to this site, I can't reply to individuals yet, so, Laissezfairesucks.....here goes.

      Jefferson indeed began free education FOR 3 YEARS, because he knew there were poor but deserving children whose families could not afford schooling. He never dreamed we would end up giving all students free education as we are set up today. Out of those who completed the first 3 years, a handfull would be chosen based on their ability to comprehend to attend another year.

      Perhaps if you would read what he wrote, rather than what people wrote about him, you'd see he was a proponent of small government. Whenever you trust others to educate you, instead of educating yourself, you're at the mercy of their spin. Our school texts are full of spin.

      Being born equal doesn't mean we are all born with equal abilities. Even idiot savants bear that out. Not all children are capable of going to university, even though they may get free grants to do so. Then, you have those who simply choose not to go to University. Bush's comment about sending the lower paying jobs overseas, to give our population the ability to work in the higher paying sectors was short-sighted. There are many in our population who cannot or will not ever get those jobs. They simply don't have the capabilities to do many of those jobs.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by commonsenseliberal (April 10, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
           

        So basically what you're saying is that school history books are wrong because YOU don't agree with what's in them.

        Got it.

        Jefferson, Washington, Adams, they are not the entirety of our nation's history - and they are not the end all, be all, of an evolving representative republic.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by goshzilla (April 10, 2009 2:41 pm ET)
         

      But has anyone bothered to clarify the correct historical reason for the Boston Tea Party?

      At the time of the incident the East India Tea Company was granted a tax deduction that allowed them to sell tea to the colonies at a price lower than imported tea. During this time the only tea that could be legally sold was from the E.I.T.C. the response of the colonists was of anger because it was an example of a government mandated monopoly on trade. It had nothing to do with paying higher taxes on tea(that assertion is false, because the colonists would be buying cheaper tea if they bought from E.I.T.C.)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Reality (April 10, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
           

        Riiiight!  However, if the government would have stayed out of the taxpayers pocket in the frst place, then this could have totally been avoided. 

        Is that not the correct assessment?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nycgal (April 10, 2009 5:08 pm ET)
         

      Fox preaches to the choir a small, insulated and isolated one.  Even though they have 'high' ratings --it's all from their base, that watches them religously and believes everything they say.  No amount of reasoning or analysis or outrage is going to change their minds or convince Fox to alter their programming.

      I think by constantly posting articles/clips of these fools gives them a much, much wider audience and inadvertantly gives credence to the craziness coming out of their mouths. 

      I propose complete internet silence on Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity et al as they are irrelevant and we should be focusing on the issues.  If a tree falls in the woods...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Scooter (April 10, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
         

      I don't see the hypocrisy here.  Fox is covering these protests, because they are a big thing.  Plain and simple.  They would still happen without Fox News, believe me.  I was at the one in Cincinnati, and there were no major news networks there, just locals, which Fox picked up.

      And another thing....Hannity and Beck are commentators fueled by opinion.  Please get that through your heads. 

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mo3470 (April 10, 2009 11:09 pm ET)
         

      From ThinkProgress:

      Despite these attempts to make the “movement” appear organic, the principle organizers of the local events are actually the lobbyist-run think tanks Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works. The two groups are heavily staffed and well funded, and are providing all the logistical and public relations work necessary for planning coast-to-coast protests:

      Freedom Works staffers coordinate conference calls among protesters, contacting conservative activists to give them “sign ideas, sample press releases, and a map of events around the country.”

      Freedom Works staffers apparently moved to “take over” the planning of local events in Florida.

      Freedom Works provides how-to guides for delivering a “clear message” to the public and media.

      Freedom Works has several domain addresses — some of them made to look like they were set up by amateurs — to promote the protests.

      Americans for Prosperity is writing press releases and planning the events in New Jersey, Arizona, New Hampshire, Missouri, Kansas, and several other states.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jedi_munkie_spy5971 (April 11, 2009 11:12 am ET)
         

      Some people can't figure out the difference between a reporter and news commentator.  Sean Hannity is a news commentator, your local TV news has reporters.  Can a news commentator promote something via his show?

      BTW Fox News is balanced...

      Sean Hannity = "conservative"

      Geraldo Rivera = "Liberal"

      Greta van sustern = "moderate"

      Alan colmes = "liberal"

      Oliver North = "Republican"

      Bill O'Reilly = "moderate"

      Mike Huckabee = "conservative"

      Go ahead and figure out some of the others.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by libertyordeath20007896 (April 11, 2009 12:10 pm ET)
         

      You know what it isn't Fox news. They are reporting news. I too am mad over the crazy spending, does that make me a lunatic like you trying to make fox news. This is sad but my realization that this is not about party lines but about just craziness to spend money to get out of debt. Who believes this? Most rational people. Their not democrat or republican, their American!!!!Have a Great Day!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ashbymarketing8780 (April 11, 2009 3:12 pm ET)
         

      I am going to attend a rally simple because I do believe we are on a path of spending that by all accounts can not be sustained. The Congressional Budget Office confirms it. It's not just President Obama's policies but state and local increases also.

       Fox news has been overdoing this and I would agree even promoting a event that hasn't happened yet is rather silly.

       Interesting that the rally organizer for the event in my area has declined (so far )any political candidates/officer holders requests to speak at the event. She believes this is not a platform for politicians to gain from. This may change of course.

       Rachael Maddow on CSNBC did some coverage last night that was of course very slanted, they picked out the dumbest of the dumb to comment and made it seem like it was only ultra right wing radicals protesting a tax decrease for 95% of Americans, she gave her typical "look how stupid these people are " face. Maddow failed to mention in a short 24 months some of these buts expire  and with the Bush tax cuts expiring we will have almost a trillion in tax increases over the next five years (According to the congressional budget office).

        From the people I have talked to attending many are middle class, some soccer mom types that have never even been to a protest, far from ultra right wing radicals, but we shall see. It should be interesting.

      Report Abuse

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace