About us Login Get email updates
Special Reports
Print

REPORT: Time and again, Fox News doctors video to smear progressives

May 05, 2009 8:30 am ET

SUMMARY: Media Matters has documented numerous examples of Fox News hosts and correspondents cropping comments by progressives and Democratic political figures in a manner that misrepresents them.

Comments

On three occasions from April 24 to May 1, Media Matters for America documented Fox News figures airing clips of progressives that were cropped in a way that misrepresented their statements. For example, White House correspondent Wendell Goler cropped a comment by President Obama and took it out of context to falsely suggest that he supports creating a health-care system "like the European countries." In fact, Obama was paraphrasing the town hall question he had been asked before explaining why he opposed such a system.

These examples are not anomalous for Fox News -- while it purports to be "fair and balanced" and claims, "We report, you decide," Media Matters has documented dozens of similar examples over the years. Fox News has misleadingly cropped the comments of progressives such as Obama, former Vice President Al Gore, Vice President Joe Biden, Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), and former President Bill Clinton. Those comments dealt with a wide range of topics, including health care, earmarks, the financial crisis, the 2008 presidential campaign, and global warming.

In 2006, Media Matters noted a pattern in which correspondents on Fox News' Special Report aired cropped clips of Democratic senators commenting on President Bush's warrantless wiretapping that did not include those senators' objections to the program's legality.

Below, Media Matters presents a non-comprehensive list of the most misleading instances in which Fox News figures aired cropped clips of progressives that were taken out of context.

  • During the May 1 edition of Special Report, saying it was a "description of how the president hopes his nominee will interpret the law," congressional correspondent Major Garrett aired a clip in which Obama stated: "I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes." Garrett then said: "That aggravates those who believe justices should follow the Constitution and legislative intent." But Garrett omitted the very next sentence, in which Obama stated: "I will seek somebody who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role."
  • On the May 1 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, during a segment suggesting that Gore has profited from his advocacy of renewable energy and climate change mitigation, guest host Laura Ingraham presented clips of Gore's April 24 congressional testimony that had been edited to remove his statements that he donates the money he makes from his climate-related work to a nonprofit organization.
  • During the April 24 edition of Special Report, Goler claimed that Obama "doesn't want to do it halfway" on health care, and then aired a clip from a March 26 online town hall event of Obama saying, "If you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?" Following the clip, Goler reported: "His critics worry universal health care would mean government-run health care." In fact, Obama actually said, "Now, the question is, if you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?" [emphasis added] In doing so, Obama was paraphrasing the town hall question he had been asked -- "Why can we not have a universal health-care system, like many European countries, where people are treated based on needs rather than financial resources?" -- before explaining why he opposed such a system.
  • On the April 3 edition of his television program, Sean Hannity played a clip of Obama saying in an April 3 speech in Strasbourg, France: "In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America's shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." Hannity then said: "And the liberal tradition of blame America first, well, that's still alive." Hannity later asked: "Why is there this anti-Americanism in Europe?" In fact, immediately after the part of the speech Hannity played, Obama criticized anti-Americanism in Europe as well as Europeans who "choose to blame America for much of what's bad."
  • During the March 16 edition of The Live Desk, co-host Martha MacCallum claimed that "after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend." Fox News then aired clips of administration officials purportedly giving an optimistic view of the economy, which included a clip of Biden stating: "The fundamentals of the economy are strong." After the clips aired, MacCallum contrasted the administration's purported remarks from "this weekend" with what then-Sen. Obama said during the 2008 presidential campaign, when he criticized Sen. John McCain for stating that the "fundamentals of our economy are strong, but these are very, very difficult times." However, Biden did not make his remarks during an "interview[]" over the past weekend; Biden made his remarks at a September 15, 2008, campaign event, and, like Obama, was criticizing McCain for his remarks -- not echoing McCain. On the next day's Live Desk, MacCallum apologized for "inadvertedly us[ing]" the clip.
  • On April 7, 8, and 9, several Fox News personalities -- including Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Fox & Friends co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Steve Doocy -- aired cropped video of Frank's exchange with Harvard University student Joel Pollak, who asked Frank during an event at the Harvard School of Government, "[H]ow much, if any, responsibility do you think you bear" for the financial crisis. The Fox News personalities suggested or stated that Frank had refused to answer Pollak's question or had denied any responsibility for the crisis. In fact, in portions of the exchange not aired by the Fox News personalities, Frank said, "The answer is, yes, I do take responsibility for something." Frank later added that after filing "a bill in 2006, when I was still in the minority, to say hedge funds should be registered," in 2007, he "was approached by people who said, 'No. No. You can't do too much regulation,' and I backed off. I wish I hadn't." Frank also noted that he did, in fact, work on legislation to deal with mortgage lending, stating that in 2007, his committee passed restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and on subprime lending.
  • On the March 6 edition of his Fox News program, Hannity falsely claimed that Obama made a "campaign promise" to allow "no earmarks." After purporting to "go to the videotape" and "show the audience at home" Obama's "campaign promise" of "no earmarks," Hannity aired a number of clips from the 2008 presidential campaign in order to claim that Obama was breaking his promise, when, in fact, in three of the clips, Obama was referring to reforming the earmark process, and in a fourth, he was asserting that an opponent was being hypocritical for taking earmarks and then advocating against them. In the fifth clip, which was actually taken from a January 6 media availability -- not during the presidential campaign, as Hannity suggested -- Obama stated: "We are gonna ban all earmarks -- the process by which individual members insert pet projects without review." However, Obama was referring to his desire to "ban all earmarks" from his "recovery and reinvestment plan," which he specifically distinguished from "the overall budget process."
  • Like Hannity, O'Reilly aired Obama's statement, "We are going to ban all earmarks," and falsely characterized it as a promise to ban them from all legislation, not from the recovery plan. On the March 4 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly aired Obama's statement, then said, "President Obama pledging last January to end earmarks in federal spending." Later in the show, referring to earmarks included in the omnibus appropriations bill, O'Reilly stated, "But Obama's on record -- we just played the clip -- that he's going to do away with this. And then he takes 9,000 of them and signs it?"
  • On the October 17, 2008, edition of Special Report, Washington correspondent James Rosen stated of Samuel Wurzelbacher -- commonly known as Joe the Plumber -- "Even Obama himself has gone to work on this working stiff," and aired a cropped quote of Obama saying, "How many plumbers you know making a quarter-million dollars a year?" In fact, the context of that remark makes clear that Obama was actually criticizing McCain, not Wurzelbacher, as Rosen falsely claimed.
  • On the July 8, 2008, edition of Hannity & Colmes, Hannity aired a deceptively cropped statement from Clinton's July 5 remarks at the Aspen Ideas Festival in asserting that Clinton was "obviously taking a shot at Senator McCain." In fact, as the full statement and context of Clinton's remarks make clear, Clinton was discussing what former South African president -- and political prisoner -- Nelson Mandela means to him. Hannity provided no evidence to support his assertion that Clinton's comments were a "shot at Senator McCain."
  • During the January 31, 2008, edition of America's Pulse, host E.D. Hill falsely asserted that Clinton said "we need to slow" the economy in order to combat global warming. Hill cropped Clinton's comments, airing only his statement: "We just have to slow down our economy and cut our greenhouse gas emissions, because we've got to save the planet for our grandchildren." But Clinton did not say that we "have to slow down our economy" to fight global warming. Rather, he said that "rich" countries could take that approach, but then he said why he thought it wouldn't work, asserting that the "only way" to fight global warming is to prove that doing so "is good economics that we will create more jobs to build a sustainable economy."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by neon desert (May 05, 2009 9:52 am ET)
      3  
      To be fair to Fox News and their editing, we must remember that they have to consider the attention span of their viewers.

      And their hosts.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (May 05, 2009 10:54 am ET)
      7  
      FOX NEWS...

      We Distort, You're Deceived.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Gravatar (May 05, 2009 10:57 am ET)
      4  
      The people at FOX are mostly hardcore consevervatives who could care less that the country is moving in a progressive direction.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Thorgrim (May 05, 2009 11:36 am ET)
        16
      This is nothing compared to the MSNBC/CNN/EVERYOTHER NEWSORG Obama liberal lefty love-in.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by whillenbrand (May 05, 2009 11:46 am ET)
        6  
        Get over it! You lost, the good guys finally won. Frankly, I'm proud to be part of the "Love-in" and not part of your sore-looser mentality.
        So LOVE IT or LEAVE IT!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Hurryduck@aol.com (May 05, 2009 4:43 pm ET)
            7
          With all due respect, whillenbrand, you and Media Matters are the bad guys. This website lies about and distorts everything Conservatives and so called Conservatives say.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by loonz (May 05, 2009 4:59 pm ET)
            3  
            For example...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (May 05, 2009 6:05 pm ET)
              6  
              hurryduck was in a hurry and didn't have time to give you any examples. Providing videos and transcripts isn't enough facts, don't ya know? Media Matters has a secret laboratory where they fake everything, somehow. george soros is involved, along with Barbra Streisand...
              Report Abuse
              • Author by liberaldemdave (May 06, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
                1  
                oh, mary! i'm totally and utterly offended! you left out "teh gays". EVERYONE knows that part of our super-secret agenda is to support Media Matters.

                (removing tongue from cheek now)
                Report Abuse
          • Author by rms (May 05, 2009 7:51 pm ET)
            4  
            Yes, thank you, Thorgrim and Harryduck, for providing all those indisputable examples in making your assertions. We don't believe either of you...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by LuvLuLu (May 05, 2009 8:25 pm ET)
            4  
            MMfA uses facts, exact transcripts and video links to document what they're saying. You, not so much. One cannot "lie" when one uses accurate, complete transcripts and videos to demonstrate the points one is making. However, when one doesn't provide a lick of proof or factual content, one can lie a lot!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by mjh (May 06, 2009 1:46 am ET)
            7  
            "This website lies about and distorts everything Conservatives and so called Conservatives say."

            TRANSLATION: How dare this site actually QUOTE VERBATIM and present AUDIO and VIDEO clips of us neoKKKons saying what we normally keep behind closed doors!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by ewl94232 (May 06, 2009 12:01 pm ET)
                5
              The Klan, from its inception and through its various reincarnationsrious and factions was virtually exclusively composed of Democrats who supported such inspired leaders as Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt.

              This is one of those, " ... but failed to mention the Klan's connection to the progressive Democratic Party," moments.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by foghornleghorn (May 06, 2009 1:11 pm ET)
                2  
                ewl, the klan is so 1920's. Please come back to the 21st century.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by liberaldemdave (May 06, 2009 1:47 pm ET)
                1  
                ...and abraham lincoln spins in his grave everytime you republiCONS use his name in vain.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 06, 2009 7:53 pm ET)
                1  
                Ewl,
                Humor me and show me what happened to the South's voting patterns after the Civil Rights Act was passed. Don't forget to include which Senators became Republicans in the South during that time and their thoughts on race relations. Please include Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond in your analysis.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by Ouroborus (May 05, 2009 11:48 am ET)
        7  
        Then please feel free to cite specific examples in detail as MMfA has done here. Since this is 'nothing' in comparison, surely such examples should be available in abundance, no?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by skiploader1111 (May 05, 2009 11:51 am ET)
        6  
        Because Fox News and talk radio told you so. With no evidence of falsifying video and audio of course.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snoopy (May 05, 2009 12:05 pm ET)
        4  
        Project much, sorebum?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by progressiveright (May 05, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
        4  
        Can you prove this or are you just parrotting what Rush and others of his ilk have told you to say.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by snoopy (May 05, 2009 11:38 am ET)
      2 1
      Uh oh! Don't look now (OK, look now!) but 1st it was pagent bought breasts, now it's nude pics of miss high and mighty california! I'm very sure now that she's fox news material!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (May 05, 2009 11:43 am ET)
      4  
      Awww c'mon Media Matters, if Fox News stops distorting the comments of of progressives and Democrats, even more Fox News viewers are going to agree with progressives and Democrats and vote for them. They can't always just make straw man arguements to favor conservatives, sometimes they gotta have the falsified video and audio to back them up.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ewl94232 (May 05, 2009 11:48 am ET)
      5  
      I'm a FOX watcher and often defender. But I think you have caught them fair and square on most of these. I wish I could say that my side wouldn't do such a thing, but that would be foolish. When its reporters fudge evidence to support their opinions about the opposition they do no one a favor. Awareness of this failure is why I make it a point to also survey the opposition's point of view.

      Both sides are made up of human beings which means that falibility is built-in on both sides. Some of your fans might benefit from keeping this in mind, but I figure that, like some fans of FOX, they're looking more for reenforcement of the attitudes they already hold than a critical analysis. They make a mistake, just as some of my allies make a mistake if they think that the failures are the sum total of the content. That is not true of either Right or Left. It is an illusion that occurs when we fail to extend ourselves enough to understand why the otherside sees things differently.

      I enjoy your reporting and the expansions of text you so often supply. Thank you for the service.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (May 05, 2009 2:31 pm ET)
        8  
        Appreciate your comments. Most of us on here would like to see honest discussion, based upon facts, not spin.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by anotheramerican (May 05, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
            10
          Hahaha...
          My only question is it only when one agrees with you do you consider it honest discussion?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (May 05, 2009 3:01 pm ET)
            7  
            I think most of us know that Mary is the type that values discussion (i.e., a fair interchange of ideas), not just agreement. Many of us are the same way. If you can honestly say the same for yourself, then that's fine; however, if that were the case, would you be making such a ridiculous charge in the first place and preceding it with your incredibly immature "Hahaha"?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ewl94232 (May 05, 2009 3:02 pm ET)
            1  
            You know, the world is full of different people and each and every one of them has a different perspective on what is going on. That people will disagree is one of the most natural and predictable things there is. I like to try to understand what others think whether I agree with them or not. Ususally they've built their beliefs on accepting or rejecting some elements on which I have done the opposite. But why they chose the other direction is interesting and forces me to reexamine my own beliefs. But when people do nothing but toss out an insult toward the person that disagreed with them, there's no insight to be gained from that.

            I don't think my allies are perfect so it comes as no surprise they sometimes do or say things that I wouldn't do or say. I don't have to defend them if I don't believe they deserve it. But will do so if I think it helps the cause of truth and justice. I don't think I can be hurt by someone presenting an honest view of the truth and if their perception of what's real is better than mine, then they're doing me a favor by sharing it, even if it does put in doubt the things I currently believe.

            But I haven't much tolerance for people that just toss out a thought with no evidence or rational development.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (May 05, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
            4  
            Do you think they distorted here, AA? I think they got caught in the act, don't you?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by progressiveright (May 05, 2009 12:15 pm ET)
      5  
      Fox news claims to be fair and balanced. This type of activity is niether fair nor balanced. Fox and its parent company Newscorp have an agenda for the right and will do anything even lie to achieve this. They are part of a plot to destroy the truth and America.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (May 05, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
      5  
      Fox is just doing what they sued to be allowed to do - LIE.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jconnor194372 (May 05, 2009 7:43 pm ET)
      1  
      Perhaps the republican honor roll could be passed to UK home secretary for inclusion in next banned list ala savage.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Big Kev (May 06, 2009 5:00 am ET)
        7
      That's right, the Main Stream Media never did the same chop job on Bush. I guess when the shoe is on the other foot, it hurts don't it. Quit whining and just take the punches, Bush did for 8 years.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (May 06, 2009 9:34 am ET)
        3  
        Once again, a claim is made with absolutely nothing offered to back it up? Why do you cons think that anecdotes=data?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RODLY (May 06, 2009 10:46 am ET)
        3  
        Please provide a concrete specific example of the "chop job" on Bush.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ewl94232 (May 06, 2009 12:35 pm ET)
            3
          Chop job on Bush? An example? You have to be kidding!
          How about:
          - His alleged desertion from the National Gaurd.
          - His alleged alliance with the House of Saud.
          - His alleged low IQ (140 per military records).
          - His alleged spying on American citizens.
          - His alleged manufacture of false evidence of weapons of mass destruction to support ... Haliburton, his father's legacy, his own megalomania, etc.
          - His alleged lies to Congress re the reasons for war in Iraq.
          - His alleged theft of the 2000 election.
          - His alleged sabotage of the twin towers.
          - His alleged plot to kill Black people in New Orleans.
          - His alleged sabotage of the New Orleans levies.
          - His daughter's alleged moral degeneracy.
          - His alleged exploitation of 9-11 for base political purposes.
          - His alleged indifference to the sacrifices of American service people.
          - His alleged part in the alleged plot to "get back at" former Ambassador Wilson in the Valerie Plame affair.
          - His alleged lack of qualification for the office of President because he'd only been the governor of a state with slightly more than average restrictions on gubernatorial authority.
          - His alleged indifference to the plight of death-row inmates.
          - His alleged history of drug abuse.
          - His genuine history of alchohol abuse that had ended more than twenty years before he ran for President.
          This is far from a complete list and if you think I'm taking the time to look up references for each of these you are insane. What none of you seems aware of is that approximately 70 - 80% of the people in the media you think leans Left rate themselves as Liberals. You poor guys are so incapable of seeing the beam in your own eye. That you think the media slants against you is indicative of something, but I'm afraid you're a long way from figuring it out.
          Report Abuse

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace