About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media gave Bush free pass for repeating false "dodged a bullet" claim about New Orleans levees

September 13, 2005 7:20 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

11 Comments

After touring hurricane-ravaged New Orleans on September 12, President Bush met with reporters and repeated the specious claim that his discredited statement -- "I don't think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees" -- was based on news reports from the morning after the storm indicating that New Orleans had "dodged a bullet." But the media either uncritically repeated Bush's hollow explanation of his comments -- first offered up by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff -- or ignored it entirely.

The assertion that the president relied on news reports to apprise himself of the situation in New Orleans -- rather than the National Weather Service, which reported the first levee breaches before and shortly after Hurricane Katrina passed through New Orleans -- is an incredible one. But in fact, many in the media were not reporting that New Orleans "dodged a bullet," as Media Matters for America has noted. For example, 12 hours before the time when Bush claims to have heard the "dodged a bullet" news reports, the New Orleans Times-Picayune reported that the levees had been breached. Moreover, while Bush did not indicate from which "airwaves" he had heard the "dodged a bullet" reports, other newspapers in addition to the Times-Picayune reported on the morning after the storm that there had already been breached levees and significant flooding. For example, on August 30, the Los Angeles Times reported that a levee break had occurred by late morning August 29, with water from the break "spill[ing] through the area, flooding the town's two main shelters and swamping the local National Guard armory, leaving even public safety officials homeless."

Nevertheless, at a September 12 meeting with reporters, when Bush was asked, "Did they [administration officials] misinform you when you said no one anticipated the breach of the levees?" he responded:

BUSH: No. What I was referring to is this: When that storm came by, a lot of people said we dodged a bullet. When that storm came through at first, people said, "Whew." There was a sense of relaxation. And that's what I was referring to. And I myself thought we had dodged a bullet. You know why? Because I was listening to people probably over the airwaves say, "The bullet has been dodged." And that was what I was referring to. Of course, there were plans in case the levee had been breached. There was a sense of relaxation at a critical moment. And thank you for giving me a chance to clarify that.

Bush's comments echoed those of Chertoff and Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers, who said on September 6: "The headline, of course, in most of the country's papers on Tuesday were 'New Orleans dodged a bullet,' or words to that effect. At that time, when those words were in our minds, we started working issues before we were asked."

Bush's continued spinning of his discredited remarks drew scant attention from the media. According to a Nexis search*, just two major papers covered Bush's comments on September 13: The Boston Globe and Newsday. The Globe simply quoted Bush, while Newsday reprinted portions of a September 12 Associated Press article, which noted: "He [Bush] said he got that impression from the media." The September 13 Atlanta Journal-Constitution reprinted that portion of Bush's statement.

The September 12 broadcast of National Public Radio's All Things Considered, correspondent David Greene reported simply that Bush "revisited" his comment. CNN covered Bush's remarks live, but failed to challenge the president's spinning of his own remarks. However, on the September 12 edition of CNN's NewsNight with Aaron Brown, John Dickerson of Slate.com and Time magazine White House correspondent Mike Allen discussed the president's comments, and Dickerson noted: "The White House and the administration says that they were relying on the people on the ground seeing what was going wrong. Well, that's a fair point, except that the Department of Homeland Security should be able to do a little bit better than watching just the news reports on television."

CNN, while remaining uncritical of the president, did refute similar claims made by Chertoff. On the September 12 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, correspondent Tom Foreman challenged Chertoff's claim that the flooding in New Orleans "did catch people by surprise."

From the September 12 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360:

FOREMAN: The head of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA [Federal Emergency Management Agency], Michael Chertoff, has insisted for two weeks he had no warning of how bad Katrina could be.

CHERTOFF: Even as everybody thought New Orleans had dodged the bullet Tuesday morning, the levee was not only being flooded, which is I think what most people always assumed would happen, but it actually broke. So I think that was -- did catch people by surprise.

FOREMAN: But it turns out the National Weather Service issued a detailed message a day before the strike, saying buildings would be leveled, high-rises crippled and most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks, perhaps longer. In addition, and again contrary to Chertoff's claims, FEMA was most certainly warned that the levees could collapse, although even well after the levees failed, FEMA officials continued to downplay how bad the flooding might be. One said, "I don't want to alarm everybody that, you know, New Orleans is filling up like a soup bowl. That's just not happening." But in fact, it was happening.

* Nexis search was for "Bush and Katrina and (dodg! w/5 bullet)" in major newspapers and transcripts.
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnumdb (September 13, 2005 9:58 pm ET)
         

      There WERE two small papers that used the 'dodge a bullet' headline. VERY small papers - none of which were on the airwaves.

      You can see those articles at:

      1) GrenadaStar

      2) WorldNetDaily.

      And if these were the papers the Bush people were looking at, they need to be fired since as you said, the REST of the media... actually said very different things!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wanderwoman (September 13, 2005 10:54 pm ET)
         

      I think Mr. Bush has been watching the Daily Show and decided to produce sound bites tailor-made for Jon Stewart to lampoon. Jon should have a field day with this one.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (September 13, 2005 11:24 pm ET)
         

      If NO dodged a bullet I hate to see what taking one in the chest looks like.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by john barringer (September 14, 2005 12:00 am ET)
         

      "You know why? Because I was listening to people probably over the airwaves say, 'The bullet has been dodged.' And that was what I was referring to."

      Everyone says Bush, Chertoff, et al are lying when they trot this out. Probably are and, in a way, I hope they are. The alternative is that they planned their response to this crisis on the basis of TV and newspaper reports and not on first-hand expert information from people on the scene and from NOAA. Hell of a way to run a railroad!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sagra (September 14, 2005 3:41 pm ET)
           

        I wonder how many died because Wing Nut Daily didn't bother to get the story straight.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by The Lonewacko Blog (September 14, 2005 12:36 am ET)
         

      From the very same WSJ article that MMFA links to: No major newspaper printed a headline that literally said New Orleans "dodged a bullet,' as Mr. Chertoff claimed. But some did say the city had escaped a direct hit — which was true, but misleading — while others focused on the levees along the Mississippi River. Meanwhile, it was the levees along canals extending south from Lake Pontchartrain that gave way...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (September 14, 2005 4:44 am ET)
           

        Call it “an unfortunate ricochet” and stop this silliness already. How many bodies and billions in damage does it take before Bush will unequivocally own up to a failure? All this nonsense about dodged bullets and levee ignorance is a carefully structured wall of semantics to allow Bush an elegant political exit to the NO disaster. Swallow a small, tiny amount of the blame while dumping gallons of it on Gov. Blanco. Let the press beat Brown to a pulp while he, Bush, reengages his agenda to pack the courts with arch conservatives that will overturn Roe v. Wade, allow Halliburton to profit from more misery and death, and just watch the federal funding for state education and welfare programs disappear in a puff of “legislation prioritizing” when he, Bush, makes those tax cuts of which 15% funnels to the top .1% permanent, and oh, won’t it be a great day when we all share in the Bush vision of an “ownership society” where corporations can file bankruptcy because of “declining market conditions” while ordinary folks recovering from colon cancer will be asked to pay every cent owed, to the dollar, since it’s obvious they contracted cancer to bilk the credit industry, irresponsible consumerism and so forth.

        Again, can someone give me a good reason why they voted for Bush? I’d accept sadism, but barely. Even a sadist has a “safe phrase” and “No More Bush!” works as well as any.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rufus t firefly (September 14, 2005 8:30 am ET)
         

      I Heard this in an NPR segment on Monday and was astonished by his apparent lack of understanding and grasp of the subject. He rambles and fumbles his way through, referring to what "some people are saying, PROBABLY on the airwaves". This is leadership? How can anyone listen to this man speak, when he's not under the direct supervision of his handlers, and not see him for the clueless intellectual midget that is the real Bush? He's an embarassment and should be sacked but I'm afraid, as stated above, that the machine pushing this country towards the precipice will survive this latest failure of leadership.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnnybadhair (September 14, 2005 9:45 am ET)
         

      This is quite interesting since Bush has stated publicly that he does not listen to news reports and likes to get his information unfiltered from his aides. Anyone pick up on that and call him on it yet?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by miss otis (September 14, 2005 2:12 pm ET)
         

      Everyone should check out the Daily Howler for today because he's got both Brian Williams on the "Today Show" and a reporter on NPR both using the phrase "New Orleans dodged a bullet." There's plenty out there Bush has to answer for, let's not over reach . This guy can still wriggle out of this is if Independents and normal conservatives feel there's an unfail pile on going on by the left. He has to be held squarely up against the wall and for once face the repercussions of his actions and inactions.

      Report Abuse