About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Henry reported that DeLay legal issues are "mostly about politics"

October 14, 2005 7:17 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

7 Comments

On the October 13 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN congressional correspondent Ed Henry baselessly asserted that the ongoing legal battle between former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Travis County, Texas, district attorney Ronnie Earle is "really just politics back-and-forth." In his comments, Henry was repeating the unfounded claim by DeLay and his legal team that Earle's probe into DeLay's alleged violations of Texas campaign finance and money laundering laws is politically motivated.

Following a report by Henry on the DeLay story, CNN anchor Tom Foreman asked Henry whether the newest developments in the case simply represent political wrangling or instead indicate that Earle's evidence against DeLay is growing. Henry unequivocally responded that the "back-and-forth" that has recently taken place "is really just politics." He went on to claim that "this case mostly is about politics, if you listen to the DeLay camp in particular." He later concluded, "I don't want to minimize the legal part of it, but clearly most of this is political."

Indeed, "the DeLay camp" has consistently attempted to frame Earle's investigation as a political matter and repeatedly accused Earle of partisan motivations. In response to his initial indictment on conspiracy charges and his subsequent indictment for money laundering, DeLay referred to Earle as an "unabashed partisan zealot" and the investigation as "so political" and a "political witch hunt." DeLay even alleged that Earle had been working in conjunction with the Democratic Party leadership, although he provided no evidence to support this claim.

Although Earle is a Democrat, DeLay's characterization of him as a "partisan zealot" is undermined by his record as a district attorney. Of the 15 previous instances in which Earle has won an indictment against a government official, 12 involved charges against Democrats.

This is not the first time that Henry has promoted DeLay's attempts to discredit Earle as politically motivated. In an October 7, 2004, appearance on CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, Henry highlighted Earle's party identification and history of investigating Republican officials while ignoring his record of prosecuting Democrats.

From the October 13 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

FOREMAN: Ed, is this just a back-and-forth that's going on politically on this thing? Or is there a sense that there is a preponderance of weight piling up against Mr. DeLay?

HENRY: A lot of the latest volleying we've seen, I think you've put your finger on it, is really just politics back-and-forth. Both sides trying to make their case. Ronnie Earle trying to pile on against Tom DeLay here, just as the DeLay camp is trying to pile on evidence that they believe that, in fact, there's been misconduct. But basically, neither side has moved the ball forward legally -- in any legal sense -- since those two indictments were handed up over the last week or two. And most of the damage has not been legal so far, it's been political, Tom DeLay having to step down from his post as majority leader. That's why this case mostly is about politics, if you listen to the DeLay camp in particular.

But we have to wait and see where this all goes because there could be major legal ramifications. Obviously, that second indictment on charges of money laundering that came down, that could result, ultimately, in a long prison sentence if it were ever -- if Tom DeLay were ever convicted. We're far, far from that. The DeLay camp still confident all of this is going to be tossed out. I don't want to minimize the legal part of it, but clearly most of this is political.

FOREMAN: Ed Henry, thank you very much.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by deeznuts (October 14, 2005 10:38 pm ET)
         

      Liberal media my muscular buttocks.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dee (October 14, 2005 11:45 pm ET)
         

      "this case mostly is about politics, if you listen to the DeLay camp in particular." He later concluded, "I don't want to minimize the legal part of it, but clearly most of this is political."

      At least Henry leaves himself some wiggle room by stating he doesn't want to "minimize the legal part of it". Then he goes back to the "about politics" talking point. Monday morning quarterbacking isn't even performed well by this guy along with many other DeLay apologists. You gotta love these states rights types, especially when their state is going after them for good reason. DeLay did use Federal resources to find the Texas legislators (democrats) that wouldn't agree to become another nail driven by the "Hammer". This is the point Henry unknowingly makes so well if one looks into the big picture of the redistricting manipulated by DeLay and his money laundering. It is all about politics or it wouldn't be in court, DeLay violated campaign laws in Texas in order to do a bit of gerrymandering and that is nothing but politics pure and simple whether it is criminal or not. This spin is quite entertaining and the attacks upon any critic, prosecutor, or disbeliever in anything GOP related is really getting stale. One more blathering quote from Henry:

      "...neither side has moved the ball forward legally..."

      DeLay has been indicted, seems like moving forward legally to anyone with a brain cell??

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (October 15, 2005 2:09 pm ET)
         

      It's not about politics. It's about a felony.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Buzzramjet (October 15, 2005 2:29 pm ET)
         

      It's about how many hundred dollar bills Ed Henry has stuffed into his pocket by the reichwingers who pay him to make such idiotic comments.

      BUT he still is probably not making as much as Armstrong was for shilling.

      I sent CNN a letter asking them to please send their reporters back to Journalism school and retake the class about ETHICS.

      Obivously they are sorely lacking in that department.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mike in seattle (October 15, 2005 8:54 pm ET)
         

      "Man is by nature a political animal"

      ...so in that we care about a-holes like Delay breaking the law for political gain then Earle must resort to a certain amount of political maneouvers to keep the indictments from being tossed.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sagra (October 17, 2005 9:53 am ET)
         

      Did DeLay ever provide that evidence he had that Earle was in cohoots with the DNC? That should be out any day now, shouldn't it?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by deeznuts (October 17, 2005 11:18 am ET)
           

        I can't see how that would be relevant. I don't think anyone denies that the DNC has anything to gain from Delay's ouster.

        The indictment will proceed on the basis of evidence of Delay's wrongdoing. Just because the DNC would like to see him fail doesn't mean he's innocent.

        Report Abuse