About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly offered differing stories on guest's failure to appear

November 10, 2005 3:15 pm ET
image

13 Comments

Lauding the Hillsborough County, Florida, school board's reversal on November 8 of its decision to end school closings for certain religious holidays, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly offered differing accounts of why a potential guest, Bishop Chuck Leigh of the Apostolic Catholic Church in Tampa, Florida, failed to appear on The O'Reilly Factor. On the November 9 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly read from a St. Petersburg Times article by reporter Melanie Ave:

Bishop Chuck Leigh, pastor of the Apostolic Catholic Church in Tampa, said he was invited to speak on O'Reilly's show but was turned away after he refused to say the secular calendar was an affront to Christians.

"I said this is more of an attack on Muslims," he said. "If it had been anything but the Muslims, it never would have appeared in the press and on TV and certainly not on national TV. It's become nothing more than a way to justify hate."

O'Reilly condemned Ave as "simply lying" and retorted:

O'REILLY: As for Pastor Leigh, he was one of many potential guests interviewed by Factor producer Kim Harvey. He was not selected. At no time was the pastor ever told what to say.

However, on the November 9 broadcast of the nationally syndicated radio show The Radio Factor, which aired earlier that day, O'Reilly called the same report "a lie" but offered a different explanation for Leigh's absence:

O'REILLY: That's a lie. That's a lie. Flat-out lie. We invited the guy on the program along with four or five other people. And we evaluated who would be the best guest. He didn't call back until late in the afternoon. And then told us, well, thanks for the invitation, maybe next time. We said sure, bishop.

This is not the first time that discrepancies have arisen over guests asked to comment on the Hillsborough situation. As Media Matters for America has noted, O'Reilly claimed that Jennifer Faliero, the lone dissenter in the original school board decision to eliminate school closings on religious holidays, declined to appear on the program due to "pressure" from opponents. Tampa Tribune columnist Dan Ruth reported a different reason, writing of Faliero: " 'I told them I had a conflict,' Faliero explained. Her daughter had a soccer game Thursday."

From the November 9 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: Predictably, The St. Petersburg Times, a radical-left newspaper, is all for the religious holiday ban and framed the issue as anti-Muslim. Reporter Melanie Ave wrote, "The Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly has focused on the involvement of Muslims. ... Bishop Chuck Leigh, pastor of the Apostolic Catholic Church in Tampa, said he was invited to speak on O'Reilly's show but was turned away after he refused to say the secular calendar was an affront to Christians."

Ms. Ave is simply lying. If you watched our coverage last week, the only Muslim angle was explaining how the controversy began and my comment that the request was like asking Pakistan to declare All Saints Day a holiday. That was it.

As for Pastor Leigh, he was one of many potential guests interviewed by Factor producer Kim Harvey. He was not selected. At no time was the pastor ever told what to say.

Ms. Ave did not even call us for a comment, a major sin in journalism, but I'm not surprised. Again, The St. Petersburg Times is a dishonest, far-left publication that does not deserve reader or advertiser support, period.

Now the school board's decision and its reversal is not due to me. It happened because the folks have simply had enough.

From the November 9 broadcast of Fox News' The Radio Factor with Bill O'Reilly:

O'REILLY: Then the St. Petersburg Times goes on to say, "Bishop Chuck Leigh, pastor of the Apostolic Catholic Church in Tampa" -- that's not Roman Catholic, by the way -- "said he was invited to speak on the O'Reilly show but was turned away after he refused to say the secular calendar was an affront to Christians."

That's a lie. That's a lie. Flat-out lie. We invited the guy on the program along with four or five other people. And we evaluated who would be the best guest. He didn't call back until late in the afternoon. And then told us, well, thanks for the invitation, maybe next time. We said sure, bishop. Just a lie. And the St. Petersburg Times never called The Factor to find out if that was accurate, that quote was accurate, never.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by electricbassplayer (November 10, 2005 4:12 pm ET)
         

      It's so strange to witness someone with a diseased conscience.

      I guess you can live with a lot of baggage if the pay is good enough.

      Or if you're just a kook, plain and simple.

      I'd feel sorry for the guy if he wasn't so damned destructive to society.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by daggotht (November 10, 2005 4:24 pm ET)
         

      Bill O'reilly, crazy person extraordinaire

      Report Abuse
    • Author by cmarcis (November 10, 2005 5:03 pm ET)
         

      I'm no O'Reilly fan, but I don't see how his statements contradict each other. Albeit, his first statement doesn't give much detail, but his second statement blow the first one away. It appears to me that, if nothing else, his second statement elaborated more on the story than the first.

      I can't believe I have to defend this guy, but just because Media Matters claims it is a contradiction, it doesn't mean it actually is. This mars the normally excellent coverage that MM has on BO'R in my opinion.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by cmarcis (November 10, 2005 5:05 pm ET)
           

        Change that second sentence to "Albeit, his first statement doesn't give much detail, but his second statement DOESN'T blow the first one away."

        I really need to review when I write something before posting it; otherwise, I just contradict myself.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Scotty Johnson Sr. (November 11, 2005 2:03 pm ET)
             

          Well, you are wrong. The first one says that "The Factor" decided against having him on, the second one says that the Bishop himself declined to come on. It's a clear contradiction.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (November 10, 2005 5:16 pm ET)
         

      I wonder if Mr. "Nospin" would ever call a newspaper, a "radical far-right' rag like he did on the left side with the St. Petersburg Times. He will label, label, label that side but stays strangely silent when it comes to the rightist rantings of say, a Wall Street Journal or Washington Times.

      He spins so much while not spinning it's almost zen.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (November 10, 2005 5:17 pm ET)
         

      cmarcis - Thursday November 10, 2005 05:05:20 PM EST

      These two statement at least on the face of it seem contradictory to me:

      As for Pastor Leigh, he was one of many potential guests interviewed by Factor producer Kim Harvey. He was not selected.

      We invited the guy on the program along with four or five other people.

      So which is it, was he invited to be on the program or never selected?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by soros (November 10, 2005 5:48 pm ET)
         

      The choice I have is to believe Bill O'Reilly or a prominent church figure. As cynical as I am about figures that dress themselves up as holy & spiritual vassals of God, well.. the choice is easy isn't it :)

      Hey Bill, you just accused a good christian of bearing false witness on your golden reputation. I might ask, "Why do you hate Christianity?"

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 10, 2005 8:24 pm ET)
         

      i thought o'reilly was going to say mmfa scared the bishop off.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 10, 2005 8:45 pm ET)
         

      the real story hear is that o'reilly accuses melanie ave of the st pete times of lying. but if you link to the article and read the story it's a small part of a 1000 word article. all ave does is quote the bishop. so o'reilly won't accuse the bishop of lying, so he goes after a reporter doing her job. she obviously knows only what she was told.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by deeanna (November 11, 2005 1:21 am ET)
         

      Caught in the act.While it has been suspected that there are fishy tactics used in selecting guests for Fox' Shows,this is,to my best recollection,the first time O'Reily and Fox Network was caught.It looks like the pentegon isn't the only one coaching people on what to say.This is sad.Evaluating guests to see which one is best suited to come on the show? That's not cool.I mean,this offers more proof that O'Reilly is a decietful person...a FOX for lack of a better word.I am not surprised to find out just how decietful they are,I am surprised they would go so far as to ask a man of the clergy to "play along".Sad.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by claudo (November 11, 2005 7:50 am ET)
         

      O'Reilly must be saying hosannas about the school board's reversal. I hope that, as a good Christian, he is happy about the 3500 anti Muslim e-mails which appeared to be a motivating factor in the reversal. (article in the St.Petersburg Times) Interestingly, the school board decided that Eid was not worthy of a religious holiday. Peace on earth, good will towards men - Yeah, O'Reilly, your're full of something and it ain't Christmas cheer!!!!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by VastLibMediaConspiracy (November 11, 2005 8:23 am ET)
         

      Bill O'Lielly and the Truth - they do not know one another.

      Report Abuse