About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Network news ignored defeat of Republican budget cuts

November 18, 2005 8:08 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

10 Comments

The November 17 nightly news broadcasts and the November 18 morning news broadcasts of the three major television networks failed to cover the defeat of budget legislation pushed by the Republican leadership of the House of Representatives that would have cut spending on health and education programs. On November 17, the House voted down the measure, which contained $142.5 billion in discretionary spending, by a margin of 224 to 209, with 22 Republicans joining all Democrats in opposition. Two of the three network morning news programs covered two other Republican-backed measures that passed early on November 18 -- a House budget-cutting bill and a Senate tax-cutting bill -- while ignoring the defeat of the earlier House bill.

The networks' lack of coverage is significant because, as The New York Times noted, the bill's defeat marked "the first time since the early days of the Republican takeover of the House a decade ago that the majority had come out on the losing end of such a vote." The Los Angeles Times also noted that "[t]he GOP leadership's struggles came on some of the first major actions the House has taken since Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), known for controlling his party's members and moving controversial measures to passage, was forced to give up his post as majority leader after being indicted in Texas on money-laundering charges."

The defeated measure would have cut current spending by $164 million, The New York Times reported. Early November 18, House Republicans succeeded in passing legislation "cutting benefit programs, such as Medicaid and food stamps, by about $50 billion over the next five years," according to the Los Angeles Times. The bill passed 217-215, with no Democrats voting in support, after Republicans leaders reduced the extent of some cuts to attract the support of moderates in their party, the Los Angeles Times reported.

On the respective November 18 broadcasts of NBC's Today and CBS' The Early Show, NBC's Ann Curry and CBS's René Syler each mentioned the $50 billion spending cut approved by the House, as well as a bill approved by the Senate containing $60 billion in tax cuts -- bills that passed early on November 18 -- but neither mentioned House Republicans' failure to pass the earlier spending bill. ABC's Good Morning America made no mention of either House bill or the Senate bill.

The failure to cover the defeat the budget bill is especially striking in the case of NBC's Nightly News, given that a November 17 post by NBC News producer Mike Viqueira on the Nightly News' Daily Nightly weblog -- posted shortly before that evening's Nightly News broadcast -- cited the "completely unexpected defeat" of the bill as "evidence that the congressional GOP has some serious problems." Viqueira remarked that the House Republican leadership was "blindsided by an unusual coalition of conservatives and moderates," an event "[t]hat does not reflect well on the man running the floor in the absence of Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo."

From the November 18 broadcast of NBC's Today:

CURRY: During the night, the House passed $50 billion in budget cuts by two votes. Opponents say the cuts will hurt the poor. The Senate, meantime, passed a tax cut bill that will prevent about 14 million families from paying higher taxes through the alternative minimum tax.

From the November 18 broadcast of CBS' The Early Show:

SYLER: On Capitol Hill, the House approved a budget cut package early this morning by a two-vote margin. It would cut $50 billion from a group of welfare programs over several years. It still needs an OK from the Senate. Just before the House vote, the Senate approved $60 billion in tax cuts.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by colinlbc (November 18, 2005 8:26 pm ET)
         

      In the Canadian and other parliaments a defeat of a government bill regarding budgetary spending would result in the defeat of the government, the disolution of parliament, and an election being called. It is a huge deal!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Cerberus (November 18, 2005 8:32 pm ET)
           

        This action took place in the U.S. Congress. It isn't a big deal. Considering what is going on right now, Reps debating Murtha's proposal to cut and run, the defeat of this particular budget bill is miniscule.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by lostlogic (November 18, 2005 8:37 pm ET)
             

          This action took place in the U.S. Congress. It isn't a big deal. Considering what is going on right now, Reps debating Murtha's proposal to cut and run, the defeat of this particular budget bill is miniscule. by Cerberus

          ****

          Actually I believe the proposal under discussion is the Republican proposal to cut and run—the Republicans are not allowing a discussion on Murtha’s plan.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mybrotherskeeper (November 19, 2005 5:39 pm ET)
               

            Late Friday evening Anderson Cooper rightly noted--and he was alone in doing so--that Rep. Murtha had in fact called for the phased redeployment of our troops (and only after the Dec. elections), not the "immediate withdrawal" from Iraq that made all of the headlines and that was, as you note, the subject of the Republican resolution in the House.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by stillfightingignorance6 (November 19, 2005 5:54 pm ET)
                 

              Immediate Withdrawal

              Late Friday evening Anderson Cooper rightly noted--and he was alone in doing so--that Rep. Murtha had in fact called for the phased redeployment of our troops (and only after the Dec. elections), not the "immediate withdrawal" from Iraq that made all of the headlines and that was, as you note, the subject of the Republican resolution in the House.

              by PJT

              ------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Well, you know how the wacks feel about the facts. I'm sure that smilin' douche bag duncan hunter'd never let 'em stand in his way.

              Still, I'm not so sure Ol' Ms Schmidt for brains has her finger on the pulse of the American People quite the way she thinks she does.

              Created: Friday, November 18, 2005, at 17:47:45 EDT Do you think the United States should:

              Stay the course in Iraq 3% 388 votes

              Withdraw U.S. troops within six months 85% 12352 votes

              Commit to do whatever it takes to win the war 13% 1841 votes Total: 14581 votes

              Report Abuse
          • Author by 1428a (November 20, 2005 12:04 am ET)
               

            Actually I believe the proposal under discussion is the Republican proposal to cut and run—the Republicans are not allowing a discussion on Murtha’s plan.

            by lostlogic

            -----------------------

            It's the "with us or against us" ideology at work; ; you either stay the course or you withdraw immediately.No phaseouts allowed .

            Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (November 19, 2005 1:59 pm ET)
         

      This action took place in the U.S. Congress. It isn't a big deal. Considering what is going on right now, Reps debating Murtha's proposal to cut and run, the defeat of this particular budget bill is miniscule. by Cerberus

      ============================================================

      Nice recitation of wingnut talking points there, Cerberus. But no sale. Try again.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ryooki (November 19, 2005 2:54 pm ET)
         

      Why would the defeat of a budget bill be miniscule? I just don't get it. Cutting the budget is supposedly one of the Republican's big issues. They lost this one amongst themselves.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mybrotherskeeper (November 19, 2005 5:53 pm ET)
         

      ...was the defense bill that passed in the Senate recently by a 96-0 vote. I have no idea what the subject of this particular bill was, having only seen a headline on C-SPAN, but since it apparently passed while the torture debated was still going on, I believe it had nothing to do with the torture issue which was the exclusive focus of all of the networks' news coverage..

      Report Abuse
    • Author by 1428a (November 20, 2005 12:25 am ET)
         

      PJT, I don't which defense bill you're thinking of but the one passed on Tuesday has a small bit embedded devoted to torture. The bill in case anyone cares is S.1042, [link to thomas.loc.gov]

      See section Title 10 Subtitle G, Section 1071. Its not as much as being done elswhere; it basically requires the establishment of a uniform policy on "interrogation by the armed forces."

      The Torture issue's big, and see how it comes out.

      Report Abuse