CNN: Filibuster comments from Switzerland made Kerry -- but not Chambliss -- seem "elitist"
SUMMARY: CNN's Ed Henry said that Sen. John Kerry's call for a filibuster of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s nomination to the Supreme Court reinforced the "elitist" label given to Kerry by the GOP during the 2004 presidential campaign because he made the statement from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. However, when CNN later interviewed Sen. Saxby Chambliss about the potential filibuster, there were no "elitist" comments to be found, even though Chambliss was also commenting from Davos.
In reporting on Sen. John Kerry's (D-MA) call for a filibuster of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s nomination to the Supreme Court, CNN anchor Miles O'Brien and CNN congressional correspondent Ed Henry asserted that by calling for the filibuster from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Kerry reinforced the "elitist" label given him by the GOP during the 2004 presidential campaign. However, when CNN later interviewed Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) about the potential filibuster, there were no "elitist" comments to be found, even though Chambliss was also commenting from Davos.
On the January 27 edition of CNN's American Morning, Henry reported:
HENRY: Republicans believe that round two in "Bush v. Kerry" is going to go to Bush again, in part because John Kerry has decided to launch this filibuster of Samuel Alito from, of all places -- Davos, Switzerland -- where Kerry was attending the World Economic Forum. I can tell you, even some senior Democrats up here on Capitol Hill are saying they think this is only going to fuel Republican charges that Kerry is an elitist, that he's basically launching this from overseas. But a Kerry aide fired back to CNN that the senator could care less what the chattering class is saying about this.
Later, O'Brien interviewed Los Angeles Times columnist Ronald Brownstein about the proposed filibuster and alleged that the Republican stereotype of Kerry's "elitist nature" was reinforced by calling for the Senate action from Davos. O'Brien then paraphrased a famous line from Shakespeare's Hamlet to deride the Democratic filibuster effort:
O'BRIEN: Joining us now is CNN political analyst, LA Times columnist Ron Brownstein. They [senators conducting filibusters] don't do that anymore, do they? They don't actually have to read anything --
BROWNSTEIN: No, they don't -- they don't have to stand there like Jimmy Stewart [in the film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (Sony Pictures, 1939)].
O'BRIEN: Virtual filibusters. Maybe, they should make them do it again then that could change things. Let's say -- how likely is that? And what is John Kerry thinking getting on the phone from Davos, Switzerland? All that does is, you know -- every -- every stereotype, which the Republicans would like to put out there about John Kerry and his elitist nature, is reinforced by that.
BROWNSTEIN: Well, there are a couple of steps here. First, there's a lot of Democratic opposition to Samuel Alito. As we saw, a unanimous vote of the Judiciary Committee, much more than there was to [Chief Justice] John Roberts. But the big question, of course, is whether there is enough -- and there may well be more than 40 votes against him, for his confirmation, but are those opponents willing to filibuster? You know, Miles, remember your Shakespeare? In Henry IV, one character says, "I can summon spirits from the vasty deep," and another one says, "well" -- young Henry says, "well, so can I, and so can any man, the question is, will they come when you call them?" And it's really the same thing here. John Kerry can call for a filibuster from Davos, or the Senate floor, or anywhere else he wants. The question is: Does he have the 41 votes he needs? And the Democrats, by and large, think that's an uphill proposition.
O'BRIEN: Interesting. Shakespeare. I'm very impressed. Methinks --
BROWNSTEIN: Yes. A relevant quote, however.
O'BRIEN: Methinks the Democrats protesteth too much, here, perhaps. A little Shakespeare back at you, there.
Later on the January 27 edition of CNN Live Today, anchor Daryn Kagan interviewed Chambliss from the World Economic Forum about Kerry's filibuster proposal. But Kagan offered no commentary about Chambliss's location, except to note it, even though Chambliss was commenting on the filibuster from Switzerland.
From the January 27 Live Today:
KAGAN: Let's get back to some politics now. As we told you earlier, Senate Republicans hope to have Judge Samuel Alito confirmed to the Supreme Court in a vote next Tuesday, but Democratic Senator John Kerry is making a last-ditch effort to filibuster. Kerry is over in Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Conference. Also attending that conference is Georgia Republican Senator Saxby Chambliss. Joins me live now from Davos. Senator, good afternoon to you, there, in Davos.
CHAMBLISS: Glad to be with you, Daryn. We don't get much of this in Atlanta. It's great to be here.
KAGAN: No, it's been a very mild winter here in Atlanta. Let me ask you about this political storm that's brewing a little bit. Any comment on Senator Kerry from there in Davos calling for a filibuster of the Alito vote?
CHAMBLISS: Well, I would be very much surprised if the Democrats do decide to filibuster Judge Alito. I understand Senator Kerry went home early this morning, as a matter of fact, went back to Washington to do whatever is going to be done relative to that. But, you know, I think we have the votes. We're scheduled, right now, to vote at 4:30 on Monday afternoon on the cloture, and then we'll vote, Tuesday morning, on the confirmation; and, you know, this man's qualified. I think the American people understand that, particularly after watching the hearings. So, hopefully, it will move forward very quickly.
KAGAN: And I take it you'll make it home in plenty of time for both of those votes.
CHAMBLISS: We will.
The Washington Post reported on January 27 that Republicans "poked fun" at Kerry for announcing the filibuster from Switzerland:
"Continuing to threaten a filibuster, even after it is crystal clear that Democrats don't have the necessary votes to sustain their obstruction, is needless, strange and at odds with many of their fellow Democrats," Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) said in a statement. Some Republicans poked fun at Kerry -- the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee, who may make another White House bid -- for allowing others to announce the filibuster plan earlier in the day while he was attending an economic conference in Davos, Switzerland.















Perfect: a spin-adled report that Kerry's announcement from Davos, Switzerland makes him look "elitist" also contains a quotation from Shakespeare's Henry IV.
On Monday they'll be quoting Voltaire while they call him "too French."
So the content of the commentary is affected by the locale from which they were uttered? Kerry is elitist and Chambliss is not? What?
Of course those "journalists" fail to discuss why Kerry supports a filibuster, it's so much easier to label him an elitist .
At the risk of repeating my response post to "Olivelawyers" from another thread:
"Filibuster could salvage the separation of powers"
I totally agree (with the filibuster) even with the risk of political suicide for the Dems. The Congress needs to stand up and preserve the Constitutional checks and balances that are supposed to be the essence of our Democratic Republic. I still don't see any outrage at the idea of Presidential "signing statements" being used by Bush to bypass the Congressional intent of the bill, as in the McCain anti-torture bill. Presidential "signing statements" were traditionally used to note and congratulate the particular members of Congress who brought the bill into being, but Bush is taking the "signing statement" to a new level by ignoring the legislative process and purpose and interpreting the law as he sees fit. Since Alito is known to be a strong supporter of the "Unitary Executive" would he not be likely to uphold such unilateral powers asserted by the Executive branch? To confirm Alito is to give the President a Constitutional blank check and the potential to make the legislative body impotent.
Perhaps the filibuster would hurt the Dems politically but I think it is the right thing to do, a worthy fight to keep our government Constitutionally balanced.
[link to www.johnkerry.com]
That first clip is the most intellectually insulting "news" I've seen in a long time; TV newsies trying to give some legitimacy to their sarcastic, opinionated remarks by invoking Shakespeare.
And tapping Saxby Chambliss, who poured gallons of poison in the ears of voters in his race against Max Cleland - a genuine American hero through and through - for WHAT? Just for a comment about a possible filibuster? Couldn't they find anyone in Washington looking for some face time?
O'Brien, Henry, and Kagan. Now I know of three others to avoid. And their advertisers will be informed of my intention to buy elsewhere.
...LA Times' Brownstein.
ChickenHawk Senator Chambliss (Draftevader - Weak Knees)
Chambliss received a 4-F deferment from the draft for a 'bad knee. It should also be noted that Saxby is a long-term avid jogger and a braggart to NYC Firemen post-911 about his volunteer fireman past.
Chambliss questioned triple amputee war veteran Cleland's patriotism in the '02 Georgia election for a Senate that Frist and Lott also made.
It has always been the right that disrespected soldiers.
Doesn't quoting Shakespeare make a reporter seem like a pompous ass?
Comment from President Bush about the war as he was about to tee off at a golf course. Bush said; "I call upon all nations to do everything they can to stop these terrorists killers. Now watch this drive."
The FIRST thing I thought of when I read this was Bush's asinins "now watch this drive" line.
Who can seriously tell me the circumstances surrounding THAT weren't elitist (and irretrievably stupid).
that would be like a nail in Bush's presidency's coffin if anyone in the MM was pushing anything other than Right wing talking points.
asinins "now watch this drive" line.
That should read "asinine."
Stupid keyboard.
played a clip from a Republican in Congress (I can't remember who) talking about Kerry calling for a filabuster from the "slopes of Switzerland" as if Kerry was vacationing there. Makes one want to hork.
DO YOU NOTICE WHEN IT LOOKS LIKE THE DEMOCRATIC ARE DOING SOMETHING THAT MIGHT MAKE THEM LOOK BAD HENRY HAVE THIS BIG SMILE ON HIS, FACE BUT WHEN THINGS LOOK BAD FOR REPUBLICANS HE LOOKS ALL SAD, AND WILL PUT A GOOD SPIN ON THE STORY.
Why isn't George W considered an elitist? He was born into a wealthy family in New Haven, Connecticut. Grandson of a millionaire US Senator, son of a US President who had enough pull to squeeze him into the National Guard when there was a waiting list. Maybe it's just me, but everyone seems to be fooled by the cowboy boots and swagger. He's a spoiled little rich kid, just like Kerry. The only difference is one choose a life of service and one chose a life of leisure.
Kerry campaigns oversea and wants Alito to be filibustered. How does that make him an elitist?
The internet is rapidly replacing television news. People believe what they hear without bothering to investigate whether it's true, which by the way is what a journalist's job is. Unfortunately the media in this country is turning into infotainment, funded by the deep pockets of the right wing machine. Bush jr. is the worst kind of elitist and yet most people don't see him that way. This is the media doing what it does best, image profiling. This is all they know how to do anymore. Sad....
...talks about perpetuating the stereotype of kerry as elitist, while he and other media figures repeat the gop talking points without noting one of their boys is in the same place. georgia, i think, had the first all statewide electronic voting in 2002. the day before the election, cleland had a 8 point lead in the atlanta journal constitution, but "lost" by 5 to chambliss. notice how the republicans oppose a paper trail? and have opposed recounts, ballot examinations, and machine checks all over this country? am i saying i don't trust the gop, that they would cheat? you got that right. one more thing on the elitist angle. everybody knows the bush "ranch" is just a lot of acreage with some phony props that the media broadcasts in front of. it's all an effort to make our beloved leader look like the cowboy he's not.
Republicants have plenty of largesse on their side... lots of golf and tennis clubs, which are the very definition of "elitist" in most dictionaries... this emphasis on Switzerland is just common Republicant provincialism...