About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Citing no evidence, NY Times reported Bush's poll numbers "beginning to inch up"

January 31, 2006 3:35 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg wrote -- without citing evidence -- that "[t]he president's poll numbers, which plummeted last year, are beginning to inch up." In fact, a review of eight major polls released in the week preceding Stolberg's report revealed that polls showing President Bush's approval rating either declining or remaining steady outnumbered polls showing an increase.

4 Comments

In a January 29 New York Times article, reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg wrote -- without citing evidence -- that "[t]he president's poll numbers, which plummeted last year, are beginning to inch up." Later in the article, Stolberg again reported that Bush's poll numbers "are rising but still comparatively low." In fact, a review of eight major polls released in the week preceding Stolberg's report revealed that polls showing President Bush's approval rating either declining or remaining steady outnumbered polls showing an increase.

The results of those polls:

  • An ABC News/Washington Post poll, conducted January 23-26, found Bush's approval rating to be 42 percent. That figure is down four percent from the previous ABC/Post poll, conducted January 5-8.
  • A Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll, conducted January 24-25, placed Bush's approval rating at 41 percent. That figure is down one percent from the previous Fox/Opinion Dynamics poll, conducted January 10-11.
  • A CBS News/New York Times poll, conducted January 20-25, found Bush's approval rating to be 42 percent. That figure is up one percent from the previous CBS poll, conducted January 5-8.
  • A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted January 20-22, placed Bush's approval rating at 43 percent. That figure is the same as Bush's approval rating in the previous CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted January 9-12.
  • Rasmussen Reports' daily tracking polls show Bush's approval rating to have ranged from 48 to 50 percent since January 28, after ranging from 44 to 46 percent for most of January.
  • Three other major polls, which also suggest conflicting trends in Bush's approval ratings, do not have recent prior results for comparison. A Time magazine poll conducted January 24-26 put Bush's approval rating at 41 percent, which is equal to the last Time poll, conducted November 29-December 1. A Cook Political Report/RT Strategies poll conducted January 22-25 found Bush's approval rating to be 47 percent, up five percent from the previous Cook/RT Strategies poll conducted December 8-11. A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll conducted January 22-25 put Bush's approval rating at 43 percent, noting that the figure was "a big drop" from older polling by the Los Angeles Times, and that "most national polls have shown Bush's popularity declining dramatically":


    A majority of Americans (54%) disapprove of the way the president is handling his job, while 43% approve. This includes 39% who strongly disapprove. This is a big drop from the beginning of last year, when a January L.A. Times Poll had Bush's job rating at 50% approve (47% disapprove). Throughout much of 2005, most national polls have shown Bush's popularity declining dramatically. The poll results are very close to the average of other national polls released in the last two weeks.

  • The only major poll released since Stolberg's January 29 article indicates a lower approval rating for Bush than any of the polls released earlier in the week. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll conducted January 26-29 placed Bush's approval rating at 39 percent, equal to the previous NBC/Journal poll conducted December 9-12.

The margin of error in all of the above polls is approximately 3 percentage points.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by pete592 (January 31, 2006 4:30 pm ET)
         

      Bill O'Reilly says this paper is blatantly, deliberately and unabashedly anti-Bush. What gives?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by skiploader1111 (January 31, 2006 6:12 pm ET)
           

        why O'Reilly and other Republicans think that the NYT is anti-Bush. It comes down to the definition of BIAS.

        Liberals complain about conservative bias when liberal opinion is kept out of the discussion on a paper or network and only allow the conservative point of view to be expressed. Example is Fox News which only has one liberal anchor (Colmes). Also when a network only invites conservative guests to their panels.

        Conservatives OTOH complain about liberal bias when a liberal is allowed to talk at all.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dave_chicago (January 31, 2006 5:08 pm ET)
         

      Stolberg concludes her article with a quote from Cong. Jack Kingston (R-GA): "If the main [re-election] topic is the economy, the war on terrorism and fuel independence, then [Republicans] should be O.K."

      Worker benefits are being cut. Health care costs are shooting up. Bin Laden still threatens, 4-1/2 years later. Iraq is a horrendous mess, and gas for our insufficently fuel-efficient new cars is near $3/gallon. If you like that sort of thing, then Republicans "should be O.K.".

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (January 31, 2006 6:00 pm ET)
         

      people will forget about WH outing of CIA agent, incompetence in Katrina disaster, Abramoff bribery of Republicans, the illegal warrantless spying on Americans, the doubling of the national debt in 5 yrs, the skyrocketing of feul cost, and of course the disaster that is the Iraq War and the lies that got us in there. Then the polls will go up for Bush.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.