About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh on U.N. Development Programme proposal: "How can we rape the U.S. for $7 trillion?"

January 31, 2006 5:39 pm ET
image

Please upgrade your flash player. The audio for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a MP3 version of the audio.

SUMMARY: Rush Limbaugh claimed a proposal from the United Nations Development Programme to unlock some $7 trillion in wealth worldwide -- unveiled recently at the World Economic Forum's annual meeting -- was intended to "rape" the United States "for $7 trillion."

11 Comments

Attacking an economic proposal by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Rush Limbaugh, on the January 30 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, claimed the plan was intended to "rape" the United States. Limbaugh made the comment while discussing the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, which took place from January 25 to 29 in Davos, Switzerland. The UNDP plan, which was unveiled at the international gathering, proposes new approaches to global problems that its authors claim would unlock some $7 trillion in wealth worldwide. The proposal is presented in The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges (Oxford University Press, 2006), a book edited by Inge Kaul, special adviser to the UNDP's Office of Development Studies, and Pedro Conceição, acting director of the UNDP's Office of Development Studies.

While talking about the UNDP proposal, Limbaugh both quoted and paraphrased a January 30 article in The Independent, a London newspaper. According to Philip Thornton, The Independent's economic correspondent, the UNDP plan would "unlock" wealth through six economic schemes, including "[r]educing greenhouse gas emissions through pollution permit trading" and "cutting poor countries' borrowing costs by securing the debts against the income from stable parts of their economies." The article noted that the plan is contingent in part upon the United States changing its stance on the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement that aims to reduce or limit net emissions of certain greenhouse gases. The United States, under the Clinton administration, signed the agreement, on which President Bush subsequently reneged. After asserting that "we don't have the same kinds of problems in this country that they're [forum attendees] all discussing and worried about in Davos," Limbaugh added: "When they [the UNDP offficials] say they wanna unlock $7 trillion of wealth; it means, 'How can we rape the U.S. for $7 trillion?' "

From the January 30 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Rush Limbaugh Show:

LIMBAUGH: And, you know, the problems of the world created by that kind and those -- those variations of those forms of government, we don't have the same problems in this country that they're all discussing and worried about in Davos -- "It's tearing us up!" When they say they wanna unlock $7 trillion of wealth; it means, "How can we rape the U.S. for $7 trillion?"

This is a long story, and I'm not gonna -- I'm not gonna bore you with the whole thing. Let me just give you a couple of ideas that they propose. "The scheme, by the way, which is backed by the U.K., France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, was born out of a proposal by Gordon Brown through a larger scheme to double the total aid budget to $100 billion a year." Now, when it says here that this -- it's backed by the U.K., France, Italy, Spain -- that's -- it means it's backed by people from those countries who went to Davos.

"In an endorsement of the report, Mr. Brown said, 'This shows we can help equip people in countries for a new global economy that combines greater prosperity and fairness, both within and across nations.' " These guys think they can manage a global economy. They can't even manage an economy in a small, little, Podunk nation that's the total -- it -- most of its budget is the result of gifts, donations, contributions, aid, foreign aid, whatever you wanna call it. And these people now claim that they have the expertise to manage a global econ -- You don't manage an economy. You deregulate it and get outta the way, leaving no room for people like this to even have a job, which would be the best thing overall for most people in the world.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rusty shackleford (January 31, 2006 5:47 pm ET)
         

      Judging from his recent comments (e.g., Wal-Mart being "raped" in Maryland) Rush is certainly preoccupied with raping. Creepy.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (February 01, 2006 12:57 am ET)
           

        You have fallen on a Rightwing "CORE BELIEF". Rape is defined as a sexual violation, and Limbaugh is now conflating RAPE with the alleged taking of MONEY.

        From this, we now know that Rush identifies his sexual identity with his MONEY. He apparently has no sexual identity in the normal sense ... he can't keep a wife ... so perhaps it was his "cheating" with his real love, CASH, that made him unappealing to the human species.

        In truth, an ongoing sexual love affair with MONEY explains nearly every Rightwing Republican policy, starting with taxes ($800 billion mostly to the top 5%) and moving through no-bid contracts (Halliburton posting record BILLION$ in profit), and including SUPER-SECRET "energy meetings" which the American public cannot know about, but which see Big Oil raking in BILLION$). Then there's Ken Lay, Abramoff, and lessers like Armstrong Williams.

        If rape now conflates with MONEY, then America is experiencing "Sabine Women" treatment at the hands of the GOP.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by rusty shackleford (February 01, 2006 2:53 pm ET)
             

          You have fallen on a Rightwing "CORE BELIEF".

          Ouch! And I can't get up! :^o

          Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (January 31, 2006 6:03 pm ET)
         

      There it is, ladies and gentlemen; you've just witnessed the birth of a GOP talking point. Apparently, that's what Rush means when he says he's on the "cutting edge"; his sychophantic audience is the test market for new GOP propaganda.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by k2 (January 31, 2006 6:20 pm ET)
         

      the use of this particular Limbloviatingian tool: and I'm not gonna -- I'm not gonna bore you with the whole thing.,/i> which deciphered means: I don't have a clue about what I am ranting about. But take it to the bank 'cause I say so.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by k2 (January 31, 2006 6:21 pm ET)
         

      Italics off

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (January 31, 2006 7:47 pm ET)
         

      Rape is definitely too strong a word to use in this situation, but if this plan is put into effect, it should be evident that the majority of the $7 trillion will come from the US. After all where else in the world is there an economy of this size, even considering the economic growth going on in India and China. BTW, are those countries signatories of the Kyoto treaty yet?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (January 31, 2006 8:22 pm ET)
         

      billions in tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations like exxon? that's a good transfer of wealth.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tohioliberal (February 01, 2006 1:32 am ET)
         

      Rush is a gasbag.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.