About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Watts falsely accused Gov. Kaine of misrepresenting student loan, Medicaid cuts

February 01, 2006 7:43 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: CNN political analyst and former U.S. Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK) accused Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine of falsely claiming during the Democratic response to President Bush's State of the Union address that Republicans in Congress are cutting funding for student loans and have tried to cut Medicaid funds. In fact, bills already passed by the House and the Senate include $12.7 billion in spending cuts to student loan programs and approximately $7 billion in spending cuts to Medicaid.

14 Comments

During CNN's January 31 special post-State of the Union coverage, CNN political analyst and former U.S. Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK) accused Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine of falsely claiming, during the Democratic response to President Bush's State of the Union address, that Republicans in Congress are cutting funding for student loans and have tried to cut Medicaid funds. Discussing Kaine's remarks with Democratic strategist and CNN commentator Paul Begala, Watts said, "They ought to send Governor Kaine to bed with no dinner for saying they're cutting student loans and cutting Medicaid funds. You know, that is not the case." Watts repeated the claim in a later discussion with Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL), adding, "Rahm, we need to send you to that bed as well." In fact, bills already passed by the House and the Senate include $12.7 billion in spending cuts to student loan programs and approximately $7 billion in spending cuts to Medicaid.

In the Democratic response, Kaine stated that "the Republican leadership in Washington is actually cutting billions of dollars from the student loan programs that serve working families" and "has made efforts to cut Medicaid funds for our most vulnerable citizens."

On December 21, 2005, in a 51-50 vote, the Senate approved nearly $40 billion in budget cuts, including cuts of $12.7 billion to federal student loans and nearly $7 billion in Medicaid funding as part of the Republican-sponsored Deficit Reduction Act (DRA). Five Republicans and independent Sen. Jim Jeffords (VT) joined all 45 Democrats in voting "no" on the measure, forcing Vice President Dick Cheney to cast the tie-breaking vote. Senate Democrats forced small changes to the bill by using a procedural tactic known as the "Byrd rule" and sent it back to the House for a new vote . The House approved the new bill 216-214.

On January 27, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report studying the effects of the proposed budget cuts and found, as a January 30 New York Times article noted, that the proposed Medicaid budget cuts would mean that "[m]illions of low-income people would have to pay more for health care under a bill worked out by Congress, and some of them would forgo care or drop out of Medicaid because of the higher co-payments and premiums." According to the CBO: "In response to the new premiums, some beneficiaries would not apply for Medicaid, would leave the program or would become ineligible due to nonpayment. CBO estimates that about 45,000 enrollees would lose coverage in fiscal year 2010 and that 65,000 would lose coverage in fiscal year 2015 because of the imposition of premiums. About 60 percent of those losing coverage would be children."

The DRA would also cut funding for student loans by $12.7 billion, mainly by raising interest rates on college loans. According to a December 21, 2005, Boston Globe article, "[t]he bill would cut the amount of loan money guaranteed by the federal government, pushing up interest rates. It would also impose a[n] insurance fee on student loans." The Globe further noted: "Student borrowers would be forced to pay a fixed rate of 6.8 percent on loans, and parents would have an interest rate cap of 8.5 percent, up from 7.9 percent. Further, Pell Grants would remain capped at $4,050 per student per year, despite earlier promises by the Bush administration to raise the cap to $5,100." The National Education Association and several others have called the reductions the "largest cut [in student aid] in history."

From CNN's January 31 special post-State of the Union coverage featuring Situation Room host Wolf Blitzer:

BLITZER: Paul Begala and J.C. Watts are here with us as well. Paul, what do you think of these numbers?

BEGALA: Well, I think that, if I were working at the White House, I wouldn't be as happy. You know, you need -- he's got to move it higher than that. And you're right. The people who are watching are going to tend to be people who are more favorably disposed to the president. And I think one of the ways he failed is that he's fallen into Washington jargon, which is surprising, because he did have this wonderful -- I'm from Texas -- this wonderful way of talking like a real person, a Texan. He talked about competitiveness. What is that? You know, people sitting at home just want to find a way to pay for their kids' college costs. And I contrast that with Tim Kaine, who said right away, "Look, they're going to be cutting student loans. Kids need that to go to college." He didn't talk about competitiveness. The president talked about isolationism -- whatever that is -- protectionism. These are Washington buzzwords. So I think he was very distant and out of touch with the real lives of real people.

BLITZER: Congressman Watts, J.C. Watts, former Republican congressman from Oklahoma, what do you think?

WATTS: Well, Wolf, I think they ought to send Governor Kaine to bed with no dinner for saying they're cutting student loans and cutting Medicaid funds. You know, that is not the case.

[...]

EMANUEL: Well, Wolf, first of all, as I just told you, the 9-11 Commission gave this president and Republican Congress a failing grade for what they've done. And as it relates to the security of the American people, we stand ready to work with this president to do that, but we're not going to just try to have an issue. What we want to do is, we want to make progress on that issue and work with the president and sit down. The question I have for them is, are they determined to have an issue or are they determined to work with having the security? And I'll tell you, on that speech tonight, I thought that speech was tired and I thought that speech said, "If you liked the last six, years we're going to give you two more years of that." And the Democrats are saying it's time for new priorities, to put the American people first and change the direction of this country. And the Congress -- and let me say this. Tomorrow morning, the first step, rather than embrace the future, this Congress, under the Republican leadership --

BLITZER: All right --

EMANUEL: -- is going to cut college assistance by $12.7 billion. That's not exactly what I would say would be investing in America's future.

BLITZER: J.C. Watts, what about that? Do the Democrats have a point?

WATTS: No, Wolf, they don't. You remember, I said we should send Governor Kaine to bed with no dinner for saying that we were cutting student loans. Rahm, we need to send you to that bed as well. That's just not the case.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ShawnGLane (February 01, 2006 8:48 pm ET)
         

      Why did CNN add Watts to their list of talking heads? Seeing him on H&C was bad enough and now CNN. Unbelievable.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (February 01, 2006 9:27 pm ET)
         

      At present, former Representative J.C. Watts is both a lobbyist and an infomercial salesman; in addition, he is the Chairman of GOPAC, which is something of a lobbying group for the RNC, "dedicated exclusively to electing Republicans to state and local offices" (as their website proclaims).

      In 2002, he set up JC Watts Cos., a lobbying firm; his most lucrative clients include SBC Communications, the government of Senegal, the Bowl Championship Series, and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

      Now really, is this what CNN calls a 'political analyst', a lobbyist? A lobbyist for the RNC? An infomercial salesman?

      What, they couldn't just hire Jack Abramoff for his 'political analysis'?

      He's out on bail, he must have been available.

      [link to www.thehill.com]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (February 02, 2006 1:53 am ET)
         

      For talk head nincompoops like Watts that there's an actual record of these votes, otherwise he could go on spouting lies like this forever and ever and ever...which of course is Fox News's job.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Lynn (February 02, 2006 10:33 am ET)
           

        Talking points like Watts spewed last night works very well over at Fox, because that pretty much sums up what the conservative pundits that are allowed on Fox do; but when teamed up with real thoughtful analysts like the ones that were on CNN with him the other night Watts just comes off looking like a smiling idiot with nothing subsatantive to contribute to the discussion. At least that was my take.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Brian in FL (February 02, 2006 9:27 am ET)
         

      I know people like Watts are going to spread their talking points. CNN knows it as well.

      What annoys me the most when reading stories like this, is where are the actual journalists at CNN? Where are their fact-checkers?

      If Media Matters can easily pull up the information, why doesn't CNN? Why did they not correct Watts?

      Once again, the mainstream media fails to do their job.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ellington (February 02, 2006 9:59 am ET)
         

      A CNN "analyst" called the Governor of Virginia and a Representative from Illinois LIARS?

      Because they stated a FACT?!

      It's pretty bad that Watts and other conservatives distort the facts to try to cover these cuts. We heard President Bush the other day tell a student that these weren't "cuts," they're "reform."

      But Watts took the next step: he called two sitting elected officials LIARS for exposing this distortion.

      This is just outrageous. Watts should be made to apologize, or be fired. Every Democratic politician should boycott interviews on CNN until he does.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (February 02, 2006 10:40 am ET)
         

      The new catch phrase seems to be "put to bed". We need to put dissenters to bed. Translation. We need to sweep our cuts to education "under the carpet".

      We need to put the NSA story to bed. Translation, we need to sweep it under the carpet.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by deus_ex_machina (February 02, 2006 12:37 pm ET)
         

      He sounds like he's been slapped upside the head one too many times, and I'm not just talking about his football playing days.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by davkas (February 02, 2006 1:06 pm ET)
         

      "creating their own reality."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 02, 2006 1:07 pm ET)
         

      He has transformed from representing the people's wishes to a GOP Bobble Head but I guess that is a natural transition when you get a certain type of paychecks and toe the line. Good thing he is not working for me or we would have a closed door meeting.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by left of center (February 02, 2006 1:21 pm ET)
         

      Just wondering where Tommy, Another American, and Oscar are on this one? Come on guys, we all know you're up to the challenge. Not gonna let a few innocent facts scare you off now, are you? This one from Watts isn't just a little misinformation - it's a flat out bald faced lie.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by bird (February 02, 2006 1:23 pm ET)
         

      in the fact that I've known Tim Kaine years during his time as City Councilmember, Mayor, and Lieutenant Governor. His speechwriter is a very good friend of mine, whom I just spoke to today. I'm also the type of friend that if there had been any glowing inaccuracies in that Dem response, I would have busted his butt.

      The fact of the matter, there was nothing in that response that was not correct.

      Watts fell into the trap of a relative unknown being selected for this honor... he does not know Tim Kaine. Tim would not have misrepresented a fact so blatant, such as Mr. Watts is attempting to do on this issue. One does not need to lie when the facts, clearly demonstrated in the post above (and I don't always agree with viewpoints on this website), are on your side.

      Thank God the Democratic leadership gave Tim complete editorial control over what he said that evening. Now if only the Pelosi and Reid crew can build on the "better way" message, and seek a bipartisan approach among those on both sides of the aisle who actually choose to deal with issues rather than lambast the other side over them. It has worked swimmingly in Virginia under Mark Warner and now Tim Kaine, and a party leadership needs to stand firm.

      This is indeed a leadership content to shout out opposition to the Bush Administration's terrible management, but put forth little to no ideas of how they'd manage it better. Pelosi offered no clue after the cutaway to her interview after the dialogue shown above. Wolf Blitzer specifically asked her for ideas, and she offered none other than to show that the President is wrong.

      And I'll tell you what... it's hard to direct the MSM to articulate ideas when the Democratic leadership, the entity hurt the most (next to the free exchange of ideas, a principle upon what this nation was built), will not.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by doug broda (February 02, 2006 2:57 pm ET)
         

      There's no question that Congress has cut student loan funding. This goes beyond spin to mistruth.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.