About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Russert selectively cited new NBC poll to back up assertion that Americans, despite concerns, agree with Bush on domestic spying

February 06, 2006 2:18 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Stating on Meet the Press that Americans support President Bush's domestic spying program, Tim Russert selectively cited data from an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll to prove his point. Russert cited a question about whether people support Bush's "approach" to the domestic spying program, while ignoring poll questions regarding privacy concerns raised by the program and whether warrants should have been obtained before wiretapping.

6 Comments

On the February 5 broadcast of NBC's Meet the Press, NBC News Washington bureau chief Tim Russert selectively cited the results of a January 30 NBC/Wall Street Journal poll on Americans' views on President Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program as a preface to asking his panel whether "the president has turned the corner on that issue." Russert reported the results of one question that showed a slight majority approving of the program, but ignored the next two questions in the poll, which produced contradictory results. Russert had previously cited the results of one of those questions in earlier appearances on NBC and MSNBC to discuss the poll, but the question he left unreported in those appearances and on Meet the Press was the question that more directly contradicted the finding that a majority approved of the domestic surveillance program.

Russert cited the poll's finding (question 23) -- that 51 percent approved of the "domestic wiretap program sponsored by the president," while 46 percent disapproved, -- in order to ask Los Angeles Times columnist Ronald Brownstein, "[H]as the president turned the corner on that [issue]?" That question actually asked about whether people approved of Bush's "approach" on the issue of "using wiretaps to listen to telephone calls between suspected terrorists in other countries and American citizens in the United States without getting a court order to do so."

In previous appearances on the January 30 editions of NBC's Nightly News and MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, and on the January 31 edition of NBC's Today, Russert reported that same poll finding to assert that Americans, while divided, slightly approved of "Bush's approach" in ordering the warrantless wiretaps. In those reports, Russert also noted the poll's finding (question 25) that a slight majority of Americans are concerned about the possible invasion of privacy: 56 percent said they were either "extremely concerned" (31 percent) or "somewhat concerned" (25 percent) that "the Bush administration's use of these kinds of wiretaps could be misused to violate people's privacy." On the February 5 broadcast of Meet the Press, however, Russert did not note the poll's findings on this question.

Russert said that the first question indicated that a "slight majority" agreed with the "president's view" of the wiretapping issue. During his Nightly News report, Russert said that this question "is the president's view, in effect. Should there be wiretaps without a court order?" After reporting the results, he said, "That's the president's position in favor." On Hardball, Russert said that the question indicated that "a majority believe with the president that you can, in fact, wiretap without a warrant." And on Today, Russert said that "a slight majority do support the president's view" that the wiretapping program is a "terrorism issue" as opposed to a "civil liberities" issue.

However, in all four of these reports addressing the poll, Russert omitted any mention of another related question from the poll (question 24), which found that 53 percent of Americans agreed that the Bush administration "should be required to get a court order before wiretapping"; while 41 percent disagreed. The finding from question 24 appears to contradict the finding in question 23, which Russert reported in each appearance. Indeed, in contrast with Russert's suggestion, The Wall Street Journal -- which co-sponsored the poll with NBC -- reported in a January 31 news article that the poll's results showed that Americans' opinion on the warrantless domestic spying is "mixed":

On the controversy over warrantless wiretaps by the National Security Agency, opinion is mixed. A narrow 51% majority says it approves of the Bush administration's approach to wiretapping international calls by suspected terrorists abroad and inside the U.S. But when asked whether the administration should obtain court orders for those wiretaps, the result is reversed, with 53% saying court orders should be required. Some 79% of Democrats, 58% of independents, and 27% of Republicans describe themselves as "extremely" or "quite" concerned that warrantless wiretaps "could be misused to violate people's privacy."

From February 5 broadcast of NBC's Meet the Press:

RUSSERT: Gentlemen, let me show you the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll on domestic wiretap program [sic] sponsored by the president. Fifty-one approve, 46 disapprove. Ron Brownstein, has the president turned the corner on that?

BROWNSTEIN: I think, as the issue is now defined, the polls have been very consistent from the beginning. That's one of about five or six polls that have shown a narrow plurality or majority supporting it. And I don't think the Judiciary Committee hearing, at least as it's structured, is likely to change that. If the debate is over whether the president has this authority or not, I think that the evidence is, from the polling, slightly more Americans say yes then no. What might change it is evidence about how the program was actually implemented and used and whether it caught more Americans in its net than the administration has suggested, as suggested in a story by The Washington Post today. Those are the kind of questions that might move public opinion, I think, more than what the Judiciary Committee is likely to debate.

From January 30 broadcast of NBC's Nightly News:

BRIAN WILLIAMS (anchor): And, Tim, two issues have been hot domestically: domestic eavesdropping of late and the lobbying scandal in Washington. Where are they playing politically?

RUSSERT: Here's lobbying, Brian. Which party is more influenced by special interests? Twenty-two percent of Americans say the Democrats; 36 percent say, no, it's the Republicans; and 33 percent, a third of Americans, say both parties equally. Then --

WILLIAMS: Tim --

RUSSERT: Yeah, we're talking about eavesdropping, Brian. It's very important. This is the president's position, in effect. Should there be wiretaps without court order? Fifty-one percent approve; 46 percent disapprove. That's the president's position in favor. But what about concerns? Fifty-six percent say they have concerns about wiretaps without warrants, 43 percent say they're not concerned. Brian, it's quite striking. Both those issues, lobbying and wiretapping, big in Washington debates, but on a list of priorities for America, on the bottom. And when asked whether they think that lobbying reform, if enacted by Congress, would change things, 65 percent of the American people say "wouldn't change things very much."

WILLIAMS: Tim, thanks, as always. A fresh polling numbers out tonight. Tim Russert in our NBC News Washington bureau.

From the January 30 (7 p.m. ET) edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:

CHRIS MATTHEWS (host): Who's winning this big fight here in Washington over domestic spying?

RUSSERT: Well, it's pretty interesting. We have asked people about spying issues, and a majority believe with the president that you can, in fact, wiretap without a warrant. However, when you ask the second question -- are you concerned by that policy? -- 56 percent say they are concerned by it. So the president has a slight majority supporting his policy. But there's a lot of tentativeness underneath the surface that if, in fact, something goes wrong or they learn more information, those numbers could swing.

From the January 31 broadcast of NBC's Today:

KATIE COURIC (co-host): Let's talk about the poll and, specifically, his approval rating, Tim. Thirty-nine percent approve of the job the president is doing; 54 percent disapprove. Put that in context for us, and is it true that the White House believes he has something like a 52 approval rate ceiling?

RUSSERT: Yeah, it's quite interesting. They realize that the two presidential races he was in he didn't pass that mark, and so it's impossible in their minds for any president to achieve the kind of levels that presidents in history did, of 60, 70 percent, or this president did after September 11th. But Katie, the administration and the White House believed they had made some progress. They were hoping that by now they'd be in the 40s or mid-40s with approval rating. Thirty-nine's a low number, and 54 disapproval is a very high number. They realize there's a long way to go in order to recapture the favorable rating and popularity the president once had.

COURIC: Why do you think the numbers haven't budged, Tim? As we know, last week the administration went on an all-out sort of counteroffensive to talk about domestic spying or terrorist surveillance, depending [on] who you're asking in terms of the name for that policy. I know that when asked about wiretaps without court orders, 51 percent approve, 46 percent disapproved. As I recall, it was pretty evenly split before this campaign embarked by the White House. So is -- should we conclude that wasn't particularly successful?

RUSSERT: Well, the president thinks that they gained a few points on that by making it a terrorism issue rather than a civil liberties issue. And a slight majority do support the president's view on that. But, Katie, the very next question -- are you concerned there could be abuses? -- 56 percent say that. And so, I think we're going to come down to on this issue is the courts. If the courts rule in favor of the president, he'll probably be OK on this issue politically. If they rule against him, if there is a suggestion that he broke the law, that could become a very lethal issue for the Democrats.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by davide (February 06, 2006 3:59 pm ET)
         

      I concur. It is a reflection of just how eerie the US has become in it's lapdog media, when people are polled as to what their general opinion is, and that is used to justify it's legality. I mean, what gives?

      The people through their representatives entrust the government to act within the parameters of the constitution, and we have courts to interpret and the legislature to enact laws. So, it doesn't matter what a random sample answer in a loaded question, and Russert long ago gave away his bias as an apologist for the administration. Who cares what a poll says?

      This seems to be a continuation of republican strategy, aided by the Meet the Press chubbo ...repeat enough times that some poll seems to cut the administration slack and somehow turn that into an argument that this isn't illegal. This strains logic and credibility, as if we all didn't know that already.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Intrepid Liberal Journal (February 06, 2006 4:45 pm ET)
         

      has essentially delivered the Republicans an unfiltered megaphone while the Democrats are reduced to an annoying tiny plastic whistle that screeches and everybody just wants to ignore. Is it any wonder that the Republicans currently are consumed with hubris and total disregard for the law as well as ethical behavior? The Republicans are like dogs: they lick their balls because they can. The media is reluctant to hold their "benefactors" accountable for anything.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by left of center (February 06, 2006 5:01 pm ET)
         

      It's a very disturbing trend to observe. I have watched, as, very slowly, the poll numbers regarding public support for this "warrantless domestic surveillance program"- let's call it what it is, OK? It's not a "terrorist surveillance program" - tilt in favor of the President. Although, yes, a very slim majority believe that a warrant should be obtained, the number that felt that way was much higher just a month ago. So, tell me, what has changed? Absolutely nothing....except a few choice word changes in the media, and a media assault by the administration. So, based on what a conservatively biased media has filtered to the public, they have almost - ALMOST- gotten most of the American public to buy off on this as acceptable and legal. So, I must beg the question - is the American public just incredibly ignorant? (I may have answered my own question here) or are the message spinners just that good? I really fear for the future of this country.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (February 07, 2006 5:49 am ET)
           

        The PUBLIC is busy trying to make ends meet as the REALITIES of Bush's "economic programs" hit home hard. Higher local taxes, higher gas, higher heat and A/C, higher health care, stagnant wages and NO job security, no new GOOD jobs ... people have all they can do keeping what they've got.

        Into this Bush-created downfall of America, the mouthpieces of the few wealthy-and-getting-wealthier continue a barage of pro-Republican propaganda. Bush can do no wrong. The economy is great. Iraq is going very well. Bush can keep us safe. Democrats are cowards, unpatriotic, whiners, and have no ideas.

        Robber barons used to hire gangs of thugs to bust up Unions. The owners could afford to pay the gangs, to beat and kill those who worked for them. Why would they do this? Because the workers were demanding better treatment.

        Now, the robber barons hire Media, to carry their lies to "the people", and to retain the gravy train that is working so well for them. There is BIG MONEY in keeping the American public fooled. It all depends on keeping Bush in power. You ain't seen nothing yet. Look for outrageous spending to keep the Congress Majority GOP. Why? Losing either house will mean the loss of control of SUBPEONA POWER. With such power, the Dems can finally get at THE TRUTH, and this must be avoided at all costs.

        So, the "PERCEPTION" will be that Bush is just trying to protect us, like some great FATHER caring lovingly for his helpless children. There is no need for checks and balances, no need to verify, no need for any suspicion; this president is due ABSOLUTE TRUST.

        This is the message the Media is pushing, and it will work well enough. Josef Goebbles learned long ago: If you want to control the masses and support the dictatorship, control the MESSAGE ... and lie, lie, lie.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by left of center (February 07, 2006 12:27 pm ET)
             

          I was just talking with a very close friend of mine the other day, and he was talking about how something that Joe Scarborough said made so much sense. He was talking about pork in the budget, we got on the topic of the line item veto, etc. And I ended up talking with him about it for almost an hour on the phone. My friend is a very intelligent guy, but the propagandists really are that good ( this was after my post, by the way ). But, more disturbing, a 10 grader with decent logical skills and some education in Constitutional Law (my bachelor's degree, btw) can see through the lies with little effort. I'm constantly amazed at the amount of times I hear one of the pundits start spouting what THEY claim the constitution says, and I find myself saying to myself - "not the one I read" - and I just want to smash my TV set. I think you're right on one thing - people are working incredibly hard to just hang on to what they have - and as such, have no time left to educate themselves on what is happening in this country. Thankfully, the realities hit the wallet sooner or later, and people wake up and go "what the f*&%???" and eventually vote for a change (UN-fortunately, that vote may be on Diebold machines, which, I suspect, have a Republican vote multiplier subroutine (ONE for the Democrat, 1x2 for the Republican).

          Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (February 06, 2006 5:50 pm ET)
         

      ...is that the media believe that taking polls qualifies as "reporting." Polls are useful in some contexts but seem to be overused these days.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.