About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

AP failed to note that McClellan withheld heart attack info in press briefing

February 15, 2006 3:14 pm ET

SUMMARY: An Associated Press article failed to inform readers that White House press secretary Scott McClellan, during his noon press briefing on February 14, withheld from reporters the fact that the man Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot had suffered a heart attack earlier that morning. Moreover, the AP article left the false impression that McClellan had indeed informed reporters of this development.

8 Comments

A February 15 article by Associated Press staff writer Tom Raum failed to inform readers that White House press secretary Scott McClellan, during his noon press briefing on February 14, withheld from reporters the fact that the man Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot had suffered a heart attack earlier that morning. Not only did Raum -- and the AP in general -- not report this element of the story, his article left the false impression that McClellan had indeed informed reporters of this development.

The White House was first notified at approximately 7:40 a.m. ET February 14 that the victim of the February 11 hunting accident, 78-year-old Texas lawyer Harry Whittington, had suffered a heart attack. McClellan was reportedly unaware of this development during his morning press briefing. According to an account in the Los Angeles Times, he said he learned of it "shortly before" delivering his noon briefing. Despite the significance of this news, McClellan did not subsequently inform the White House press corps of Whittington's worsened condition, as the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and USA Today all reported.

But the three AP articles published since news of the heart attack became public all failed to disclose that McClellan withheld this information. Staff writer Lynn Brezosky's February 14 article ignored this element of the story, despite noting that McClellan had made light of the hunting accident during his morning briefing. Staff writer Nedra Pickler's February 14 article similarly omitted any mention of McClellan's actions.

Moreover, Raum's article provided a version of events that falsely suggested that McClellan, after learning the news of Whittington's heart attack, had, in fact, disclosed this information during the second briefing:

After first defensively fielding questions on why disclosure of the Saturday shooting was delayed until the next day, Press Secretary Scott McClellan joked about the situation with reporters at his morning briefing. Later, he turned somber after doctors in Corpus Christi, Texas, said the Austin lawyer shot by Cheney -- Henry Whittington, 78 -- had suffered a minor heart attack after birdshot from Cheney's blast migrated to his heart.

"If you want to continue to spend time on that, that's fine," McClellan told reporters pressing him on the shooting incident. "We're moving on to the priorities of the American people. That's where our focus is."

By reporting that McClellan "later turned somber" after learning of Whittington's condition and then including one of his remarks from the noon press briefing, Raum left the false impression that the reporters present at that briefing were able to attribute McClellan's change in tone to this new development. By contrast, New York Times staff writers Elisabeth Bumiller and Anne E. Kornblut reported McClellan's "serious" and "impatient" tone during the second briefing, but noted that he was withholding information at the time:

Mr. McClellan joked that the Texas Longhorns, the N.C.A.A. football champions who were at the White House to meet with the president, would be in their team color, orange, and "the orange that they're wearing is not because they're concerned that the vice president will be there."

Continuing the play on orange, the color hunters wear as a safety precaution to avoid being shot, Mr. McClellan held up his own orange and gray tie. "That's why I'm wearing it," he said, to laughter.

But by the time of Mr. McClellan's noon briefing, when the press secretary was aware of Mr. Whittington's downturn but did not disclose it to reporters, his tone was serious, even as he was at times impatient with the persistent questions about the shooting. "If you want to continue to spend time on that, that's fine," Mr. McClellan said. "We're moving on to the priorities of the American people."

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank also noted McClellan's changed demeanor and explained that the reason behind the shift -- Whittington's heart attack -- was then "unbeknownst to reporters":

Why the quick switch in tone? Unbeknownst to the reporters -- but well beknownst to McClellan -- the White House had been informed before the second briefing that the shooting victim, Harry Whittington, had suffered a heart attack and had undergone a cardiac procedure because a pellet from the vice presidential shotgun was in his heart. Suddenly, the White House had more than an embarrassment on its hands.

During the noon briefing, McClellan even fielded a question from Fox News chief White House correspondent Carl Cameron about the extent of "relief" in the White House regarding Whittington's purported smooth recovery:

CAMERON: Back to the Saturday activities, understanding that the vice president and his entourage's primary concern was Mr. Whittington's health, and remains so, last night the late-night comics went to town; this morning you joked about orange and the Longhorns being here. To what extent is there a certain degree of relief that Mr. Whittington seems to be fine, but a bit of, perhaps, humor involved --

McCLELLAN: Well, I think Mr. Whittington remains in our thoughts and prayers. We all want to make sure that he's okay and that he gets home and he recovers fully. And that's where our focus is and that's where it will continue to be. And I think people have to make their own judgments in terms of how they go about that.

Appearing on the February 14 edition of MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann, Milbank commented that this moment in the briefing "would have been a fine time for Scott to jump in and actually say what he knew."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tex (February 15, 2006 3:35 pm ET)
         

      Why do reporters keep showing up at the White House to listen to Scott McClellan?

      As the "VOICE OF THE PRESIDENT", McClellan -- and indeed, this Administration -- has ZERO credibility. They withhold information. The information they give is provably WRONG. They are arrogant and openly hostile to the press. Why go at all?

      What will it take for the White House Press corps to finally protest, and refuse to attend press conferences with a known serial LIAR, whose entire purpose seems to be to mislead the American Public?

      Shouldn't they demand that, at the very least, another spokesperson be broken in, so that his credibility can be destroyed as well?

      On the other hand, McClellan is now known to be such a dependable liar, you can bet that if he says it, the OPPOSITE is true. I guess that's certainty of a sort.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by BillJ-MN (February 15, 2006 4:46 pm ET)
           

        Why do reporters keep showing up at the White House to listen to Scott McClellan? - from Tex

        Lately it seems to be similar to the reason someone goes to the arcade to play Whack-A-Mole.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 15, 2006 6:28 pm ET)
           

        There is an old saying that nothing is official until it has been officially denied.

        McClellan frequently uses phrases like "that's obsurd" or "that's ridiculous". What he really means is, "You will never be able to prove that, because we already have been able to successfully quell the investigation, cover it up, shred it, buy off and/or plug the leaks."

        Is there anyone left who trusts the words coming out of his mouth after it has been shown that at times those words are not at all true?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by parlo (February 15, 2006 5:52 pm ET)
         

      Matt Lauer and Tim Russert discussed the press secretary this morning on the TODAY show. They defended the press suspicions quite well I thought. By TODAY show standards anyway.....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by wolf kotenberg (February 15, 2006 7:04 pm ET)
         

      <<<>>>>>>

      True, noone is disputing we all wish Mr Withington a speedy recovery. But the WH obfuscation process is in full gear. Who cares what Scott McClellan knows, he is a hack. Once the man is in the ambulance the investigation begins and that is not sequential, that is concurrent....................unless you are privilegdged ( sorry, I can't spell this word ) and not subject to the same laws mere mortals are??? Gotta drag out my copy of the " Pelican brief " and re4read.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by shannon (February 15, 2006 10:22 pm ET)
         

      Maybe it's just the nurse in me, but just because the White House is aware of Mr. Whittington's condition does not give the press the right to know. I have taken care of "controversial" patients before. just because certain people may know their condition does not mean they have the right to release it.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (February 16, 2006 10:39 am ET)
           

        You're a nurse--I'm impressed! I'm in academe, myself.

        We were having a discussion/dispute recently, and unfortunately the thread got archived before I could respond. If you'd like to continue it further, you can reach me at plrr811@hotmail.com (no attachments, please)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by captfoster2 (February 16, 2006 8:54 am ET)
         

      I applaud your stance on the "Privacy" issue.......

      But the true issue in this mess is the fact that McClellan is no longer trustworthy.....in fact...this entire Bush Regime hasn't been untrustworthy since Nov 2000!!

      Even Ari Flescher is coming out and saying the lies are obvious!! If Ari comes out and says this..............

      Unfortunately....Mr Whittington's condition is only sought after by the press because ( like the details being withheld for over 20 hours) its the press prehaps finally growing balls and realizing that this group isn't worth defending!!

      Is it right that his condition is demanded or made public? No, it isn't!!

      But this is the VP of the USA........the attempted cover-up was appalling and the lies that followed (as we expected) and the likes of Fox Opinion and various other so-called news agencies & reporters trying yet again to help create cover for this regime.....

      I hope all the best for Mr Whittington........and while we don't really need to know how he's doing.....it is part of a bigger picture and that is unfortunate!!

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • Associated Press
    Associated Press

    The Associated Press
    450 W. 33rd St.
    New York, NY 10001

    Main Number
    +1-212-621-1500