AP's Shrader again used White House's "terrorist surveillance program" terminology
SUMMARY: Associated Press staff writer Katherine Shrader again used the White House's preferred terminology -- "terrorist surveillance program" -- to describe President Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program.
In her February 17 article, AP staff writer Katherine Shrader again used the White House's preferred terminology -- "terrorist surveillance program" -- to describe President Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program. Media Matters for America previously noted that Shrader used a similar term in a February 9 article without pointing out that it is one promoted by the Bush administration to cast the controversial program in a way most likely to secure the public's support. In fact, reports in The New York Times and The Washington Post make clear that the term far understates the huge net cast by the program: Far beyond "terrorist surveillance," the program has monitored the communications of thousands of people with no relationship to Al Qaeda.
Other news outlets that have used the term without qualification include Fox News, CNN, and The Washington Times.
While the term appears to have originated on December 22 with the right-wing news website NewsMax.com, the White House first adopted it in a January 22 backgrounder on Bush's authorization of the National Security Agency (NSA) to intercept communications of U.S. residents without court warrants. Bush first used the term publicly in a January 23 speech at Kansas State University in which he said of the NSA's activities, "It's what I would call a terrorist surveillance program."
On January 24, Shrader contributed to an article on Bush's speech written by AP staff writer Nedra Pickler that clearly identified the term "terrorist surveillance program" as a "new label" promoted by the president:
With congressional hearings set to begin on this issue Feb. 6, Bush kicked his administration's new intensive public relations effort to win support for the program run by the National Security Agency. As part of that, he gave it a new label -- the Terrorist Surveillance Program.
But in a February 9 article, Shrader used the term without informing readers of its origins:
At least one Democrat left saying he had a better understanding of legal and operational aspects of the anti-terrorist surveillance program. But he said he still had a number of questions.
And in the February 17 article, "Spying Program Prompts Political Jitters," Shrader continued her use of the use of the term:
Polls show approval for Bush's U.S.-based terrorist surveillance program is growing. An AP-Ipsos poll last week showed that people are now evenly divided on whether the administration should be required to get warrants before monitoring domestic calls overseas.















We'd like to announce that the nation is doing very well indeed pitching in to the new Whittington "Pellet Confiscation Initiative", or as it will henceforth be referred to, the PCI.
The goal, of course, is to prevent polluting the environment with small quantities of lead, which can really mount up. Instead of leaving this lead lying around to cause environmental problems, volunteers will carry some home with them, taking personal responsibility.
PCI: The administration's new program which makes the world a better place.
Would it be acceptable to simply call it the surveillance program and not use the term terrorist? I am not sure what exactly MMFA thinks the media should call it, because they would have to know that it would not be called "plan to monitor liberals so evil republicans can rule the world".
It's not a terrorist surveillance program if it's monitoring people other than terrorists. Clearly, that was the case.
"Warrantless domestic surveillance program."
"Clearly Illegal Violation of the 4th Amendment"
The "We're going to spy on you, to hell with the Constitution, and there's nothing you can do about it because we have the "INHERENT" power of the GODS" program.
For some reason I don't see your term getting much use in media reporting. One never knows though.
IF THEY WANT A DATA BANK THEY JUST GO HERE AND YOUR BANK SORRY I LEFT IT IN CAPS-THEY'RE STILL LOOKING FOR THE DOTS-ELLINGTON -EXPLAIN?TEX TAKE YOUR MEDICATION--THE PROGRAM IS FOR SURVAILLING NOT SPECIFIC SEARCHING.
Talk about tinfoil hats. I think the nurse is coming with your Haldol
Only you would know the medication is and what disorder its for.I often post way over your head-Should I revert to an eigth grade level-thats what NYT and WP use as a standard
I pick things off my sweater that show more higher brain function than I have EVER seen in any of your posts.
"Should I revert to an eigth(sic) grade level"
You should aspire to an eighth grade level