NBC's Miklaszewski provided McClellan's dubious defense of Guantánamo without challenge
SUMMARY: NBC News' Jim Miklaszewski uncritically reported White House press secretary Scott McClellan's response to a new United Nations report on the treatment of detainees at Guantánamo Bay, even though McClellan's claims had previously been undermined by both the International Committee of the Red Cross and internal U.S. government emails.
On the February 16 edition of NBC's Nightly News, NBC News chief Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski uncritically reported White House press secretary Scott McClellan's response to a new United Nations report on the treatment of detainees at the U.S. military's Guantánamo Bay prison facility, which alleges that "some interrogation techniques [practiced at the facility] are actions amounting to torture." Even though McClellan's assertion -- that the report is "a rehash of allegations from prisoners who are trained by Al Qaeda to make false claims about being tortured" -- has been undermined by a 2004 International Committee of the Red Cross report and internal U.S. government emails, Miklaszewski did not mention any of the substantial evidence that refutes McClellan's assertion. Miklaszewski also failed to challenge McClellan's claim that all of those held at Guantánamo "are dangerous terrorists" and "people that are determined to harm innocent civilians or harm innocent Americans," even though a recent National Journal report and a Seton Hall University School of Law study have concluded that the government has only scant or weak evidence against many of those held at the Guantánamo naval base, which is located at a U.S.-controlled port in Cuba.
Allegations that prisoners at Guantánamo have been tortured have not come just "from prisoners who are trained by Al Qaeda to make false claims about being tortured" as McClellan asserted, but have been documented in FBI emails, in which, as Media Matters for America has noted, FBI agents described graphic instances of abuse by interrogators at Guantánamo that the agents personally witnessed. In one email
, an FBI agent described the interrogation methods employed by Department of Defense officials as "torture techniques." T.J. Harrington, the FBI's deputy assistant director for counterterrorism, detailed in an email
several agents' accounts of abusive treatment, including one in which a female sergeant "grabbed [a] detainee's thumbs and bent them backwards and indicated that she also grabbed his genitals." The sergeant, according to Harrington, warned her subject that past interrogations had left other "detainees curling into a fetal position on the floor and crying in pain." Harrington also included an account of a detainee being "subjected to intense isolation for over three months ... in a cell that was always flooded with light," which led to him "evidencing behavior consistent with extreme psychological trauma (talking to non-existent people, reporting hearing voices, crouching in a corner of the cell covered with a sheet for hours on end)." A third FBI document described a detainee "chained hand and foot in a fetal position to the floor" and who was subjected to food deprivation and temperature extremes. "The detainee was almost unconscious on the floor, with a pile of hair next to him," the FBI agent wrote. "He had apparently been literally pulling his own hair out throughout the night."
A November 30, 2004, article in The New York Times reported: "The International Committee of the Red Cross [ICRC] has charged in confidential reports to the United States government that the American military has intentionally used psychological and sometimes physical coercion "tantamount to torture" on prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba," based on visits to the prison by ICRC staff and interviews with Guantánamo detainees. According to the Times article, the ICRC "has been conducting visits to Guantánamo since January 2002," and that "[i]ts officials are able to visit prisoners at Guantánamo under the kind of arrangement the committee has made with governments for decades. In exchange for exclusive access to the prison camp and meetings with detainees, the committee has agreed to keep its findings confidential."
McClellan's claims that "[w]e know that these are dangerous terrorists. They're being kept at Guantánamo Bay. They are people that are determined to harm innocent civilians or harm innocent Americans," are contradicted by a February 3 report in the National Journal that documented the apparent lack of evidence against many of the detainees:
Some of the men [Defense Secretary Donald] Rumsfeld described [in a June 27, 2005, statement] -- the terrorists, the trainers, the financiers, and the battlefield captures -- are indeed at Guantanamo. But National Journal's detailed review of government files on 132 prisoners who have asked the courts for help, and a thorough reading of heavily censored transcripts from the Combatant Status Review Tribunals conducted in Guantanamo for 314 prisoners, didn't turn up very many of them. Most of the "enemy combatants" held at Guantanamo -- for four years now -- are simply not the worst of the worst of the terrorist world.
Many of them are not accused of hostilities against the United States or its allies. Most, when captured, were innocent of any terrorist activity, were Taliban foot soldiers at worst, and were often far less than that. And some, perhaps many, are guilty only of being foreigners in Afghanistan or Pakistan at the wrong time. And much of the evidence -- even the classified evidence -- gathered by the Defense Department against these men is flimsy, second-, third-, fourth- or 12th-hand. It's based largely on admissions by the detainees themselves or on coerced, or worse, interrogations of their fellow inmates, some of whom have been proved to be liars.
[...]
Even as the CIA was deciding that most of the prisoners at Guantanamo didn't have much to say, Pentagon officials were getting frustrated with how little the detainees were saying. So they ramped up the pressure and gave interrogators more license.
The questions to the detainees about 9/11 and Al Qaeda and about each other were so constant, so repetitive, so oppressive that some prisoners, out of exasperation or fatigue or fear, just gave in and said, sure, I'm a terrorist. False confessions and false accusations are rampant, according to the lawyers and the Defense Department records.
One man slammed his hands on the table during an especially long interrogation and yelled, "Fine, you got me; I'm a terrorist." The interrogators knew it was a sarcastic statement. But the government, sometime later, used it as evidence against him: "Detainee admitted he is a terrorist" reads his tribunal evidence. The interrogators were so outraged that they sought out the detainee's personal representative to explain it to him that the statement was not a confession.
The National Journal reported that, according to Michael Scheuer, former head of the CIA's "bin Laden unit," "[b]y the fall of 2002, it was common knowledge around CIA circles that fewer than 10 percent of Guantanamo's prisoners were high-value terrorist operatives."
In addition, a February 8 review of government documents by the Seton Hall law school found, among other things, that "[f]ifty-five percent (55%) of the detainees are not determined to have committed any hostile acts against the United States or its coalition allies" and that "[o]nly 5% of the detainees were captured by United States forces. 86% of the detainees were arrested by either Pakistan or the Northern Alliance and turned over to United States custody. This 86% of the detainees captured by Pakistan or the Northern Alliance were handed over to the United States at a time in which the United States offered large bounties for [the] capture of suspected enemies."
From the February 16 edition of NBC Nightly News:
MIKLASZEWSKI: Four years after the detention camp at Guantánamo Bay first opened, there's increasing international pressure now to shut it down. Today at the United Nations, Secretary General Kofi Annan told the U.S., all Guantánamo prisoners must be granted a fair trial or released.
ANNAN [clip]: And I think it would be up to the government to decide hopefully to do it as soon as is possible.
MIKLASZEWSKI: In Brussels today, the European parliament passed a resolution also urging the U.S. to close Guantánamo, calling it symbolic of all that's wrong in the U.S. "war on terror." The fresh demands followed today's release of a UN report which claims violent force-feeding of prisoners on hunger strike, and some interrogation techniques are actions amounting to torture. But UN investigators never visited Guantánamo because they were denied permission to question the detainees themselves. And today, the White House shot back, calling the UN report a rehash of allegations from prisoners who are trained by Al Qaeda to make false claims about being tortured.
McCLELLAN [clip]: We know that these are dangerous terrorists. They're being kept at Guantánamo Bay. They are people that are determined to harm innocent civilians or harm innocent Americans.
MIKLASZEWSKI: Now, military tribunals may soon begin for only a small handful of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, but some Pentagon officials already say that it's likely many may never have a day in court.















... is not only understandable, it's to be expected. At this point, anything out of his mouth is bound to be UNTRUE.
But reporters who simply report his words uncritically as "the truth"? They are not reporters. They are paid stenographers for the state, propagandists for hire.
THE PEOPLE can no longer count on getting THE TRUTH from today's media.
Thank God for MMFA and similar internet sites. You can bet the NeoCon regime is working overtime trying to figure out how to shut it down.
And even if he's not outright lying, he just parrots the talking points over and over and over. I agree with what you said in an earlier post; it doesn't make sense for the WH press corps to even bother going to press briefings anymore. It's an outrage that McClellan is getting paid by our tax dollars to lie to us.
We're paying billions (I think about 1.5) for GOP propaganda "PR"... uh, I didn't ask for my tax dollars to be used in this manner.
McClellan knows he can get up there and say virtually anything and not be held accountable by reporters and the media establishment. Time after time, even after being burned by his misstatements, the media not only lets him off the hook but continues to serve as a stenographer/mouthpiece for the administration.
If she's still working and not retired, I think we need to get Helen Thomas moved to the front so that if McClellan ignore's her it would be really obvious. I really love watching her ask questions and seeing Presidential Press Secretaries sweet and squirm. This McClellen clown even squirms when the Bangladeshi guy lobs him the softball questions. I'm sure that Helen Thomas could make him cry if not soil himself.
If Scott McCellan tells you the prisoners at Gitmo are terrorists, just believe it.
If he tells you the UN report is a rehash, just believe it.
If Cheney tells you he had "one beer," just believe it.
If Rice tells you, "No one expected airplanes to be used as weapons," just believe it.
If Rumsfeld tells you, "We know where the WMD's are," just believe it.
If Chertoff tells you we're rebuilding New Orleans, just believe it.
If Snow tells you the deficit will be cut in half by 2009, just believe it.
If Libby tells you he didn't know Valerie Plame was undercover, just believe it.
If Bush tells you "When we talk about monitoring Americans, we're talking about getting a court order," just believe it.
Just believe it all...
... and then you, too, can be in the Washington press corps.
I imagine that any interregation in any "police" jurisdiction could be tantamount to torture in the eyes of someone. I suppose military boot camp could be listed as torture. I would like to see the definition of "tantamount to torture" before makin a judgement in this case.
The relevant question is would they be described as torture by an FBI agent as what happened at Guantanamo was? What we know for sure is that an AMERICAN soldier recieved a brain injury while just POSING as a prisoner. I say if you beat someones head on the floor hard enough to cause a brain injury where six months later he was STILL having seizures from it we are getting pretty close to torture, I think its bad enough that an FBI agent is calling it torture we really have to take that seriously
that one act you described. However, in defense of the guards, I have relatives that are correctional officers at a local penitentary. Some of the things that they put up with on a daily basis would be enough to push a relatively untrained officer to go "over the edge" in relatiation. Should it happen, no? Will it happen occasionally, certainly. Those that are behaving inappropriately should be removed from duty (or re-assigned), but the prisioners (or in this case, detainees)should not be released.
My Bad!! Too early in the morning, can't spell. Try "Retaliation"
Questioning if there really WAS abuse to excusing the abuse with the, they had it coming defense. I choose not to get into the semantics of that argument. What was done there was called torture by someone with no reason to lie which was McClellans defense, that it was a lie. We shouldnt be doing it period. The UN report is what we deserve for it happening at all. So lets stop making excuses and stop the abuse. I dont think this administration WANTS to stop abuse and torture which is why they at the signing of the anti torture bill said they have the right to exempt themselves from it, another dispicable action by this lawless administration
A poorly-trained or inexperienced guard in some state pen blowing up at a prisoner is a very different situation from coordinated and authorized torture by experienced personnel.
At this point, the ritual of Scott McClellan's daily spin with the press is a exercise in a Republican rally call on how to defend the President's policies. I wonder what MMFA thinks will come out of confronting the lack of confrontation from the the media. At best, the press will be lucky the land on the right side of an issue; they have no commitment to journalistic excellence. In fact, the only beholding dynamic the press respects is ratings and it's ability to crate news to fit the new race to the right wing media slant. In today's political arena we have a lot to be concerned about. The lost of left wing power within the three branches of Government have created "black Hole" for everything people orientated to fall in. From laws to legislation, 40 years of hard earned Democratic ideals, that some have lost their lives for, seem to be falling by the waist side.
There is some light at the end of this fall: the 2006 elections should be the first major offensive from he left. As it turns out, the same power the Republicans fought so hard for will be their own demise. Absolute power corrupts, and we all have been witness to a lot of "good oh boy" corruption. Yes, the right wingers are trying their best at the only form of bipartisan politics they are willing to truly give a try: blame for the scandals they have made such a mess out of.
Joseph
When Americans as a collective accept the suspension of Habeas Corpus, Free Speech, and Privacy for the sake of security from a crippled Saudi & Egyptian in a cave is a sad day indeed.
As America is focused on the V.P Dick presumption of being above the law, we mortals, comrades of the new American order bobble in the back round without a curious reporter, or paper, or network.
Why a citizen would be placated for waiting 14 hours before notifying authorities about a shooting of another man, accident or no, and face virtually no formal questioning, inquest, or official investigation of any kind, is testament to the new order of the Haves showing the reality to the Have-nots.
We former citizens of an American Democracy should be happy that our barely elected, newly coroneted Co-King should not show his displeasure by taking yet more of our liberties for our curiosity.
After all, the Republican Rulers have decided that crimes committed in the name of security by this Administration in cooperation of the Congress & Senate’s turning a blind eye is of course a prerogative of their position in our former Democracy.
We dismantled the Bill of Rights with the abomination called the Patriot Act, and the presumption of expanded powers by the invention of the Unitary Executive. Our Republican New American Order is arranging to criminalizing public protest, now known as a Disruptor. The Secret Service will now have the Uniformed Division of the Secret Service or it’s own version of Brown Shirts unencumbered by warrants, judges, or existing laws of any kind, constitutional or not.
I care not if the V.P. shoots every Texas brown-nose attorney for practice sake. I care that the Republicans are dismantling the democracy we spent over two centuries, and millions of lives to protect for the sake of a couple of draft dodger’s assessment of a national threat. The mileage they have gotten in frightening a nation into unilaterally surrendering our civil liberties, and rights.
I want my countrymen and women to remember where their honor comes from, for whom the bell tolls. I want to be an American living in the good old USA, Land of the Free, Home of The Brave again. I want to be lead by men and women of some backbone, some character. Am I alone in believing that a man’s character should be a starting point as to whether they are fit to lead??
Happy Thoughts;
Dan Grady
All this slacking off is getting nowhere. People are just sitting in Gitmo; they need to be tried. This is just like the the two terror suspects from Lodi. Those two have been sitting in jail for ~8 months- longer than the sentence for their crime! (lying to the FBI)
I think the gov't has a weak caser on most of these people and are keeping them in legal limbo, waiting for something to stick.
Back to the topic at hand: Torture is bad and Bush is scum from claiming exemption from the torture bill. "Compassionate conservatism" my foot!