About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Reuters ignored Abramoff's claim of ties to Bush, Rove, McCain

March 09, 2006 1:25 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: A Reuters article on former Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff's disclosure to Vanity Fair that he "worked closely with many top Republicans, despite their claims to the contrary" ignored Abramoff's claims, in the same magazine article, of close ties with President Bush, White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ).

8 Comments

A March 8 Reuters article on former Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff's disclosure to Vanity Fair magazine that he "worked closely with many top Republicans, despite their claims to the contrary" ignored Abramoff's claims, in the same magazine article, of close ties with President Bush, White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), all of whom have denied personal connections to Abramoff.

Excerpts of the Vanity Fair article, appearing in the magazine's forthcoming April issue, are available on the magazine's website. According to those excerpts:

An insider tells [contributing editor David] Margolick that Abramoff blames competing Republican lobbyists and Arizona Senator John McCain -- with whom Abramoff says he's had a contentious relationship -- for his downfall. Abramoff tells Margolick that McCain staffers deliberately humiliated him, doling out embarrassing e-mails to the press.

"Mr. Abramoff flatters himself," Mark Salter, McCain's administrative assistant, tells Margolick. "Senator McCain was unaware of his existence until he read initial press accounts of Abramoff's abuses, and had never laid eyes on him until he appeared before the committee."

Abramoff says, "As best I can remember, when I met with him, he didn't have his eyes shut. I'm surprised that Senator McCain has joined the chorus of amnesiacs."

[...]

[Abramoff discussed his relationship with] President Bush, who claims not to remember having his picture taken with Abramoff. According to Abramoff, at one time, the president joked with Abramoff about his weight-lifting past: "What are you benching, buff guy?"

Reuters reported that in the Vanity Fair article, Abramoff "complains that many of those who used to work closely with him now claim that they never knew him," but made no mention of Abramoff's claims of ties to Bush, Rove, and McCain. According to the Reuters article:

The magazine features photographs of Abramoff with former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former President Ronald Reagan, whom he met when he was president of the College Republicans.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman ate dinner at Abramoff's house and forced a Democratic appointee out of the State Department for him, Vanity Fair said.

[...]

Abramoff also said Montana Republican Sen. Conrad Burns was especially cooperative.

"Every appropriation we wanted we got," he said. "Our staffs were as close as they could be."

Spokesmen for Burns and DeLay were not immediately available for comment.

By contrast, a March 8 Associated Press article reported that Abramoff "says President Bush knew him well enough to joke with him about weightlifting." The AP article also noted that, according to Vanity Fair, "Rove's relationship with Abramoff was deeper" than the White House has previously acknowledged, and that "Rove dined several times at Abramoff's former restaurant in Washington, Signatures, and was Abramoff's guest in the owner's box of the NCAA basketball playoffs a few years ago, sitting for much of the game at Abramoff's side." A separate March 8 AP article was devoted entirely to Abramoff's claim that McCain "deliberately humiliated him."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by info8508 (March 09, 2006 2:46 pm ET)
         

      The Republicans are bullet proof. Scooter Libby got caught, now Abramoff and they "acted alone." There are Democrats that took bribes too so they will have to be skinned alive. But the Republicans he bribed won't even get an honorable mention. Maybe God is on their side? In Washington today it pays to be "born again."

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Intrepid Liberal Journal (March 09, 2006 2:57 pm ET)
         

      the media would go into a tizzy. But he can't because this is a REPUBLICAN SCANDAL I repeat, this is a REPUBLICAN SCANDAL.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dougsomers (March 09, 2006 3:20 pm ET)
           

        .......this explains why McCain has gone into hiding lately.......

        Report Abuse
      • Author by heru (March 10, 2006 12:37 am ET)
           

        surprise surprise!

        Abramoff is connected to all leading Republicans because the are all money grabbing flag waving crooks.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by guy (March 10, 2006 4:57 am ET)
           

        The MSM is all hot to unjustly name Democrats that aren't even part of the scandal -- so, yeah... if he had named just one Democrat.

        On the flip side, the Decoycrats don't seem to mind all that much that the media is raking them. I'm not talking about the rank and file, such as many posting here -- I'm talking about the leadership. Not really much of an opposition.

        Vote Third Party.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dougsomers (March 10, 2006 10:21 am ET)
             

          ........apparently you haven't read the latest Poll Results.....

          Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (March 09, 2006 5:39 pm ET)
         

      "Please sir, might I have a little more your tasty gruel?"

      Is this just British-speak for Fox? Or possibly it may been negated by PM Blair's minions—just as GeeWillikers' own might have…squelched it on this side of the Atlantic. So is Reutie really in a hissy–fit with Vanity Fair or is Reuters merely Fox-hunting? And which Fox-mouth will be the first to raise their pinky? It doesn’t seem these two media-empires are all that separated by a sea of bombast.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rcossebo (March 10, 2006 2:19 pm ET)
         

      What the hell is wrong with Reuter's? They used to be a reputable media source! Have they sold out to the Rapture Right as well?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.