About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Cavuto didn't ask about indictment during DeLay interview

March 10, 2006 5:31 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: In an interview with former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Fox News' Neil Cavuto not only failed to ask DeLay any questions about his indictment by a Texas grand jury on charges of money-laundering, he did not even mention the indictment.

16 Comments

During the March 9 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, host Neil Cavuto interviewed Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) regarding the recent decision by Dubai Ports World, the company owned by the government of Dubai, to transfer management of U.S. ports to an American company. During the interview, Cavuto not only failed to ask DeLay any questions about his indictment by a Texas grand jury on charges of money laundering, he did not even mention the indictment.

In September 2005, DeLay was indicted on charges of conspiracy and money-laundering involving alleged illegal corporate contributions into Texas state elections. Because the rules of the U.S. House of Representatives bar members who are accused of criminal activity from assuming leadership positions, DeLay was forced to step down as House majority leader. The indictment centered on DeLay's involvement in raising money for Republican candidates for Texas legislature seats in 2002. Texas Republicans gained control of the state House that year for the first time in 130 years, paving the way for a redrawing of the congressional district map in Texas that altered district demographics in ways favorable to Republicans. Texas Republicans subsequently gained five U.S. House seats in the 2004 election. In December 2005, a judge dismissed the conspiracy charge but upheld more serious charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Soon after, DeLay announced he would not seek to regain his post as House majority leader.

From the March 9 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:

CAVUTO: Well, the Dubai port deal collapsing under the enormous weight of all this intense opposition -- even some of the president's closest allies were against the deal, including my next guest, Republican Congressman Tom DeLay, who joins us now. Congressman, you never liked this. How do you feel now?

DeLAY: Well, I feel very good. I think it's a win-win situation, Neil. I think the president will still be able to carry on his relationship with Dubai and UAE, because he stood up for what he thought was a good deal. And I think the American people win by answering this problem that I have always had, and that's foreign governments owning corporations and coming in and -- and competing with American corporations, what I think is unfairly. I don't mind foreign investment, as long as it participates in the market. But the whole notion of the deep pockets of a government owning a corporation, and, of course, the biggest issue being national security which we all had real questions about, I think it's all taken care of now. That's what good government is.

CAVUTO: Were there any -- any divisions, sir, with the president? I mean, did you, in either conversations with the president, get the feeling that he was being, I don't know, felt like Custer?

[laughter]

DeLAY: No, no. This president stays focused, I got to tell you. His leadership style and his management style is very good. Yeah, there was breakdown. These -- this decision probably should have -- not probably -- should have gone higher, with Cabinet secretaries making the final decision, rather than underlings. It was -- it was a botched mess. But the president understood it, got it right quickly, started working with people. And this solution looks like it's a very good solution.

CAVUTO: I -- I guess there's a different spin on it, Congressman, and that is that the president really never did get it. He was pushing for this deal, earlier threatened a veto. Then, of course, there was this 45-day stay, if you will, but that he was going to stick to his guns, even though he had only lately come to those guns.

DeLAY: Well, he --

CAVUTO: What do you make of that?

DeLAY: He thinks the deal is a good deal. He -- he thinks -- and he still stands by that. We disagreed with him. I -- I think he also understood that we probably need to look again, with an -- with an emphasis on national security, I mean, answer questions like, yes, now, this Dubai company, owned by the Dubai government, will have easier access to visas to come into the United States to so-called work for their -- for their company. How does that play out? How do the visas come? I mean, those kinds of questions are very important, as it relates to keeping -- holding security in our ports and keeping the American people safe. So -- I -- but I think all this now is being answered. And -- and it's the way a problem should be worked out and a solution found.

CAVUTO: Very quickly, sir: If you were majority leader at the time all of this broke, would this have gotten to be such a tempest?

[laughter]

DeLAY: Oh, I don't know about that. I mean, who knows. I don't -- I -- I think everybody understood the problem. And, thank goodness, they found a solution.

CAVUTO: All right, Tom DeLay, great having you again. Congratulations on your primary win. We will see what happens in November.

DeLAY: Thank you, Neil.

CAVUTO: All right, Tom DeLay in Washington.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by draftedin68 (March 10, 2006 5:42 pm ET)
         

      It was hard to understand Neil during the "interview" - you know, his muzzle being buried so far into the south side of the north-facing DeLay and all.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by RobertSeattle (March 10, 2006 5:51 pm ET)
           

        ...then he can be impeached!

        (Maybe Neil can wear a Blue Dress too)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by dougsomers (March 10, 2006 5:59 pm ET)
         

      ....what else is new, Fox failed to ask Cheney about the shooting details during his interview. Tweety has HARDBALL, Fox has SOFTBALL...........

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dougsomers (March 10, 2006 6:00 pm ET)
         

      ..... will Abramhoff be next, discussing the wonders of Capitalism.................

      Report Abuse
    • Author by haapi (March 10, 2006 6:12 pm ET)
         

      I'm sure Delay only agreed to be interviewed if he was promised that no questions would be asked about the indictment, so this is no surprise.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (March 10, 2006 6:44 pm ET)
         

      Please; be sure to wash your hands, and use an alcohol based scrub when handling Tom Delay & Neil Cavuto at the same time.

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

      Report Abuse
      • Author by guy (March 11, 2006 6:29 pm ET)
           

        Decoycrats????

        No, thanks.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dangrady (March 12, 2006 2:25 pm ET)
             

          The ‘14 points of recognition of Fascism by Dr. Lawrence Witt,’ written as an attempt for the proletariat to guard against the future rise of Fascism has hit on all 14 points with the single party rule of the Republican Party, and the disastrous election of the Bush/Cheney Presidency.

          We don't have the luxury in this next election cycle. Either a newly elected majority exercises its vital oversight responsibilities to lift the lid on the pot of nightmares, crimes, and destruction of our democracy, or we can kiss democracy goodbye.

          Again, Fascism rearing its head with a beloved ally of the Bush regime in Italy, and the Berlusconi government means that the chance is great this trend could be world wide. When a democracy gives up on a free press, and deregulates the integrity of a free media in allowing a few rich, powerful conglomerates to monopolize the media, the misinformation flows, and the democracy declines.

          If the world has learned anything from WWII & the Cold War is that when democracy descends into a Fascist or Communists state, chaos, genocides, and the dissolution of the middle class is the result. NO MIDDLE CLASS, NO DEMOCRACY.

          Divide the vote with third party voting is just another wedge the Republicans use to hold power.

          Happy Thoughts

          Dan Grady

          Report Abuse
          • Author by dougsomers (March 13, 2006 3:53 am ET)
               

            ......without Nader in 2000, George W. could clean brush everyday; no more third parties!!!!!!!!!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by peet (March 10, 2006 7:16 pm ET)
         

      ...it's FOX.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (March 10, 2006 8:14 pm ET)
         

      probably correct to not mention the indictment in this interview. Any mention of that at this time could "taint" a potential jury pool (as if its not already tainted by all the pre-court publicity that has been accorded Mr. Deter in this case.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pjcarter (March 10, 2006 10:24 pm ET)
         

      And you know what? that wasn't even the topic! The topic was the Dubai ports deal.

      We also have no way of knowing whether DeLay told Cavuto in advance that he would not comment on his case. So let's be fair here.

      That being said, Cavuto is still a panderer to the right and like many of his Fauz brethren speaks from a bully pulpit when confronted with perceived liberal agenda.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (March 11, 2006 6:30 pm ET)
         

      Except partisan knifefighting. If he wasnt going to talk about his indictment there was no worldly reason to have him on the show. Except to further partisan propaganda

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (March 12, 2006 3:09 pm ET)
         

      DeLay sure did get quite nervous at the end of the segment when Cavuto asked this question: ---------

      CAVUTO: Very quickly, sir: If you were majority leader at the time all of this broke, would this have gotten to be such a tempest?

      [laughter]

      DeLAY: Oh, I don't know about that. I mean, who knows. I don't -- I -- I think everybody understood the problem. And, thank goodness, they found a solution. ----------

      I think that the little laughter was specifically regarding the fact that DeLay is not majority leader because he was indicted.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mirkwood (March 13, 2006 11:01 am ET)
         

      DeLAY: Yeah, there was breakdown. These -- this decision probably should have -- not probably -- should have gone higher, with Cabinet secretaries making the final decision, rather than underlings. --

      The president supported this idea. Is he an 'underling'?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.