About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NBC's Today, like MSNBC's Hardball, hosted more conservatives than liberals

March 20, 2006 7:12 pm ET

SUMMARY: A Media Matters survey of guests on NBC's Today show thus far in 2006 revealed a significant preference for conservatives over progressives.

19 Comments

A Media Matters for America survey of guests on NBC's Today show thus far in 2006 revealed a significant preference for conservatives over progressives. For the period from January 1 to March 16, Media Matters found that when MSNBC host Chris Matthews is classified as a conservative, conservatives outnumbered progressives by a ratio of 3-to-1. When Matthews is not included, the ratio is 2-to-1 -- 10 conservatives to five liberals, though two guests classified as liberals appeared together. Interviews with politicians were not counted in this survey.

Matthews, host of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, was a guest six times. While conservatives often complain that Matthews is a liberal, Media Matters named him 2005's Misinformer of the Year for his role as a purveyor of conservative misinformation. Media Matters has also identified numerous instances of Matthews's gushing over President Bush, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), and other Republicans. Recently, Matthews has:

  • remarked to White House deputy press secretary Trent Duffy, "See how much we get done when you come over here?" adding, "I wish we had you on every night."
  • said of House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), "You can see this man's greatness"; said that KT McFarland, a Republican U.S. Senate candidate in New York, is a "delightful candidate"; and stated that "people will say" McFarland's opponent, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY), is "Dukakis in a dress" (a reference to unsuccessful 1988 Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis).
  • claimed that the nation's dislike of then-first lady Hillary Clinton was the reason why control of Congress shifted to Republicans in 1994, further claiming that a recently reported that a voter-data venture led by Democrat Harold Ickes -- an adviser to Clinton -- is "just like we saw the NSA doing" in conjunction with President Bush's controversial warrantless domestic eavesdropping program.
  • misrepresented the positions of President Bush and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on a recently passed South Dakota abortion ban.
  • praised conservative Philadelphia-based radio host Michael Smerconish without noting that Smerconish appeared at a political event with Matthews's brother, who is a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in Pennsylvania.
  • misrepresented a Massachusetts Democratic gubernatorial candidate's position on a parental consent provision for pregnant minors seeking abortions.
  • overstated Bush's personal popularity ratings and claimed to be "amazed" when a poll showed that "50 percent of the [American] people don't like him -- just don't like this guy."
  • lauded Bush as reminiscent of a heroic character in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird for his actions in the Dubai Ports World controversy: "He looks like he's a wise man now ... almost Atticus Finch."
  • described McCain as a "maverick," Bush as "charming," and Republican National Committee (RNC) chairman Ken Mehlman as "Kenny Boy."

Other guests making an appearance on Today in 2006 include Bill O'Reilly, host of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor; Joe Scarborough, host of MSNBC's Scarborough Country; Fred Barnes, co-host of Fox News' The Beltway Boys and a regular contributor to Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume; Mary Matalin, a Republican consultant and a former co-host of CNN's Crossfire; Richard Haass, a former Bush administration official, Wendy Wright; president of Concerned Women for America; William A. Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights; and Dr. Laura Schlessinger, author and nationally syndicated radio host.

In the same time period, only five progressives or liberals appeared on Today. They include James Carville and Paul Begala, political contributors to CNN's The Situation Room, who appeared together to promote a book they co-wrote; Michael Eric Dyson, an author and professor at the University of Pennsylvania; Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and Richard Walter, a screenwriter. Walter is included as a liberal in this instance because he argued opposite Donohue during a segment on the upcoming film The Da Vinci Code.

The Today show findings echo two other studies by Media Matters that have documented the greater number of conservatives on other television programs: The February report "If It's Sunday, It's Conservative," a comprehensive study of guest appearances on the Sunday-morning talk shows on ABC, CBS, and NBC, and another recent study on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews. The methodology used in the studies identified each guest's general partisan or ideological orientation, coding each guest as Democrat, Republican, conservative, progressive, or neutral (nonpartisan, centrist, or having no political orientation).

Today Guest Survey: January 1-March 16, 2006

Conservative guests

Air date

Guest

Topic of discussion

1/4/06

Dr. Laura Schlessinger

Her book Bad Childhood, Good Life: How to Blossom and Thrive in Spite of an Unhappy Childhood (HarperCollins, January 2006)

1/14/06

Chris Matthews

Iran's nuclear program, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, hearing for Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr.

1/24/06

Bill O'Reilly

President Bush, Osama bin Laden

1/27/06

Fred Barnes

His book Rebel in Chief: Inside the Bold and Controversial Presidency of George W. Bush (Crown Forum, January 2006)

1/27/06

Joe Scarborough

Oprah Winfrey's confrontation with author James Frey

2/3/06

Richard Haass*

Iranian nuclear program

2/4/06

Chris Matthews

Domestic surveillance, new House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH), lobbying scandal

2/16/06

Mary Matalin

Vice President Dick Cheney's handling of his hunting accident

2/25/06

Chris Matthews

Iraq and Dubai ports deal

3/1/06

Chris Matthews

Iraq, Afghanistan, Hurricane Katrina

3/3/06

Thomas Monaghan, Domino's Pizza founder

Ave Maria, Florida, a town being built around a Catholic university he founded

3/5/06

Wendy Wright

Morning-after pill distribution by Wal-Mart

3/8/06

William A. Donohue

The Da Vinci Code film

3/9/06

Joe Scarborough

President Bush, Iran, Iraq, Dubai ports deal, 2006 elections

3/11/06

Chris Matthews

Failure of Dubai ports deal, Republican presidential hopefuls

3/13/06

Chris Matthews

Possible presidential candidates

Liberal guests

Air date

Guest

Topic of discussion

1/11/06

James Carville, Paul Begala

Their book Take It Back: Our Party, Our Country, Our Future (Simon & Schuster, February 2006)

1/23/06

Michael Eric Dyson

His book, Come Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster (Basic Civitas, February 2006)

3/5/06

Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood Federation of America

Morning-after pill distribution by Wal-Mart

3/8/06

Richard Walter

The Da Vinci Code film (appeared opposite Donohue)

Neutral guests

Air date

Guest

Topic of discussion

1/1/06

Tim Russert

Politics of 2006

1/2/06

Howard Fineman, Newsweek chief political analyst

Bush's agenda for 2006

1/3/06

James Risen

His book, State of War: The Secret History of the Bush Administration and the CIA (Free Press, Janauary 2006)

1/7/06

Connie Chung, Maury Povich

Their MSNBC show Weekends with Maury & Connie

1/8/06

Tim Russert

Rep. Tom DeLay, Alito nomination

1/9/06

Tim Russert

Alito nomination

1/13/06

Tim Russert

Alito nomination, Bush's visit to New Orleans

1/15/06

Tim Russert

U.S. relationship with rest of the world

1/22/06

Tim Russert

Tax cuts, economy, drug program for seniors

1/27/06

Tim Russert

Bush, domestic spying, possible Alito filibuster

1/29/06

Tim Russert

Preview of Bush's State of the Union address

1/31/06

Tim Russert

Bush's State of the Union address

1/31/06

Tom Brokaw

Bush's State of the Union address

2/2/06

Thomas L. Friedman, New York Times columnist

America's dependency on oil

2/15/06

Tim Russert

Cheney's hunting accident

2/22/06

Tim Russert

Dubai ports deal

2/27/06

Tim Russert

Dubai ports deal, 2008 election

3/2/06

Thomas L. Friedman

India, Iraq

3/10/06

Tim Russert

Dubai ports deal, 2008 election

3/14/06

Nicholas D. Kristof, New York Times columnist

Attacks occurring in Sudan and Chad

3/16/06

Tim Russert

Bush's poll numbers

* Haass is president of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is included in the conservative/Republican category because he worked previously in the Bush State Department as director of policy and planning and also worked as a special assistant to President George H.W. Bush from 1989 to 1993. Nicholas Lemann described Haass as a moderate in the March 31, 2003, issue of The New Yorker.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Dem02020 (March 20, 2006 9:33 pm ET)
         

      I like the photo of Matt and Katie that appears over the item on the front page (the photo doesn't seem to accompany the item once clicked though); they look like the typical cutesy-wootsey guy-and-gal fluff-talking couple that our 'media' thinks we want to hear from on matters such as Iraq, illegal wiretapping, Congressional ethics, 'pre-war intelligence', back-breaking Federal deficits...

      You know how they banter and chat into the camera, the cutesy-wootsey guy-and-gal fluff-talkers:

      MATT: And when we return after the break...

      KATIE: We'll have everybody's favorite Maverick, John McCain...

      MATT: And also Bill O'Reilly will join us to help you all understand just what's wrong in America today...

      KATIE: And then on a Brighter Note, we'll get to what's right about America in our Exclusive interview with President Bush...

      MATT: Where we'll find out just how it was that Atticus Finch screwed up, and how Mr. Bush would have done a better job at saving Tom Robinson's life...

      KATIE: All coming up...

      MATT: After...

      KATIE: The break!

      (Smiles Abound!)

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jpark (March 20, 2006 10:38 pm ET)
           

        Her colonoscopy was more interesting than anything that comes out of her mouth.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (March 21, 2006 12:36 am ET)
         

      in the same way the Washington Time is. Wow, now that I reread this I realize I meant to insult someone and someone got insult but I don't know who.

      Something of note Ken Mehlman is now "Kenny Boy". What happened to Ken Lay? Are they trying to erase him. Or are they inferring that Mehlman will be discarded as Lay was once his usefulness has passed. I guess mid-terms if all goes well for us (by us I mean the country) -- hope,hope come on Democrats get it together. Kenny Boy, that's would be like have the President turn to you and go "You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie." Start packing up now.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by left of center (March 21, 2006 1:27 pm ET)
           

        If I were a Dem in Congress right now, I think I'd be keeping my mouth shut in the near term, and start blasting the Republicans within 60-90 days of the mid terms elections. Why bother giving them ANYTHING

        Report Abuse
      • Author by left of center (March 21, 2006 1:34 pm ET)
           

        as I was saying why give the GOP anything to respond to and allow them to change the subject - the Republicans are desperately trying to control the message and change the subject. Although I support Feingold's censure resolution, he just gave the Republicans a way to change the subject from how incompetent the administration is to "Feingold is a liberal, lefty kook and since he doesn't support the President, he doesn't support the troops..." and blah, blah, blah. They've done this type of bait & switch EVERY TIME they've had any criticism. The administration has been indicted by the facts from their critics, so they just smear/discredit their critics without EVER addressing the facts. GOP SOP - that's all there is to it. I said it in '04 after the elections were over - when the GOP gained seats and kept the presidency, I said, "OK, they now have all the rope they need to hang themselves with" - well, I think I was right, and unless ALL of the states and counties have Diebold machines, the GOPers have a tough road this fall. If you can't win fair? Cheat.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by corvus (March 21, 2006 7:45 am ET)
         

      I'm really surprised people still watch these folks expecting something different. I've stopped watching and assume many others have decided to do the same. Whether it's straight out propoganda or well orchestrated political theatre either way these shows provide provides no value to the viewer/consumer/customer. Change the channel!!!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by grhino (March 21, 2006 8:13 am ET)
         

      If its MMFA, its another flawed guest study...

      1) Just because Chris Matthews doesn't relentlessly attack Bush & Republicans and try to smear them at every opportunity like you guys do, does NOT make him a conservative

      2) Nicholas Kristof, James Risen, and Thomas Friedman are NOT "neutral". Read above comment regarding Chris Matthews. Yea, Kristof is a real look at the issues from all sides kind of guy. He never toes the liberal line in attacking the president.

      I wonder which is going to come first..an honest, unbiased study from MMFA (so far they are 0 for 2) or Democrats regaining seats in a national election....guess we'll have to wait and see

      Report Abuse
      • Author by davkas (March 21, 2006 9:02 am ET)
           

        Okay, add Nicholas Kristof, James Risen, and Thomas Friedman in the liberal column. Doesn't really change that much. The conservative appearances still double the liberal appearances which shows a preference for more conservative view points. Yes Chris Matthews does not always hold to right wing ideas but he does lean way more to the right, more often (as MM has clearly documented). To say that Matthews is not more conservative is like saying that Bill Mahar is not a Liberal because he is okay with wire tapping and generally dislikes political correctness.

        Facts are Liberal. The big picture is Liberal

        Report Abuse
        • Author by hogprint (March 21, 2006 10:48 am ET)
             

          MMfA posted the headline topic, but not where the conversation went or what context it was in. Other than the laughable rating of Cons/lib guests you really have nothing to go on but faith that the "liberal side" was not pushed.

          I guess MMfA yearns for the days when there was only three media outlets and they all toed the line for the libs....ah the days.........

          Report Abuse
          • Author by davkas (March 21, 2006 11:18 am ET)
               

            Again, it appears that facts and reality are liberal values.

            MM posted the topic as "NBC's Today, like MSNBC's Hardball, HOSTED more conservatives than liberals." Can we at least assume that most right wing hosts will express right wing ideas or point of views? Seems like a reasonable assumption to me. I mean I can't see Fred Barnes coming on to talk about the value of the single payer health care system. I didn't realize that MM had to capture the exact essence of each conversation for you to be satisfied with their findings. Anyway, you could probably search their archives to see what was said on each day but the posting of "....HOSTED more conservatives than liberals" is still true.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by hogprint (March 21, 2006 10:50 pm ET)
                 

              Davkos posted:

              "Again, it appears that facts and reality are liberal values. "

              I never argued that Kristol was not conservative, but Kristof and Fineman. Also labeling Matthews as conservative is a stretch. You're making the map fit the terrain. It is a shaky argument at best, but one that has you liberals on fire. Stoke the base baby!

              Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (March 21, 2006 8:17 am ET)
         

      Make your case, MMFA. When I watch Russert, I see him carrying the water for the Rightwing. While his bias may be more "subtle" than others, it is relentless. Even his "hard hitting" questions of Republicans, when they come, have the feel of being planned out to diffuse criticism, and put controversies "behind us". He rarely challenges the packaged (and FALSE) White House talking points.

      But, I may be "scientifically" wrong, here. Russert may be a straight shooter. Prove your case, MMFA.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by biketowork (March 21, 2006 9:43 am ET)
         

      Maybe we should cut Today some slack for using the on-screen caption "No Spine (sic) Zone" when O'Reilly was on. That was hilarious.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by hogprint (March 21, 2006 10:42 am ET)
         

      Kristof and Fineman NEUTRAL! HA! Your report is tainted already. Matthews and Scarborough are MSNBC crossovers and are there just to pimp their own shows. This boat is full of holes and sinking fast.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by (March 21, 2006 1:19 pm ET)
         

      Just as you say Chris Matthews isn't a conservative because he doesn't bash Bush, use your same words to apply the theory that everyone who bashes Bush is not a liberal. Your statement would mean that everyone in the United States is a liberal, because they bash Bush. Conservatives who bash Bush are now labelled "liberal".

      "Liberal" now has a new meaning today to people like you: Liberal means anyone who bashes Bush. That is not the case.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by grhino (March 21, 2006 5:51 pm ET)
           

        what in the world are you talking about???

        "Your statement would mean that everyone in the United States is a liberal, because they bash Bush."

        How...what the hell are you talking about??

        "Liberal means anyone who bashes Bush. "

        No, liberal means people who consistently advocate liberal/progressive positions and also coincidentally have been bashing Bush for the last 5 years. Friedman has written 1 column which hasn't been against the administration/Republicans in the last 2 years that I've seen and it was the one on the ports (which didn't even really turn out to be a conservative/liberal issues since House Republicans defeated it 62-2). Do you have any evidence of Kristof/Friedman/Risen favoring conservative positions which would classify them as "neutral"???

        Regarding Matthews, what I was saying (which apparently you didn't get), was that just because MMFA thinks Matthews is soft on Republicans/Bush, that doesn't qualify him as conservative. I can provide just as many examples of him being soft on Democrats/attacking Republican & Bush ideas. MMFA thinks Matthews is conservative because he doesn't hate and attack Bush/Republicans as much as they do. Ok, fine, maybe he doesn't do enough for their liking but that doesn't qualify him as "conservative"; maybe relative to the crazy left-wingers who work there he is conservative, but not to the general public or general voting population.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by (March 21, 2006 1:21 pm ET)
         

      The only people in the United States who aren't "liberal", according to the comments above, are Bush's cabinet.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by left of center (March 21, 2006 1:43 pm ET)
           

        Point well made - but I'll clarify it a little more - I am now and always have been a political moderate, and I strongly believe in balance in goverment. I don't believe in or support political parties, and feel that both parties have created enormous barriers to consolidate the power between them. However, at this point I feel that the Republicans have just gone way, way too far. If you govern to please just the 20 or 30% that support you no matter what, then the 40-60% in the middle will go to the other side. I live in Texas - Bush was a TERRIBLE governor in my opinion - but the governor in TX has no real power, so I was willing to wait & see when he was appointed president (not elected in my opinion). He has been a disaster. So, I've gone from independent to an "anyone not Republican" voting stance. And, I know I'm not alone.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.