Time heralded McCain as a "waste and fraud hunter"
SUMMARY: In a profile of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) as one of "America's 10 Best Senators," Time magazine credited McCain for spending "his entire Senate career exposing wasteful pork-barrel projects," and praised him for using his "backwater committee, Indian affairs," to "launch an investigation of lobbyist Jack Abramoff." But Time neglected to mention a recent McCain proposal for $10 million in federal money for the University of Arizona law school, as well as reports that McCain shielded Republican colleagues from his committee investigation.
In an April 24 profile of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) as one of "America's 10 Best Senators," Time magazine credited McCain for spending "his entire Senate career exposing wasteful pork-barrel projects," and described him as "a waste and fraud hunter." Time also praised McCain for taking "his backwater committee, Indian affairs, and us[ing] it to launch an investigation of lobbyist Jack Abramoff."
In burnishing McCain's oft-invoked reputation as a "pork-buster" or lobbying reformer, Time apparently ignored a recent bill McCain proposed calling for $10 million in federal money to establish a center at the University of Arizona law school as a tribute to the late Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, which has been derided by critics as "a classic case of lawmakers' trying to funnel money directly to a home-state institution for a project that should find financing elsewhere." Also, Time neglected to mention that McCain, as chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, reportedly shielded his Republican colleagues Sens. Conrad Burns (R-MT) and David Vitter (R-LA) from the committee's investigation into Abramoff's influence-peddling schemes on Capitol Hill.
From Time's profile of McCain:
Many of the problems McCain tackles are entrenched and unexciting: they challenge the rules in Washington and the cynicism of voters at home. Over the past decade, McCain forced through a reform that made the money coming in from rich interest groups and directed at political advertisements more transparent. He has spent his entire Senate career exposing wasteful pork-barrel projects. And in the past year, he took his backwater committee, Indian affairs, and used it to launch an investigation of lobbyist Jack Abramoff, whose admission in federal court that he conspired to bribe public officials produced a series of efforts to ban certain kinds of influence peddling.
[...]
Opinion writers have been perplexed at the preprimary turnaround, but the two-year walk-up to 2008 won't just consist of courting the party's die-hards. McCain is scheduled to assume the chairmanship of the powerful Senate Armed Services Committee next January, a target-rich environment for a waste and fraud hunter. He is already stumping against gerrymandering, which he says is undemocratic. "It's harder to keep your job in the politburo in Havana than in the House of Representatives," McCain says.
And if he wins in 2008? Among the first items on his agenda in 2009, McCain says, is winning the battle that George W. Bush just lost -- fixing Social Security and other underfunded entitlements. Crucial to that effort, he says, is getting Congress to clean house. "If you've got $47 billion in earmarks and 6,140 pork-barrel projects on the highway bill, how can you expect the American people to make tough decisions about entitlement programs?" he asks.















I think it's a stretch to imply the Time piece is sympathetic to Republicans. (Even though MM doesn't state this outright, the implication is there.)
The majority of the "Ten Best" on the list are Democrats!
The majority of the "Five Worst" are Republicans!
It's hardly a Republican puff piece. Anyone else agree?
But what MMFA states here is that the times awards McCain based on misinformation.
This item did not imply, as you wrote that the "Time piece is sympathetic to Republicans." The item is focused specifically on Time's treatment of Sen. McCain, and made no mention of the other senators profiled.
Moreover, Democrats do not make up the the majority of the senators on the "10 Best" list, as you claim. By our count, there are 6 Republicans to 4 Democrats:
Republicans
Thad Cochran (R-MS) John Kyl (R-AZ) Richard Lugar (R-IN) John McCain (R-AZ) Olympia Snowe (R-ME) Arlen Specter (R-PA)
Democrats
Kent Conrad (D-ND) Dick Durbin (D-IL) Ted Kennedy (D-MA) Carl Levin (D-MI)
It is correct that there are six Republicans. I accidently counted Olympia Snowe as a Republican, although she is considered a "RINO" by many, as she often votes with Democrats on social issues. Top ten "RINOS". I regret the error.
of McCain:
[link to www.click2houston.com]
Rod Serling announces, "Where the campaign rhetoric, and the TRUTH, converge. There's a sign up ahead ... it says the TRUTH is thrown out, and TIME will instead print the invented FICTION in place of the facts."
"And if he wins in 2008? Among the first items on his agenda in 2009, McCain says, is winning the battle that George W. Bush just lost -- fixing Social Security and other underfunded entitlements."
What do you think he means by "fix" Social Security?
With a "maverick" like McCain what could he possibly come up with?
McCain is a REPUBLICAN.
See, it is good for something. Origami, collages, ransom notes, if you run out of Charmin...
The only thing McCain's hunting these days is the presidency and he'll use any hunting tool to get it.
I'd like to know if any reporter has asked McCain about his flip flop on tax cuts. Just a couple of years ago, he was vehemently against them in times of war. Then, last year, he voted for them.
Any thoughts out there?
pulled a "Clinton" and polled, finding the base he is trying to appeal to is for (and not against) tax cuts, so the position shifts to fit the pollin data.
They're correct if they leave off the last word.
MMFA objects to McCain being lauded as a Senator that has a reputation for exposing wasteful pork-barrel spending by citing only one example of misuse of federal money by McCain with his proposal for $10 million for the University of Arizona law school. No doubt this is pork barrel spending, but is this just one example of many similar projects he's proposed or just the one and only time McCain has indulged in this type of behavior?