About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Dobbs again accepted misleading claim that Democrats are to blame for House immigration bill's felony provision

April 24, 2006 5:41 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: CNN's Lou Dobbs allowed Rep. Peter King to advance a misleading Republican claim Dobbs himself had previously repeated on the program -- that Democrats bear responsibility for a controversial provision in the immigration bill passed by the House of Representatives that would make unlawful presence in the United States a felony.

7 Comments

On the April 19 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, host Lou Dobbs allowed Rep. Peter King (R-NY) to advance a misleading Republican claim Dobbs himself had previously repeated on the program -- that Democrats bear responsibility for a controversial provision in the immigration bill, passed by the House of Representatives, that would make unlawful presence in the United States a felony. Media Matters for America has debunked this claim before, noting Dobbs's prior repetition of it.

During a discussion of illegal immigration, Dobbs stated that Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-WI) -- who sponsored the House bill and later offered an amendment that would have reduced the penalty of unlawful U.S. presence from a felony to a misdemeanor -- "told me on this broadcast that the Democrats were responsible for the fact that the legislation that would create a felony for coming into this country illegally was really a ploy by the Democrats." Inviting King to confirm the claim, he asked: "Is that true?"

King replied that the claim was "[a]bsolutely true," then advanced an argument put forth by Republicans -- that because 191 House Democrats voted against Sensenbrenner's amendment, they are responsible for the felony provision in the bill.

In response to King's assertion, Dobbs stated that "politics are being played with this on the part of both parties."

But as Media Matters previously noted, the claim that Democrats bear responsibility for the immigration bill's harsh penalties -- and opposed Republican efforts to soften them -- distorts the stated motives on both sides of the aisle. In fact, many Democrats made clear at the time of the vote that their rejection of the Sensenbrenner amendment was consistent with their opposition to subjecting illegal immigrants to any criminal penalties at all, including those that would have been imposed under Sensenbrenner's amended bill. Republicans, meanwhile, explained that they sought to downgrade the felony designation in order to encourage more prosecutions of illegal immigrants.

As Media Matters also noted, Dobbs himself repeated the misleading Republican claim on the April 12 edition of his program, stating that "Congressman Sensenbrenner himself tried to remove the felony provisions from his bill" but "[t]he move was blocked by House Democrats."

From the April 19 edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight:

DOBBS: Congressman Pete King is the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. He is a co-sponsor of the Sensenbrenner legislation that continues to trigger protests across the country. Congressman Pete King is our guest here in New York tonight. Good to have you with us, Mr. Chairman.

KING: Lou, great to be here. Thank you.

DOBBS: We're -- we're seeing more demonstrations. We're seeing more people focusing on the Sensenbrenner legislation. Congressman Sensenbrenner told me on this broadcast that the Democrats were responsible for the fact that the legislation that would create a felony for coming into this country illegally was really a ploy by the Democrats. Is that true?

KING: Absolutely true. It's always been a misdemeanor to enter the country illegally. We wanted to make it a misdemeanor to stay in the country illegally, because if it's wrong to enter the country, it should be wrong to stay illegally.

So, we -- originally, the bill called for a felony. Jim Sensenbrenner got up on the House floor, offered an amendment to reduce it from a felony to a misdemeanor -- 192 (sic) Democrats voted to keep it a felony. Over 161 Republicans voted to make it a misdemeanor. So, that is a felony because of the Democrats.

Now, their reason for that is -- I think it was obvious. They wanted to put what's called "a poison pill" in the bill, so they could later claim that it's a felony.

DOBBS: So, politics are being played with this on the part of both parties.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mr. l (April 24, 2006 7:16 pm ET)
         

      because the dems have REPEATEDLY said why they oppossed the bill...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ellington (April 24, 2006 7:33 pm ET)
         

      Randi seems on her way to being a regular fixture on Dobbs's show.

      How about it, Randi? Will you call Lou on this?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jpark (April 24, 2006 10:45 pm ET)
           

        I don't see what Randi sees in this guy. Maybe she is smitten. He is obviously a right wing prick but she gushes about him. It is pathetic.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by sasami (April 25, 2006 1:44 am ET)
             

          Yeah. She's been talking about how great he is lately. I hope she calls him out.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by robak2nd3388 (April 24, 2006 10:32 pm ET)
         

      dobbs restated the issue correctly and asked for a response. king went on to ascribe political motives to the democrats opposing reduction of the felony position. what did dobbs do wrong? don't the democrats ever play political hardball? i think its very possible that the democrats want to keep an obviously unpopular provision in an otherwise popular bill so that we can harp on it and reduce support for the entire bill. i think this criticism of dobbs is misplaced.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by OldMarine (April 25, 2006 12:58 pm ET)
           

        and I sent an email to Mr. Dobbs afterwards saying that he should allow Democrats to put forth their position and not rely on a Republican to truthfully put forth the Democratic position. I also indicated that it would be nice if he would, when discussing issues like this, have parties from both sides available to discuss the issue.

        I usually find Mr. Dobbs to be a more moderate voice, but I don't get to watch as often as I would like and perhaps that's just how the topics "shake out".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by corvus (April 25, 2006 7:40 am ET)
         

      Lou Dobbs is a transparent. He's a bigot who plays politics with EVERY issue he sticks himself to. I stopped watching his show after his watching his guests provide factually wrong information to the viewer and Lou just sits there letting the wrong information flow.

      This is just business as usual for Dobb's

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace