Associated Press identified VDARE.com as an "immigration-focused Web magazine" -- not noting that it publishes "white nationalists"
SUMMARY: In an April 28 article, the Associated Press identified right-wing website VDARE.com only as an "immigration-focused Web magazine," even though the site publishes the work of "white nationalists," according to its editor. The AP also failed to note that VDARE writer Bryanna Bevens, whom the article quoted, has made disparaging remarks about Hispanics, in which she advocated the creation of "National Hispanic Crime Prevention Month," and warned of "Mexico's conquest of the United States."
In an April 28 Associated Press article, Hispanic affairs writer Laura Wides-Munoz identified right-wing website VDARE.com only as an "immigration-focused Web magazine," even though the site publishes the work of "white nationalists," according to its editor. The AP also failed to note that VDARE writer Bryanna Bevens, whom the article quoted, has made disparaging remarks about Hispanics, in which she advocated the creation of "National Hispanic Crime Prevention Month," and warned of "Mexico's conquest of the United States."
Wides-Munoz included a quote from Bevens in her article, which described the negative reaction of some Americans to a recently released Spanish-language rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner:
Bryanna Bevens of Hanford, Calif., who writes for the immigration-focused Web magazine Vdare.com, said the remix particularly upset her.
"It's very whiny. If you want to say all those things, by all means, put them on your poster board, but don't put them on the national anthem," she said.
But as Media Matters for America noted, VDARE.com is more than an "immigration-focused Web magazine." Named for Virginia Dare, the first child of English descent born in the New World in the 16th century, the site publishes the work of "white nationalists," according to a statement by Peter Brimelow, who operates VDARE.com through his nonprofit organization, the Center for American Unity. In 2003, the Southern Poverty Law Center added VDARE.com to its list of hate websites. VDARE's FAQ page contains three links -- one that leads to an explanation of its name and two that offer instructions on how to report an illegal alien. A search for the word "white" on VDARE returns articles with headlines such as "Do White Men Need Their Own Political Party?," "Harvard Hates The White Race?," "White Americans: Second-Class Citizens," and "No Democracy For Whites In The New America."
In Bevens' regular columns for the site, she has made disparaging remarks about Hispanics. In a September 29, 2004, column titled "How about 'National Hispanic Crime Prevention Awareness Month'?," Bevens noted that "Hispanic Heritage Month ... coincides with National Crime Prevention Month," adding that "[t]his quirky happenchance led me to explore the possibility of a new and, well, corollary awareness month." Later in the column, she wrote:
Hispanic heritage and their [sic] contribution to American culture might be something worth celebrating, I don't know. I'm too concerned with what they have contributed American culture by way of crime--starting with their first: the crime of illegal entry.
Hispanics should realize (and some of them do) that illegal immigration harms Hispanic heritage.
If they support the effort to remedy this problem, they won't need a Hispanic Heritage awareness month.
In a May 28, 2005, column, Bevens also called immigration legislation proposed by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and co-sponsored by Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) "a plan that, with a bit of luck, should complete Mexico's conquest of the United States by the end of the decade." She continued:
A merger made in heaven, I imagine San Diego will look exactly like Tijuana but with workman's comp, subsidized housing, and penicillin.
Oh wait, that is what San Diego looks like now.
Additionally, as Media Matters also noted, VDARE.com has published the work of Kevin MacDonald, who appeared as a character witness for David Irving in Britain in 2000, when Irving unsuccessfully sued a Holocaust studies professor for calling him a Holocaust denier. In a November 5, 2005, review of Yuri Slezkine's book The Jewish Century (Princeton University Press, 2004), MacDonald wrote:
Slezkine also ignores the extent to which Jewish competition may have suppressed -- arguably sometimes reversed -- the formation of a native middle class in Eastern Europe. He seems instead to simply assume the locals lacked the abilities required.
But the fact is that in most of Western Europe Jews were expelled in the Middle Ages. And, as a result, when modernization occurred, it was accomplished with an indigenous middle class. Perhaps the Christian taxpayers of England made a good investment in their own future when they agreed to pay King Edward I a massive tax of £116,346 in return for expelling 2000 Jews in 1290. If, as in Eastern Europe, Jews had won the economic competition in most of these professions, there might not have been a non-Jewish middle class in England.















According to the "logic" of the VDare.com Web site and its subscribers, Virginia Dare, first English baby reportedly born on this side of the Atalntic, is the first, true American citizen? Therefore, it follows that, little Virginia's parents, and the rest of the Roanoke colonists were legal, and naturalized, American citizens too. So I guess it only follows that each and every wave of subsequent English colonization were, likewise, naturalized citizens of the United States.
Hmmm...somewhere my public school education when amiss. I never knew that the Native American Indian tribes had immigration and naturalization services! I had simply taken it for granted that Sixteenth, Seventeenth, Eighteenth and Ninteenth century white settlers claimed, populated and became citizens of what is now the United States the old fashioned way: They stole it, through war, rapine and disease.
Silly me.
And it is such a pity that the white caucus is so woefully under represented in the US government and on the boards of all the major US companies.
Don't ask me how because it's a long story, but I recently attended a KKK rally, and these VDARE muleheads have a lot of the same talking points.
Among the craziness that I witnessed was a guy touting the following statements in support of his white pride:
Whites invented civilization. Whites invented musical instruments. You don't see any Mexican submarines.
No wonder the Klan votes republican.
How did you end up at a KKK rally? Now maybe you were undercover and you don't want to blow your cover, so I'll undersatnd if you don't respond. Now I could never get near one of course so I'll have to ask you, are the real ones as funny as the ones I've seen on TV?
and, of course, we had to go to a rally. They were actually very friendly and hospitable, but as soon as they started talking about issues, it was crazy. They did, however, remain friendly the whole time, despite their message. That's one thing that I think isn't well-known about them. Nobody was shouting or shaking his fist or any of that.
I also have to admit that their message really wasn't about hate, at least not openly. They talked about why they're proud to be white, but not about why other races might be inferior. It was sort of enlightening, but I mostly don't believe it....their history is too riddled with hate.
Regardless, they're still crazy.
They might very well have been friendly and peacefull-seeming precisely because they knew that a film crew was there. It was public knowledge, and we had permission from the grand poobah.
I read a funny book call 'Republican Like Me'. In a chapter that addresses the racist element of the Republican party he made contact with some White separatists groups and interviewed to become a member. He was ingognito so they thought he was the real deal. It was pretty funny
hey were actually very friendly and hospitable
I would be surprised if you were black or hispanic and they had been friendly. What is your race?
Had I been anything other than caucasian, I wouldn't have gone. I'm a loon, but I'm not crazy!
"Don't ask me how because it's a long story, but I recently attended a KKK rally."
I'm still laughing at the into "Don't ask me how...". How could we NOT ask you "how"!?! That's like saying, "Don't ask me why, but I just burned down your house."
You have to love the logic of those people, though, don't you? How could you argue with the fact that you're never seen a Mexican submarine? QED! I guess they've softened their postions on Muslims, Hindus and Jews, though, because I have, in fact, seen pictures of Israeli, Iranian and Indian submarines.
Yeah.....I know. I re-read my post right after I hit the "post" button, and thought to myself, "You dumbass. How can anyone not ask?":)
The documentary is about a woman who's having her baby christened by a clan leader. OUCH!
"You don't see any Mexican submarines" - that's one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. What a bunch of pinheads (with appropriately shaped hoods).
she was not a U.S. citizen, either . . . if the U.S. Government, and by extension the United States itself, has been in existence only since 1789, anyone born before then {like Dare in 1587} was NOT a "U.S. citizen," simply a child of immigrants . . .
And Mexicans don't even bomb our villages or torture our people in the process.
And, as a result, when modernization occurred, it was accomplished with an indigenous middle class.
The notion that the English population was "indigenous" at that point shows the writer of the article is ignorant of the most elementary history and is not worth being taken seriously. "Indigenous" is equated with "white", despite the fact that some of the population were relatively recent arrivals from the continent and no more "indigenous" than the English Jews.