About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Post article claimed primary election results -- including one Democratic victory and several Republican losses -- signal trouble for incumbents of both parties

May 18, 2006 3:46 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: Washington Post writers Dan Balz and Chris Cillizza asserted that the results of primary elections held in Oregon and Pennsylvania, which saw several Pennsylvania Republican state legislators ousted, "were the latest signals of brewing unrest that could threaten incumbents of both parties in the November elections." However, of the results reported in the article, the only one involving a Democrat was the primary victory of incumbent Oregon state Gov. Ted Kulongoski.

7 Comments

In a May 18 Washington Post article, staff writers Dan Balz and Chris Cillizza asserted that the results of primary elections held May 16 in Oregon and Pennsylvania, which saw several Pennsylvania Republican state legislators ousted, "were the latest signals of brewing unrest that could threaten incumbents of both parties in the November elections." However, of the primary results reported in the article, the only one involving a Democrat was Oregon state Gov. Ted Kulongoski, who won his primary election by 54 percent of the vote.

Balz and Cillizza asserted that the results in that race indicated that Kulongoski may be vulnerable in the November elections. No other Democratic primary results were discussed in the article. While the article noted that incumbent Rep. Don Sherwood (R-PA) won 56 percent of his primary vote, signaling a potential vulnerability, it also noted that "more than a dozen" Republican members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly were defeated, including Senate Majority Leader David J. Brightbell and Senate President Pro Tempore Robert C. Jubelirer.

In further support of their assertion that Tuesday's results signaled potential election woes for incumbents from both parties, Balz and Cillizza cited the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, released May 16, which found that 55 percent of respondents indicated that they are inclined to consider a new Congressional candidate, while 35 percent said they preferred to vote for an incumbent. However, the Post report omitted other findings from the same poll showing that, were the elections held today, respondents would be more likely to vote Democratic by a margin of 52 percent to 40 percent.

The poll also asked respondents which party they would they like to see in control of Congress after the congressional elections, regardless of their own local race -- respondents preferred Democrats by an even wider margin: 56 percent to 33 percent. Further, a separate analysis of the poll published in the May 17 edition of the Post, written by Balz and staff writer Richard Morin, noted that "Democrats are now favored to handle all 10 issues measured in the Post-ABC News poll."

From the May 18 Washington Post article:

Pennsylvania voters dumped two Republican leaders in the state Senate and scared a GOP member of Congress, while Oregon voters sent a warning they are unhappy with the Democratic governor.

Cumulatively, the results Tuesday were the latest signals of brewing unrest that could threaten incumbents of both parties in the November elections.

In Oregon, Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D) won his primary election but claimed just 54 percent of the vote. He is one of several Democratic executives who face tough reelection contests in a year when Democrats are generally optimistic about their prospects in U.S. House and Senate races. Other embattled Democrats include Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle and Michigan Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm.

[...]

But there are signs of broader disaffection. A new Washington Post-ABC News poll found that 55 percent of those surveyed said they are inclined to look around for someone new rather than support their incumbent members of Congress this fall, the highest level of anti-incumbency since the 1994 midterm elections that dethroned Democrats on Capitol Hill.

[...]

Among U.S. House primaries in Pennsylvania, Republican Rep. Don Sherwood's primary victory with 56 percent of the vote over a little-known and underfunded opponent signaled that his admission of an extramarital affair had damaged his standing and makes him vulnerable to a Democrat in November.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by peet (May 18, 2006 4:03 pm ET)
         

      What the 'between-the-line', wink-wink is.... "Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D) won his primary election but claimed just 54 percent of the vote" = good news for the neocon candidates.

      But, as they say in basketball... A win by one point... is STILL a win (as long as you count all the points).

      Report Abuse
    • Author by k2 (May 18, 2006 4:57 pm ET)
         

      When "W" won by just 51% it was a CLEAR MANDATE from the people!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by tabkhan (May 18, 2006 5:16 pm ET)
           

        Poor Dan Balz, he'll be the last to catch on.

        I still love WaPo, or at least parts of it, but why does it seem that there's a hidden formula, known only to the Post's political writers, that says for every good word about the Dems, they have to add five negatives, and for every bad word about the Pugs, they add ten negatives about the Dems? It's almost in their genes. I fear.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by herdfelter (May 19, 2006 5:00 am ET)
             

          Well said, Tabkhan. The Post could use some new staff for political analysis writing.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by mwolfrey8605 (May 19, 2006 9:37 am ET)
             

          It is amazing that an internal problem of Pennsylvania over a Pay Raise for the Legislature, including Governor Rendell (D), gave themselves, is some how being linked to the President of the United States!!??

          That pay raise has resulted in the ouster of 3 Judges, and countless other elected officeials in the last election, and it appears as if it will carry through to this coming election. Governor Rendell will probalbly not be reelected because he signed the Elected Official pay raise into law.

          Stop fantasizing at the National Level about the meaning behind local politics. Unless you live there, you would never understand.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (May 18, 2006 8:26 pm ET)
         

      but I do believe there will be a LOT of surprises in both parties, although the R's will probably be hit harder than the D's.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by soxeryn (May 19, 2006 7:10 am ET)
         

      That's their script, so I guess we'll just have to get used to it.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace