About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Garrett falsely framed Busby's support for Senate immigration bill as wanting to give Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants

June 02, 2006 2:03 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: On Fox News' Special Report, correspondent Major Garrett falsely claimed that Democratic congressional candidate Francine Busby "endorses providing" Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants. Garrett appeared to be distorting Busby's support for a recently passed Senate immigration bill in the same way Busby's Republican opponent, Brian Bilbray, did. In fact, the Senate's legislation would do nothing to change the current prohibition on illegal immigrants receiving Social Security benefits.

10 Comments

On the May 31 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume, correspondent Major Garrett falsely claimed that Democratic congressional candidate Francine Busby "endorses providing" Social Security benefits "to people who are here illegally." Garrett appeared to be distorting Busby's support for a recently passed Senate immigration bill in the same way Busby's Republican opponent, Brian Bilbray did -- as giving illegal immigrants Social Security benefits. In fact, the Senate's legislation would do nothing to change the current prohibition on illegal immigrants receiving Social Security benefits.

Busby and Bilbray are running in a special election to represent California's 50th district in Congress, replacing former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who was recently sentenced to more than eight years in prison after he pleaded guilty to tax evasion and conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud, and tax evasion.

In his report, Garrett noted Bilbray's opposition to the bill and then reported that, according to Bilbray, voters do not support "the benefits tucked inside [Sen. John] McCain's [R-AZ] bill." Garrett then quoted Bilbray, who falsely asserted that one of those "benefits" was that the bill would "giv[e] Social Security benefits to people who are here illegally." Garrett then repeated Bilbray's distorted representation of the bill to describe Busby's support for the bill, saying, "Busby endorses providing both of these benefits [Social Security and the earned income tax credit] to illegals."

In fact, the "McCain bill" that Garrett cited -- based on a bill co-sponsored by McCain and Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA) -- would not change current law, which excludes illegal immigrants from receiving Social Security benefits. Bilbray and Garrett appeared to be referring to an amendment (SA 3985) offered by Sen. John Ensign (R-NV), opposed by McCain, and rejected by the Senate, which would have denied immigrants currently working illegally in the United States, who later became eligible for Social Security (as citizens or legal residents), any credit for work done as illegal immigrants. For example, a person who enters the country on a work-eligible temporary visa can legally obtain a Social Security number (SSN). If the worker overstays that visa, a non-verifying employer can still file Social Security taxes using the worker's previously-issued SSN. If the unauthorized worker later becomes a U.S. citizen under the earned citizenship provisions of the Senate bill, that person could count all the time he or she had worked and paid Social Security taxes, including during the time the worker was in the United States illegally. Under Ensign's proposal, the newly legalized worker would have received no credit for contributions made to Social Security while working illegally.

During the floor debate on Ensign's amendment, McCain noted that the Senate bill -- without Ensign's amendment -- does not change the current ban on unauthorized immigrants receiving Social Security benefits:

McCAIN: Mr. President, I rise in strong opposition to the Ensign amendment. Under current law, undocumented immigrants are ineligible for Social Security benefits, which I think is entirely appropriate. But we all know that millions of undocumented immigrants pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for years and sometimes decades while they work to contribute to our economy.

[...]

The Ensign amendment would undermine the work of these people by preventing lawfully present immigrant workers from claiming Social Security benefits that they earned before they were authorized to work in our country. If this amendment is enacted, the nest egg that these immigrants have worked hard for would be taken from them and their families.

Although Garrett included a clip of Busby saying, "I would be supportive of those," it appears she was simply repeating her stated support for the McCain-based bill. Media Matters for America has found no other evidence that Busby supports making undocumented workers eligible for Social Security benefits. In a Project Vote Smart questionnaire, Busby reiterated her support for the McCain bill and did not indicate support for "[r]elax[ing] restrictions barring legal immigrants from using government funded social programs (e.g. public housing, food stamps)."

From the May 31 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

GARRETT: John McCain was supposed to be in this picture but fellow Republican Brian Bilbray -- he's on the far left -- revoked a months-old invitation to this breakfast fund-raiser where Bilbray is in a neck-and-neck battle to succeed Congressman-turned-felon Randy "Duke" Cunningham. McCain's authorship of a Senate immigration bill that Bilbray brands as amnesty has made McCain radioactive among Republicans in this GOP stronghold just north of the border.

BILBRAY: San Diegans were very upset about it, and we had to warn the senator that there were people that were going to come to this event who were very upset with what the Senate was proposing.

GARRETT: Bilbray has poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into TV ads attacking his Democratic opponent, Francine Busby, for supporting McCain's immigration bill.

ANNOUNCER IN AD: Say no to amnesty. Don't vote for Busby.

BUSBY: Mr. Bilbray is not offering solutions. He's just offering a lot of tough rhetoric and people want to hear solutions.

GARRETT: Bilbray says no issue is driving voters like immigration.

BILBRAY: It is the issue in this election. The next six months, there is only going to be one issue settled in Washington, and that is: Do we give amnesty or don't we give amnesty to 11 million illegal aliens? And this is where it really comes to a head.

GARRETT: Busby says immigration matters but not more than the war in Iraq or concern among seniors about the Medicare drug benefits.

BUSBY: It's hard to really put immigration right up there. I mean it is an important issue, but there's other ones right up there at the top.

GARRETT: Bilbray recently won the endorsement of House Judiciary Committee chairman and immigration hardliner James Sensenbrenner.

SENSENBRENNER: The strongest message against illegal immigration that the voters of San Diego County can send is by sending Brian Bilbray to Congress.

GARRETT: But Busby is sticking with McCain and his plan to legalize most of the estimated 11 million illegals in America now.

BUSBY: I've been trying to explain it to people and show them the various aspects of it that make it a comprehensive bill with long-term solutions.

GARRETT: Bilbray says the more San Diegans learn about the benefits tucked inside McCain's bill, the less they like it.

BILBRAY: They don't support giving Social Security benefits to people who are here illegally. They don't support giving the earned income tax credit here.

GARRETT: Busby endorses providing both of these benefits to illegals.

BUSBY: I would be supportive of those because I don't think that you just give people a ceiling to run into.

GARRETT: While the rest of the country may have not heard about this race, all of political Washington is riveted on the outcome of this somewhat obscure special election in California's 50th district. Republicans are willing to spend $5 million to defend this district and the RNC has dispatched 70 field staff to help Bilbray cross the finish line victorious. Democrats will probably spend upwards of $4 million on this race and consider it a tea test -- a key test rather of their ability to link President Bush's low poll numbers, Duke Cunningham's felony conviction and overall malaise among Republican independent voters to win a surprising victory.

If Democrats do, they believe that will create unstoppable momentum heading into the 2006 elections. Republicans agree. That's why they're spending money and devoting all of the staff to help Bilbray win.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Timster (June 02, 2006 2:17 pm ET)
         

      Busby is polling so strongly in the CA 50th, the echo machine is spending a lot of time and money distorting the facts about Busby. Immigration is just the latest "wedge" issue of the righties. I wrote about it on my blog, even though I’m no longer in the 50th. They even tried to portray Busby as pro-pedophilia. Them crazy Republicans, if it wasn’t so important Busby wins, their actions and words would be funny.

      [link to www.forkesreport.com]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by right ON (June 02, 2006 2:34 pm ET)
           

        i love it when liberals accuse the "righties" of using immigration as a wedge issue. that is so utterly false, it's ridiculous. bush and many on the right want nothing to do with this issue, they pray it goes away as it splits their party down the middle. the wall street crowd that wants all the cheap labor along with open borders/markets and the conservatives who want our borders enforced. face it, bush is in bed big time with many on the left on this issue and that has many liberals spinning around in circles not knowing how to play this. they either agree with bush, or they agree with conservatives. no wonder they make such idiotic statements blaming "righties".

        Report Abuse
        • Author by zerosumgame0005 (June 02, 2006 2:44 pm ET)
             

          and nothing else. The 'Wall Street crowd' ARE repukelicans.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by right ON (June 02, 2006 2:48 pm ET)
               

            not all conservatives are wall street republicans. due to the incredibly offensive remark you made recently against one of my posts, you offer nothing to the debate. you are free to respond to my posts, i will cease now in responding to yours.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by peet (June 02, 2006 3:22 pm ET)
               

            Aren't you lucky.

            Report Abuse
        • Author by draftedin68 (June 02, 2006 2:51 pm ET)
             

          The "issue" here is that FOX NEWS intentionally lied about a candidate's position.

          Both you and FOX NEWS are allowed your own opinions, but not your own facts.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by Timster (June 02, 2006 6:51 pm ET)
             

          "bush and many on the right want nothing to do with this issue, they pray it goes away as it splits their party down the middle." Okay "Right On," did you take an ignorance pill? Seriously, Bush campaigned on this very issue in 2000.

          Isn't it curious that immigration, which has been a problem for several decades, all of a sudden is a crisis, so much so that House Republicans write a race-baiting anti-immigration bill that threatens to make felons of illegal aliens just -- coincidentily -- when their approval rating is in the toilet, and get the populace all worked up over it?

          It's no surprise that both Brian Bilbray and Duncan Hunter put immigration at the top of their list of issues on their campaign websites. It's the Republican talking point of the season. And, if you "hint-hint" the bill targets them brown people, you know you will get all the concerned White Folks scared.

          Republicans lied about Iraq, failed to protect our ports, failed when it came to Hurricane Katrina, failed when it came to handling our Nation's budget, the congressional Republicans assisted Bush in blowing the huge budget surpluses and then assisted Bush in running up the largest deficit in history and now the American people are ready to change Washington.

          So now the Republicans pull another wedge issue out of their hineys (immigration) and hope the American public stays scared and angry through the November elections so they can use the Rove startegy of "fill'em with fear" to get the vote.

          Bush campaigned on immigration in 2000 -- your comment, "Right On," still has me laughing.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by casey (June 02, 2006 6:44 pm ET)
         

      According to the GAO as reported here, [link to www.washingtonpost.com] the Senate bill would indeed give Social Security benefits to illegal-today-but-legal-if-this-passes folks, as well as to any extended family members that enter the country through the reuniting aspects of the Senate version.

      No flaming please, just facts.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by casey (June 02, 2006 6:47 pm ET)
         

      CBO, not GAO

      Report Abuse
    • Author by anti-war conservative (June 04, 2006 5:31 pm ET)
         

      Busby blew her chances with last Thursday's comments about "not needing papers to vote". Unless the Dems outflank the GOP on "securing the border first" issue they will blow their chance in November as well.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.