About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

ABC, Scholastic injecting conservative misinformation into the classroom

September 07, 2006 12:46 pm ET

4 Comments

"Discussion guide" suggests Iraq had WMD; miniseries blames Clinton for 9-11

In conjunction with the September 10 premiere of its flawed, partisan miniseries The Path to 9/11, ABC has teamed up with Scholastic Inc. to urge 100,000 high school teachers nationwide and their students to watch the controversial miniseries and then use Scholastic's "discussion guide" in class. A Media Matters for America review of the ABC/Scholastic material has found it to be rife with conservative misinformation.

The ABC/Scholastic material is deeply flawed because, in addition to omitting key information, it promotes conservative talking points:

  • It tells students that the United States went to war in Iraq because of weapons of mass destruction -- but fails to note that, in fact, Iraq did not have WMD. Nor does it note the increasing evidence that the Bush administration knew this all along and manipulated intelligence in order to make a dishonest case for war.
  • It falsely suggests a tie between Iraq and the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
  • It gives unjustifiably upbeat accounts of reportedly dire conditions on the ground in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • It suggests that military responses to Osama bin Laden by the Clinton administration could have "hinder[ed] the U.S. stance on the war on terror."
  • It asks students to debate whether the media "hinder our national security."

The miniseries itself is also reportedly deeply flawed, with initial reviews and fact-checks showing that it twists and invents facts and storylines to create a false picture of the Clinton administration's role in failing to prevent the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks while largely ignoring Bush administration failures. News reports even indicate that an FBI agent who was a consultant to the film quit during production "because he thought they were making things up."

For ABC and Scholastic to promote this egregious conservative misinformation to high school students around the anniversary of the 9-11 terror attacks is irresponsible and morally repugnant.

Click here to contact Scholastic and urge them to correct the conservative misinformation in their materials. High school students shouldn't be required by their teachers to listen to conservative lies.

Please also click here to urge ABC to hold off airing the miniseries until its flaws have been fixed.

Resources:

ABC and Scholastic release skewed Path to 9/11 "Discussion Guide" for teachers to assign to students

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by parcival (September 07, 2006 6:39 pm ET)
         

      that ABC would consider airing third rate propaganda. Wasn't it Howard K. Smith of ABC who defended the Vietnam "war" until its end, unique among network anchors?

      Boycott those ABS stalinoids...and keep "scholastic" out of our schools.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by cstoryco6827 (September 07, 2006 9:01 pm ET)
           

        I really want to see the show! I think it's unfair that some want to prevent me from seeing this. Instead I have to take somebody's word for it. I didn't take their word about Moore's propganda movie about 911.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by zoomj (September 08, 2006 10:37 am ET)
             

          I really want to see "The Regans"! I think it's unfair that some want to prevent me from seeing this. Instead I have to take somebody's word for it. I didn't take their word about Culter's propganda book about liberals.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by zoomj (September 08, 2006 10:41 am ET)
         

      I hope this encourages parents to work with their schools to learn more about how the they interact with scholastic materials, and to question scholastic as a trusted source of educational material.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.