About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Searching for the GOP's silver lining, ABC's Gibson misrepresented his own network's poll

October 10, 2006 1:13 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: ABC News' Charles Gibson claimed that a poll's finding that "the Foley scandal is dwarfed by other concerns," such as the Iraq war, terrorism, and the economy, "would seem to be good news for Republicans." In fact, the poll also found that, by significant margins, more Americans trust Democrats over Republicans to handle the Iraq war, terrorism, and the economy.

11 Comments

In discussing an October 5-8 Washington Post/ABC News poll with ABC News chief Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos on the October 9 broadcast of ABC's World News, anchor Charles Gibson claimed that the poll's finding that the scandal involving former Rep. Mark Foley "is dwarfed by other concerns," such as the Iraq war, terrorism, and the economy, "would seem to be good news for Republicans." In fact, the poll also found that, by significant margins, more Americans trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle the Iraq war, terrorism, and the economy. Neither Gibson nor Stephanopoulos explained how greater concern over Iraq, terror, and the economy, compared to the Foley scandal, "would seem to be good news for Republicans" when their own poll shows that Americans trust Democrats more than Republicans to handle those issues.

From the October 9 broadcast of ABC's World News with Charles Gibson:

GIBSON: Republicans fear the Foley scandal could cost them congressional seats in November. But according to a new ABC News/Washington Post poll out tonight, just 18 percent of voters consider the scandal an important issue. In contrast, 83 percent see Iraq as a major issue. Terrorism and the economy also rank much higher as concerns for voters. So we turn to our chief White House -- Washington correspondent George Stephanopoulos. And George, I'm gonna put these numbers up right next to you, because it does show that the Foley scandal is dwarfed by other concerns. And that would seem to be good news for Republicans, but other numbers in the poll might not be such good news for the Republicans.

STEPHANOPOULOS: That's right, Charlie. A lot of flashing red lights for Republicans in this new poll. We find that only 32 percent of the country approves the job Congress is doing. Only 39 percent approve of the job the president's doing, 66 percent of the country thinks we're going in the wrong direction, and by a 13-point margin, they prefer Democrats over Republicans come November. So what this basically shows is that the bump that the president and his party got in September by focusing on terrorism, by falling gas prices, has gone away. They're back to the same low numbers they've been fighting all year.

GIBSON: All right. You just mentioned that the approval numbers for Congress are very, very low, and that would, obviously, seem to be problems for incumbents. But there's always that old conventional wisdom, George, that people don't like the Congress as a whole, but then they turn around and vote for their member who is already there.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And that is still holding up, Charlie. You look at this poll, and 60 percent still approve of their individual member of Congress. And I think that's a testament and it validates the Republican strategy this year, which is "all politics is local." They stole it from [former House Speaker Thomas P.] "Tip" O'Neill [D-MA]. They basically built a levee around their members, and the question is, can it fight back this national wave?

GIBSON: All right, George Stephanopoulos reporting on the poll from Washington. Thanks.

According to the ABC News/Washington Post poll, when asked which issues were important to their vote, 83 percent of respondents chose the Iraq war, 78 percent chose terrorism, and 77 percent chose the economy. When asked which party they "trust to do a better job handling" Iraq, 51 percent of respondents chose Democrats, compared with 38 percent who chose Republicans. On terrorism, 47 percent chose Democrats, compared with 41 percent who chose Republicans. On the economy, 54 percent chose Democrats, while 37 percent chose Republicans. In fact, as ABC's poll analysis noted, "Democrats lead in public trust to handle each of seven areas tested in this poll." The other areas included immigration, health care, ethics in Washington, and the "main problems the nation faces over the next few years."

Moreover, the October 5-8 poll's findings on Iraq and terrorism represented a clear shift from the previous month -- according to a September 7 Washington Post/ABC News poll, the percentage of respondents who trusted Democrats and Republicans to handle the Iraq war was approximately equal (43 for Democrats, 44 for Republicans), and a higher percentage of respondents trusted Republicans (47 percent) to better handle terrorism than Democrats (40 percent).

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by peet (October 10, 2006 1:28 pm ET)
         

      It's good news for the Republicans that the leader of anti-internet sex predator program was found guilty of just that?? That's pathetic! I feel like I'm dreaming sometimes... How about this Charles...

      GIBSON: "...what's worse, it seems the best thing the Republicans can look to right now is that one of their own prominent Congressmen is currently under investigation for soliciting on-line sexual favors from a minor..."

      Doesn't that seem more reasonable?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tex (October 10, 2006 1:32 pm ET)
         

      For ALL "mainstream media" -- even now -- is "Where is the Good News for Republicans?" Diminish importance of SCANDALS, point to a couple of points upturn for the President (still around 40% approval) is a GREAT TREND, etc, etc.

      There is definitely BIAS in the news media these days, even while the actual indicatiors across the board point to an OPPOSITE REALITY. The Republicans are in terrible shape and getting worse: all indicators are for a Democrat blowout in November.

      It's positively PAINFUL watching these news drones grasping for the "GOP are really OK" indicators ... which are non-existent on examination.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by clams casino (October 10, 2006 1:35 pm ET)
         

      ...it's still an absolutely ridiculous statement, and I can't believe Stephanopoulos fell right in line with this nonsense. Gibson says "83 percent see Iraq as a major issue," as if anything at all coming out of Iraq could even remotely be considered good news--for Republicans or for anyone else. Aargh, my head hurts.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ChristianDemocrat (October 10, 2006 2:00 pm ET)
         

      Chris Matthews stated that, as a result of the Foley scandal, "[The war] has been taken off television, and Bush must love it." However, now it's a good thing that the Iraq war is at the top of the list of voters' concerns. With logic like that, who needs stupidity?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by casac2942 (October 10, 2006 2:18 pm ET)
         

      Regardless, this Foley pervert has taken Iraq off the air and no one can dispute this.

      MMFA is just as responsible as they have continued to push this pervert and ignore the media's blatant ignorance of the Iraq war.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 10, 2006 3:03 pm ET)
           

        How hard is this to understand. MMFA exposes Media misinformation. Right now the media is all about Foley. Why is it suprising that a lot of the media misinformation is also about Foley? Should MM stop reporting the media misinformation and spin because they think the STORY the misinformation is coming from has already been covered?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (October 10, 2006 3:44 pm ET)
           

        Go back to your boss Karl and get some other line of reasoning.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (October 10, 2006 7:37 pm ET)
           

        >>"MMFA is just as responsible"<<

        That's laughable.

        Hastert ignores, denies and covers-up. Right-wing apologists (Hannity, Drudge, etc.) make excuses and play the blame-someone-else, responsibility-dodging, outright fabrication game. Foley goes into hiding.

        These are the people that are fully, totally responsible for perpetuating this story. If they'd be honest and up-front, we could get this resolved. And perhaps if Foley had been able to control his urges to begin with, we wouldn't even be talking about it.

        Interesting that NOW, suddenly, the right wing talking point is to bring back the subject of Iraq and all the other "important things".

        Report Abuse
    • Author by bruce1ace (October 10, 2006 3:23 pm ET)
         

      that some conservatives can be fair about what they see, this came out today from Reuters:

      "These polls seem to suggest the public has decided to just 'throw the bums out,"' said Karlyn Bowman, a public opinion analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

      "These are huge, huge, numbers and they are very bad for Republicans," she said. "There is not a shred of good news in these polls for Republicans."

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (October 11, 2006 12:43 am ET)
           

        That's one "analyst" who won't be speaking on-camera and employed by this "conservative" operation - ever again!

        Report Abuse
    • Author by conleytgwinn (October 11, 2006 12:50 am ET)
         

      Preview would R-E-A-L-L-Y help (especially when the logon operation deprives me of the view of a comment to which I would like to respond, leaving me forced to hope I remember the facts, and got the HTML, syntax, and spelling all properly set:

      Since Karlyn is apparently never actually on camera in the interview, my initial point may be that she must choose between speaking truth, and remaining employed?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

  • ABC
    ABC News
    ABCNews
    7 W. 66th St.
    New York, NY 10023