MSNBC's O'Donnell, Slager made false claims and suggestions to paint recent political scandals as bipartisan
SUMMARY: MSNBC anchor Melissa Slager falsely claimed that one of the three House members who resigned this year because of ethical scandals was a Democrat; in fact, all three who resigned over the past year were Republicans. MSNBC's Norah O'Donnell presented a "scandal scorecard" noting that Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (NV) "is facing a Senate ethics probe," overstating the amount of profit Reid allegedly made in the deal and ignoring a transaction in which House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) reportedly made an even bigger profit on the sale of land near a highway project for which he reportedly included an earmark in a transportation bill.
Reporting on recent political scandals during the 2 p.m. ET hour of the October 13 edition of MSNBC News Live, anchor Melissa Slager falsely claimed that "three House members have resigned this year because of ethical scandals -- two of them Republican, one of them Democrat." In fact, the three House members who have resigned over the past year amid various ethics probes and criminal investigations were all Republicans -- former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (TX), Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (CA), and Rep. Mark Foley (FL). Additionally, during the 11 a.m. ET hour of the October 13 edition of MSNBC News Live, MSNBC chief Washington correspondent Norah O'Donnell presented a "scandal scorecard" noting that Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (NV) "is facing a Senate ethics probe looking into whether he failed to properly account for a business deal that allowed him to collect over $1 million." Not only did O'Donnell suggest a higher profit than the $700,000 Reid in fact received, but, more important, omitted any mention of a transaction in which House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) reportedly made a profit of almost $2 million on the sale of land following his reported intervention on a transportation bill to include an earmark for a highway project near that land. O'Donnell also did not mention DeLay by name, who resigned amid ethical scandals, investigations, and criminal charges, and falsely suggested that Democrats are as entangled in the scandal relating to disgraced former lobbyist Jack Abramoff as Republicans are.
Contrary to Slager's claim, three House Republicans have resigned due to "ethical scandals." On November 28, 2005, Cunningham resigned from Congress after, as CNN reported, "pleading guilty to taking more than $2 million in bribes in a criminal conspiracy involving at least three defense contractors." Cunningham was sentenced to over eight years in prison and is currently serving his term. In April, DeLay resigned after several of his closest staff members either were implicated or pleaded guilty to charges relating to the Abramoff scandal. Prior to his resignation, DeLay was indicted on conspiracy charges stemming from a Texas campaign finance investigation. Foley resigned September 29 after being confronted by ABC News about sexually explicit electronic communications he allegedly had with teenage congressional pages. A fourth Republican, Rep. Bob Ney (OH), is being pressured to resign, particularly after entering a guilty plea on October 13 to charges of conspiracy and making false statements stemming from his ties with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff; Ney has so far declined to resign.
While discussing the recent political scandals on the 11 a.m. ET edition of MSNBC News Live, O'Donnell equated the "scandal of the year, Mark Foley's resignation over e-mails and X-rated instant messages to pages," with reports that Reid "is facing a Senate ethics probe looking into whether he failed to properly account for a business deal that allowed him to collect over $1 million." In fact, Reid requested the Senate ethics committee review his filings after the Associated Press reported that he may have improperly reported a land transaction in Clark County, Nevada, in which he made a $700,000 profit. But O'Donnell did not mention reports that Hastert made a profit of almost $2 million on the sale of land in Illinois following his inclusion of a provision in a transportation appropriations bill for the construction of a highway near the land. By contrast, as Media Matters for America has noted, there is no allegation of official action on Reid's part that may have affected the value of his land.
Additionally, O'Donnell falsely suggested that Democrats were equally involved with the scandal surrounding Abramoff. After adding Ney (R-OH) to the "scandal scorecard," O'Donnell asserted: "But Abramoff didn't just work with Republicans. Several top Democrats have also faced questions about money they received from Indian tribes, thanks to Abramoff." In fact, while Democrats have received contributions from Abramoff's lobbying groups and his clients, as Media Matters has repeatedly noted, Abramoff has made direct contributions only to Republicans. Moreover, O'Donnell's statement ignores the difference between simply accepting contributions, which is not illegal or improper per se, and taking contributions in exchange for official actions, which is at the heart of ongoing Abramoff-related investigations, none of which reportedly involve Democrats.
Further, in her "scandal scorecard," O'Donnell omitted specific mention of DeLay, who resigned from Congress immediately after, as the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported, "his former aide, Tony Rudy, pleaded guilty to conspiring with lobbyist Jack Abramoff to corrupt public officials." Rudy's plea agreement also reportedly implicated former DeLay chief of staff and Abramoff associate Edwin A. Buckham. Additionally, on November 21, 2005, former DeLay press secretary and Abramoff lobbying partner Michael Scanlon pleaded guilty to conspiring with Abramoff to bribe public officials. DeLay's resignation came seven months after being indicted on conspiracy charges stemming from a Texas campaign finance investigation, of which DeLay has maintained his innocence.
Additionally, on September 15, Time magazine reported that among "other sitting members of Congress and prominent individuals who could face prosecution" in relation to the Abramoff scandal, Time's sources "confirmed previous public reports that particular scrutiny is being paid to Sen. Conrad Burns, a Montana Republican who faces a tough campaign for reelection."
From the 11 a.m. ET segment of the October 13 edition of MSNBC News Live:
O'DONNELL: Several recent polls have all shown voters angry over the scandals in Washington, or split over the scandals. But no party holds exclusive rights to the stench coming from the nation's capital. Take a look at the scandal scorecard. For Republicans, there's scandal of the year, Mark Foley's resignation over emails and X-rated instant messages to pages. But on the Democratic side, Senate Leader Harry Reid is facing a Senate ethics probe looking into whether he failed to properly account for a business deal that allowed him to collect over $1 million. But don't forget disgraced Republican Congressman Duke Cunningham, who resigned in a bribery scandal. He's now in jail. Not to be outdone, there's Democratic Congressman William Jefferson, who is currently the target of a federal bribery investigation. The FBI says it has a videotape of him accepting $100,000 stuffed in a briefcase. But the Republicans have Bob Ney, who just pleaded guilty a little while ago to taking bribes of his own, in connection with lobbyist Jack Abramoff. But Abramoff didn't just work with Republicans. Several top Democrats have also faced questions about money they received from Indian tribes, thanks to Abramoff.
From the 2 p.m. ET segment of the October 13 edition of MSNBC News Live:
SLAGER: So, three House members have already resigned this year because of unethical conduct -- two of them Republican, one of them a Democrat. But can anything be done to end all of this corruption?

















Either that or she is doing on-air auditioning for FOX NEWS. How the HELL can anyone be that grossly misinformed when they are ostensibly supposed to be an objective news anchor? I've seen worse examples of an objective news anchor being grossly and sadly misinformed, but they were on FOX NEWS, so it's not really surprise. As for O'Donnell conveniently ignoring the Hastert scandal, she has done this before. She used discredited Republican talking points to grill Howard Dean, and then practically let George Allen do an advertisement for himself while interviewed by O'Donnell.
THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com
Did you see Hannity & Colmes tonight? Some guy who looked about 12 filled in for Hannity.Sean must be pretty insecure, as this replacement was an even worse debater than Hannity, so Sean doesn't get shown up.
The guests on one segment were G Gordon Liddy and Stephanie Miller, and the questions this punk threw Miller were so loaded and unanswerable by a sane person, it's like the Con media doesn't even try anymore.
Liddy got what were suppoosed to be the same questions, rephrased as if he wrote them himself, requiring only a "support the troops" style answer.
These Grand Old Pedophiles are really creepy. It was bad enough when we knew they were chickenhawks egging on war, it was bad enough when we knew they were all getting paid off by abramoff, it was bad enough when they ran a total moron for president, now we find out that they get off on man-boy love.
how....sordid
when referencing the GOP
THEY ARE SO UPSET THAT THE DEMOCRATS MIGHT WIN SO THEY ARE PUTTING OUT LIES THAT THEY GET FROM FOX NEWS TOO MAKE THE DEMOCRATS LOOK BAD TOO. JUST LOOK AT THE NEY STORY THEY DOWN PLAYED THAT STORY ON THERE WEB SITE AND CABLE NEWS SHOWS LET THAT HAVE BEEN AN DEMOCRAT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN THE LEAD STORY ON THE WEBSITES AND NEWS SHOWS.
I thought this article would have gotten more play in the comments section! What a perfect example of the sloppy "reporting", the horserace mentality (as exemplified by odonnell's freakin "scorecard") and the egregious spewing of misinformation that have become the hallmarks of the modern-day mainstream media whores. For pity's sake, how can you do a story about congressional scandals and not mention the kingpin of filth, Tom Delay! And odonnell's sham effort to draw equivalency between the Dems and the Repubs in the dirt department just doesn't wash. First of all, calling the Foley resignation the biggest scandal that the Repubs have faced is a gross misstatement--what she should have said is that it is the one that has caused them the most grief in part because of the salaciousness of it, but also because the media has talked about it more (due to said salaciousness of course.) And she doesn't even allude to the worst part of the whole thing, the fact that it appears that Hastert et al knew about it and covered it up. Also, bringing Reid into this is extremely disingenous, since possibly "facing an ethical probe" in a matter that no one has even alleged to be illegal hardly puts this in the same class as Ney, who has been convicted of a crime (and who BTW is still in his seat!), or any of the other Repub slimesters. (Hell, Reid could have sold the Hoover Dam and not even approach the shameless corruption of Cunningham!) Leaving aside the throughly debunked Dem-Abramoff connection, really the only Dem who has been caught up in a scandal at all is Jefferson. So if odonnell's "scorecard" were truly accurate--and if she weren't such an obvious shill for Bush and co--the numbers would read Democratic scandals 1, Repub scandals too numerous to count. I'm going to hold my breath until she issues a retraction (it's been nice knowing you all!!!)
If you're owned by GE...a major contributor to the Bush regime and defense contractor... you think these slags have any intent on reporting real or factual news? Quite the opposite. They're all 'playing news' with a deliberate intent to mislead the public away from their own dirty wheeling and dealing... This is called severe conflict of interest.
...Slager has no idea what she's even saying. Gone are the days when an intelligent/thoughtful reporter (who has actually some say in the news copy) understands what he/she is even reading. Slager is a pretty talking head. Uh, Katie Couric anyone? They practice their 'serious look' ... and that's supposed to substitute for actual news.
Her reports would say that Tiger Woods loses every tournament, that Mike Tyson is still undefeated, the USA won the World Cup, and the Chicago Bears are the best team in baseball.