About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Print media reported Weldon conspiracy theories, offered no response from CREW

October 18, 2006 7:53 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Associated Press have reported Rep. Curt Weldon's statements blaming an FBI investigation of him on Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) but failed to include any response from CREW or point out that the FBI is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice, which is part of the Bush administration and headed by a Bush confidante.

7 Comments

In their recent coverage of the FBI investigation of Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA), The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Associated Press have reported Weldon's statements blaming the influence-trading probe on "the left-wing, liberal attack machine" -- and, specifically, the nonprofit organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) -- but have failed to include any response from CREW.

On October 16, the FBI raided several homes and offices linked to Weldon. The raids came as part of an ongoing investigation into whether he used his position in Congress to improperly steer lucrative contracts to his daughter's lobbying firm. As CNN congressional correspondent Dana Bash reported that day, Weldon quickly cited political motivations for the timing of the investigation and singled out CREW as having intentionally provoked the issue mere weeks before the midterm election. Bash went on to note that CREW complained two and a half years ago about Weldon to the FBI -- a division of the U.S. Department of Justice, which is part of the Bush administration and headed by Bush confidante Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales -- and aired a clip of CREW executive director Melanie Sloan stating that she "can't force the Justice Department to do anything."

From the October 16 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

BASH: The Pennsylvania Republican, a 20-year veteran of the House, is in a neck-and-neck race to keep his seat. He calls the timing of this -- three weeks before Election Day -- politically motivated, and blames Melanie Sloan, head of a liberal-leaning watchdog group for spurring the issue.

Sloan says she did file a complaint with the FBI but did that two and a half years ago, when questions were first raised by the Los Angeles Times.

SLOAN: We don't control what the Justice Department does. The Justice Department is investigating Curt Weldon. And I can't force the Justice Department to do anything.

In an October 17 article on the Weldon raids, The Philadelphia Inquirer similarly reported both Weldon's accusations and Sloan's response:

On Sunday night, Curt Weldon lashed out at Sloan and said in a phone interview that the leaks late Friday were "a gross abuse of the election process." In a statement yesterday, he called it "dirty, partisan politics at its absolute worst."

Sloan said yesterday that she was as surprised as Weldon to learn of the FBI's investigation. Her letter, after all, was written 30 months ago, she said.

"You can see that this had nothing to do with this election cycle," Sloan said. "It's bad news for Mr. Weldon, but we thought he should have been under investigation all along ... . How could his daughter get clients like that at age 29? How can she lobby her father?"

Meanwhile, an October 17 article by Post staff writers Carol D. Leonnig and R. Jeffrey Smith also reported Weldon's attempt to cast the probe as a ploy by Democratic operatives to sabotage his re-election chances. But unlike the CNN and Inquirer, the Post included no response from Sloan or any CREW spokesperson. Moroever, the Post failed to report two simple facts that undermine Weldon's allegations of a partisan plot: that CREW alleges it sent the complaint to the FBI two and a half years ago, and that the FBI is an arm of the Bush administration. From the article:

Weldon assailed the news reports as politically motivated. He blamed a 2004 complaint filed by the liberal-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which is led by Melanie Sloan, a former prosecutor who also has been a Democratic staff member on the House Judiciary Committee.

The following day, both the Times and the AP ran stories focusing on the Weldon campaign's attempts to blame CREW and the "liberal attack machine" for the investigation. But these articles also omitted any response from CREW. While both articles reported that CREW complained to the FBI in 2004, neither pointed out that the FBI is part of the Justice Department, which is controlled politically by Republicans. From the October 18 article by Times staff writer David Johnston, headlined "Investigation Is Just Politics, Lawmaker Says":

Representative Curt Weldon is describing a federal investigation into whether he acted improperly on behalf of his daughter's lobbying firm as an election-season ploy that will find that "I engaged in no wrongdoing."

"I am extremely disappointed that we are discussing this topic three weeks before an election that could determine control of Congress," Mr. Weldon, Republican of Pennsylvania, said in a statement issued Monday evening. "The timing of this situation is deeply concerning."

[...]

Mr. Weldon said he was disappointed by the "politics of personal destruction," which he attributed to "left-wing liberal activists." He singled out one group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which two years ago sent a letter of complaint to the Justice Department asking that he be investigated.

In her October 18 article, headlined "Republican Weldon blasts 'liberal attack machine' for publicity," AP staff writer Maryclaire Dale reported that Weldon had blamed not only CREW but also the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee:

A day after the FBI raided the offices of a lobbying firm run by Rep. Curt Weldon's daughter and his close friend, the Republican's campaign blamed publicity about the Justice Department investigation on "the left-wing, liberal attack machine."

[...]

The lawmaker on Tuesday blamed the investigation on the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and a group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, which he said was supported by Democratic activists. In 2004, the group asked the Justice Department to investigate Weldon for alleged bribery for "using his public office to benefit companies that hired his daughter as a lobbyist."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mefirst (October 18, 2006 8:19 pm ET)
         

      weldon was one of the main people behind the "able danger" story. the one with supposed mountains of evidence that the clinton justice dept told the the able danger group to keep hands off the 9-11 hijackers. those mountains of evidence crumbled to dust before they were ever shown apparently. weldon claimed the justice dept wouldn't let them go after mohammed atta because he "had a green card". the only problem with that little piece of fiction is, that means permanent residency, which none of the hijackers had.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by neuboy (October 18, 2006 9:11 pm ET)
         

      ...and another one bites the dust. Who knew that the "October Suprise" would be an increasinly long list of Republican candidates having their year's of ethical issues finally catch up with them.

      In just under 3 weeks, we should finally be able to get the country going in the right direction again!

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (October 19, 2006 2:33 pm ET)
           

        You do know that even if you sweep all the seats, Roberts will simply rule that you can't impeach Emperor Bungle, who will promptly pardon himself and all other members of the unruly Repugnant mob - just in case you attempt to impeach Roberts instead. But, it would be fun to try, I suppose, so count me in - and, if needed, I would contribute to buy rope.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by joanl (October 18, 2006 9:39 pm ET)
         

      This is a man that tried with his "Able Danger" to spew hate and lies and blame President Clinton for 9/11 Now we find out he is using his position to gain contracts for his daughter. The entire GOP congress is corrupt.

      If he isnt a symbol of why both houses of Congress need to be in Democrat hands , I dont know what is.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (October 19, 2006 6:56 am ET)
         

      FYI: During a political campaign, bad things will be said about you. During a political campaign, your past will catch-up with you. FYI: You are nothing but another "law-abiding" crook. Now you know and your 'child' should pay the price also. Call your "unable stranger crowd" to find the truth. If they find it it will be the first time. Your"child', you should be ashamed of yourself

      Report Abuse
    • Author by olivelawyers (October 19, 2006 3:19 pm ET)
         

      Blitzer finally followed upon on that point (it's an FBI seizure ordered on Ablert Gonzales' watch) on a segment yesterday. My associate was watching the clip on her computer so I don't have the link.

      However, Dizzyproductions/ABC lack competence as well as character.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by olivelawyers (October 19, 2006 3:21 pm ET)
           

        maybe it's so self-evident that the Post and the Times didn't see the need to comment?

        Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.