About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Touting her new book, Amanda Carpenter claimed it is "alarming" that Hillary Clinton could use "foreign money" earned by her husband in 2008 presidential race

October 19, 2006 12:53 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: On MSNBC and Fox News, Amanda Carpenter touted the purportedly damaging charge in her new book that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton will use "foreign money" made by her husband to mount a potential presidential campaign for 2008. Carpenter asserted that it is "alarming ... that there are millions of dollars in foreign money available to fund Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign as we speak."

37 Comments

On the October 17 edition of MSNBC's Tucker, the October 16 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson, and the October 13 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Human Events assistant editor Amanda Carpenter touted the purportedly damaging charge in her new book, The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Clinton (Regnery, October 2006), that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) will use "foreign money" made by her husband, former President Bill Clinton, to mount a potential presidential campaign for 2008. Carpenter asserted that it is "alarming ... that there are millions of dollars in foreign money available to fund Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign as we speak," and that Sen. Clinton's access to that money, allegedly held in a joint checking account with her husband, represents a "loophole" in campaign finance laws. In fact, public officials from both parties presumably benefit from spousal income, and many Republicans -- including President Bush -- have access to "foreign money," as defined by Carpenter, to finance their political campaigns.

On The Big Story, Carpenter described Sen. Clinton's access to "foreign money" allegedly held jointly with her husband as a "loophole," because, she falsely asserted, "campaign finance creators never considered this scenario." The Supreme Court decided that candidates have a First Amendment right to spend their personal funds without limit, but federal law does limit a candidate's access to spousal wealth. When assets are owned jointly, a federal candidate's "personal funds" includes "the value of 1/2 of the property," unless the candidate and spouse have specified a different share in an "instrument of conveyance or ownership" of the property. Property solely owned by a candidate's spouse is not defined as the candidate's personal funds and cannot be used by the candidate, as was reported when Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) mortgaged his house in order to finance part of his campaign, unable to dip into assets owned solely by his wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry.

Moreover, with regard to the second component of Carpenter's complaint about Sen. Clinton -- that her potential campaign will have access to "foreign money" and, as Carpenter asserted on Hannity & Colmes, that Sen. Clinton has "gotten rich from foreign money and corporations" -- Clinton would hardly be unique among candidates from either party in having access to "foreign money." According to his most recent personal financial disclosure, House Majority Leader John Boehner's (R-OH) jointly held assets are valued at $750,000-$1,550,000 and include mutual funds, such as EuroPacific Growth Fund Class A and SMALLCAP World Fund Class A, with investments in foreign corporations. SMALLCAP World Fund includes shares in China Mengniu Dairy Co., which is headquartered in China and describes itself as the "top liquid milk producer in China by sales volume in 2003."

Similarly, much of Vice President Dick Cheney's wealth comes from his tenure as CEO of Halliburton. The Center for Public Integrity (CPI) wrote of Cheney's Halliburton leadership: "During Cheney's tenure at Halliburton revenue more than doubled, thanks in part to Cheney's ability to secure overseas business for the firm. By the time Cheney left the firm, in the summer of 2000, overseas operations accounted for 68 percent for total revenues, up from 51 percent when he arrived." Bush also had business dealings with foreign countries. In 1986, Bush became a director of the Harken Energy Corporation. An April 19, 1992, New York Times article reported:

Mr. Bush has also helped Harken raise outside capital and acquire other companies. Foreign investors have been important. A Saudi Arabian investor, for example, purchased 17 percent in 1987, a transaction that the company says did not directly involve Mr. Bush.

Mr. Bush sold a large share of his Harken stock on June 22, 1990, at about $4 a share, for $848,000.

Money taken by candidates can also come from subsidiaries and employees of international corporations. For instance, CPI's "Buying of the President 2004" project noted that Bush received $538,850 from employees of Credit Suisse First Boston and its PAC for his 2004 presidential re-election campaign. CPI included "individual, corporate and PAC contributions" to his "gubernatorial, congressional presidential campaigns, inaugural committees, and recount fund through June 30, 2004." Credit Suisse First Boston is part of the Credit Suisse Group, which, according to its website, is "a leading global financial services company headquartered in Zurich [Switzerland]."

During Carpenter's appearance on Hannity & Colmes, frequent guest host and National Review editor Rich Lowry vowed of Bill Clinton's source of income: "I guarantee you this will be a huge issue if she's actually a presidential candidate. There's no doubt about it." Co-host Alan Colmes called Carpenter's book a "smear piece" and also accused Carpenter of "a McCarthyite tactic," for suggesting that Sen. Clinton is "using 'Communist cash' " because Bill Clinton earned part of his money from addressing a company whose CEO "was at one time a committee member in the Chinese government."

From the October 17 edition of MSNBC's Tucker:

CARPENTER: But this is indicative of a larger problem -- one that I bring up with Hillary Clinton in the Dossier that I just authored -- that I really would encourage reporters like A.B. [Stoddard] to go after is the foreign money that her husband, Bill Clinton, has been raising internationally in the form of speaking fees. I mean, there's all kinds of unsavory money transactions that are happening on Capitol Hill right now. Hillary Clinton has a larger of conflict interest that -- you know this is small potatoes compared to.

CARLSON: If that foreign money is going to campaigns, of course, that's a violation of federal law, and I haven't --

CARPENTER: Actually, it's not. Actually, from what I uncovered in my book -- in fact --

CARLSON: Since when?

CARPENTER: I can explain it right here -- is that Bill Clinton has gotten more than $20 million in foreign money. You can look this up on the Senate financial disclosure forms that I include in the back of my book with Hillary Clinton's signature. This comes from the People's Republic of China --

CARLSON: All right, I'm sure he has. That --

CARPENTER: -- other places like this.

CARLSON: OK, but if that's going to campaigns, that's a big problem.

CARPENTER: But he has a joint checking account -- here, here's how it could work out, Tucker.

CARLSON: OK, give me -- give me the short version.

CARPENTER: Here we go. They have a joint checking account. I talked with campaign finance lawyers. Hillary Clinton is entitled to half of it. That can be rolled into her campaign. That's a loophole. I talked to Senator Russ Feingold [D-WI]. It's something they never considered.

CARLSON: Huh. Interesting.

CARPENTER: You read all about it in the Dossier.

CARLSON: Well, look, if it turns out that money from Red China, as they used to call it -- and probably should still call it -- is going into Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, you know, there's a story.

CARPENTER: Well, I asked Senator Clinton if she'd use any of her personal money. She won't deny it, so it's up to her to declare that. That'd be a step in the right direction.

From the October 16 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson:

GIBSON: Amanda, what is it we possibly do not know about Hillary Clinton at this late date?

CARPENTER: The most alarming thing that I found in doing my research for the Dossier was the fact that there are millions of dollars in foreign money available to fund Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign as we speak. I found this by looking at her Senate financial disclosure forms that she's required to give to the U.S. Senate.

And what I found in there is that Bill Clinton has made more than $20 million in foreign money since he left the White House. This comes from places like the People's Republic of China, the United Arab Emirates, Colombia. There's a lot of unscrupulous places that he's been taking this money.

GIBSON: Amanda, isn't that -- isn't that his -- isn't that his speaking fee money? Are you saying that money's gone into her campaign?

CARPENTER: Well, as of right now, it's not in her campaign, but the fact right now is, is that they have a joint checking account worth between $5 and $20 million. And I spoke with campaign finance lawyers who confirm to me that Hillary Clinton can use that foreign money. Now, campaign finance creators never considered this scenario. I also talked to other people on Capitol Hill that said this is essentially a loophole that Hillary Clinton will be able to exploit.

From the October 13 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:

COLMES: And here's what you say. You say the CEO -- but -- but why the smear piece on Hillary Clinton, by the way?

CARPENTER: This is absolutely not a smear piece.

COLMES: Oh, come on.

CARPENTER: I want to tell --

COLMES: It's exactly a smear piece.

CARPENTER: -- the people right now, when they go to the bookstore, don't even read my words first. Look in the back of the appendix of the book. Right there in the back, we have her tax forms that show all the international places where Bill Clinton has been raising money that is available for her campaign.

COLMES: All right. Let me give you an example of one of the arguments.

CARPENTER: Go ahead.

COLMES: You say the CEO of a company that Bill Clinton addressed was at one time a committee member in the Chinese government and that, because that advances Clinton's family income, which, of course, they can use for races, you accuse her of using "Communist cash." This is like a McCarthyite tactic --

CARPENTER: It absolutely is not.

COLMES: This is like a McCarthy tactic -- "Communist cash."

CARPENTER: Well, I'm going to cut you off right now.

COLMES: All right, cut me off. Go ahead.

CARPENTER: But right now -- she has not used the money. The fact is, right now, is that it is available for her campaign. And the fact is that Bill Clinton's been paid more than $20 million --

COLMES: All right. Good for him. You don't believe in capitalism?

CARPENTER: -- from the People's Republic of China, from Dubai, from places in Colombia. That's more than $20 million --

COLMES: Dubai who Bush wanted to do the ports deal with? That same Dubai?

CARPENTER: Hillary Clinton has gotten rich from foreign money and corporations, knowing this, knowing that it's available for her campaign, knowing that I asked her personally on Capitol Hill in my work for Human Events if she would use her personal money. She dismissed it. She won't deny it's available.

COLMES: Well, she might. A lot of people use personal --

CARPENTER: She can't be trusted to back U.S. interests, knowing this fact.

COLMES: Well, let me ask you this also.

[...]

CARPENTER: And now that you see Bill Clinton doing all these things internationally and raising this kind of money, you realize that he is going to become the gatekeeper to her.

And the fact that he can go back in the White House and do this kind of stuff, and she -- you know, you were talking about [Sen.] George Allen [R-VA] earlier making this kind of money from a stock. Where is Bill Clinton getting it? We have problems with [Senate Democratic Leader] Harry Reid [NV]. We have a problem with K Street. Bill Clinton is being lauded -- lobbied constantly by international interests. He is married to a U.S. senator that's making policy.

LOWRY: I guarantee -- I guarantee you this will be a huge issue if she's actually a presidential candidate. There's no doubt about it.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mr. l (October 19, 2006 1:11 pm ET)
         

      Sooooooooo......according to her, an individual may not in good faith use money they acquired from 'foreign' sources....??? OK, then....please explain why this is bad....wouldn't a conservative be HAPPY to take money away from RED CHINA!!! that...that means LESS money for communisn! While they are at it, please repeal ALL of the Clean Air Act because..because that will mean LESS air for TERRORISTS!!!

      Siggghhhhh....conservatives are soooooooo short-sighted...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Sagra (October 19, 2006 1:42 pm ET)
           

        we should be thanking Bill Clinton for bringing a little of their money back to the US.

        Have you ever tried shopping for shoes that aren't made in China? New Balance has some, but you have to carefully look at the tags in each style to find the ones from the US.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dangrady (October 19, 2006 2:17 pm ET)
           

        If you want an expert on Republican sincerity, and moral compass at work, call Susan McDougall.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by zerosumgame0005 (October 20, 2006 12:14 pm ET)
           

        get from the Carlyle Group and Saudia Arabia. Or how about all that money Crash-Cart Dick gets from halliburton, off of war-profiteering, or Rummy with his selling of nuculer reactors overseas...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by RC (October 19, 2006 1:11 pm ET)
         

      "Hillary Clinton has gotten rich from foreign money and corporations, knowing this.....She can't be trusted to back "U.S. interests, knowing this fact."

      Typical right wing smear. Using the same logic regarding Bush and Chenny and Arab oil money, the same standard should be applied.

      The wingnuts will really be coming out of the woodwork as we get closer to 2008.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by NL207 (October 19, 2006 2:53 pm ET)
           

        If you knew how to spell the Vice President's name, C-H-E-N-E-Y, then you might not look so much like a wingnut.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by dangrady (October 19, 2006 3:35 pm ET)
             

          Speaking of wingnuts .... If you knew how to spell the Vice President's name, C-H-E-N-E-Y, then you might not look so much like a wingnut. - NL207 / Thursday October 19, 2006 02:53:44 PM EST

          Let me help you with that spelling lesson.

          Vice President (Presumed but not Elected) Coward!

          Vice President Deferment x 5 while endorsing the War!!

          Vice President Draft Dodger!!

          Vice President No Bid!!

          Vice President Behind Close Doors Secret Energy Policy Meetings!!

          Vice President Torturer!!

          Vice President Traitor to the Bill of Right!!

          Vice President Spying on Americans without warrants!!

          I think I will run out of space on this post, maybe some of my like minded Americans could elaborate.

          Happy Thoughts;

          Dan Grady

          Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (October 19, 2006 3:48 pm ET)
               

            Get Drunk and Shoot Someone in the Face.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by peet (October 19, 2006 4:08 pm ET)
               

            BUT! Did you spell his name right?? That's the most importan point here...

            Report Abuse
          • Author by NL207 (October 20, 2006 12:05 pm ET)
               

            So Cheney received a selective service deferrment 5 times? I really didn't pay attention. There was no one in college then who was physically and morally fit that didn't receive at least one of these. IIRC, they needed to be renewed annually while in college. Cheney must have gotten a masters degree straight away. Of course, your comments tell me you never had to deal with selective service, did you?

            Did you get this upset over Bill Clinton's Vietnam era draft dodging too? Or is this invective something you reserve only for Republicans?

            Hypcrisy. That is all you are good for. Keep on raving and spewing venom. That lets all the normal people who visit here as tourists see what you are really made of.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (October 20, 2006 12:25 pm ET)
                 

              Bill Clinton, to my knowledge, didn't invade another country for its oil, nor did he imply that those who oppose the war are traitors. If he did, I missed it.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by peet (October 20, 2006 1:36 pm ET)
                 

              Explain to the good venomous folks here how your hero C-H-E-N-E-Y managed to earn $9,000,000 of our taxpayer money last year? Is that considered an inheritance? Is that 'freedom on the march"? The list is too long, my man. You have no legs to stand on (much like the growing number of surviving service men and women who are now permanently maimed and disabled because of this neocon fantasy of world domination). Is that too harsh (venomous) for your 'conservative' sensibilities? Tough.

              Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (October 19, 2006 1:13 pm ET)
         

      Here we go again. Drag out all the old bullsh*t from the 90's. Vince Foster's gun was found in Hillary's purse, you know, and Bill Clinton strangled a 13-year-old boy with his bare hands during a drug deal in Mena, Arkansas, and Hillary's really a lesbian, too...

      Maybe this is the October surprise? Remind the knuckledraggers just how much they hate Hillary so they'll get all frothy at the mouth and go vote in November?

      Naaah...my money's on bombing a reactor in N. Korea or Iran...maybe both.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mr. l (October 19, 2006 1:17 pm ET)
         

      Dear everyone....please make all of your money directly within the border of the United States...no outsourcing, no affiliate in other countries, no employees in other lands, no computers connecting to sites outside the borders, uummm...., no using products made anywhere else but in the usa, etc...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by peet (October 19, 2006 1:17 pm ET)
         

      Alarming to whom?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Sagra (October 19, 2006 1:19 pm ET)
         

      I remember that one of OBL's cousins bailed him out of some business thing. Was that when Arbusto went belly-up?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (October 19, 2006 2:51 pm ET)
           

        And I COULD be wrong. The Saudi money came later. It was a PANAMANIAN bussinessman who first bailed Shrubby out of Arbusto. He bought ten percent of the company for one million dollars even though the entire companies assets were worth about 250,000$ I think he then changed the name to Spectrum7 got the Saudi money from Bass, then when that was gone was bought out by Soros who said directly he bought the money to buy political influence because "George isnt much of a bussinessman"

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nukeboot (October 19, 2006 1:35 pm ET)
         

      Since much of our national debt is being financed by foreign investments is she also "alarmed" about that?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (October 19, 2006 2:15 pm ET)
         

      1000 SUPEONAS, 5 Independent Prosecutors served on President Bill Clinton from 1995 to 2000.

      5 SUPEONAS, No Independent Prosecutors served on President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2006.

      Senator Hillary Clinton has yet to announce her candidacy yet and the Republicans are stirring the pot for their next Independent Prosecutor’s White Water Witch Hunt.

      When you hear these claims, and no Congressional Hearings attached, you may consider it another Republican, Scaife the freak lie.

      Remember the crazy behavior of the Republican Congress that sent our government chasing after conspiracy theories invented in the wishful imagination of a Republican Party that could not stand a real President that believed in good governance.

      All they came up with was jizz on a skirt, after 6 years of chasing conspiracies, and that was just days before Starr was to close down his investigation. A $50,000.00 skirt that was supposes to be White Water Land deal gone wrong is the greatest Republican Congressional accomplishment.

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dangrady (October 19, 2006 2:19 pm ET)
           

        corrections//

        Monicas skirt cost the taxpayer's $50,000,000.00 .

        Report Abuse
      • Author by NL207 (October 19, 2006 3:11 pm ET)
           

        [link to www.usdoj.gov]

        This is one of the things Starr was really after. One of the men named in this document, John Huang, appears on Ken Starr's list of witnesses that failed to appear, fled the country, or turned up conveniently dead before they could testify. Huang fell into the 'fled' category. This should have been captured in the Whitewater investigation but was not for lack of witnesses.

        These people, Clinton and his slimy wife included, are guilty as hell. Everybody else in this sordid story ended up either in prison or paid monstrous fines. How is it the two centerpices of all this scandal, Bill and Hillary, have avoided the slammer?

        Report Abuse
        • Author by peet (October 19, 2006 3:27 pm ET)
             

          ...Bush and C-H-E-N-E-Y and all of their buddies will get off scott free.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by rusty shackleford (October 19, 2006 3:36 pm ET)
             

          These people, Clinton and his slimy wife included, are guilty as hell.

          Wow, then all those Republican lawyers must really be incompetent, huh?

          Report Abuse
        • Author by dangrady (October 19, 2006 3:39 pm ET)
             

          When in the history of American politics have we unleashed an completely independant proscecutor 5 years to investigate an issue that he ran into a dead end in 18 months, only to be extended with the charter that if he did'nt find anything, dig more until he finds something???

          These crazy accusations have had innocent people sent to prison for not telling the lies this proscecutor wanted.

          I wonder if just 1% of the same kind of scutiny were applied on this Administration if these guys would not be in jail!!

          Happy Thoughts;

          Dan Grady

          Report Abuse
        • Author by wheat (October 19, 2006 4:23 pm ET)
             

          with all your innuendo aside, "they" (including super-partisan hack Starr) couldn't find any wrongdoing. It's called D-E-N-I-A-L and you're in it. Too bad your hatred of real democracy advocates blinds you to the multitude of illegalities the current government (TOTALLY Republican controlled) engages in....Slimy characters indeed.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by solon (October 19, 2006 4:26 pm ET)
             

          To incriminate Clinton in the Whitewater scandal. THEY LOST money in the deal. There was no there there and honest people admitted that long ago and went on to what they could find Clinton sexual misconduct. YOU are not an honest person so you CLAIM guilt without the slightest possibilty of PROVING guilt and without even TRYING to establish any guilt. Pathetic, like most of your posts.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by evillib1727 (October 19, 2006 2:32 pm ET)
         

      Little off topic. China has decided to pay a fair wage for its people. They really want to do away with the sweat shops. But what is crazy, all of a sudden all these lobbiests come out to squash the proposed idea/law. Who are the lobbiests representing? American companies......... Go figure.

      I say close all loopholes.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (October 19, 2006 2:58 pm ET)
         

      ...that there is money to be raised in campaigns. Nearly no one does that. These clean cut females who sell their souls (because you know the Repubs are the party of women!) for attention and dollars seem increasingly just sad and bitter (Annie C., Michelle M., Norah O'D).

      Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (October 19, 2006 3:58 pm ET)
         

      You must be really outraged at Haley Barbour, current governor of Mississippi, who was on a ship off the coast of China back in the 90's getting Chinese Commie money for the Republican National Committee.

      THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com

      Report Abuse
    • Author by peet (October 19, 2006 5:28 pm ET)
         

      Let's not forget the main reason WHY Clinton started these 'speaking fees' to begin with... it was to pay back his $10 million dollar legal fees foisted upon him by the Starr et al. It's just funny that he was able to pay all of it back within a year.

      I wonder how many speaking gigs Bush would get if he had to pay back a similar sizable debt??

      Does anyone find it nauseating that this strident turd is pushing her book for a buck while pissing and moaning about Clinton getting paid for speaking?? What is it with the perpetual double standard by these freaks??

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (October 19, 2006 9:06 pm ET)
         

      in the vice presidential debate about how cheney lobbied to have sanctions dropped against nations like iran and iraq?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Watcher_IL (October 19, 2006 9:37 pm ET)
         

      Isn't FNC owned by News Corp. which owned by Rupert Murdoch who is Australian?

      That means that the whole bunch at Fox Cartoon Network are taking in "foreign money".

      Isn't that alarming? he heh he he

      Report Abuse
    • Author by kenwolman (October 20, 2006 8:22 am ET)
         

      I cannot stand Hillary but my disgust is moderating the closer we get to November 7 and then 2008. If in fact Bill is giving is wife a bag of money from any country on earth, fine. This is war. This is the real war on terrorism. It is the war against the Bush administration. They scare me. In spite of 9/11, Islam is less frightening than a power-crazed evangelical cokehead who believes in absolutely nothing.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.