Hardball, Big Story, and Your World reports accepted Bush administration's misleading wage and jobs claims
SUMMARY: MSNBC and Fox News uncritically reported claims by the Bush administration, including that "wages for the average middle-class American today are actually higher than they were just a couple of years ago," ignoring a report alleging that the median hourly real wage has "declined 2 percent since 2003."
On the October 23 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, discussing her recent interview with President Bush, Maria Bartiromo, host of CNBC's The Closing Bell, uncritically relayed Bush's claim during the interview that "wages for the average middle-class American today are actually higher than they were just a couple of years ago." Neither Bartiromo nor host Chris Matthews noted that real wages -- wages adjusted for inflation -- have not risen in the past "couple of years"; according to an August 28 New York Times report, the median hourly real wage has "declined 2 percent since 2003."
In addition, on the October 23 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson, Fox News chief political correspondent Carl Cameron falsely claimed that the United States has created "some five million jobs" in "the ... five years under the Bush administration." In fact, because there was a net loss of 2.6 million U.S. jobs from February 2001 through July 2003, there has been a net gain of 3.2 million new jobs in the first 68 months of the Bush presidency, as Media Matters for America has documented. Similarly, on the October 23 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, Fox News chief White House correspondent Brett Baier uncritically reported that Bush recently "touted the nation's job creation of 6.6 million new jobs since August of 2003," ignoring the earlier job losses.
From the October 23 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to Hardball. Maria Bartiromo, host of CNBC's The Closing Bell, interviewed President Bush today and asked him about our economy, the escalating violence in Iraq, and how those two issues will influence the midterm elections. Maria, you got the hot -- the hot get today.
BARTIROMO: Thanks very much, Chris. You know, the president was very, very confident when I spoke with him about two hours ago about his chances coming up to the midterm elections. He said that he is not worried, by one iota, that the Republicans are going to lose either house of Congress. He was very confident on that and, in particular, because of the economy.
You know, he talked about the fact that inflation is low, in addition to the fact that oil prices have come all the way down from close to $80 a barrel -- now below $60 a barrel -- and he also said that, even though we are seeing a gap between the rich and poor, wages for the average middle-class American today are actually higher than they were just a couple of years ago.
So, with all that good news, the obvious question, of course, Chris, is: Well, if everything is going so well, how come the poll numbers are so weak?
From the October 23 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson:
BANDERAS: All right. Obviously, the economy is what the president currently is touting on. But do you think that the booming economy is enough to save Republicans in November?
CAMERON: It's certainly part of what Republicans want to emphasize. They would like to point out that Democrats have a cut and run strategy, in the real -- in the GOP vernacular, overseas in terms of foreign policy. And when it comes to the domestic front, Republicans argue that Democrats would raise taxes, and that would be an obvious drag on the economy that could undo what growth and what job creation there's been in the last six -- five years under the Bush administration -- some five million jobs -- as the administration is often wont to tout.
The problem is not so much the actual statistical condition of the economy, it's what people feel out in the country, and they're being reminded by Democrats all the time that it could be better. And so Republicans keep on trying to ring that bell. It's just a question of whether or not voters can hear it, hence the president's insistence on saying it daily.
From the October 23 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:
CAVUTO: Well, stocks up on Wall Street as the president talks up the economy in Washington -- chief White House correspondent Brett Baier with the latest on that. Hey, Brett.
BAIER: Hey, Neil. Touring a minority-owned bank here in Washington today, President Bush also met with area small business owners saying the strength of the nation's economy largely depends on the strength of the nation's small business sector. The president touring the Urban Trust Bank -- traveling there, here in D.C. It opened earlier this year, designed to provide a service to urban and minority customers with a focus on underserved small businesses and home buyers. Now, the president today focused on entrepreneurs; he touted the nation's job creation of 6.6 million new jobs since August of 2003, and the president said, with today's U.S. economy, people can, quote, "have a dream and work hard to achieve that dream."















two and a half years, feb. 2001 to aug. 2003, have completely disappeared, like the two months the weapons inspectors were in iraq just before bush invaded. those inspectors that bush claimed saddam "wouldn't let in", so he had to invade. bush's job creation rate is not enough to keep even with population growth. fox in wonderland.
... I really hope this 'cut-and-run' slogan goes away. Where're the Republicans when it came to Katrina? Did they cut-and-run...oh yeah, they just showed up really late. 9/11? Oh yeah... they just showed up late on that one too...
Republicans: "Better Late Than Never!" Hmmmm... I have to work on that. How about "Clearing Brush While the World Burns!"... Nah...
Proving once again how "fair and balanced" FOX is they feature creature Ann Coulter today on Gibson's "Big Story."
[link to www.eyesonfox.org]
BARTIROMO: So, with all that good news, the obvious question, of course, Chris, is: Well, if everything is going so well, how come the poll numbers are so weak?
I took a big bag of Republican talking points and "Good News" down to my bank today, and all I got from the teller was her 2 cents.
And I burned a buck fifty in gas to get there and back, so I'm out $1.48.
Could those "weak" poll numbers be a sign (or an omen, from the GOP P.O.V.) that Americans are starting to lean towards the reality based world?
They better start shoveling some more coal on that Good News Express.
... that nobody tells you.
FIRST, they never include the jobs LOST when Bush took office, over 3 million well-paying manufacturing jobs.
SECOND, they don't tell you that the jobs which have since replaced those good jobs are service sector jobs, paying 23% LESS than the jobs lost.
THIRD, they claim 80% of Americans are now interested in seeing Wall Street's DOW do well, but don't say that 60% of those are in mutual funds which do not enjoy the "trading" and "dividend payouts" of those who "play" the market in the top 20% of wealth holders. The DOW peaking means only that there is even MORE money being taken in by our wealthiest citizens, just another BONUS from Bush to his contributors.
FOURTH, they LIE about average wages going UP, when wages are actually going down or stagnated, while the COSTS of living are skyrocketing, which takes all American citizen's standard of living DOWN. When necessities like gas and school tuition and heating oil and local taxes are skyrocketing, there is much less left of every paycheck for the working man (while the wealthy are cashing in on these bonanzas.)
FIFTH, like Reagan, any hint of "prosperity" or "growth" in America is an ILLUSION, because it is paid for dollar to dollar with BORROWING, which creates the false impression of progress. Like the guy with a new credit card, he can make purchases like a RICH guy for a while, until the bills come due.
SIXTH, they never report that holders of mutual funds took a huge hit (lost as much as 60% of their savings) when Bush took office. These losses have NEVER come back, which means of course that these Americans (most of that 80%) started out much worse off than before Bush took office.
Every day, in every way, the Bush Administration has worked HARD at one thing only: Looting America to give much more wealth to the already wealthy. That IT, that's their entire "economic plan" -- and it has worked tremendously. They are a success, at that ONE THING. The REST of America declines steadily.
According to the Dept of Labor, the economy needs approx. 210,00o new jobs created each month to break even.In other words to off-set layoffs,firings,jobs going over seas,downsizing etc, 210,000 is the approx. breakeven number. Take 210,00 times it by 39 months (since Aug,o3) equals 8,190,000,Bush was gushing all over himself ballyhooing 6,600,ooo new jobs. But he forgot, or didn't know how to subtract, the breakeven number from the actual number which leaves him in the hole by 1,900,000 . Why is Aug 03,Bushs beginning point? What happened between Jan 01 till Aug 03? Oh that's right there was a net loss of 2,600,000 jobs! So in order to get the right picture you have to times 210,00 by 68,which equals 14,280,00, breakeven number. Then add 2,600,ooo( Jan 01-Jul03) to 1,900,00 =4,500,o00=jobs lost since Jan 01. Then take Bushs bragging number of 6,6oo,ooo new jobs created since Aug 03 and subtract 4,500,000 lost jobs from Bushs number of jobs created =2,10o,000 then divide by 68 = on avg 3,088 new jobs created each and every month since Jan 2001, by the Bush Job Machine!
Anytime any of the Bushites are shown actual figures, they say "9-11 happened" and the interviewer lets them off the hook.
Correct if I'm wrong,it's still dark out side,and will be till the Faux Texas Cowboy wonders off in the sunset!
Or you could look at it this way, Bush has created on average ,60 new jobs per month,per state since Jan 01
but 2,600,000/68/50 works out to 765 0n mine. Not a great number, but over 12x the number you tout.
try 3,200,000/68/50 = 941 (15x your number)