About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Mary Snow falsely characterized debate over campaign ad as "he said, she said"

October 27, 2006 5:40 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

3 Comments

On the October 26 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, correspondent Mary Snow uncritically reported a claim in an advertisement by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) that Democrat Michael Arcuri, who is running to replace retiring Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), "billed taxpayers for a call to a phone sex hotline." Snow then stated, "Arcuri says the number was on a phone bill because an aide called a sex hotline by mistake that had similar digits to a government office," but she failed to point out that Arcuri has released records that back up his claim and that Arcuri's Republican opponent has denounced the ad.

By contrast articles (here and here) in the Utica Observer-Dispatch reported the evidence Arcuri has released and cited criticism the ad has received:

  • Arcuri has released phone logs "showing that a number with the same last seven digits, but a 518 area code, was made one minute after the 800 number" to the phone sex hotline was called and that the "518-457-8462 number goes to the state Department of Criminal Justice Services." The record of both calls reportedly appeared on a hotel bill.
  • Four television stations in the targeted media market have refused to run the ad, including WUTR, which cited the fact that "their verification didn't support the position that they could make this claim" against Arcuri.
  • Republican Raymond Meier, Arcuri's opponent, called the ad "way over the line" and demanded that "it be dropped."

From the October 26 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:

SNOW: It's independent political groups, say observers, that go where candidates don't want to tread, in advertisements that are seemingly negative each season.

EVAN TRACEY (TNS Media Intelligence): These groups can really engage on issues that sometimes the campaigns just have to stay away from because they're too hot to handle.

SNOW: Case in point, this ad in New York's 24th District.

WOMAN [video clip]: Hi, sexy. You've reached the live one-on-one fantasy line.

SNOW: The National Republican Congressional Committee stands by its $10,000 ad that targets Democrat Michael Arcuri, claiming he billed taxpayers for a call to a phone-sex hotline.

Arcuri says the number was on a phone bill because an aide called a sex hot line by mistake that had similar digits to a government office. Arcuri's office says he hasn't ruled out filing a lawsuit over the ad, and his Republican challenger, Raymond Meier, has distanced himself from the NRCC and the ad.

With such loud protests over these ads, why are thousands of dollars being spent to make them?

TRACEY: If they didn't work, campaigns wouldn't use them. This is the time that every campaign that's trailing or every campaign that's trying to put an opponent away will generally try and get one ad out there on the air that they think is the silver bullet.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by redking75687 (October 27, 2006 9:24 pm ET)
         

      This is how our wonderful press reports an election...no mention of issues, just the big Party soap opera. Maybe that's because all the newspeople are just failed actors and not journalists, only hired because they look half-good on camera, with not a brain cell or a hint of conscience between them.

      Good luck, America...you're ruled by psychos and morons. We're gonna need all the luck we can get.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (October 29, 2006 1:06 am ET)
         

      with nice haircuts, Redking.And most of them have families and go to church and like puppies and freedom and don't like higher taxes or crime.

      And that's all the average voter needs to check a box and flip on the football game.

      There's slime on both sides, but this ad is so twisted and (I believe) debunked before it was made, I can't believe they got this aired.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by redking75687 (October 30, 2006 3:03 pm ET)
           

        Did you know that political ads are the third largest source of revenue for the TV industry? They don't vett ads, they just take the money. That's why they're so kissy-kissy with the Dems and Repubs...they always suck up to big advertising clients.

        Personally, I think the key to taking back the country is by bypassing TV advertising completely. Use other media to make noise and make the TV folk run after your story eventually. Use the enemy against themselves, fight him on grounds of your choosing, not his...Sun Tzu and the Art of War.

        We must think militarily about this political war of good versus evil. Our enemy are not intelligent, they are focused entirely on the tactical and not the strategic, their policies are unpopular...their vulnerabilities are everywhere.

        Only problem is that the opposition is very unorganized and also focused only on the tactical, with no long term planning. I've been keeping an eye on my state Green Party. There are pockets of support but the overall organization and strategy is lacking. I have to get more involved with them.

        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.