About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NY Times failed to inform readers who GOP consultant LaCivita really is

October 28, 2006 3:22 pm ET
image

SUMMARY: In an article about Sen. George Allen's attack on James Webb's novels, The New York Times quoted Chris LaCivita and identified him simply as "a consultant for the Allen campaign." In doing so, the Times ignored LaCivita's connections to several controversial Republican front groups, including Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth.

8 Comments

In an October 28 article on Sen. George Allen's (R-VA) recent attack on former Navy Secretary James Webb, Allen's Democratic opponent in the upcoming election, regarding novels Webb wrote years ago containing graphic passages, The New York Times quoted Chris LaCivita, "a consultant for the Allen campaign," saying: "Some of the references are simply disturbing and continue to show a pattern of disrespectful treatment of women." However, in identifying LaCivita simply as "a consultant for the Allen campaign," the Times ignored LaCivita's connections to several controversial Republican front groups, including the smear-mongering Swift Boat Veterans and POWs for Truth. The Times also failed to note LaCivita's connection to a scandal involving alleged Republican efforts to jam Democratic phone lines during an Election Day "get out the vote" operation in New Hampshire in 2002.

From the Times article:

In its latest attack, the Allen camp takes particular issue with the portrayal of women in Mr. Webb's novels, saying female characters are consistently "servile, subordinate, inept, incompetent, promiscuous, perverted, or some combination of these."

[...]

On Friday, Chris LaCivita, a consultant for the Allen campaign, issued a statement that Mr. Webb had extolled his experience as a writer "but has anyone really read what he has written?"

"Some of the references are simply disturbing and continue to show a pattern of disrespectful treatment of women," Mr. LaCivita said.

The Times, in reporting LaCivita's attack on Webb, might have noted that LaCivita was a paid consultant and media adviser to the Swift Boat Veterans in 2004, when LaCivita also worked for the DCI Group, a Republican strategy firm. In fact, it was the Times that, on August 25, 2004, highlighted LaCivita's involvement with the Swift Boat Veterans as one of the connections the group held to the Bush administration -- two of the partners at DCI Group had close connections to Bush and his 2000 presidential campaign. The Times also noted that LaCivita worked for the conservative lobbying organization Progress for America (PFA) -- he is the organization's executive director. PFA consistently stumps for the Bush administration on issues such as Social Security, judicial nominations, and the fight against terrorism, often through false and misleading TV ads. Additionally, LaCivita served as a consultant to USA Next, another Republican front group that supported the Bush administration's efforts to privatize Social Security and routinely attacked the AARP for its opposition to Social Security privatization.

LaCivita also served as political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee in 2002, and has been linked to a scandal in which, according to The Washington Post, Republican operatives in New Hampshire "allegedly tied up phone lines of Democrats and a firefighters union trying to turn out the vote in 2002." According to a June 8 Associated Press article , former Bush campaign official James Tobin "was sentenced last month to 10 months in prison on charges he helped plan the phone jamming. Tobin was convicted in December of two felony telephone harassment charges. He was acquitted of a third, more serious charge, of conspiring against voters rights." The AP article noted: "In 2002 Tobin was a regional political director for the Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee. Democrats are seeking testimony from Terry Nelson, Tobin's former RNC boss, and Chris LaCivita, Tobin's former NRSC boss."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by peet (October 28, 2006 4:44 pm ET)
         

      The NYT is obligated to give background on this character... if they are going to publish quotes from this guy playing the high-and-mighty card. Is it bias, or merely poor reporting? I think it's bias.

      I wonder what he thinks of O'Reilly's or Lynn Cheney's novels?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (October 28, 2006 4:58 pm ET)
           

        Maybe you've seen/heard this already...BUT in case you haven't Wolf Blitzer TRIED to get Lynne Cheney to talk about HER book

        He's a snippit & the link:

        BLITZER: Did you write a book entitled "Sisters"?

        CHENEY: I did write a book entitled "Sisters".

        BLITZER: It did have lesbian characters.

        CHENEY: This -- no, not necessarily. This description is a lie.

        I'll stand on that.

        BLITZER: There's nothing in there about rape and brothels?

        CHENEY: Well, Wolf, could we talk about a children's book for a minute?

        [link to www.huffingtonpost.com]

        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (October 28, 2006 6:08 pm ET)
             

          Here's the Amazon.com link for Mrs. C's out of print novel. Sounds like it's a little steamier than the author is willing to admit. Copies start at $299. There are also a few copies on ebay.

          [link to www.amazon.com]

          Here is what's printed on the back cover of the book. (Which I've cut and pasted from the Amazon link. wouldn't want anyone to accuse me of plagiarism.)

          "Sophie Dymond had overcome nineteenth-century prejudices to succeed as publisher of a hugely popular women's magazine. But when she left New York to revisit her native Wyoming, where her sister had died mysteriously, she left her prestige and power far behind. Waiting for Sophie was a world where women were treated either as decorative figurines or as abject sexual vassals...where wives were led to despise the marriage act and prostitutes pandered to husbands' hungers...where the relationship between women and men became a kind of guerilla warfare in which women were forced to band together for the strength they needed and at times for the love they wanted. In her effort to grasp the meaning of her sister's life and death, Sophie discovers the secret that tainted her life and begins to understand the experience of the vast majority of silent, trapped women."

          Report Abuse
    • Author by peet (October 28, 2006 5:03 pm ET)
         

      I love that. No wonder she and Dick are married. They suffer from the same sort of selective amnesia. Very funny stuff!

      It's that old cliche... if you're going to get up on the high ol' horse... you better be prepared for the long fall.

      I'm actually surprised Wolf had the cajones to confront a Cheney like that.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by peet (October 28, 2006 5:04 pm ET)
           

        ...thanks for the link Jeter!

        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeter2 (October 28, 2006 5:27 pm ET)
             

          It was TOO good not to share ;-)

          Of course Wolf ends up letting Miss Lynn off the hook, but that's par for the course. I'll give him an "A" for effort...and an "F" for follow through.

          Just to get back on topic, I agree with you that the NY Times, and of course ANY news organization has the duty to inform their readers/listeners about the background and/or connections of any source or spokesperson for a political candidate if they plan on interviewing or quoting them about a story/situation. That should be a no-brainer. It looks deceitful otherwise.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (October 28, 2006 11:59 pm ET)
         

      is one thing, like Billdo's crack dealer teen sex book, but I think you have to cut people some slack for autobiographical stuff.

      "where wives were led to despise the marriage act and prostitutes pandered to husbands' hungers..."

      I can understand Mrs. Cheney's writing on this subject.It's gotta be tough to get your freak on with the Penguin, and then watch him being gushed over by those tarts Hannity, Rush, O'Reilly...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne (October 29, 2006 3:52 pm ET)
         

      I can understand Mrs. Cheney's writing on this subject.It's gotta be tough to get your freak on with the Penguin, and then watch him being gushed over by those tarts Hannity, Rush, O'Reilly...

      - HuntingtonBeachLefty / Saturday October 28, 2006 11:59:15 PM EST - Reply to this comment / Flag this comment

      ____________________________________________

      THAT is just too funny!

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.