About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Beck, Mowbray tag-teamed to bash Pelosi; Beck compared Santorum to Churchill

October 31, 2006 5:35 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Glenn Beck and conservative columnist Joel Mowbray agreed that the media's purportedly positive treatment of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi is the result of a "quintessential media bias." At one point during their discussion, Mowbray claimed that Pelosi's face would make "the best mask" for Halloween because of "years and years of plastic surgery."

27 Comments

On the October 30 edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck, Beck and conservative columnist Joel Mowbray -- who was labeled simply as a "syndicated columnist" despite his columns' appearing in the conservative Townhall.com -- agreed that the media's purportedly positive treatment of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA) is the result of a "quintessential media bias." Beck and Mowbray then proceeded to smear Pelosi, with Mowbray at one point claiming that Pelosi's face would make "the best mask" for Halloween because of "years and years of plastic surgery" and Beck baselessly claiming that the media have not presented Pelosi in a manner comparable to their presentation of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) in 1994. Beck, who claimed he is "not a Republican" days after saying he "mostly vote[s] Republican," also focused the first part of a weeklong series called "Vote American" on Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), whom Beck compared to former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

Beck teased the segment on Pelosi by saying, "God help me, she could be the next speaker of the House" and then claimed that Pelosi has "already been appointed the role" of speaker because "the media has such a political agenda when it comes to the elections, they're just not able to hide it at this point." Beck claimed that the media's depiction of Pelosi differed profoundly from how the media portrayed Gingrich in 1994 and that "you'd think that the media would describe her like they did Newt Gingrich, as ruthless, authoritarian, casually reckless." In fact, in 1994, Gingrich was treated in a manner similar to the way Pelosi is treated now, as Media Matters for America documented after the October 23 edition of ABC News' political newsletter The Note similarly predicted that in the two weeks leading up to the November midterm elections, the "(liberal) Old Media" will "[g]lowingly profile" Pelosi, but "fail to describe her as 'ultra liberal' or 'an extreme liberal,' which would mirror the way Gingrich was painted twelve years ago."

During the segment, Mowbray claimed that despite descriptions "that her staff gives of her, as a grandmother who loves to bake," Pelosi is actually a "ruthless tactician who will punish anyone and cut off certain parts of their body if they don't do as she says." Beck added that in the "regular corporate world," Pelosi would be "ripped to shreds" and would be called the "b-word." Mowbray agreed and claimed that "she actually is" called the "b-word" "inside the Democratic caucus on the Hill." At the end of the segment, Mowbray claimed: "Well, I think it's kind of appropriate we're discussing this on the eve of Halloween. I think, actually, the best mask to have out there would be a Nancy Pelosi mask. And you wouldn't have to do anything that is like a character with it. You would just do a lifelike re-creation of her face. It's very scary! She always looks surprised. I think that's actually the result of years and years of plastic surgery."

The segment on Pelosi came after Beck devoted two segments to interviewing Santorum. During the interview, Beck claimed Santorum "may just be the Winston Churchill of our day, a guy who is willing to stand up for what he believes" and predicted that "tomorrow ... I'm going to be ripped apart for calling you Churchill." As Media Matters noted (here, here, and here) Beck has frequently attempted to cast himself as nonpartisan, while forwarding Republican talking points.

From the October 30 edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: OK. First of all, I've got to tell you, Mark.

MARK HALPERIN (ABC News political director): I know, you're not a Republican.

BECK: I'm not. I'm a conservative.

HALPERIN: You're a conservative.

BECK: But you say that like you're dismissing me. There's a huge difference.

[...]

BECK: Coming up, we kick off our weeklong election series called "Vote American." Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania joins me, and I've got to tell you, he makes an awful lot of sense to me.

Also, "The Real Story" on Nancy Pelosi. God help me, she could be the next speaker of the House. So why is her radical record being glossed over?

[...]

BECK: Unless you've been living under a rock, you probably couldn't help but notice that Nancy Pelosi is finally the new speaker of the House. Yeah, what? What? She's not the speaker yet? Oh, that's a technicality. We need the elections first. Honestly, isn't that the way it feels?

Somehow or another, she's already been appointed to the role, but have you asked yourself, "Why does it feel that way?" Well, it's because the real story is the media has such a political agenda when it comes to the elections, they're just not able to hide it at this point. Nancy Pelosi has publicly said that President Bush is not a leader, has no judgment, is incompetent, that the Republicans are immoral and corrupt, and they are, quote, "running a criminal enterprise."

She's someone who's supposed to unite us? Of course not. She doesn't care about unity, and she fully admits that she is 100 percent partisan. And she forces members to vote with the party if they want to stay in her good graces. And you know what? It's worked.

She has gotten Democrats to vote together 88 percent of the time. That is the most since Eisenhower was president. But given all of that, you'd think that the media would describe her like they did Newt Gingrich, as ruthless, authoritarian, casually reckless. No, no, no. According to the media, Nancy Pelosi is simply tough-minded tactician who has brought order to the Democrats.

[...]

BECK: Joel Mowbray, he is a nationally syndicated columnist who has been covering many of the House races. Joel, the way the media is treating Nancy Pelosi, quintessential media bias?

MOWBRAY: Yeah, I'd say so. Look, they want to have a female speaker of the House. They love the description that her staff gives of her, as a grandmother who loves to bake, not the ruthless tactician who will punish anyone and cut off certain parts of their body if they don't do as she says.

BECK: You know, I was reading this weekend an op-ed piece in the New York Post, and it had the quotes that -- what they used to say about Newt Gingrich, nothing anywhere close to Nancy Pelosi. And what's interesting is, if she were in just a regular corporate world, she'd be ripped to shreds. Because she's a woman, every woman who's in business will tell you, if you're tough, you're immediately the b-word. Not her. She's a grandma! How's that possible, without bias?

MOWBRAY: Well, she actually she is, I think, inside the Democratic caucus on the Hill -- I mean, I used to work on the Hill. I remember that word was tossed around to describe her from time to time.

BECK: Oh, this is not necessary.

MOWBRAY: Well, no, no, I'm just saying, but that's what you hear from other Democrats. And I actually just mean that as a serious comment.

And the Democrats don't particularly like her, but they do respect her. She is a very skillful leader, and she's done a heck of a job in holding the Democrats together. I'd actually compare her not to Newt Gingrich but rather to Tom DeLay, the Hammer. This kind of ruthless efficiency, you haven't seen in a long -- you know, since he left the Hill.

I think that she is someone who's done a great job. And, you know, look, she's held the Democrats together. But she's also a very scary face.

[...]

BECK: So let me take you to the future. If she becomes the speaker, doesn't this actually work to the advantage -- if the Republicans could actually cash in on this, doesn't she become -- isn't she the face that everybody really is frightened of, on the conservative side?

MOWBRAY: Well, I think it's kind of appropriate we're discussing this on the eve of Halloween. I think, actually, the best mask to have out there would be a Nancy Pelosi mask. And you wouldn't have to do anything that is like a character with it. You would just do a lifelike re-creation of her face. It's very scary. She always looks surprised. I think that's actually the result of years and years of plastic surgery.

[...]

BECK: Senator Rick Santorum from Pennsylvania may just be the Winston Churchill of our day, a guy who is willing to stand up for what he believes, because he knows it's just too darn important to ignore. The only question is whether voters will stand up with him.

[...]

BECK: Back with Senator Rick Santorum. Senator, tomorrow you're going to be ripped apart for being on this program. I'm going to be ripped apart for calling you Churchill. But --

SANTORUM: It'll be a pleasure.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (October 31, 2006 5:39 pm ET)
         

      Wait a minute while I get up off the floor and try to stop laughing......................................................................... ...................................................................................... ...............forget it, this is gonna take me a while to compose myself.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Wes1 (October 31, 2006 5:43 pm ET)
         

      Beck is a non-partisan so there's no basis for pointing this out as conservative misinformation.

      OK before you slay me, this was Tommy's position last week, not mine.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (October 31, 2006 5:43 pm ET)
         

      Are they talking about We-Found-the-WMD Santorum? The guy is a joke, a knuckledragging troglodyte family-values evangelical phony. I knew Winston Churchill...Winston Churchill was a friend of mine...and Rick Santorum is no Winston Churchill.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (October 31, 2006 5:47 pm ET)
         

      That's all I can say. WTF?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (October 31, 2006 5:48 pm ET)
         

      BECK: Senator Rick Santorum from Pennsylvania may just be the Winston Churchill of our day, a guy who is willing to stand up for what he believes, because he knows it's just too darn important to ignore.

      Beck is right. The fearsome specter of unrestrained man-on-dog sex is far too important for us to ignore. If Churchill were alive today, I am certain he would be standing up to defend us against interspecies sex because it is such an important, pressing concern.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 31, 2006 6:13 pm ET)
           

        Yes... think about their poor children.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by mescal (November 01, 2006 3:41 am ET)
             

          Oh, come on nowIrony. Get real.

          When was the last time that wingnuts like these gave a SH*T about poor children?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (October 31, 2006 6:04 pm ET)
         

      Where does Beck get his 'opinion'? He claims he's not partisan and merely a 'conservative'... But, he spends an awful lot of his show tearing her down.

      Can someone send me some links to prove that the media is actually giving Pelosi this amazing red carpet treatment as Beck claims? Democrats "don't particularly like her"? Come on... Methinks these guys are lying.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by dangrady (October 31, 2006 6:19 pm ET)
         

      Senator Rick Santorum from Pennsylvania may just be the Winston Churchill of our day, a guy who is willing to stand up for what he believes, because he knows it's just too darn important to ignore. The only question is whether voters will stand up with him. // Beck

      Ok; proof positive the man is a moron.

      What else is to be said, if you get your guidance from this twit, you need to stop what your doing and go back to the second grade and finish what you started.

      Happy Thoughts;

      Dan Grady

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (October 31, 2006 7:52 pm ET)
         

      Yeah, Nancy is trouble but familes what your boys around the republican house speaker. Remember Mark Foley?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Watcher_IL (October 31, 2006 8:04 pm ET)
         

      Has Rick Santorum done that deserves elevation to Churchillian heights? Wrote a book defending marriage from a fictitious assault that exists only in his and every other right wing psychopath's mind? Standing in the background of every group photo of Republican Congressional leadership?

      I think Winston Churchill did a few things that were more noteworthy.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by solon (October 31, 2006 8:10 pm ET)
         

      In that they are the same species. About like the way Sean Hannity is like Albert Einstiein

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (October 31, 2006 8:46 pm ET)
         

      ever say to British subjects during the Blitz, "buy my bumper sticker and it will be the equivalent of fighting Hitler on the front lines"?

      Somehow, I'm having trouble imagining that . . .

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Brabantio (October 31, 2006 9:22 pm ET)
         

      Well..based on what she said...yes.

      What we have here is a failed president who doesn't represent the interests of hardly anyone outside his inner circle and the fringe elements. Iraq? Not popular and only getting worse. Social security privatization? Crash and burn. The "death tax"? Only applies to the very richest section. Vetoing stem cell research? At odds with the vast majority. Meddling in the Schiavo case? My God...

      So if only the moderate Republicans can take that stand as well, that he is not a leader, that he is incompetent, that his administration is corrupt, that the rubber-stampers in Congress allow him to run the the party like a mob...then we can be united. Put them in the margins where they belong instead of in the corridors of power. Hold the administration accountable. Demand paper trails in all elections. Support the Constitution and oppose torture. Show a little rationality.

      Otherwise, this cycle will only get more vicious. The Dems will be forced to adopt the same tactics, just in order to win. The rhetoric will go further over the edge in both directions. People will lose even more faith in the system. Or the Dems will continue on the same path, always at a political disadvantage because they don't march in such lockstep, they don't speak like bumper stickers as the population loses its attention span and the corporate media is too lazy and cowardly to explain the actual facts. And if the Dems can't win with Bush and his policies as unpopular at this point in time, how can they ever?

      The divisiveness is not because of mere ideology. We've always had major differences between the parties without this low level of discourse, and we've always had people on the fringe included in the national dialogue. The split is because of tactics and attitudes. It's become a world where right and wrong, true and false don't matter anymore, and the administration seems to believe it can get away with anything. We'll always have disagreements between the parties, but we can be united in our sense of fairness, reason, and accountability.

      And the question for people like Beck, who constantly push the rhetoric further and further to the right, is what are you doing to unite the country? What is your hope for this? That everyone will become a rabid conservative just like you?

      Our country deserves better.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (October 31, 2006 9:39 pm ET)
         

      Santorum to Professor Churchill is an insult to the Professor.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (October 31, 2006 9:43 pm ET)
         

      he was comparing the Little Dick to the professor from Colorado...I bad.

      P.S. IRONY 101...I feel the same way and I live in Pa.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by leatherhelmet (October 31, 2006 11:48 pm ET)
         

      Santorum to be like Churchill because Santorum recognizes the dangers of radical Islamists, unlike MMFA which supports the mysogeny of women.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (November 01, 2006 12:53 am ET)
           

        He considers him to be like Churchill because he recognizes the problem with Islam's attitude towards women?

        What the bloody hell are you talking about?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (November 01, 2006 4:44 am ET)
           

        Kucinich is like Ghandi because he doesnt want to keep getting as many Americans killed as possible like YOU do.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 01, 2006 9:56 am ET)
           

        because Beck is a stunningly stupid individual, and only people with even less ability to reason (I allude to you, Leatherhelmet) could possibly try to defend him.

        If Santorum had any character, or any kind of a grasp of history, he would have gracefully rejected Beck's comparison. "I appreciate the compliment, but no, please don't compare me to Churchill, that's out of my league altogether." Instead, Santorum just soaks it in as though he really was worthy of that honor. Ugh.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by mescal (November 01, 2006 4:00 am ET)
         

      If you can just get past their obvious disimilarities in appearance, intellect, character, education, bearing, humor, charisma, wit, perseverance, & stature, you're still left with one powerful, undeniable similarity.

      Their hair is nearly identical.

      What's that? Churchill was bald?

      Oh, f*ck it. What the hell was I thinking, anyway?

      And, more importantly, what the f*ck WAS that mouth-breathing dullard Beck talking about?

      No, seriously... can someone tell me what the f*ck Beck was talking about?

      Anyone?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by moe (November 01, 2006 6:02 am ET)
         

      I've wondered why people like Beck have avoided military service while cheer leading from the sidelines. After all this is WWIII. Then while watching him compare Churchill to Santorum it finally hit me. The guy is simply too dumb to be carrying a weapon. Santorum is like Churchill because he stands up for what he believes?

      CNN - Who are you going to give a show to next...Chuckles the Clown? I say give Glenn a red nose and big floppy shoes and call it good.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ethelouise1 (November 01, 2006 9:05 am ET)
         

      I just have to say that when Bush annouced his new secrectary of state Condoleezza Rice he said she was the new 'face' of America. Then the 'catty' remark about Nancy's face 'having some work done'. Well at least when can look at her without screaming. Condoleezza Rice is so ugly she could make a freight train take a dirt road. She looks like a gunshot victim without reconstructive surgery. Please let's not get into 'faces', then we would have to talk about all the work Katherine Harris has had done...

      Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (November 01, 2006 10:00 am ET)
         

      and I am still laughing....this is a Gold Medal winner

      Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (November 01, 2006 12:55 pm ET)
         

      considering that both of them were/are drunks.

      THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dangrady (November 01, 2006 7:22 pm ET)
           

        Hey!! The cognac, scotch and Cuban cigars are not Republican, or just for Churchill!!

        Nothing wrong with a fine single malt and a fine Cubano, baby! Thats livin, man..

        Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 01, 2006 9:12 pm ET)
         

      misspoke. He meant Ward (not Winston) Churchill.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Most Popular Tags

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace