Contrasting Steele and Ford, Matthews asserted "unthreatening" Steele is a "gentleman of the first order" and later endorsed him
SUMMARY: During MSNBC's Battleground America coverage, Chris Matthews stated that Tennessee Democratic Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr. is "not as good a candidate as [Maryland Republican Senate candidate] Michael Steele," citing an incident in which Ford approached his opponent outside a campaign event. Matthews compared this to a 2000 presidential debate in which Al Gore approached George W. Bush; Matthews said Gore was "being a fool" and "a dork" for doing so. However, in a 2002 book, Matthews wrote that Gore "turned in his best performance" during that debate.
During the 2 p.m. ET hour of the November 5 edition of MSNBC's Decision 2006: Battleground America, Hardball host Chris Matthews called Maryland Republican Senate candidate Michael Steele, who is African-American, "a gentleman of the first order" who is "unthreatening," a comment that Matthews described as "so ethnic." Later on the same day's edition of Hardball, Matthews stated: "I do think it'd be great if Michael Steele pulled it off because I think he's up against so much," despite the fact that he believed Steele to be "vapid in his presentation."
During the discussion on Battleground America, Matthews joined fellow MSNBC host Joe Scarborough in comparing Steele with Tennessee Senate candidate Harold Ford Jr., a Democrat and also an African-American. Matthews claimed that Ford is "not as good a candidate as Michael Steele" because of an instance in which Ford confronted Republican candidate Bob Corker at a Corker event. Matthews said Ford's confrontation with Corker was the same as when "Al Gore did this to George W. Bush," an apparent reference to a 2000 presidential debate in which Gore approached Bush. Matthews added of Gore: "He thought he was being tough. He was being a fool. And we pity the fool, as we say in this country. We don't vote for the fool." Matthews also claimed that Gore was "a dork" for standing "face to face" with Bush. But while covering the debates in 2000, Matthews praised Gore's performance. Moreover, the weblog The Daily Howler noted that Matthews, in his book Now, Let Me Tell You What I Really Think (Free Press, 2002), said the third debate, in which Gore approached Bush, was when Gore "turned in his best performance."
During a discussion of the third Gore-Bush debate on the October 18, 2000, edition of NBC's Today with co-host Matt Lauer, Matthews praised Gore's performance and seemed surprised that polling indicated the voters preferred Bush:
LAUER: So, OK, so now that we have that difference drawn, who won the debate?
MATTHEWS: Well, I think Gore was more aggressive last night, and you look at all the polls, he won on a couple of points there. But clearly the interesting question again, who do you like? Bush won. It's interesting. People keep saying -- even the Bush people say Gore's good on the debate --
Similarly, in his book, Matthews said he agreed with the general reaction in the media about Gore's performance in the third debate and wrote that after "[w]atching the performance the night before, I, too, thought Gore had turned in his best performance" (Page 31). Matthews went on to note that after looking at polling of viewers' reactions, it was clear they "took away an impression of negativity and condescension" (Page 32). But despite claiming in his book that Gore "turned in his best performance" in the third debate, and despite reporting on Today that "Gore was more aggressive" than Bush and that Gore "won a couple of points there," Matthews nevertheless claimed on November 5 that Gore was "a dork" and "being a fool" by confronting Bush in the debate.
As Media Matters for America has noted, Matthews has a history of praising Republicans and smearing Democrats.
From the 2 p.m. ET hour of the November 5 edition of MSNBC's Decision 2006: Battleground America:
MATTHEWS: Thank God in Maryland, thank God in Maryland -- I completely join your sentiments on that. Neither of us are African-American, but I must say, it must get to people in Prince George's County and in Baltimore after years of Democratic rule, when do they get a piece of the pie? And I think you voiced it very well, whether that's the sentiments of those communities or not.
But Michael Steele has ran a first-rate campaign. He's a gentleman of the first order. You talk about meeting -- I've met him at so many football games and baseball games, and he's always great to hang around with him, but that's all I really know about him. But the commercials have been so positive. He's so -- I hate to say this because this sounds so damn ethnic -- unthreatening, which a lot of white voters like to see from an African-American. Unthreatening. You almost have to be castrated to take the fear away from some people. And this guy comes on as a funny guy, a lighthearted, positive guy. And the people go, "God, this guy is a guy I'd like to have living next door," although that may be pushing it in some cases.
[crosstalk]
SCARBOROUGH: Well, I would have played that up, though.
MATTHEWS: So I have to tell you, we have an ethnic problem in this country.
SCARBOROUGH: Right.
MATTHEWS: And it's coming to the fore, this race problem we have.
SCARBOROUGH: And isn't that the problem with Harold Ford? I have worked with Harold Ford.
MATTHEWS: He's not as good a candidate as Michael Steele.
SCARBOROUGH: I like Harold Ford so much. He reached across the aisle. He was a moderate man. I think he's got a real future in the Democratic Party. But I was thinking when he got off of that bus and he challenged Corker and he got in his face, I thought, "Oh, my God, Harold, you're going to cost yourself the race" because white voters who were trying to put 100 or 200 years of prejudice behind them are going to be offended by that. And I don't think that's oversimplifying.
MATTHEWS: Because the voters, especially male voters, white voters if you will, are worried, "Hey, I'm going to get in a road-rage situation with somebody, accidentally cut off, and all of a sudden he's ticked off at everything else in the world and I'm the target that day." So this guy walks up to the guy -- hey, Al Gore did this to George W. Bush. I will never forget it. It was ludicrous. He walked up to him in that final debate and stood two feet from him. Americans want distance from each other. We're not like Arabic people that talk into each other's faces so you know what they had for dinner. We don't talk like that. We want two to three feet from the other guy.
[crosstalk]
SCARBOROUGH: Right. And it's like [New York Republican Senate candidate Rick] Lazio and [Sen. Hillary Rodham] Clinton [D-NY].
MATTHEWS: And when you walk up to another guy and you stand face to face, you're a dork. And that's what happened to Al Gore that night.
SCARBOROUGH: Yup. Right.
MATTHEWS: I swear he lost the election. By the way, the Bush people tell me they were rehearsing this. They knew Gore was going to pull it. And so they catch him coming up, and Bush did that up and down on him -- remember that look -- up and down on Gore like, "What kind of a jackass are you?" And Gore just that moment, I swear, threw it away. He thought he was being tough. He was being a fool. And we pity the fool, as we say in this country. We don't vote for the fool.
SCARBOROUGH: Right. We pity the fool. That's right. Mr. T., the political analyst.
MATTHEWS: That's Mr. T. But it's so true. It is so true.
[crosstalk]
SCARBOROUGH: And I bring up the point about Harold Ford walking up to Corker because he talked about Michael Steele.
MATTHEWS: Oh yeah. He looked like he was serving him -- you know who else did that?
SCARBOROUGH: You talked about Michael Steele being -- not being threatening in Maryland. If you're an African-American unfortunately and in this country you're running for office, below the Mason-Dixon Line, you've got to be so careful, extra careful. And Harold Ford, I don't think was.
MATTHEWS: Hey, how about above the Mason-Dixon Line? Up above the Mason-Dixon Line, you've got to either have won a war or be a Harvard lawyer with, you know, a 5.0 in college and look like a million bucks, and then maybe they'll make you governor. I mean, the standards are so frickin' high if you're a black in this country to get elected. And if you make one mistake, goodbye. That's the permission slip for a lot of people. "Goodbye. You had your shot, buddy." So we've got [Democratic gubernatorial candidate] Deval Patrick up in Massachusetts, just on this ethnic front. Michael Steele is making the run of the century. If he pulls this off in Democratic Maryland, liberal Maryland, anti-Bush Maryland, and he's running on a ticket -- Republican ticket. It's astounding he can pull this off, astounding. I don't think -- I think it's almost -- well, I don't want to take it away from the guy. Let's see what happens. Let's see what happens.
SCARBOROUGH: We'll see what happens. Yeah, I would be stunned, too, especially 2006, where Republicans have so mishandled spending, the war in Iraq, and just about everything they've put their hands on. Hey, Chris Matthews, thanks so much for being with us.
From the November 5 edition of MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews:
MATTHEWS: I'm a romantic, I do think it'd be great if Michael Steele pulled it off because I think he's up against so much. A party, a state -- everything says don't run. He ran.
RON CHRISTIE (former special assistant to President Bush): And he would do so much for the United States Senate.
MATTHEWS: But I agree with him [Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson], he's vapid in his presentation.















The man is so psychotic. Everything out of his mouth is complete garbage
Scarborough and Matthews are babbling like they've been up for 48 straight hours. What a bunch of nonsense.
Like Haggard isn't the only meth freak. I think both Scarborough and Matthews might be dipping into Haggard's stash.
The sad and scary things is that they usually always babble like they've been up for forty-eight hours straight. A lot of the time it sounds like they've been up for forty-eight years straight. With no bathroom breaks. And they usually look like it as well.
THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com
I mean, he'll babble on and on, and occasionally make a good point, and then five minutes later he'll completely contradict himself.
Does anything ever connect in a cohesive way with him, or is he just constantly and always talking off the top of his head? It would be OK if he were thinking out loud, but I don't think that's the word for it.
Are these guys for real?
were to go back to school, possibly study some theory, experience a little outside of the circle that makes him comfortable, I think he could change for the better. That is saying a lot because for many of the NEOCON mouthpieces, I think it is too late.
For instance,
SCARBOROUGH: I like Harold Ford so much. He reached across the aisle. He was a moderate man. I think he's got a real future in the Democratic Party. But I was thinking when he got off of that bus and he challenged Corker and he got in his face, I thought, "Oh, my God, Harold, you're going to cost yourself the race" because white voters who were trying to put 100 or 200 years of prejudice behind them are going to be offended by that. And I don't think that's oversimplifying.
Scarborough clearly demonstrates that he understands white (racist ones, not all white) voters by knowing that a black man will always come off appearing threatening if he asserts himself, even though that type of assertion from a white counterpart will be deemed assertive (good) if from someone like Trent Lott. However, where Scarborough goes wrong and loses the moral high ground is refusing to see how regardless if that is the way the white voter sees it, it is racist and should be discouraged by pointing it out.
Other Neocons are not even able to bring the thought to a conscious level, they simply react on the knee jerk. The way Matthews does here:
Americans want distance from each other. We're not like Arabic people that talk into each other's faces so you know what they had for dinner. We don't talk like that. We want two to three feet from the other guy.
He, by instinct goes from America's desire for space (more like the desire to invade space, see SUVs) to insulting Arabics.
Scarborough actually seems to think about stuff, despite remaining a voice for his party.
I sometimes think that Matthews, on the other hand, displays all the symtoms of both schizophrnia (split off from reality) and multiple-personality disorder. Between the conditions, who could possibly know what he really thinks? I"m thinking that maybe one of his personalities is schizophrenic...
Just joking. A minor in psychology 37 years ago is hardly the basis for a reasoned opinion...
"I"m thinking that maybe one of his personalities is schizophrenic..."
I went back and read every single word so I would not miss anything (again). Matthews flips back and forth, grabbing allusions here, throwing them around there.
He does seem schizophrenic.
How the camera people's eyes must roll.
they are.
THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com
I just can't believe Mathews is ignoring the issues and basing his endorsement on the candidates' body language. It's just so unlike his usual cerebral self.
the Rush Limbaugh School of Impressionistic Body Language Journalism.
"School OF Journalism."
"damn ethnic -- unthreatening, which a lot of white voters like to see from an African-American"
=========================================
What a racist piece of BS and from the color blind Republicans. This illustrates that the rules are different for Blacks. The Republican Party is chocked full of mean-spirited in your face bullies and they're considered tough, if Black politicians act like this then they are considered threatening. I can't even believe that Chris Mattews formed his lips to say this racist BS.
Why does Chris Matthews get to speak for what "white voters" want? Categorizing people based on color is utterly ridiculous.
I totally skipped passed that, I was so focused on Scarbourough. WOW! And I thought the part that Matthews compared Americas of invading space to Arabics bad. That phrase is just plain racist (open and shut). Yet who will call him on it?
It makes me think of all the black males that were used on sitcoms. Always the non threatening type, Steve Irkel, Gary Coleman (he was small), Webster (he was small)........
definetly let you see into his soul with these statements. Chris Matthews seemed quite fund of the bully Tom Delay who was essentially the king of a Republican legislative crime ring.
the inanity.
"He's so -- I hate to say this because this sounds so damn ethnic -- unthreatening, which a lot of white voters like to see from an African-American."...Chris Matthews
=====
No Chris it sounds SO damn racist.
I couldn't put my finger on what sounded so weird about Tweety's construction there. I think you're right - he meant to say "racist" instead of "ethnic."
I lived in the state of Maryland, I did not vote for Steele, and Chris Matthews is full of BS