About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

ABC, NBC morning shows suggested -- contrary to administration statements -- that Bush will reconsider Iraq policy

November 07, 2006 1:15 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

11 Comments

On the November 7 edition of ABC's Good Morning America, ABC chief White House correspondent Martha Raddatz baselessly asserted that President Bush "will likely reassess what is happening with his policy in Iraq" because "he does not want this to be an issue in 2008." Similarly on the November 7 edition of NBC's Today, NBC special correspondent Tom Brokaw uncritically aired part of an October 26 press conference in which Bush claimed to be "not satisfied with the situation in Iraq" and added that "we're taking new steps to help secure Baghdad." In fact, more recent statements by Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have indicated that the Bush administration has no plans to change its policy in Iraq.

As the Associated Press reported on November 1, Bush said in an interview that "he did not foresee a change in the immediate future in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq" and he also "replied in the affirmative" that he wants Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld "to stay with him until the end." Conflicting directly with his October 26 statement aired on Today, Bush said about Rumsfeld's work on changing the military and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan: "I'm pleased with the progress we're making." Neither Raddatz nor Brokaw noted this. Indeed, Bush's promise to keep Rumsfeld as defense secretary through 2009 appears to have been reported less widely than other stories in the media. In a November 1-4 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press poll, 60 percent of respondents reported that they had heard "a lot" about "John Kerry's recent comments that critics said insulted U.S. troops in Iraq, which he described as 'a botched joke,' " while 26 percent of respondents reported that they had heard "a lot" about "President Bush's announcement that he will keep Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense until he leaves office in 2009."

Cheney himself refuted the suggestion -- such as that articulated by Raddatz -- that the administration's policy going forward would reflect voter concerns. When asked "if the vote on Tuesday [will] have any effect on the president's Iraq policy," Cheney replied that "the president has made clear what his objective is, it's victory in Iraq. And full speed ahead on that basis, and that's exactly what we're going to do." In the same interview, as Media Matters noted, Cheney claimed that the administration doesn't "make decisions based on the polls ... based on pundits on television, or whether or not it's popular" even though Media Matters has documented numerous instances in which the administration has reportedly timed events or made policy decisions in Iraq based on political considerations.

From the November 7 edition of ABC's Good Morning America:

RADDATZ: But he finished up his campaigning in Texas last night with his very simple message: Stick with us and the country will be better off. As you know, this has been a referendum on the president this election. Some candidates not wanting to appear with the president because of the war in Iraq. The president will likely reassess what is happening with his policy in Iraq. He does not want this to be an issue in 2008. And, for more on the 2008 race, we go to [White House correspondent] Kate Snow in Chappaqua, N.Y.

From the November 7 edition of NBC's Today:

BROKAW: Gas prices, health care, housing cost, immigration, gay marriage, and the war. Always the war.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN [video clip]: If they need to be over there fighting right now, then we need to support them, even if we don't necessarily agree with war.

BROKAW: Iraq has divided this country deeply. Where is the war taking us? What happened to "stay the course"?

BUSH [video clip]: I know many Americans are not satisfied with the situation in Iraq. I'm not satisfied either. And that is why we're taking new steps to help secure Baghdad.

BROKAW: Even longtime Republicans see this election as a vote up or down on those who thought the war was a good idea.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (November 07, 2006 1:33 pm ET)
         

      There is no misinformation, spin, or any other media bias issue here. A reporter says Bush will most likely reconsider his Iraq policy and that qualifies for mention here? Not only is it incredibly weak, but factually "most likely" correct.

      If Bush loses the House, he will have no choice but to reconsider Iraq - no brainer there.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (November 07, 2006 1:57 pm ET)
           

        On Saturday, ABC's news zipper on Broadway repeated all day long that Dick Cheney said that regardless of how the elections turn out and regardless of how the citizens feel, it will not change the administrations war policies in Iraq.

        What has changed since Saturday? Isn't MMFA saying that ABC's reporter is saying that because of the election results the administration is going to have to reassess their policy? For a network to say one thing Saturday and contradict their statement on Wednesday could be construed as misinformation.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by ChristianDemocrat (November 07, 2006 2:03 pm ET)
           

        Based on what (other than your own gut feel)?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (November 07, 2006 2:03 pm ET)
           

        The reporter has no basis for saying "likely". It is contrary to statments by Bush himself--and Cheney. It's misinformation, plain and simple. It's there for anyone to see, except those that pretend not to see it.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (November 07, 2006 2:15 pm ET)
             

          If that's all the conservative misinformation you've got in your arsenal on Election Day, well.........let's just say that if you are getting drunk on that "whine" today, you will have a huge hangover tomorrow.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by dave_chicago (November 07, 2006 2:56 pm ET)
               

            >>"If that's all the conservative misinformation you've got..."<<

            Only the tip of the iceberg--or toe of the elephant.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by tommy (November 07, 2006 3:03 pm ET)
                 

              Check back in when you've found the iceberg or captured the elephant. This isn't even a snowflake or a gnat.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by Pragmatic Liberal (November 07, 2006 3:57 pm ET)
                   

                Bush NOT reconsidering his Iraq policy is at the crux of this campaign season. To suggest that he's going "change course" after all is to mitigate a lot of the ammunition the Democrats have on this administration.

                Report Abuse
              • Author by dave_chicago (November 07, 2006 4:43 pm ET)
                   

                >>>"Check back in ..."<<<

                I'd be glad to assist the truly blind. But the willfully blind like you, who have no excuse but their ability for denial, refuse to see what they don't want to see.

                Report Abuse
          • Author by steeve (November 07, 2006 3:53 pm ET)
               

            Um, there is more than one MMFA post for today. Go see.

            (Why did I have to tell you that?)

            Report Abuse
    • Author by AshenShard (November 07, 2006 1:50 pm ET)
         

      If I am correct, these hints have been coming out from Republicans connected to the administration and pundits while at the same time they are denying they are going to change policy. The point is they are suggesting a change in policy right before election which is likely just a tactic to try and convince people sitting on the fence to continue to 'trust' Republicans. These two messages are directed at two different parts of the public, 'stay the course' to the base, and 'change of policy' to the fence sitters.

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.