About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox whitewashed Lott's 2002 resignation: "He ran into a little bit of difficulty"

November 15, 2006 5:59 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Several discussions on Fox News about Sen. Trent Lott's candidacy for Senate minority whip have glossed over or omitted any explanation of exactly why Lott stepped down from his Senate leadership post in 2002 -- specifically, that Lott was forced to resign after praising Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 pro-segregationist presidential campaign.

20 Comments

Multiple discussions on Fox News' Fox & Friends and Special Report with Brit Hume about Sen. Trent Lott's (R-MS) candidacy for Senate minority whip have glossed over or left out any explanation of exactly why Lott stepped down from his Senate leadership post in 2002. Specifically, no one on either show reported that Lott resigned after praising Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 pro-segregationist presidential campaign, saying that if Thurmond had won the race, "we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either." Republicans have since elected Lott as whip, over Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), by a vote of 25 to 24.

As Media Matters has noted, Lott resigned his Senate post -- at the time, he was Senate minority leader and was expected to be named majority leader after Republicans gained control of the Senate in the 2002 midterm elections -- over comments he made at Thurmond's 100th birthday party on December 5, 2002. Thurmond ran as a "Dixiecrat" in the 1948 U.S. presidential election and actively endorsed continued racial segregation. Lott said of Thurmond at the birthday party: "I want to say this about my state: When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either." Amid widespread criticism over his remarks, Lott resigned from the Republican leadership on December 20, 2002.

But on the November 15 edition of Fox & Friends, the co-hosts repeatedly avoided telling viewers exactly why Lott was forced to resign. Co-host Gretchen Carlson said that Lott was making a "comeback" after "he got into a little bit of difficulty some time back and lost his majority seat when he spoke about Senator Strom Thurmond back in his presidential run in 1948." Later on, Carlson said that Lott "used to be the majority leader until he ran into a little bit of difficulty, but now he's making a comeback." Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy then said that Lott's election as minority whip would be "interesting," because he "had been the number-one guy in the majority, and then, after those comments that he made at a birthday party cost him his job and his leadership position, now he is poised to be the number-two guy."

On the November 14 edition of Special Report, Fox News correspondent Major Garrett made no mention of Lott's remarks in his report on the minority whip race. Instead, Garrett reported that that if Lott won, he would be "returning to a leadership table that the White House pressured him out of several years back," which would be "a signal Republicans will be sending the Bush White House that they're no longer going to follow their lead in all matters."

From the November 15 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

DOOCY: Three minutes after the top of the hour. As things start to take shape leadership-wise on the Democratic side -- you know, we were telling you yesterday that Nancy Pelosi backing John Murtha, and now all these suggestions that he's tied to corruption and lobbyists and stuff like that. Trent Lott is now making a big comeback on the Republican side. He is challenging Lamar Alexander of Tennessee for the whip job, the number-two job in the Senate behind [Sen.] Mitch McConnell [R-KY].

CARLSON: Yeah, I mean, it's sort of surprising, because I think it sort of it came about in a very quick fashion after the midterm elections last week. As we all know, the vote will be today, 9:30 a.m. Eastern time. Here's the key: It's secret ballot, so you can do whatever you want and then tell somebody else that you voted the other way. It appears right now as if Senator Lott may have the votes that it takes. Surprisingly so, because we all remember that he got into a little bit of difficulty some time back and lost his majority seat when he spoke about Senator Strom Thurmond back in his presidential run in 1948.

KILMEADE: Yeah, the problem is, Lamar Alexander says, "Excuse me, I have the votes." So, a spokesperson for Lott says, "No, no, excuse me, my man has the votes." It's gonna be an interesting thing because no one doubts, number one, Trent Lott's a marvelous spokesperson, he's very good and conversant on all the -- on the issues, and he knows how to get things done behind the scenes.

[...]

CARLSON: In the meantime, guess what? Another Republican is making a huge comeback. Remember Senator Trent Lott? Yeah, well, he used to be the majority leader, and then he ran into a little difficulty, but now, he's making a comeback. He is putting his name out there against Lamar Alexander of Tennessee for the minority whip position. Now, some are very surprised by the fact that he's trying to make this sort of a comeback. But it looks like he may, in fact, have enough votes to overtake Alexander for this position.

DOOCY: Because Lott's spokesperson has told Fox he's on the road to victory, he's apparently got enough votes to whup Lamar Alexander. However, Lamar Alexander's people are saying, you know what, the senator from Tennessee has got enough votes as well. So it would be interesting because Lott, who had been the number-one guy on the majority and then after those comments that he made at a birthday party cost him his job and his leadership position, now he is poised to be the number two guy behind Mitch McConnell, who would be the leader.

CARLSON: It's interesting, because Lott says that he jumped in late because he was waiting to see how his good friend Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania would do in his election, because he apparently was going to be taking that number-two position. And then when he lost re-election, that is when Senator Trent Lott said, "Hmm, maybe I'll consider that role."

From the November 14 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume:

GARRETT: Senate Republicans, meanwhile, welcomed their one new member, Tennessee's Bob Corker. Kentucky's Mitch McConnell joked that Corker will have plenty of freshman duties.

MCCONNELL: He will be the president, the vice president, the secretary and treasurer of the Republican freshman class.

GARRETT: And in the only intriguing Senate GOP leadership race, Tennessee's Lamar Alexander is running against former Majority Leader Trent Lott for party whip, the number-two post.

ALEXANDER: After the drubbing we took, it needs, first, unified leadership. And, second, we need some new faces and some fresh thinking.

GARRETT: Republican senator sources tell Fox that they very much expect Lott to win that race, returning to a leadership table that the White House pressured him out of several years back. If Lott wins, it will be a testament not only to his ability to count votes, but also a signal Republicans will be sending to the Bush White House that they're no longer going to follow their lead in all matters.

In a related story, last night the Republican-controlled House failed to pass a Vietnam trade normalization bill the White House wanted. Today, House Republican leaders said they will not bring it up this lame-duck Congress, but will revisit the bill later in December -- Brit.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Lynn (November 15, 2006 6:12 pm ET)
         

      I wonder how often he will appear on BET news?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Wes1 (November 15, 2006 6:31 pm ET)
         

      ...is like saying Lott's a little bit racist.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mefirst (November 15, 2006 7:07 pm ET)
         

      why the republicans would do this. lott is damaged goods. i just saw some talking head on nbc nightly news talking about how good he is at organizing. maybe, but what does this say for the public image of the party, especially with mitch mcconnell being from kentucky. i've seen some conjecture that maybe the southern strategy has worked too well. that it's given the party a too conservative image, which is working against it in areas like the northeast. lincoln chaffe of rhode island lost his senate seat for one reason. he's a republican. the polls show that otherwise voters liked him. admittedly lott possibly just put his foot in his mouth, but when you're praising a guy who split with the democrats to run on a platform of segregation forever, you need to speak very carefully. if you watch the tape, you will see ol strom giving lott a look like boy you're gonna stir it up now.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jscott (November 15, 2006 7:39 pm ET)
           

        is a lightweight backbencher.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by tex (November 16, 2006 7:48 am ET)
           

        Fox, led by Sean Hannity and his FBI video, have taken to stating that Jack Murtha is "Ethically Challenged". In fact, his name is not mentioned without the prefix "Ethically Challenged Jack Murtha" on FOX these days.

        Of course, the FBI tried to catch Murtha in a "sting" of accepting cash, AND HE REFUSED. He was investigated, and cleared. So, of course, FOX feels entitled to smear and brand him, based on ... on WHAT? Speculation and innuendo ONLY. So much for "fair and balanced", when we have Lott, WHO ACTUALLY RESIGNED LEADERSHIP over his "views" on racial politics, being reinvented at the same time.

        We have INNOCENT Murtha gaining a FOX smear prefix, while GUILTY Lott is being given a whitewash and a pass. That's our FOX.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by solon (November 16, 2006 5:40 pm ET)
           

        He has very good organizational skills and true talent is not all that common among the rightwing GOP.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by artvandelay2006 (November 15, 2006 8:30 pm ET)
         

      MMFA apparently doesnt watch enough fox news. shep smith on the Fox Report discussed Lott's controversy at LENGTH and even aired the clip of it, saying many viewed it as racially insensitive.

      MMFA must have decided to close up shop @ 2pm eastern and smear whatever data they gathered to count for the entire day. That is sloppy reporting and sloppy fact gathering.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by joanl (November 15, 2006 8:42 pm ET)
           

        What is the smear? These are the facts that occured.

        I think you are smearing MMFA.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by therick (November 15, 2006 8:56 pm ET)
           

        But this wasn't the Shep Smith show now was it. I suppose next you'll argue that Fox is quality because they tell the whole truth some of the time.

        You right wing nutjobs hate MMFA, because they play your quotes and shows it's visitors the your garbage. Straight from the horse's mouth.

        Art, just keep hating. It is what we've come to expect from the right. There's a new congress in town, and now all you've got is talk.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by artvandelay2006 (November 16, 2006 3:06 am ET)
             

          the mmfa headline was "FOX", thus implying ALL of fox news did this, when in fact that is MISLEADING and WRONG.

          leave it to a liberal smear merchant's supporter to try and weasel his way out of this one.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (November 16, 2006 6:27 am ET)
               

            correct?

            Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (November 16, 2006 8:35 am ET)
               

            then the whole U.S. Senate should be condemned for Lott's racist comments.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by kgonz (November 16, 2006 5:41 pm ET)
               

            You concede that on multiple FOX shows they DID NOT cover the whole story, but on ONE they did? And somehow, MMFA indicating that this is a trend on FOX is a SMEAR? You are desperate. You can't argue that Lott isn't actually racist, that his statements aren't relevant, or that the shows identified actually did cover the issue, so instead you claim that MMFA smears FOX by not indicating the one show on which they accurately reporting the story.

            MMFA is dedcated to reporting conservative misinformation. They did that. They do not post when FOX actually does report accurately. You can't take your Republican blinders off and so you decide that something accurate is a smear. Pathetic.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by solon (November 16, 2006 5:44 pm ET)
               

            Is your argument that if FOX EVER mentions this scandal they can then talk about the incident at length in all their other programs WITHOUT mentioning what happened? Yeah, that would suit someone who LOVES to be brainwashed the bottom line is clear, this DID happen, MMFA is absolutly correct. You have NO POINT

            Report Abuse
          • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (November 16, 2006 10:52 pm ET)
               

            Art: The emperor has no clothes!!!!!

            PS: Not much brain power either!!

            Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (November 16, 2006 1:18 am ET)
         

      This is clearly the work of an internal FOX memo. You can tell they are being made to say that the democratic leadership process is becoming bad for the democrats, and that the rise for Trent Lott is a comeback for the republicans. But how do you do that? Make sure they don't know the full story of Trent Lott.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (November 16, 2006 10:34 am ET)
         

      that the US would not have "had all those problems" had the leader of the Segregationist Party been elected President in 1948.

      Everyone knew precisely what Lott meant, especially because of his long-standing relationship with "Justice Jim" Johnson and the Council of Concerned Citizens, (CCC, but may just as well be KKK).

      Lott got less than what he deserved, but the GOP constantly has to prove that they're bigger bigots than the next guy, unless the next guy is Glenn Beck.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (November 16, 2006 10:46 am ET)
         

      The right-wing trogs are up in arms about Lott's selection too. Which makes me wonder: who did support this bonehead move?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (November 16, 2006 11:44 am ET)
         

      They are right back at it. At least Limbaugh admitted that he was carrying water for the Republicans and that he knew that what he was saying was garbage. Although he is apparently back to carrying water now and the admission was purely motivated by selfish reasons. He didn't want to lose his audience. FOX NEWS will get even worse now. As long as the paychecks come in, the clowns at FOX NEWS will continue with the prostitution.

      THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Feed IconRSS Feeds

Get personalized rss or email alerts

Connect & Share

Facebook Twitter Digg YouTube MySpace