About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Media glossed over new Senate minority whip Trent Lott's pro-segregation, anti-civil rights past

November 16, 2006 3:02 pm ET

22 Comments

In reporting on Sen. Trent Lott's (R-MS) November 15 election as Senate minority whip, several print media outlets noted that Lott had made a "comeback" after stepping down from the Senate leadership in 2002 over remarks he made at then-Sen. Strom Thurmond's (R-SC) birthday party praising Thurmond's 1948 pro-segregation presidential campaign, but failed to note that Lott's 2002 remarks were just the most recent in a pattern of public statements and actions that were attacked as racially insensitive and, in several cases, as indicating support for racist entities.

Reporting on Lott's election on November 16, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today, and The Wall Street Journal noted simply that Lott, at Thurmond's 100th birthday party on December 5, 2002, said of Thurmond's 1948 campaign: "I want to say this about my state. When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We're proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years, either." A November 16 Los Angeles Times editorial, however, noted that Lott has "a credibility problem on issues of race," adding: "For example, when the Internal Revenue Service moved in 1981 to yank the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because it prohibited interracial dating, Lott defended the school's position on religious freedom grounds."

As Media Matters for America has noted, there are numerous other examples of "racially insensitive" statements and actions by Lott. A December 13, 2002, Scripps Howard News Service article documented the reasons that both Democrats and Republicans blasted Lott for his apparent endorsement of segregationist policies:

In 1982, Lott voted against the extension of the Voting Rights Act, which authorizes the Justice Department to review election law changes in Mississippi and other Deep South states and to monitor elections.

In 1983, he was one of 90 House members who voted against creating a national holiday to honor Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Six years later, Lott was one of seven senators who voted to abolish the King holiday commission, and in 1994, he was one of 28 who favored scrapping its federal funding.

Lott was one of 34 senators who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1990, which reversed five Supreme Court rulings that had limited the ability of minorities to win job discrimination lawsuits and damages. After President George H. W. Bush vetoed the bill, Lott voted for a different version in 1991.

And in 2001, Lott was the only senator who opposed President George W. Bush's nomination of Roger Gregory, an African-American from Virginia, to the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

[...]

In 1999, when Lott was embroiled in another racial controversy, he had only one African-American worker, a mail clerk, out of a staff of 65.

In 1981, Lott filed a brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit seeking to overturn an IRS decision to deny a tax exemption to Bob Jones University because of the school's ban on interracial dating.

In 1995, Lott criticized Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) for intervening with 39 other lawmakers to get the FBI to release documents in the 1966 death of civil rights activist Vernon Dahmer to Forrest County prosecutors.

In 1999, it was reported that Lott had spoken to and met with the segregationist Council of Concerned Citizens on a few occasions. Lott then condemned the group.

Last year, Lott and the other white members of the Mississippi congressional delegation refused an entreaty from former Netscape president James Barksdale to declare that they would vote in favor of a statewide referendum to remove the Confederate emblem from the state flag. The proposal lost.

A December 13, 2002, Knight Ridder article reported:

In Washington, Lott worked from 1968 to 1972 as an aide to Rep. William Colmer, a powerful Mississippi Democrat who had advocated segregation. When Colmer retired, Lott ran for and won his seat as a Republican in 1972.

In 1981, the Justice Department threatened to block efforts by the city of Jackson, Miss., to annex suburbs, because the addition of mostly white suburban voters would dilute the political strength of black voters, and thus would violate the Voting Rights Act. Lott objected in a letter and the Justice Department dropped its opposition.

That same year, Lott filed a "friend of the court" brief with the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals objecting to the Internal Revenue Service's decision to deny a tax exemption to Bob Jones University because the Christian school banned interracial dating.

"Racial discrimination does not always violate public policy," the brief argued. "If racial discrimination in the interest of diversity does not violate public policy, then surely discrimination in the practice of religion is no violation."

Lott argued that many religious schools in his district would be threatened with lost tax exemptions.

[...]

Lott has also been linked to the Council of Conservative Citizens, a group that grew out of the segregationist White Citizens' Council of the 1960s. He was quoted in a CCC newsletter as telling the group in 1992 that "the people in this room stand for the right principles and the right philosophy. Let's take it in the right direction, and our children will be the beneficiaries."

Lott said Wednesday that the meeting was an open political forum that attracted numerous elected officials. He has said in the past that he was not aware of the group's segregationist history. He appears with four CCC leaders in a 1997 photograph; one of the people in the photo was William Lord, a former regional director for the White Citizens' Council who had served as a county chairman in one of Lott's political campaigns.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by tommy (November 16, 2006 3:09 pm ET)
         

      Another weak topic here. They referenced his remarks about Strom Thurmond directly which was the main reason for his downfall back then. His "comeback" now is due to that. And even the LA Times editorializes their take on his race credibility.

      There is no glossing over anything.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by joanl (November 16, 2006 3:30 pm ET)
           

        Tommy there does seem to be some glossing, the media did not fully detail the actions of Lott, and spent an enormous amount of time in the past few days on the Murtha-Hoyer Number 2 race.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by tommy (November 16, 2006 3:40 pm ET)
             

          You may have a point, but it could be space or other issues why they do not include all the examples here. The reason Lott got himself in trouble and created the controversy were the Thurmond remarks, so they of course would be highlighted and focused on.

          Glossed over sounds like a implied covering up of his past remarks to put him in a better light. If that were the case I highly doubt the LA Times would have editorialized his "race credibility issues".

          Report Abuse
      • Author by Wes1 (November 16, 2006 3:30 pm ET)
           

        over and over. No picture of him with the CCC, no quotes of him defending Bob Jones U., no mention of his opposition to MLK holiday.

        Good article by MMFA.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by dave_chicago (November 16, 2006 5:55 pm ET)
           

        >>"Glossed over?"<<

        It's pretty obvious you are pretending as if you don't see the evidence just so you can post a contrarian message.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ellie717 (November 16, 2006 3:14 pm ET)
         

      To disagree with this posting by Media Matters when I read the headline, because I thought they were going to dredge up long ago actions by Senator Trent Lott.

      It sure sounds like from this laundry list that he does have a number of fairly recent skeletons in his closet that I was not aware of, and the reason I was not aware of them was because the media has not presented them in the fashion that Media Matters did above.

      Another outstanding job by Media Matters of showing us why they provide a valuable service to our nation.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (November 16, 2006 3:25 pm ET)
           

        I didn't know Lott had a pattern of white power moments. Week topic? Maybe, but the post was an eye opener for me regardless.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by rusty shackleford (November 16, 2006 3:23 pm ET)
         

      Why is it that whenever Mississippi makes the national news, it's always for something bad? Hurricanes, Trent Lott, etc. etc.

      Charlie Rangel's opinion notwithstanding, it's not all bad here.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (November 16, 2006 3:52 pm ET)
         

      ...plain and simple. Why the GOP would want to pull him out of the swamp...beats me. Who're they appealing to? Not sure I want to know...

      But, we do hear a lot of the 'embarrassing' moment for Pelosi...as well as the 'giddy' arousal by the Repubs by this purported 'initial failure' by the Dems...

      [link to www.nytimes.com]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lynn (November 16, 2006 4:14 pm ET)
         

      I don't want Lott in the lead on anything that could impact my life, but my feelings about Lott not withstanding I truly don't understand why they selected two Southerners for the top leadership positions. Many Republican strategists and pundits speak of the danger of the Republican Party becoming a regional (southern) party. It seems to me they should be working on efforts to broaden their appeal, and this probably serves further to limit it. I don't think exhuming Lott and consequently his baggage will prove to be a positive for them

      Report Abuse
      • Author by jeter2 (November 16, 2006 4:58 pm ET)
           

        I'm a bit surprised too [why they selected two Southerners for the top leadership positions]. But MOSTLY about Lott. Was a "comeback" even justified? I certainly didn't think the guy should be tarred & feathered BUT I am disappointed that the Republican Party seems to be adopting a "let's let bygones be bygones" attitude by electing Lott to a leadership post.

        I'm NOT sure I would have expected the media to give a litany of Lott's racially insensitive/prejudice past, other than mentioning the Strom Thurmond birthday incident which led to his downfall. HOWEVER, it was eye-opening to read the history here provided by MMFA. Which makes me wonder [even more] WHY the Republicans are resurrecting Lott...

        Report Abuse
    • Author by njguy93 (November 16, 2006 4:48 pm ET)
         

      Art has bi-polar disorder.

      THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com

      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (November 16, 2006 5:09 pm ET)
         

      With a black Democratic candidate (Obama) probable in 2008, the GOP views Lott as the ultimate base energizer. What better way to attract the ever-shortening attentions of those lazy-eyed Confederacy worshippers than appointing a man with a rich history of supporting racism.

      The more the GOP changes, the more they embrace the values of the defunct racist wing of the Democratic Party, which is no accident.

      After the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the vast majority of the Dixiecrats became Republicans. Like Lott.

      Lott shouldn't be the GOP whip. He should BE whipped. A taste of that old “Southern hospitality” he cherishes so.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by oscar the grouch (November 16, 2006 8:56 pm ET)
         

      him to the Southern Bigots equivalent of AA and he's reformed. After all, it worked for Mr. Byrd (ex-member KKK).

      Report Abuse
      • Author by loonz (November 16, 2006 11:31 pm ET)
           

        Whenever racism in the current republican party is broached, conservatives always bring up Byrd in an attempt to buffer the criticism. Byrd relinquished the “Piece of Sh*t” title long ago and a number of republicans are endlessly competing for it.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by oscar the grouch (November 17, 2006 7:47 pm ET)
             

          "Once a racist

          ALWAYS a racist.

          - Citizen J / Friday November 17, 2006 10:26:15 AM EST "

          Is Byrd a closet racist per Citizen J, or has Lott reformed? HMMMM?

          Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (November 16, 2006 9:29 pm ET)
         

      with Lott's election to Senate Minority Whip, this may be the only time in history that a white man from Mississippi will be considered a "minority" anything . . .

      Report Abuse
      • Author by wolf kotenberg (November 17, 2006 1:12 am ET)
           

        could mean he can " whip minorities " now. I know it is a stretch but I need humor.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by ufleirx (November 17, 2006 2:02 am ET)
         

      After misleading a country into war, killing God knows how many Iraqis and 3000 + service members -- not counting other injuries, corruption, bribery, violating the Constitution like it was a $2 hooker, pedophilia, conspiracy to obstruct justice, and that is just what we know about -- torture I forgot torture, sorry -- a Southern Republican whose sin is being a bigot is almost a refreshing change of pace, if it were not for the fact he had his hands in some of the above as well. It's pitiful what lowered expectation has brought us to.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (November 17, 2006 10:10 am ET)
         

      Where'd you go?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ponder (November 17, 2006 2:48 pm ET)
         

      I remember a couple of years ago debating on blogs where I told people that to vote repug was to embrace racisim. When they complained I told them to change there party if they wanted to fix the image instead of shouting down those that stated the obvious. I suppose they listened and instead of doing what I had hoped and distancing themselves from racisim they have embraced it to woo back the "rednecks" that they are so angry that did not vote for them. What if all "rednecks" are not racist? How screwed will they be then? What will happen if the Dem's balance the budget in 5 years and I dont know drop the gun control thing? Will the repugs have to resort to the purely Racist or Evangelical or Self Hating Gay vote? I am not sure that percentage would go above 31%, oh hold it isnt that the presidents approval rating???? lol

      Report Abuse
    • Author by misterb (November 18, 2006 5:56 pm ET)
         

      Trent Lott is the best choice for the job because he will continually remind us of how radical, how goofy, and how racist the right wing is.

      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.