Fox & Friends interviewed Inhofe again; co-host Doocy seconded his claim that humans are not a cause of global warming
SUMMARY: Fox & Friends conducted a one-on-one interview with Sen. James Inhofe for the second time in two weeks, during which he asserted that there is no "relationship between manmade gases and global warming." In fact, the scientific consensus view is that "human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming" of the planet.
For the second time in two weeks, Fox News' Fox & Friends conducted a one-on-one interview with Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) -- who in 2003 called global warming "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people" -- in which Inhofe downplayed the threat of climate change without challenge. During the interview, Inhofe asserted that there is no "relationship between manmade gases and global warming" and co-host Steve Doocy echoed this argument, declaring that Inhofe had made a "great point" because "there's been no scientific connection" established between climate change and human activity. In fact, as Media Matters for America has repeatedly documented, scientific organizations such as the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) share the consensus view that, according to a June 2006 NAS report, "human activities are responsible for much of the recent warming" of the planet.
Inhofe further suggested that the relatively calm 2006 hurricane season disproved warnings from scientists and others that global warming will lead to "terrible hurricane season[s]" and affirmed his claim that "there is not a relationship between hurricanes and what they call global warming by manmade gases." Doocy suggested the same at the beginning of the interview, noting that the 2006 season was "the calmest in a decade," and asking, "So what happened to all those naysayers about the hurricanes?" As the weblog Think Progress noted, a November 27 Drudge Report headline similarly implied that the 2006 hurricane season contradicted warnings from former Vice President Al Gore regarding the relationship between global warming and hurricanes. The headline was accompanied by a picture of Gore taken from the movie An Inconvenient Truth and read "BLEW IT: HURRICANE PREDICTIONS OFF TRACK; QUIETEST SEASON IN A DECADE." But the fact that there were fewer hurricanes in 2006 does not undermine Gore's position, as Think Progress explained:
First, Gore never predicted that there would be more storms in 2006. He said that global warming made it more likely that there would be more intense hurricanes in the future.
Second, the fact that there were fewer hurricanes in 2006 does not suggest that global warming is not real or not dangerous. There are other factors -- on a year-to-year basis -- that can reduce the number and intensity of hurricanes.
Think Progress went on to note several "other factors" that likely contributed to the calm 2006 season, which included abundant "Saharan dust and air over the Atlantic Ocean," the rightward trajectory of this year's storms, and the southward shift in wind direction due to a "rapidly growing El Nino, a warming of water over the tropical Pacific Ocean."
Furthermore, Inhofe attempted to downplay the fact that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger -- a fellow Republican -- has recently come out in support of legislation intended to target global warming. "There's a lot of publicity that they signed into law, this global warming law," Inhofe said. "But they don't have coal-fired generating plants in California. They're done in other states and they come in by wire. So it doesn't really affect them. ... So California is different than the rest of the country." But Inhofe ignored that the original bill signed by Schwarzenegger on September 27 not only imposes emissions restrictions on utilities, but also on automobiles. Moreover, Inhofe overlooked that Schwarzenegger approved a separate bill that prohibited utility providers in California from entering into long-term contracts with coal-fired power plants located outside of the state that do not meet certain emissions standards.
From the November 28 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:
DOOCY: After predictions that this hurricane season would be the biggest, worst ever, nobody expected it to be the calmest in a decade. So what happened to all those naysayers about the hurricanes? Senate Environment and Public Works Committee chairman James Inhofe joins us from Tulsa, Oklahoma. Good morning to you, Senator.
INHOFE: Hey, good morning. And Steve, I heard you give the weather, and you're right. Out here in Tulsa, Oklahoma, it's a terrible storm, and I'm sure that's due to global warming.
DOOCY: Well, you know what, at the beginning of this season after -- granted, last year was terrible. But all of the environmentalists and a lot of scientists said, "This is all because of global warming. And you think this year is bad, wait 'til next year."
INHOFE: Well, see, that was Al Gore, Barbra Streisand, Robert Kennedy Jr. --
DOOCY: Well-known scientists.
INHOFE: -- all of them making the -- well-known scientists -- all saying that because of global warming it's -- we're going to have a terrible hurricane season. At that time, we were on this program saying that there is not a relationship between hurricanes and what they call global warming by manmade gases.
GRETCHEN CARLSON (co-host): And at the same time, Arnold Schwarzenegger -- well known in Hollywood and now across America as the governor of California -- he was on Meet the Press this past Sunday saying that, in fact, he does believe that there is global warming. Let's take a listen and I want to hear your comments.
SCHWARZENEGGER [video clip]: There's always in history been people that are back with the thinking in the Stone Age. And I think that the key thing for us is -- is not to pay attention to those things. Because as I said, the science is in. We know the facts. There's not any more debate as to global warming or not. We have global warming. And the fact also is that we can do something about it.
CARLSON: Those comments, I guess, were directed at you, Senator Inhofe. Your response?
INHOFE: Well, let me first clarify what they mean when they talk about global warming. My statement -- and I credit [Meet the Press host] Tim Russert for giving it accurately -- is that it's not the matter of whether or not it's getting warmer. What it is is: Is there a relationship between manmade gases and global warming? And there isn't.
Well, I love Arnold Schwarzenegger. In fact, my nephew is his creative consultant for his campaign. I think he's a great guy and all that. However, that's California. You know, one thing about Democrats -- they all read from the same songsheets. Republicans don't. And there's a lot of differing opinions in the Republican Party. And then, let's consider also, this is California we're talking about. And right in the center of California, you have this Hollywood mentality -- they call it the Hollywood elitists. They're the ones pouring money into campaigns, and that naturally prejudices people. And one other thing. You -- there's a lot of publicity that they signed into law, this global warming law, last -- last month. But they don't have coal-fired generating plants in California. They're done in other states, and they come in by wire. So it doesn't really affect them.
DOOCY: Right. Exactly right.
INHOFE: So California is different than the rest of the country.
DOOCY: And Senator, you made a good -- a great point earlier. You know, here is some sort of global warming going on. The temperature is just a little warmer around the world than it was a while back. But there's been no scientific connection -- they simply can't say, "You know what, you leave your car idling or you use a lot of hairspray, and you're poking a big hole in the ozone" or something like that.
INHOFE: Yeah, they try to do that. But the panic that's going on right now in that far-left environmentalist community is that one-by-one their strongest supporters are leaving them. For example, Paul Gilding, who is a former executive director of Greenpeace, he now says it's no longer a science, it's a religious test. Here's the best one here. Claude Allégre is a French geophysicist. He's the only one who is on both the French and the United States national academy of sciences. I'm going to read you his quote.
DOOCY: Quickly.
INHOFE: He says, "The cause of warming is unknown. The proponents of manmade catastrophic global warming are being motivated by money."
DOOCY: There you go.
INHOFE: So there you have it. And people are starting to panic now.
DOOCY: All right, Senator James Inhofe. Always good to speak with you, we'll talk to you again soon.
INHOFE: Thank you.















Are most Repubs anti-science (with the interesting exception of Arnold)? Why do they not agree with 97+% of the scientists who study this? Do they lack a certain gene?
How does the entire conservative side align itself so neatly into a package of stupid with a bow on top? Do they have to agree to hate science and believe only in miracles that have been oral, rewritten, translated, and bastardized for centuries?
Anyone who believe in these clowns does not deserve to be in a scientific debate of any sort.
fixing their emission spewing sources will cut into their profits. How awful that they may have to settle for a $500M year in profits vs. that $1B a year...
I've thought about this. From the top, it's deception. They want to keep the oilfires burning, so they use argument by exhaustion, cherry pick studies and misrepresent scientific articles. Or just plain lie. They trust that the public won't check on them.
Then, there's the public, who have been trained by Republicans to doubt the media, and to doubt scientists. Plus, if Al Gore is interested in something, it must be wrong because he is an evil liberal out to take my money and car.
But most people can figure this stuff out. The positive is that the 70% or so so of diehard Republicans who march in lockstep will lose all credibility when it becomes clearer and clearer that the predictions will be on the mark. I think this is Gore's strategy to move people from the right. In ten years the dem running against Inhofe can point at him and say "Can you believe this guy doesn't believe in global warming?" and a seat is gained.
Because it's a crock, a fantasy that humans can affect global warming. An ant can't tow a train from California to Maine. We can't do anything about it and scientists cannot prove we can.
Scientists have been blatantly wrong before.
[link to time-proxy.yaga.com]
The s0-called science is junk and rigged. It has become a green disease cult to believe that humans cause global warming.
I really learned something about the science in 1974 (the year of the linked article). Since scientific research obviously stopped in 1974 and since no further data can be allowed to change predictions, then it really makes me feel good about global warming. I guess it really is just a scam since those scientists in 1974 proved, once and for all, that the earth is getting colder.
What bothers me a little is why their data is so much better than the data today. You know, since we have computer that can process more data and we have better predictive models than they did in 1974.
But again, I guess it is just my old scared self talking and I can re-read your 1974 article and just start feeling good all over again....
note the question mark. there was no consensus among scientists in 1974, as there is now on global warming.
Between human activity and global warming.
Between Inhofe's mouth and cerebral cortex.
Watching these clowns discuss science is like watching a dog try to operate a doorknob.
It's crazy that Doocy attempts to discuss matters scientific and political. He rarely knows what he's talking about and has trouble getting his facts correct. He is good at repeating right wing talking points though. He's more a parrot than someone with an astute mind that does any critical thinking. He should stick to reading the weather map and pimping his and News Corp's lame Mr. Happy book (which I read through the other day at Borders...what a silly, corny book it is). Fox & Friends shouldn't be considered a news show. It's a platform for right wingers to make their points and get easy questions with some silly fluffy stuff thrown in for good measure.
Fixing emissions would not cut into their profits. They would simply push that "expense" onto us, the consumers, raising the price. And as the Left always says, that would hurt the poorest among us most of all. Al Gore could certainly afford the big, gas guzzling SUV, but Joe six pack might have to get a skateboard. Why do you guys hate the poor so much?
the automotive industry was required to put in seat belts, then catalytic converters, then air bags, mileage standards, etc. etc. Big bidniss told us then that the poor would be hurt most of all. Which of course didn't happen, as poor people still drive and bidniss somehow manages to make profits.
Gore drives a Prius hybrid vehicle from what I hear.
and he said they bought a hybrid vehicle, replaced all their lights with low watt flourescent bulbs [me too, it does save money. cost a little more initially but last forever. batteries too, i have some double aa rechargables i've charged at least 300 times.] and to think this country had a choice between this intelligent hard working man, and we elected some smirking lazy corporate shill goober who partied until he was forty years old. the joke unfortunately is on all of us.
Jeez, Dave, Randy just poked a hole in your argument that you could drive a bus through, it's about the same size as the hole in Inhofe's head.
Does Fox and Friends even really count as a news show anyway? Does anyone ever listen to what these arsehats are saying? I know, I'm sure people lick up whatever they're putting down. It's a fluffy morning show with 3 hosts who know nothing about everything.
they know everything about nothing.
so, it would appear they are like the opinion section of most newspapers. the heck with real news we can use
I still do not understand the purpose of this show, it literally bores me to death. I mean these hosts are clowns, and their guests are always washed up conservatives. I refuse to watch ANY FAUX NEWS program except for FOX NEWS WATCH. Fox and Friends is just a lamer version of the TODAY show...
Jim Inhofe and Steve Doocy: well-known scientists.
--Mein KampfIf Wikipedia is correct, the Allegre quote originates from a debate regarding an erupting French Volcano ... In 1976 (!).
Thanks Inhofe's Anonymous Aide #1 for the great investigative work.