About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox's Baier misrepresented recommendations of Iraq Study Group

December 08, 2006 7:30 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Brett Baier reported that President Bush had "praised the report and the members on the Iraq Study Group [ISG] for tying any withdrawal to commanders' assessment of the conditions on the ground in Iraq." In fact, the ISG's recommendations run counter to Bush's policies and assumptions regarding U.S. troop presence in Iraq.

3 Comments

On the December 7 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson, Fox News chief White House correspondent Brett Baier claimed that, during a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, President Bush had "praised the report and the members on the Iraq Study Group [ISG] for tying any withdrawal to commanders' assessment of the conditions on the ground in Iraq." But Baier failed to note that the ISG's recommendations run counter to Bush's policies and assumptions regarding U.S. troop presence in Iraq.

Baier appeared to be referring to the answer Bush gave when asked: "And back to the issue of the troops, is it possible to get them out of Iraq by early 2008, as the [ISG] report talks about?" Bush replied that the "the report said" that withdrawal would be "depending upon conditions" and added that "commanders will be making recommendations based upon whether or not we're achieving our stated objective" of an Iraqi "government which can sustain, govern, and defend itself." Indeed, the ISG report does include a conditional, which states that "[b]y the first quarter of 2008, subject to unexpected developments in the security situation on the ground, all combat brigades not necessary for force protection could be out of Iraq."

But Baier failed to note that the report also recommends, that "[i]f the Iraqi government does not make substantial progress toward the achievement of milestones on national reconciliation, security, and governance, the United States should reduce its political, military, or economic support for the Iraqi government." Additionally, Recommendation 20 of the report states: "If the Iraqi government demonstrates political will and makes substantial progress toward the achievement of milestones on national reconciliation, security, and governance, the United States should make clear its willingness to continue training, assistance, and support for Iraq's security forces, and to continue political, military, and economic support for the Iraqi government."

In other words, the Bush administration's policy, which Bush hinted at in answering the question, has assumed that U.S. support, including troop presence, will continue until conditions improve, while the ISG report recommends that U.S. "political, military, or economic support" should be reduced unless conditions improve.

From the December 7 edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson:

JOHN GIBSON (host): That is tonight's "Big Story." President Bush agreed with the bipartisan panel that we need a new way forward in Iraq at a news conference at the White House today. It was a joint event with British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The news conference comes one day after the Iraq Study Group released its report that calls for major policy changes overseas. Members of that group testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee today about their findings and their 79 recommendations.

Fox's chief White House correspondent Bret Baier has it all covered live from the White House -- Bret.

BAIER: Hey, John. The president's in the process of changing course in Iraq. And he said today he couldn't really do that without consulting his closest ally, British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Now, the president said he will not take all of the Iraq Study Group's recommendations. But senior aides tell us that we will know which recommendations he will take before Christmas, as he will lay that out in a formal presentation.

Today, the president and the prime minister said the lessons from the Iraq Study Group report are the need to support Iraq's government fully, to get Iraq's neighbors to do the same, and to work harder to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian dispute.

You'll remember that the Iraq Study Group report described the situation in Iraq as "grave and deteriorating". Well, the president today called the situation "unsettling," then was pressed by a British reporter if he was really in denial about the true situation on the ground.

BUSH [video clip]: Not only do I know how important it is to prevail, I believe we will prevail. I understand how hard it is to prevail. But I also want the American people to understand that, if we were to fail, and one way to assure failure is just to quit, is not to adjust and say it's just not worth it. If we were to fail, that failed policy will come to hurt generations of Americans in the future.

BAIER: The president praised the report and the members on the Iraq Study Group for tying any withdrawal to commanders' assessment of the conditions on the ground in Iraq.

As for the specific recommendation to engage directly in talks with Syria and Iran, the president didn't fully rule that out as far as regional talks, but he set the bar very high. And British Prime Minister Tony Blair also questioned the motivation of those two countries.

BLAIR [video clip]: In other words, you support the democratic elected government, you do not support sectarians, and you do not support, arm, or finance terrorists.

Now, the very reason we have problems in parts of Iraq -- and we know this very well down in the south of Iraq -- is that Iran, for example, has been doing that. It's been basically arming, financing, supporting terrorism. So we've got to be clear on the basis upon which we take this forward.

BAIER: Prime Minister Blair is heading to the Middle East in coming days to try to restart peace talks there, something he says is directly tied to the Iraq situation, something the administration here says could help calm the broader Middle East -- John.

GIBSON: Bret Baier at the White House. Bret, thanks very much.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Dem02020 (December 08, 2006 8:01 pm ET)
         

      I hope you can all appreciate just how utterly worthless all this rhetoric about Iraq is...

      Recall just last week, how intense was the "debate" of "civil war" versus "sectarian violence" (and my favorite, The Daily Show's "faith-based melee")...

      What's the current status of that "debate"?

      I mean, it must be important to argue about words... and for that matter, when it comes to the ISG Report, it must be important to argue "recommendations"too, right?

      So last week's heated "debate" about the "faith-based melee" seems to have cooled for now... but sure to flare up at some inconvenient time to come, just like a rash.

      I wonder how much time (and words) can be wasted discussing these "recommendations"...

      ...while Iraq goes without a STABLE GOVERNMENT (and while none appears anywhere within the administration's sights)...

      ...and while more U.S. Troops, and more Iraqis are killed...

      ...and while $2 billion per week (per week!) is siphoned off from the U.S. Treasury in the name of Iraq.

      And that's the real "stay the course" ("stay the course": The words went away, but not the actual staying of the course, right?)...

      $2 billion dollars per week... that's what Operation Iraqi Freedom nets it's authors...

      ...who are also the authors of all this utterly worthless rhetoric about Iraq, the ISG Report included.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (December 10, 2006 3:57 am ET)
           

        the nuts and bolts of the whole thing isn't going to change overnight, even as they gradually change the advertising.

        Putting the brakes on the colossal theft of Americans money will be gradual at best, as the Republicans slowly convince their followers that they are "moving forward" by doing the exact opposite of what they've been selling for the past 6 years.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jscott (December 09, 2006 11:40 am ET)
         

      actually READ the report, or is he just reading the fox news (lowercase intentional) teleprompter?

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.