Greenfield and now Matalin defend Obama-Middle East references as a joke
SUMMARY: Mary Matalin said discussion about Sen. Barack Obama's middle name, Hussein, is "really about nothing" and responded that co-host Alan Colmes should "get a sense of humor" after Colmes requested that Matalin ask her "conservative friends to drop the 'Hussein.' " CNN's Jeff Greenfield had similarly claimed that he was joking when he likened the style of Obama's clothing to that of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
On the December 14 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Republican political strategist Mary Matalin said discussion about Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) middle name, Hussein, is "really about nothing" and responded that co-host Alan Colmes should "get a sense of humor" after Colmes noted "many conservative bloggers and some conservative talk show hosts [are] emphasizing his middle name," and requested that Matalin ask her "conservative friends to drop the 'Hussein.' "
Two days earlier, CNN senior political analyst Jeff Greenfield had explained on the CNN website that he was making "a joke" when, on the December 11 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, he compared the similarity of Obama's "business casual" clothing to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's "jacket-and-no-tie look."
During the discussion with Matalin, Colmes noted that "the blogosphere is bubbling with chatter" about the topic of Obama's middle name and asked Matalin, "Should we make a lot about that?" Matalin responded, in part, by dismissing it, asking, "Who cares what his name is?" After Matalin complained that Colmes should "get a sense of humor" about the topic, Colmes noted, "[Y]ou know what the real subliminal message is, saying his middle name is Hussein. Don't play naïve with me, Mary." Later in the discussion, co-host Sean Hannity asked "if his middle name is Hussein, what is wrong with people that bring up his middle name? ... [A]re we that sensitive now, that if we actually say somebody's name, that now that's out of bounds?"
Greenfield introduced his CNN report on Obama by saying: "[I]n the spirit of retched excess, let's take a look not at what [Obama is] saying, but at another crucially vital matter: what he is wearing." After comparing Obama's "business casual" dress to Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) -- who, Greenfield said, wore "the kind of casual look you see at country clubs and lawn parties in the Hamptons" -- President Bush, former President Ronald Reagan, and former President Richard Nixon, Greenfield asked, "Is there any other major public figure who dresses the way [Obama] does?" Greenfield responded, "Why, yes. It's Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. ... And maybe that's not the comparison a possible presidential contender really wants to evoke." Greenfield added:
GREENFIELD: Now, it is one thing to have a last name that sounds like Osama and a middle name, Hussein, that is probably less than helpful. But an outfit that reminds people of a charter member of the Axis of Evil? Why, this could leave his presidential hopes hanging by a thread. Or is that threads?
In his online response to criticism of the report, Greenfield stated that the report was "a joke -- not to be taken internally, externally, or most of all, seriously" and that it was "an obvious, patently absurd parody of muddled political thinking." Greenfield added that "[m]ost of what happened here, I think, is a demonstration of the hair-trigger instincts that have grown up among some of the bloggers."
On the weblog Talking Points Memo, Joshua Micah Marshall noted:
Greenfield says it was a joke. No kidding. Of course, it was a joke. I know that. It was a just a very odd one -- picking up on an association I really don't think had occurred to anyone else, and which builds with an odd eagerness on the already iffy focus on finding which of Obama's names sounds like which terrorist mass-murderer.
From the December 14 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes:
COLMES: And meanwhile, the blogosphere is bubbling with chatter about the senator's middle name, Barack Hussein Obama. Should we make a lot about that? Joining us now is former adviser to President Bush, Mary Matalin. Mary, tell me you're all bent out of shape -- first of all, there she is -- you're all bent out of shape about Barack Obama's middle name. This proves that he's not fit to be president, right?
MATALIN: Alan, Merry Christmas. I see you're in the holiday spirit.
COLMES: Merry Christmas to you. I don't mind, by the way. I have no war on Christmas. Thank you for saying that.
MATALIN: And Happy Holidays or whatever. I wasn't trying to make a political point there. But I do want to make this political point: You wonder why people across the country wonder -- think that we're in a parallel universe? Who cares what his name is? Who cares what his [unintelligible] is?
COLMES: Then why are so many conservative bloggers and some conservative talk show hosts emphasizing his middle name every time they mention him?
MATALIN: I think what people on the conservative side are noting about Barack Obama is how illustrative, indicative he is of where the Democratic Party is. He shoots off to be the number-two or the number-one challenger to Senator Clinton, and he's a nothing, based on nothing. He's an empty vessel. But it does say something, an important validation of the election we just went through, which are people want to turn the page. They want a different tone. They want civil debate. They want real dialogue. And even though he's not talking about anything --
COLMES: All right, then tell your conservative friends to drop the "Hussein" as if that's significant, and let's not --
MATALIN: Oh, for Pete's sake, get a sense of humor, for -- Lord, have mercy!
COLMES: Well, I -- you know what the real subliminal message is, saying his middle name is Hussein. Don't play naïve with me, Mary. You know it better than that.
MATALIN: I'm not -- I'm -- you know what? This -- we're not going to go through another campaign like this. The people spoke, and they sent a message to both parties.
COLMES: Right.
MATALIN: They didn't validate any Democratic agenda, because the Democrats didn't put out one.
COLMES: Well, they sent a message to your party.
[...]
HANNITY: Now, if his middle name is Hussein, what is wrong with people that bring up his middle name? Why -- is -- are we that sensitive now, that if we actually say somebody's name, that now that's out of bounds?
MATALIN: I personally am so callous, to having worked for and loved a president who's called everything from a liar to an idiot to anti-science to -- you know, they can't find enough horrible, vile things to say about this president or this vice president, for that matter, so whatever this conversation is, it's really about nothing. And I'll say again, that's the message that the electorate sent in this cycle was, "Get off it. Can we talk about some issues here?" Which he hasn't been doing, but hopefully he will.
HANNITY: Three things. Tom DeLay says Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States. Clinton has hired Hillary a faith guru to try and get evangelicals on board. And then there's this article, actually has a picture of somebody very famous that you know today in the New York Post, and that would be your husband, James Carville, Paul Begala, Joe Lockhart. "Bubba's buds chew over 2008 with Hil." So, she clearly is running. Do you agree with Tom DeLay? Is she the next president of the United States?
MATALIN: Oh, I think -- no, I don't agree with that. I think she's likely to get the nomination. I don't think it'll be a coronation. I think she'll have to fight for it. But, you know, and I don't mean this pejoratively, but Barack Obama is an empty vessel, and Edwards is an empty suit who's leading in Iowa, and Kucinich is empty-headed, so, you know, she's got the most heft of all of them. And she's a very methodical candidate. I don't see how anybody beats her.
From the 4 p.m. ET segment of the December 11 edition of CNN's The Situation Room:
BLITZER: And as Jack just noted, he's clearly a rising political star, and he's a favorite among many Democrats looking toward the next presidential election. And that means a lot of scrutiny for the Illinois senator, from his head right down to his clothes. Let's turn to our senior analyst, Jeff Greenfield -- Jeff.
GREENFIELD: Wolf, the political community has gone predictably hysterical over Senator Barack Obama's presidential flirtation. So, in the spirit of wretched excess, let's take a look not at what he's saying, but at another crucially vital matter: what he's wearing.
[begin video clip]
GREENFIELD: The senator was in New Hampshire over the weekend sporting what's getting to be the classic Obama look. Call it business casual: a jacket, a collared shirt, but no tie. It's a look the senator seems to favor, and why not? It's dressy enough to suggest seriousness of purpose, but without the stuffiness of a tie, much less a suit. There is a comfort level here that reflects one of Obama's strongest political assets, a sense that he's comfortable in his own skin, that he knows who he is.
If you want a striking contrast, check out Senator John Kerry as he campaigned back in 2004. He often appeared without a tie, but clad in a blazer, the kind of casual look you see at country clubs and lawn parties in the Hamptons and other tony locations.
When President Bush wanted to campaign in casual mode, he skipped the jacket entirely. Third-generation Skull and Bones at Yale? Don't be silly. Nobody here but us Texas ranchers. You can think of Bush's apparel as a kind of homage to Ronald Reagan. He may have spent much of his life in Hollywood, but the brush-cutting ranch hand was the image his followers loved, just as the Kennedy seafaring look provided a striking contrast with, say, Richard Nixon, who apparently couldn't even set out on a beach walk without that "I wish I had spent more time at the office" look.
But, in the case of Obama, he may be walking around with a sartorial time bomb. Ask yourself: Is there any other major public figure who dresses the way he does? Why, yes. It's Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who, unlike most of his predecessors, seems to have skipped through enough copies of GQ to find the jacket-and-no-tie look agreeable. And maybe that's not the comparison a possible presidential contender really wants to evoke.
[end video clip]
GREENFIELD: Now, it's one thing to have a last name that sounds like Osama and a middle name, Hussein, that is probably less than helpful. But an outfit that reminds people of a charter member of the Axis of Evil? Why, this could leave his presidential hopes hanging by a thread. Or is that threads? -- Wolf.
BLITZER: Jeff Greenfield reporting for us -- Jeff, thank you very much.

















that's cause even reich wingers can still get their @sses sued off for slander.
The conservatives are never joking when they say things liberals question. And the liberals are always joking when they say things conservatives question. (See the other thread about the Dowd-Obama exchange).
insults aren't debate, they are insults. The right is so quick to talk about respecting the officials, yet are always the 1st to be dismissive and disrespectful to any hopefuls who aren't of their persuasion. Using smear and innuendo to destroy someone's credibility is wrong. However, I fully support payback. Republicans have had a 10 year reign based on smear and innuendo, I am all for getting even before getting civil.
My absolute favorite headline on this site the past month was just recently removed, unfortunately, but said something to the effect of : Attacks on Media Matters!" and then goes on to link to a few columns by Malkin and MRC who apparently had the audacity to respond to columns written by Alterman and Boehlert, correcting what they thought were inaccuracies in the columns. Good grief, if that stuff qualifies as an attack I guess MMFA is in attack mode 24/7. How about a little thicker skin MMFA? You can dish it, but apparently can't take it.
Well, watching right wing garbage and then recording it for austerity IS a 24/7 job. But you seem to forget, MMFA reprints, word for word, just what they say. Maulkin responding? More like Maulkin refining her original statement. That's like saying "ooooh, I didn't really mean niggah when I said it! I was just using it rhetorically speaking!"
Try again.
I like my previous post just the way it is. Have a nice weekend!
you and other conservative posters are given as much space as you want to criticize, respond, attack. which is how it should be, but don't turn around and pretend you don't get your say.
I've been posting on and off for two years and you haven't chased me away yet. This is a good site.
However, MMFA's previous headline which I referred to about being "attacked" because a few bloggers responded to their column was ludicrous on its face. How about just saying "Malkin and MRC respond to our criticisms"? Playing the victim is so beneath the site. That's all I was trying to say.
you said mmfa can dish it out but "can't take it". i replied that they apparently can because you guys are pretty much given free rein. and truthfully if you wanted to debate that headline, perhaps you did then, but that would have been the time to do it. when we all had access to it and could debate whether it was an attack or not. just because you decide it was not an attack doesn't mean anything, and basically it's just opinion on both sides. the real question would be who's telling the truth and who is fudging. don't wait until something is off the board to decide you want to debate it.
To be honest, I wasn't able to post for a few days when those threads were new so I missed my opportunity. But I agree that my comments would have been more relevant on those threads. I'm sure I will have more chances down the road!
40 years of Utopian dominance, prior to the "last 10 years" of Republicans" turn, and the Utos can't take it.
10 Years of lying corrupt warmongers and the Public has had enough, lets hope despite the snivelling its another 40 years before the public trusts them again.
Why are you letting him change the subject?
When conservatives joke it's mean spirited, usually racist, uncalled for slander. When liberals do it however, it's just a little rib sticking.......come on.
All together now "Double Standard"....
that stoop to the low standards of Limbaugh or Coulter, and have the high visibility you suggest. Humor me!
How about Al Franken or Randy Rhoades? Oh, that's right. You said "high visibility".
You don't see anyone on cable saying crap about your precious right wingers, and that's the point. Maybe you are ok with that, but I'm not. There is no fairness in purposely keeping one side silent in the media. That ain't capitalism, or market driven, that's purely ownership driven decision to promote one party above democracy. And before you say, buy your own station, just remember, not just anyone can buy a station. George Steph. has more than enough money to buy several stations, fact is he's prevented from doing so. But I guess you like unfair advantages, it's easier than having to prove yourself.
I accidentally watched Kieth Olbermann a while back and if I remember correctly, he was bad-mouthing Foley. I could be wrong, though. I know I've seen people in the media bashing Tom Delay. So what? I could not possibly care less. And by the way, I don't consider anyone in politics (right or left) to be "precious". I'll leave the political "hero-worship" to you.
You whine that "one side is kept silent" in the media but you have Air America...Oh, wait. They might as well be silent because NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY. Now THAT is capitalism in action for you. Why don't you go listen to NPR? They should be anti-capitalist enough for you. Or why not talk George Soros into buying a station? Nah, bad idea. Even he's not stupid enough to throw his money away. Like it or not, the left wing crap you guys are trying to peddle just doesn't sell in America. Grow up, act like an adult and get over it.
EVERYTHING you post turns into a tirade about Air America.
You've got them on the brain.
Seek help.
targets AirAmerica, Smokey.
Imust have read 100 of your posts the last several days, and at least 2 of 'em targeted AirAmerica.
Can't you change the subject.
No--I understand. Bringing up Air America upsets the Utos here, and it's just too much fun.
it's getting kinda dull. But in the interest of your driving force (capatilism) I've gotta stone that will hew your blade true. Just bring a few coins and I'll make it so.
but Capitalism's good. Try it sometime.
please try to do so, but you misspelled his misspelling. That also seems to be the level of care you put into the rest of your posts.
Thats why Donahue had his networks highest rated program when it was taken off. Thats why Liberals won Senate races in Minnesota, Ohio, Vermont, and regulartly win them in Massachutsets, California, New York New Jersey and on and on. Man you really live in your own little world dont you.
Dont come anywhere near the level of advocating assasination of the President or a sitting Supreme Court justice not even in the same universe. Nor of beating liberals with baseball bats. You guys have tried this before, there is NO liberal equivelent of Coulter PERIOD.
You're forgetting the beautiful people. Alec Baldwin in particular.
He does not make his living as a pundit. He is not the voice of anyone but himself. Coulter and Savage make their LIVING being insane violence spewing hatemongers. Now you would have a point IF the media PAID him to spout his violent temper tantrums, which you are correct and he does to but they DONT so y0u DONT.
Why do we keep letting these trolls change the subject?
The issue is Greenfield and Matalin trying to weasel out of the wink-wink innuendo leveled at Obama with the shopworn "It was only a joke!" routine.
I recall that some years ago I was at a party where I objected to a seriously racist "joke." I was told in response that it was too bad I couldn't see "the lighter side of life." Because, y'see, it was "only a joke."
But "jokes" can carry real messages. So let's stay focused on the issue at hand.
Duhhbya's war plan
with Kennedy's and Johnson's....
Eisenhowers and Nixons
When conservatives say tawdry and indefensible things its alway a joke. You guys have tried to pass off the most ludicrous calls for violence and vicious smears as jokes except you can never point out what the JOKE is supposed to be. Now I will give you that THIS time it seemed like a joke. An infantile and immature joke but a joke nonetheless. However trying to link this to a general double standard is completely without merit. When you can cough up liberals joking about murdering people or beating them with baseball bats get back to me.
Alec Baldwin. Don't ask for a quote--you'll have to dream up an apology for him.
He is a jerk, HE however is not PAID to be a jerk he is just one naturally. So there still is no double standard. I am sure there are lots of liberal jerks who are just citizens and speak for no one but themselves. CONSERVATIVES make their jerks rich buying their books and touting them as spokespersons, giving them radio shows and syndicated newspaper columns, when someone does that for Baldwing get back to me.
"I SAID...
Alec Baldwin. Don't ask for a quote"
-----
Why not? If he spews hate as often as you say he does you should be able to find a quote as easily as one can locate oxygen. Why don't you post a few where he "jokes" about killing Supreme Court justices, or beating people with baseball bats before attempting to talk with them? How about a quote where he advocates killing all the leaders of a country and converting all the people to Christianity?
Because you can't, and you know it.
The Cons were also just joking when they showed a white girl coming on to Harold Ford. Its only coincidence that the white loser won because of it.
what is wrong if people bring up his middle name. the real question is why you have to bring it up. i'm sort of a news junkie and to this day i do not know the middle names of howard dean, al gore, hillary clinton, and a whole group of people who have been around a lot longer than obama. if his middle name was arthur, fox wouldn't even bring it up.
If any of these people had the same name as a murderous dictator, trust me, you'd know it.
fox would be all over them, for the same foolish reason. but what does the fact that....wait a minute, it can't be, you can't be serious, you're saying that sharing the same name means they would think the same things? say it ain't so. of course, i did point out your posts are to be regarded as pure entertainment.
If any of these people had the same name as a murderous dictator, trust me, you'd know it.
Thank you! You have just conceded the entire argument. The reason the right keeps bringing up Obama's middle name is to try to subtly link him to a murderous dictator!
We accept your gracious unconditional surrender.
The name "George" is about to go the same way as Adolph and Attilla.
Also there will be a massive assault of legal name changes for the thousands of people with the innocent misfortune of having the last name "Bush".
It took Saddam 20+ years to kill est. 2 million, George has done in 600k in just 3 years.
"If any of these people had the same name as a murderous dictator, trust me, you'd know it."
-----
The only person that has the same name as Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is his father, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.
Because you use the handle of a vegetable, should we assume you are equally brain-dead? It's the same faulty logic as you are trying here. But you would have no arguments at all if you didn't use faulty logic. It's the only type you know.
Doesn't using the full name, Barack Hussein Obama, have to be funny before you brush it off as a joke?
I defy anyond to explain to me how that is funny.
I don't mean funny as in the boy's fly is down on the playground funny.
I mean adult, clever funny.
Swing and a miss...
...anyone
At least for a President. We've simply NOT had Presidents with *ethnic sounding names* [outside of Van Buren...though that's a stretch]...I'm talking Italian, Greek [Dukakis would have fit here--had he won] Hispanic, Russian, Polish, Jewish...ok hopefully you all GET my drift.
So whether it's *politically correct* or not Barack Obama is NOT a *typical sounding* American President's moniker. Now ADD Hussein to the mix, and SOME people are falling over laughing about it. President Barack Hussein Obama. Mmmmmmm....just doesn't sound, dare I say it? American. PLUS there's that [former] dictator with the SAME name. Mix the 2 factors and well...
So yeah people [on the Right] are making jokes, snickering. MAYBE the name Barack Obama they would have left alone. BUT when you ADD Hussein, it tickles their funny bone. Childish? Of course. BUT sometimes we laugh at childish stuff.
Bottom Line: IF someone doesn't vote for Obama BECAUSE his name doesn't *sound* like our other Presidents more *typical American sounding names* OR because his middle name reminds them of Saddam...then they probably don't have enough intelligence to make a wise decision anyway. It's as STUPID as voting for someone because they are *good-looking*.
Call President Obama anything you want as long as you call him Mr. President first after the '08 election.
How 'bout we just call him "H"? Just kidding. What, exactly, does Obama stand for other than he's against AIDS and for abortion? I really don't know.
I fail to see how YOUR ignorance is OUR problem. He has certainly talked enough about issues.
i would recommend you tune in rush for your take on all the issues. you sound exactly like the guys that call in and say rush i never had a thought in my head til i started listenin' to you.
that the ones who deride others for having no sense of humor are the ones who are so obviously deficient themselves? It's hard to imagine Matalin even cracking a smile, let alone a good joke. And to compound the irony, does anyone know what Alan Colmes did before he got into radio (and well before signing up as Hannity's punching bag)? He was a stand-up comedian!
Honestly, when a right-winger accuses a left-winger of having no sense of humor, that statement itself is probably the funniest thing that the right-winger can ever muster.
Why hasn't somone thrown a bucket of water on this witch?