About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Despite large Dem margin, MSNBC's Johnson wrote that "Dems just squeaked through" midterm election

January 03, 2007 11:17 am ET

SUMMARY: In an online article, MSNBC reporter Alex Johnson wrote that Democrats "just squeaked through" the midterm elections. In fact, in the upcoming session of Congress, Democrats will hold a larger majority in the House than Republicans had in any Congress since they gained control in 1994.

17 Comments

In a January 1 MSNBC.com article titled "That was 2006: The Year of the Sneer," MSNBC reporter Alex Johnson wrote that Democrats "just squeaked through" in the November 7, 2006, midterm elections. That section of the article was labeled "From the jaws of defeat." In fact, as the result of the midterm elections, Democrats have a larger majority in the House of Representatives 233-202 -- than Republicans ever had after gaining a majority in the House in 1994. Republicans last held a majority of more than 30 seats in the House during the 80th Congress, which sat from 1947-1949 and opened with a 246-188 Republican majority.

Moreover, as Media Matters for America noted, Democrats not only gained control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, they did so without losing a single seat in either chamber of Congress.* The last election in which a major political party retained all of its House seats came in 1938, when Republicans took 81 seats without losing a single one of their own. That year, Republicans -- like the Democrats in 2006 -- held all of their seats in the Senate as well.

An Associated Press article (subscription required) that appeared in the November 12, 1938, edition of The New York Times stated that this outcome may have then been unique in U.S. history at the time.:

Republican forces in Congress came through Tuesday's election without the loss of a seat. Veteran officials here said today, that as far as they were able to determine, the record was unique for a major party.

Therefore, the 2006 Democratic victories in Congress represent:

  • A larger majority than Republicans had in any Congress since taking control in 1994.
  • The first election since 1938 in which a U.S. political party retained all its House seats.
  • Apparently only the second time in U.S. history that a "major party" survived an election without losing a single seat in either the House or the Senate.

From Johnson's January 1 MSNBC.com article:

From the jaws of defeat

So how did the Democrats do it? Basically, the Republicans blew up in a giant North-Korean-dictator-Kim-Jong-Il-hairdo-like mushroom cloud.

Even then, the Dems just squeaked through, despite the president's pell-mell retreat as his father's grayest advisers took control of Iraq policy. Despite the rise in the number of U.S. service members killed to 2,947 (as of Dec. 19). Despite the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis as Sunni militants, Shiite militants, Kurdish militants and al-Qaida militants fought bloodily for control of the country. (All of which, eventually, meant Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his smirk were bundled off into retirement and left the administration reduced to arguing that the violence didn't, at least technically speaking, meet the dictionary definition of a civil war.)

Despite the conviction of Republican-linked über-lobbyist Jack Abramoff (for fraud). And White House aide David Safavian (for obstruction). And [former] Republican Reps. Randy "Duke" Cunningham [CA] (for taking bribes) and Bob Ney [OH] (for receiving inappropriate gifts). And Republican former Gov. George Ryan of Illinois (for impressive all-round corruption).

Despite the forced resignation of Republican Rep. Mark Foley [FL], who was discovered sending salacious electronic messages ("how [sic] my favorite young stud doing?") to male congressional pages even as he led the House panel investigating sexual exploitation of minors.

Despite the indictment and retirement of House Republican leader Tom DeLay, a Hammer who became the Texas legal system's Nail.

Despite the indictment and resignation of the vice president's chief of staff, I. Lewis "What Kind of a Name Is Scooter for a Grown Man" Libby, on suspicion lying [sic] to cover up the defamation of an administration critic. (That's the case in which the vice president will make history by taking the stand.)

Despite widespread condemnation of the administration's secret programs to eavesdrop on American citizens' telephone calls and delve into their financial records and electronic mail without court warrants.

Despite the vice president's unfortunate choice of hunting targets: an elderly lawyer. This really happened: A few days later, the lawyer's family apologized to the vice president for causing all that trouble.

Still, at year's end, Republicans could celebrate that a Democratic congressman, William Jefferson [LA], was under under [sic] investigation for allegedly trying to sell his influence to Nigerian scamsters.

Then they saw the Democrats self-immolate over the selection and then defeat of millionaire candidate Ned Lamont against pro-Iraq war Senator Joe Lieberman [CT].

And that in her first act as the first House Speaker-elect, Rep. Nancy Pelosi got herself into a right-royal catfight by backing the ethics-challenged John Murtha [PA] to be majority leader over the more popular choice of her colleagues, Steny Hoyer [MD], with whom Pelosi has feuded for years.

Somewhere, Dick Cheney was smiling again.

* Sen. Joe Lieberman lost in the August 8 Connecticut Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate. Declaring his intent to caucus with the Democrats if re-elected to the Senate, Lieberman subsequently ran and won as an independent in the general election.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by zerosumgame0005 (January 03, 2007 11:21 am ET)
         

      LOL keep on whistling guys, fact it repukes had the power in all three branches and then tossed it into the george-hole and now they wail and weep and moan about how mean people are to them!

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Marker (January 03, 2007 11:32 am ET)
         

      The repug's just keep squeaking...

      Report Abuse
      • Author by dangrady (January 03, 2007 1:53 pm ET)
           

        Revisionist, history is hardly wrapping the fish, the ink barely dry, and they are already re-writing history to fit the narrow minds!!

        They have the mega-phone and they have the podium, so why must they lie!!!!!!!!!!! They think we don't notice, and if we do we're too lazy, and detached to do anything about it, even when they "take a thumping" as it was just weeks ago described by our own George who would be king President!

        Can we now dispense with any presumptions of expected fairness from a corporate media and return to the common sense of the Fairness Doctrine. It's time we get both sides of the argument, not just the fantasies of the Neo-Cons!

        Happy Thoughts;

        Dan Grady

        Report Abuse
    • Author by political_left-religious_right (January 03, 2007 11:34 am ET)
         

      against Frazier. I remember it well.

      Why can't these people face facts? First it was Time magazine's banal cover about "why the center is where to be," then the pundits tried to explain the phenomenon away by claiming that "it's the conservative ideas within the Democratic party that won for them," and of course there are the hard-core cases like Brent Bozell who say it all happened because of the evil influence of the "liberal media," and now this. Why, if they could deny the whole thing happened at all, I'm sure they would.

      Even GW had the sense to call it a "thumping." Not that he's permitted it to change any of his policies....

      Report Abuse
    • Author by skiploader1111 (January 03, 2007 11:36 am ET)
         

      and in '04 Bush's 50.9% was a landslide mandate. Yeah, sure, OK.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by fantagor (January 03, 2007 2:22 pm ET)
           

        Yes, I remember the days of newspapers touting Bush's manna-like "mandate", rhetorical hogwash suds-up from a less than 3% margin of victory bucket.

        Then along comes a major league ass-kicking from the Democrats and the headline is "squeaked out" or "by" or "through".

        How about just "squeak!", as in the press is comprised entirely of mice not men. Get a backbone, MSM, and stop pitching for a losing team.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Eric Jaffa (January 03, 2007 11:41 am ET)
         

      ...which is Democratic by 51-49, including 2 independents (Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman) who are caucusing with the Democrats, in writing "squeaked through."

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Brabantio (January 03, 2007 11:56 am ET)
           

        He would still be wrong. Winning the Senate was beyond most people's expectations. If it was expected that the Dems would have 59 seats and ended up with 51, then he might have a point.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (January 03, 2007 12:00 pm ET)
         

      As for "squeaking by", I'll squeak along like this anytime:

      The 109th Congress saw it's Senate suffer the loss of six incumbents...

      ...all Republicans! (Burns, Allen, Santorum, Talent, DeWine, and Chafee)...

      ...while the Democrats lost not a single incumbent in the Senate.

      And as for the 109th's House of Representatives...

      ...twenty-two (22!) incumbents lost their seats...

      ALL REPUBLICANS!

      (Among them, Hayworth [worthless to the U.S. House], Bonilla, Leach [Whitewater leech!], Sherwood, Bass, and Weldon [Will you go for the 'Able Danger' distraction? I guess you didn't!])

      ...not one single Democratic Representative lost their seat in the 109th Congress.

      That's twenty-eight (28!) REPUBLICAN incumbents of the 109th Congress lost their place (lost their way)...

      ...versus not a single DEMOCRATIC Senator or Representative losing their place in the 109th Congress!

      "Squeaked by"?

      Every wheel should squeak like that... we'd never need the grease, ever.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Dem02020 (January 03, 2007 12:35 pm ET)
           

        Among the House races, we had in PA-8 (Philadelphia area) a real donnybrook (which means a kind of brawl in public... the kind of brawl the Irish love)...

        Incumbent Mike Fitzpatrick (Republican... booo!) versus Democratic challenger Patrick Murphy (the Irish, they love the People near as much as they love the land... more so).

        Donnybrook.

        Now Mike, you go home, from Parliament (not a loser, but just a runner-up... a runner-up in a donnybrook!)...

        Home to the land (Philadelphia area) and the People.

        If you're Irish then you love both.

        If you're Patrick Murphy, you go to Congress, to fight hard for the land and the People...

        Patrick "Paddy" Murphy

        ...fight hard for us Paddy... for the land and for the hard (hardy... hearty) Souls who live on it.

        Fight hard for the People Paddy.

        It'll not get easier, and it'll not get weaker (the thing We Irish fight against)...

        But what do we care, we're Irish!

        We love a fight... the more public, the better!

        The donnybrook.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by jeter2 (January 03, 2007 12:26 pm ET)
         

      Equals a squeak by???

      Ah it's getting harder & harder to know WHICH definitions are correct.

      Damn time to throw away my Webster's dictionary....and order the Right-Wing version;-)

      Report Abuse
    • Author by pick of the litter (January 03, 2007 1:07 pm ET)
         

      It would seem that the point of this article is to say that no matter how corrupt the repubs were, the dems still barely managed to win elections, so you dems watch out and don't press your luck. I like the research that MMFA has done to totally disprove this writer's lame assertions. I see an effort here to undermine dem political confidence and will to challenge the ones in power who have steered this country so off-course. If the dems don't put the heat on, the public will only grow more discontented. It would appear that some lapdogs would rather sabotage Congressional courage than encourage ethical rehabilitation.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by jack.dominey7011 (January 03, 2007 2:06 pm ET)
         

      Alex Johnson isn't a Republican. While his sentence is arguably untrue, I think MM is missing the point - after all the crap that Republicans got caught and called for in 2006, why did any of them get elected?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by conleytgwinn (January 03, 2007 5:07 pm ET)
           

        While I think you are right to wonder "why did any of them get elected?", I will admit I'm curious how you know "Alex Johnson isn't a Republican"?

        I'm also curious if it matters what his political party is, so long as he toes the line,totes the bale, and tows the barge for the MSM line that the Dems never get it right, which is why the Repugnants always win?

        Report Abuse
      • Author by jscott (January 03, 2007 10:28 pm ET)
           

        90% of the congressional districts have been gerrymandered to the point that they are no longer competetive. Of the 10% that were actually in play, the Democrats kicked ass.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by conleytgwinn (January 03, 2007 11:07 pm ET)
             

          of the voters MUST have a modicum of sense . . . and even dedicated Repugnant voters must have a limit . . . so, how did any of them get elected?

          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.