On MSNBC, NY Times reporter Kornblut repeated "cut and run" attack on Democrats
On the January 4 edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country, New York Times reporter Anne E. Kornblut asserted that the "biggest nightmare for some of the Democrats in the Senate would be a Democratic Party that looks as though it just wants to, from -- the words from 2004 - 'cut and run,' " referring to the label frequently applied by Republican critics to Democratic proposals to withdraw troops from Iraq. As Media Matters for America has noted, many media outlets have uncritically repeated the "cut and run" characterization, while failing to note that recent polling, including exit polls of 2006 voters, finds a majority favoring the idea of troop withdrawal.
In repeating the characterization, Kornblut described it as "the words from 2004," apparently referring to that year's presidential campaign. But Republicans and conservatives used the phrase to dismiss calls for withdrawing troops from Iraq throughout 2006 as well (as Media Matters documented numerous times, including here, here, here, here, and here). However, as Media Matters further noted, exit polling conducted during the 2006 elections showed that a majority of Americans favor a withdrawal of all or some U.S. troops from Iraq.
From the January 4 edition of MSNBC's Scarborough Country:
KORNBLUT: Well, it's interesting. I already heard some grumbling in the elevators today from, you know, all the Democratic supporters who are out here, especially from San Francisco, asking the question: "Are the Democrats going to cut off funding for the war in Iraq?" Can they prevent financially --
SCARBOROUGH: And you heard that on day one?
KORNBLUT: And that's -- it's before this -- before the swearing-in this morning.
SCARBOROUGH: And let me take you back 12 years. I promised my staff I would never talk about when I was in Congress, but --
KORNBLUT: Oh, please, indulge us.
SCARBOROUGH: -- my first day -- my first day, I had been told by people in my district: "Follow around [Rep.] David Dreier [R-CA]. David Dreier's the only true conservative up there, votes against all the funding bills." The first day, I get off the elevator and somebody pulled me to the side from my district and said, "You see how David Dreier voted on that first vote? Stay away from him. Stay far away from him!" And it's already happening here, right?
KORNBLUT: Oh, yes, absolutely. So, I think you will see -- I mean, the first 100 hours is going to knock off some of the other, I would say easier issues, although they're also issues that they ran on in November. You know, we saw today ethics reform was already out there. They're putting freshmen out on the floor to talk about issues that they know won big in November.
Iraq is much more difficult and I think made more so by the fact that you have, you know, 9,000 people in the Senate running for president, and all of them are going to take a position, especially the Democrats who are running, that's careful not to make them look soft on foreign policy. I think the biggest nightmare for some of the Democrats in the Senate would be a Democratic Party that looks as though it just wants to -- from -- the words from 2004, "cut and run."
SCARBOROUGH: Yeah, there's a -- and that's a problem.















Everyone knows that Bush has created and orchestrated a total mess in Iraq and the only remaining solution is a political settlement. The Generals agree with that too, and they should know.
So at this point in time the prudent course is as many expert suggest:
Don't Surge, Don't Bump, Don't Escalate. Don't offer more targets to kill. Begin pulling the troops out to force the Iraqis to take charge of their own country. The Generals have this same view.
This Bush war has been lost! And now Bush wants one last opportunity to win his war that happens to be already lost. He blew his chance to win and now it’s too late.
We pulled out of Vietnam and it was correct and good. We must now pull out of Iraq. It will be correct and it will not transfer the war to our country. Bush's statement is absurd and insults our intelligence. He’s been lying about everything for a long time now.
Even his wife is busy explaining how great things are going in Iraq. Conservatives discount her statements as being totally untrue and out of touch with reality.
It will be the same as when we left Vietnam. We had the same scare tactic consequences of leaving Vietnam. I’m a Vietnam Veteran and in those days it was called the Communist Domino Theory. If we didn’t win in Vietnam then the whole world would become Communistic. It was BS then and it’s BS now as applied to Iraq.
disagree on one point, Sams-
That Bush wants a chance to win the war. OK, he might, but the people in charge of him,IMO, just want a continuous, perpetual war, just as they did in Vietnam.
Not only keeps our money flowing to them, makes it much easier to change rules about, oh, warrants, letter opening, phone tapping...
Did Not Agree With George So He Replaced Them With Generals Who Will Be More Agreeable.
BUSH:
"I'M THE DECIDER! AND I DECIDE WHAT'S BEST!"
He has also pointed out that he has a high regard for what the Generals on the ground are saying about Iraq. They said don't SURGE and he fired them for it. Looks like a Dictator to me.
Is the GOP policy of getting as many Americans killed as possible
"Cut and Run" is deader than "Flower Power" or "23-Skiddoo". Hey, grandma Kornsmut, the Republican Revolution is over, because it WAS televised, and the country realized what a pack of waterheads the Republican Party is.
The cat's pajamas!
Exactly right! Bush claims that he would listen to his generals, he claims to be the decider and then fires those generals that he claimed to be willing to listen to......
Hmmm...... I wonder how many managers would be able to hold on to their jobs if they were to claim this, instead of generals: replace with: employees
I'm not big on going through a long impeachment process, but all Clinton did was lie about sex and look at that dispicable display of power by the Repubs, at least no one died over it!