About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN, NBC blame Obama "opponents" for smears advanced by media

January 26, 2007 6:02 pm ET

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

SUMMARY: Anderson Cooper, David Gregory, and Soledad O'Brien have all asked Sen. Barack Obama about smears leveled against him, purportedly by his political "opponents" or "enemies." But in each case, they did not name any of these "opponents." Indeed, by framing their questions in terms of political "opponents," they ignored the media's role in promoting these smears, and in some cases originating them.

27 Comments

In recent interviews, CNN host Anderson Cooper and NBC News chief White House correspondent David Gregory both asked presumptive 2008 presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) how his political "opponents" or "enemies" would attempt to use his middle name, Hussein, against him. Cooper also asked how Obama's "opponents" would use Obama's "father's religious background." Additionally, Cooper, Gregory, and CNN host Soledad O'Brien all asked Obama about the discredited smear that as a child Obama attended a madrassa -- a radical Muslim school. In their questions, Cooper, Gregory, and O'Brien did not name any of these "opponents." Indeed, by framing the questions in terms of political "opponents," they ignored the role of the media -- including CNN and MSNBC -- in promoting these story lines and, in cases, even originating them.

"Barack Hussein Obama"

MSNBC host Chris Matthews -- not a Republican operative -- was apparently the first to mention Obama's middle name as a possible political issue. On the November 7, 2006, edition of MSNBC's Hardball, Matthews said: "You know, it's interesting that Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein. That will be interesting down the road, won't it?" Following that:

  • On November 27, 2006, MSNBC host Tucker Carlson referred to nationally syndicated radio host Bill Press as "a true member of the Barack Hussein Obama fan club."
  • During the November 28 edition of Hardball, Republican strategist Ed Rogers referred to "Barack Hussein Obama." On December 13, Matthews teased another interview with Rogers by describing the strategist as "the one who just loves Barack Obama's middle name Hussein." Matthews then criticized Rogers for insisting on referring to Obama as "Barack Hussein Obama," saying, "[T]he only time we start using three names for a person is when they're an assassin."
  • On the December 5 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Brit Hume, senior political correspondent Carl Cameron told viewers: "Though he's written two books about himself already, most people know very little about Barack Hussein Obama Junior's uncommonly privileged life."
  • CNN senior political analyst Jeff Greenfield said on the December 11 edition of CNN's The Situation Room: "Now, it is one thing to have a last name that sounds like Osama and a middle name, Hussein, that is probably less than helpful." On December 12, Greenfield explained on the CNN website that he was making "a joke" when, during the same segment, he compared the similarity of Obama's "business casual" clothing to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's "jacket-and-no-tie look," but did not note his "Hussein" comment. As Media Matters for America noted, CNN correspondent Jeanne Moos also said on December 11: "As if that similarity [between "Obama" and "Osama"] weren't enough. How about sharing the name of a former dictator? You know his middle name, Hussein."
  • On the December 14 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio program, Rush Limbaugh suggested calling Obama "Barack Hussein Odumbo." In a December 11 weblog entry, Chicago Sun-Times Washington bureau chief Lynn Sweet wrote that Obama had "chided" New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd "in a kidding way -- for a comment in the 12th of 14 paragraphs in an Oct 21 column. She wrote that Obama's 'ears stick out.' " A December 15 entry on the blog The Radio Equalizer, discussing Limbaugh's comments, asked "Is Senator Barack Hussein Obama (D- Ill) now so accustomed to fawning press coverage that even the slightest bit of criticism can send him racing toward the offending party in a state of sheer anger?"
  • On the December 14 edition of Hardball, NBC's Mike Viqueira announced "a man named Barack Obama, whose middle name, incidentally, is Hussein, running for president."
  • A January 2 Associated Press article about a CNN on-screen graphic labeling Osama bin Laden "Obama" said of Obama: "If he does enter the race, his middle name might also prove troublesome. Republican operatives are already referring to him by his full name: 'Barack Hussein Obama.' "
  • On the January 14 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, co-host Sean Hannity asked: "Now, if his middle name is Hussein, what is wrong with people that bring up his middle name?"
  • On the January 16 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Limbaugh called Obama a "half-minority" and said that "the media ... are in the midst of Obama-gasms" because "Barack Hussein Obama" has formed a presidential exploratory committee.
  • On the January 16 edition of Fox News' Special Report, host Brit Hume referred to "Barack Obama -- Barack Hussein Obama."
  • In his January 19 column, syndicated columnist Cal Thomas wrote: "That Sen. Barack Hussein Obama Jr. chose the day of the 'American Idol' season premiere to launch his presidential exploratory committee is nicely symbolic" because Obama is "mostly a blank slate on which others can write what they choose."
  • On the January 20 edition of Fox News Watch, host Eric Burns referred to Obama as "Senator Obama," "Barack Obama," and "Illinois Senator Barack Obama." Media writer Neal Gabler referred to Obama as "Barack Obama" and "Obama." However, moments later, Newsday columnist Jim Pinkerton referred to "the questions about a fellow, as Cal [Thomas] alluded to, named Barack Hussein Obama are waiting to be asked."
  • On January 23, Boston Herald columnist Virginia Buckingham wrote that the Democratic Party's nominee "will not be Barack Hussein Obama ... [T]here's the unfortunate name, which shouldn't matter but will."
  • In a January 23 unsigned posting, InsightMag.com asked about Obama: "If he was raised in a secular household (as he claims), why does he have -- or retain -- Muslim names, Barack and Hussein?"
  • On January 24, right-wing pundit Ann Coulter wrote that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) "is probably the real front-runner based on: (1) the multiple millions of dollars she has raised, and (2) the fact that her leading Democratic opponent is named 'Barack Hussein Obama.' "

Obama's father

In his interview with Obama, Cooper asked about the political effects of his "father's religious background." As Media Matters noted, Obama described his father in an April 5, 2004, Chicago Sun-Times article as "agnostic," and the article described his stepfather as "a non-practicing Muslim." However, members of the media have suggested that Obama's father may be a political liability because of his Muslim heritage:

  • In a December 18 column headlined "Barack Hussein Obama: Once a Muslim, Always A Muslim," right-wing pundit Debbie Schlussel argued that because Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) middle name is Hussein, his late, estranged father was of Muslim descent, and he has shown interest in his father's Kenyan heritage, Obama's "loyalties" must be called into question.
  • On the January 19 edition of KSFO's Morning Show, co-host Lee Rodgers asserted that "Thomas Lifson at the American Thinker, valuable website, easy to find on the web -- the American Thinker -- raises a question about Senator Obama that needs to be answered if he is going to run seriously for president, and it's this: He was born, as I said, to a Muslim father, which is -- that's the reason for his first and middle names -- Barack and Hussein, which is his middle name, are Islamic names. According to Islamic scripture, this is what Islam teaches its adherents: One who is born to a Muslim father is a Muslim. Forever. It's like being Jewish descends from the mother, but you can always convert out. Islam? Uh-uh." Lifson cited Schlussel's column as the basis for his speculation.
  • Juan Williams, National Public Radio senior correspondent and Fox News contributor, said on the January 21 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday that Obama "comes from a father who was a Muslim," adding that "given that we're at war with Muslim extremists, that presents a problem."

Madrassa

InsightMag.com posted an article on January 17 alleging that "[s]ources close to [a] background check ... conducted by researchers connected to Senator Clinton" told the website that Obama "spent at least four years in a so-called Madrassa or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia." The InsightMag.com article used similar language to that used by Gregory and Cooper, describing the "researchers connected to Senator Clinton" as "political opponents within the Democratic Party." The article bore the headline "Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background."

On the January 19 editions of their radio programs, conservative talk-show hosts Melanie Morgan, Lee Rodgers, and Rush Limbaugh, forwarded the accusation that Clinton's team was responsible for spreading the smear about Obama, as did Fox News' John Gibson on that day's edition of The Big Story. As the blog Think Progress noted, on the January 19 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends First, hosts Steve Doocy, Brian Kilmeade, and Gretchen Carlson focused an entire segment on the allegation.

However, on the January 22 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, CNN reporting debunked what media critic Howard Kurtz called the "bogus charge" that Obama attended a madrassa. Kurtz also noted the attempt by InsightMag.com and others "to blame this rumor-mongering on the rival campaign of Hillary Clinton."

In a January 20 New York Post article, Obama strategist David Axelrod denied that Obama attended a madrassa: "He was not raised as a Muslim, and he did not go to a madrassa. It is a complete contrivance, and its purpose is clear." Axelrod added that he did not "believe ... for a second" the idea that Clinton's camp was behind the allegation. The story also quoted Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson saying, "We have no connection to this story."

Despite the complete lack of substantiation of InsightMag.com's smears against Obama and Clinton, media reports after the InsightMag.com article repeated them:

  • On the January 19 edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck, Beck stated that the source of the story "is a conservative blog" and that "the odds of this being true pretty darn close to zero," but nevertheless said that "if you live in Chappaqua, New York, and you hear a strange grinding noise coming from the Clinton estate, it could be Hillary Clinton sharpening her knives in the basement."
  • On the January 19 edition of his radio program, Limbaugh uncritically repeated parts of InsightMag.com's madrassa story.
  • In his January 21 Chicago Sun-Times column, columnist Mark Steyn wrote that Obama "was raised in an Indonesian madrassah by radical imams" and that "[t]he madrassah stuff was supposedly leaked to Insight Magazine by some oppo-research heavies on Hillary Rodham Clinton's team."
  • In her January 23 Herald column, Buckingham wrote: "Everything there is to know about John Kerry's record is known. Obama? Well, for starters, we're just hearing a bit about the senator's early education at a madrassah in Indonesia. Yes, the source is Insight Magazine, run by the Moonies, but I haven't heard a strong denial from the Obama camp. What else will we learn about this Democratic 'rock star'' in the YouTube era?"
  • On the January 23 edition of KSFO's Morning Show, Morgan and Rodgers repeated the claim that Obama "went to a Muslim school, a madrassa they call it. ... [T]hose things are funded by Saudi Arabia." They also cited a report alleging that the story came from the campaign of former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC). Morgan claimed the new charge originated from U.S. News & World Report's "Washington Whispers," but Media Matters found no such article on the weblog or in the magazine. Rodgers reiterated comments he made January 19 on the Morning Show, during which he suggested that Obama may be a "death target" because of the revelation that he was born the son of a Muslim. On the January 23 show, Rodgers said: "If your father is a Muslim, you're a Muslim, and as far as Islamic law is concerned, you are a Muslim forevermore. ... And Islamic law says: 'You try to get out, any Muslim has not only the right but the duty to kill you.' "
  • In his January 23 column, Washington Times editor-in-chief Wesley Pruden cast doubt on the veracity of InsightMag.com's accusation that Obama attended a madrassa, but he never denounced the second, baseless part of the story -- that Clinton's camp was responsible for spreading the rumor. Pruden also wrote that "maybe Obama himself was behind such a 'leak,' to get the story out where his spinmeisters can cut off the story's legs now, while there's time and opportunity."
  • On the morning of January 25, on the front page of ABC News' website, a headline read: "Madrassa Madness: Was Hillary Behind Obama Smear?" below pictures of Clinton and Obama, despite the fact that the article to which the headline links notes that the accusation that Clinton is responsible for the smear "remains unproven and unsubstantiated."
  • On the January 25 edition of the Morning Show, Morgan and Rodgers continued their discussion of the accusation. Rodgers acknowledged that the story had been "discredited" by CNN but in turn purported to discredit CNN by claiming that the network is "the propaganda mouthpiece for the political left. They're the Democratic Party's Al Jazeera."

From the January 23 edition of CNN's Anderson Cooper 360:

COOPER: In recent days, a conservative magazine published rumors that were picked up by another cable news channel that you attended a madrassa as a child in Indonesia. CNN did its own investigation. We sent a reporter to the school, found out it's a public school; it's not a madrassa.

Do you think this is a sign of things to come? How much, I guess, did your middle name, your father's religious background, how much do you think that's going to be used against you by your opponents?

OBAMA: You know, when I ran for the United States Senate, right after the -- I won the primary, there were some political operatives that put up a website that superimposed my face over bin Laden. And, you know, full with the beard and the turban. We ended up winning that race 70 percent to 30 percent.

From the January 24 edition of NBC's Today:

GREGORY: You've seen in just the first week of your campaign some of the ugly side of politics, a report surfacing this week that you attended a radical Islamic school in Indonesia. Reporting has since emerged that that school was no such thing. I wonder how you think your political enemies will try to capitalize on your background overall, including, quite frankly, the fact that your middle name is Hussein.

OBAMA: Well, you know, when I was in Illinois running for the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama is not your typical name, and everybody questioned how voters would respond. And we ended up winning 70 percent of the vote.

From the January 24 edition of CNN's American Morning:

O'BRIEN: Let me ask you a question about your personal -- throwing your hat into the ring to be president. As you know, another cable channel ran with the story that you attended a madrassa in Indonesia. We sent a reporter to Indonesia, turns out it was a public school there. Curious to know where you think stories like that are coming from. Who is generating those?

OBAMA: Well, you know, it's very hard to say. I mean, keep in mind, when I was running for the United States Senate, after I won the Democratic nomination, there was an image of me superimposed over a picture of bin Laden. I think that people like to play with my name. I'm accustomed to that.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mr. l (January 26, 2007 6:10 pm ET)
         

      Obama should turn and face the interviewers and say 'YOU are responsible for the attacks against me, whether by making sh*t up or by ommitting FACTS clearing up these ridiculous 'charges', or whatnot.  The MEDIA is fueling all these unfounded and scrillious 'stories'- YOU are my 'enemy', dear sirs and madams...'

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Rocky Mountain Joe (January 26, 2007 6:42 pm ET)
           

        Yes he should do not only that but point out that engaging in such vile behaviour also contitutes an attack on democracy itself by undermining the process.

         

        Report Abuse
    • Author by wfz5622 (January 26, 2007 6:52 pm ET)
         

      ccurate, even-handed, and entertaining perspective on Obama, see<a href="[link to www.amazon.com] BARACK OBAMA BE PRESIDENT</a> (Nimble Books, October 2006) available athttp://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0978813804/webadvertising-20 orhttp://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/should-barack-obama-be-president/

      Report Abuse
      • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 26, 2007 11:22 pm ET)
           

        By W. Frederick Zimmerman, WFZ? How many times are you gonna hawk your book here?

        Tell you what, if I promise to get one at the 99 cent store in 2 weeks, will you call off your ad blitz?

        Report Abuse
    • Author by greekfurnace (January 26, 2007 7:16 pm ET)
         

      It's quite clear...

      The MSM is no friend of Obama, Hillary or the Democrats. They are the 'oponents'. But, we knew that.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by ldoren1626 (January 26, 2007 8:00 pm ET)
         

      Look, a writer said that if he was wrong about the Obama thing, then Obama should sue him.  The media took it and ran with it.  While the information is now being questioned, it begs the questions why hasn't Obama sued the guy yet if the information is untrue?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (January 26, 2007 10:49 pm ET)
           

        You eat hampsters.  Now sue me.

        Someone get this clueless fool off our website.  Newsflash:  defamation suits don't work in this country outside the most extreme circumstances.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by steve k (January 26, 2007 11:09 pm ET)
           

        A quick grammatical note: "to beg the question" means to use circular logic, i.e. assuming what you're trying to prove in the course of trying to prove it. It doesn't mean "to raise the question", as the pundits would have you believe.Sir, I am impressed by your rigor and sharpness of insight. You aren't satisfied with the verified fact that the "madrassa" Obama supposedly attended has no record of his ever being there. No, a person of your keen intellect brushes aside these irrelevancies and focuses on the really important question: why hasn't Obama bothered to sue?Well, for starters, maybe he has better things to do. Like his job as senator. And running for president.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by HuntingtonBeachLefty (January 26, 2007 11:28 pm ET)
             

          Thanks. Steve, that phrase is abused constantly, and it bugs me too.

          I hear it used that way a lot on righty radio, seems popular there, must trickle down with the talking points.

          Maybe if they get this one wired, we can explain that "carrot & stick " is not an either/or option like walking softly and carrying a big stick.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (January 26, 2007 9:22 pm ET)
         

      When you wake up to the face of Senator Obama each and every morning your not stupid. You know who will attack and you can guess just about what the attacks will be. Thank god Senator Obama is as smart, articulate and fully aware of his enemies.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Hello Infidels (January 27, 2007 9:51 am ET)
           

        He's also very good at stringing words together in a way that makes some people think this NOBODY actually might know what he's talking about.

         

        Prez material indeed.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by heru (January 29, 2007 1:34 am ET)
             

          Obama is a MAN, "Hello Infidels" is just a screen name, a high tech KKK robe, a NOBODY.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by sportsguydave (January 27, 2007 12:03 am ET)
         

      This just  in:

      President George W. Bush's middle name is Walker ... the same as the Walker family spy ring, one of the most notorious in American history...

       

       

       

      Report Abuse
      • Author by Hello Infidels (January 27, 2007 9:48 am ET)
           

        Hussein as a middle name is a dead giveaway. He is a disaster waiting to blow up. If he just denounces his Madrassa past, he'll be alright. It would also help if he denounced the whole NOI crap as well.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Citizen J (January 27, 2007 5:47 pm ET)
             

          "Hussein as a middle name is a dead giveaway." 

          The only "dead giveaway" there is the dead giveaway that you're an judgmental, unthinking zealot.  

          Clearly you're suggesting that he's just like that OTHER Hussein, right?  A terrorist, at the very least.  "Ooooo, he's got one'a them there FUNNY names...them ay-rabby names..." Scary brown people!

          That's as patently asinine as suggesting that anyone with the name of "Arnold" (as in "Benedict") MUST be a traitor.

          Impressive "insight" ya got there, truly.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by heru (January 29, 2007 1:42 am ET)
         

      If Obama had a slave name like Clarence Thomas I suppose that would make sick white racists feel much better about their chances of using him.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by corkcol6005 (January 27, 2007 4:51 am ET)
         

      The cable news media has been sucked into the Bush White House plan to divert all attention away from the debacle of the Iraq War. Thus, the media is touting anything that looks like a "smear" between candidates for the 2008 election which is just a less than subtle way of changing the subject from the mess in Iraq to an election that is almost two years away.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by layman26 (January 27, 2007 9:04 am ET)
         

      Senator Obama, How do you respond to the Insight.com article that claims that the Kucinch campaign is investigating a claim that a Joint US and Iraqi force lead by Don Rumsfeld and Sean Hannity recently downed a helicopter containing 20 gay radical Islamic zombie werewolf insurgents loyal to you just outside of Fallujah?  Do you expect to be send directly to Guantanamo Bay to await pending charges possibly for the rest of your life or be rendered to a third country for torture?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by layman26 (January 27, 2007 12:55 pm ET)
           

        As a follow-up question.  Wasn't it a strategic blunder to reveal your army of Gay Werewolf Zombies to the American Media before abolishing gun rights and closing the current loop hole that allows the sale of silver tipped arrows at gun shows without the customary background check to confirm ACLU Membership.

        Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (January 27, 2007 11:31 am ET)
         

      I am not convinced that Anderson Cooper let  Insightmag off the hook in this one. Perhaps in his mind Insightmag is included in the group of "his opponents", since this is a right-wing magazine affiliated to the right-wing Washington Times.

      I emailed him asking him to clarify.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle partiality17stereotypical (January 27, 2007 12:41 pm ET)
         

      Senator Obama's heritage may not be a liability were he to become president.  Given his grace, diplomacy, and obvious positve regard for his fellow man - coupled with his background and past association with the Muslim religion, he may, in fact, be most effective in quelling the differences (and associated violence) between the radical islamists and the rest of the world.  He has knowledge of Christian doctrine as well as the doctrine of the Islamic faith.  His background should be an asset, not a detriment to success in the polls to those who desire world peace.  I am sure that only the most stupid amongst us would buy into the TV news' propaganda regarding such a superficial aspect of a candidate like what he was named at birth.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (January 27, 2007 2:45 pm ET)
         

      Whoever says that just because Obama has a Muslim background which means that his loyalty should be questioned is emulating terrorist behavior.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 28, 2007 12:03 pm ET)
         

      Just another example of the dumbing down of the poitical dialogue on the real issues in America... brought to you by the Republicon Party.  Who cares what Obama's full name is or what color his daddy is?  And haven't reasonable, rational people set aside any doubts that as a child Obama was not indoctrinated at a radical, anti-American, fundamentalist Islamic school?  Let Obama's presidential aspirations rise or fall on their own merits... not on smear and bogus issues. The fact is that the Republicons can't win any national election unless they hold on to their base (of roughly 30% of the voters) by feeding them this constant stream of garbage and keeping them spun up about non-issues.  And we can rest assured that this will not stop...  What's next, more about how Hillary killed Vince Foster?

      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 28, 2007 1:25 pm ET)
           

        You have to consider the audience for whom this propaganda is fabricated—the reactionary, narrow-minded xenophobic troglodytes who make up the Republican base.  These are the same people who still support Puddinhead George; these are the people who helped make a racist putz like Rush Limbaugh a billionaire.

        These idiots will vote against Obama because of his name and race, and because Rush and the other GOPprofessional liars tell them to. 

        Report Abuse
    • Author by woyboy (January 28, 2007 3:28 pm ET)
         

      I am a fan of Obama, but I don't see how it's irresponsible for anyone in the media to simply refer to his full name.  For example, Chris Matthews's comment that it might become a political issue.  He was right, it will, and the irresponsibility lies in trying to make some non-existing connection, not by just mentioning the name.

       I am sure Obama will do right by embracing his name, as he has, rather than sweeping it under the rug.  It's a common political mistake.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by heru (January 29, 2007 2:00 am ET)
         

      Both Muslims and Christians enslaved black people for centuries. Thus it makes no difference whether Obama has a Christian or a Muslim slave name.

      White racists have some nerve implying that the slave name "Hussein" reflects any more evil than a slave name like "Jefferson". Devils need to stop pretending to be holy. You're fooling no one.

       

      Report Abuse
    • Author by semetarygates177597 (January 29, 2007 12:57 pm ET)
         

      I would like to say although I am a newcomer to this website and this is my first comment post that My family is very close to both senators Barack Obama and Dick Durbin and the way they and the things that they say or do not say are manipulated by conservative lunatics like sean hannity or rush limbaugh is sickening. I think its time that liberals start speaking out in the media to counter act this conservative propaganda machine. Lastly I would like to add that I think the reason the conservative media is attacking Obama so harshly is because they are scared of him because he is the type of person who brings people together and is considered a hero in some aspects by many americans. He has a certain charisma almost like that of Bobby Kennedy. I think that has been missing in American politics for far too long

      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.